Why is the Democratic Party erasing parts of their history?

SSgt Alex Robinson — Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:29:11 -0400

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/08/12/us/politics/state-by-state-democratic-party-is-erasing-ties-to-jefferson-and-jackson.html?ref=politics&_r=1&referrer=politics

Response by LTC Stephen F. made Aug 11 at 2015 2:31 PM

LTC Stephen F. — Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:31:43 -0400

Shame may be a reason SSgt Alex Robinson. That is the first one that comes to my mind as a potential reason.

Response by SSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Aug 11 at 2015 2:38 PM

SSgt Private RallyPoint Member — Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:38:37 -0400

They are fascists and poverty pimps with the constituents expanding and those to support them less.

Response by PO3 Steven Sherrill made Aug 11 at 2015 4:33 PM

PO3 Steven Sherrill — Tue, 11 Aug 2015 16:33:41 -0400

Sellouts. Spineless weak individuals devoid of the fortitude to say that History is important. These are the same idiots that would have everything south of the Mason Dixon line with the name Lee on it removed. I am so glad not to be one of the sheep.

Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Aug 11 at 2015 5:20 PM

SSG Private RallyPoint Member — Tue, 11 Aug 2015 17:20:46 -0400

First, a shift in focus is not "erasing parts of their history." The focus is being reduced to the noisier elements of the party, it's going to be interesting to see how that works out for them. My main concern with this is that it may give Democratic politicians more room to support Wall Street over Main Street, so long as their also towing the line on racial and gender issues.