What should someone do when they bust tape after a 100% HT/WT and is the only person treated differently than the rest of the company?

2023-05-13T07:40:55-04:00

Our company just did 100% hight and weight. SM bust tape by 2%, and come to find out said SM is the only one who was flagged immediately. When others were given 30 days before being flagged. What can or should the SM do? Also, SM was not taped for a second time, which states in AR 600-9 in B-2e.

Response by CSM Darieus ZaGara made May 13 at 2023 8:00 AM

2023-05-13T08:00:11-04:00

There are a number of possibilities as to why others were receiving different treatment. Having said that if you know for fact that all circumstances are the same it is the duty of the first line supervisor to question why so. They should receive a straight and plausible response. If not the Soldier should request open door for the same purpose, seeking answers.

In the end of the day the Soldier should not have busted tape and the NCOIC should not be shocked as they should have known. It is the Soldiers responsibility to maintain standards and the NCOICs to track it. It sounds to me as if we have a failure in personal responsibility and leadership.

Response by SGM Erik Marquez made May 13 at 2023 2:15 PM

2023-05-13T14:15:43-04:00

SGT Private RallyPoint Member "Also, SM was not taped for a second time, which states in AR 600-9 in B-2e."

Your correct
" If using the circumference methodology outlined in this policy and it is determined that the Soldier’s body circumference does not meet the ABCP standards, a confirmation will be completed. The above process will be completed by a
different team than the completed initial set of measurement. This must occur before any actions are taken by the commander."

And regs are regs for a reason, the circumference methodology is difficult to administer properly, and its not uncommon to have it done incorrectly. (commonly in favor of the SM, not against. )

So sure, the SM can point out the error in the procedure and ask for a second testing...likely that will result in two new teams being tasked immediately, the SM escorted to residence to change into the required uniform, escorted back to the unit testing location where they will have the test performed again under a circumference methodology trained senior supervisors observation.
If the SM passes, the flag should be voided for having been erroneously emplaced
Id also expect the CDR to critically observe the SM each time they are in uniform and if that CDR determines in their opinion the SM does not does not present a Soldierly appearance that CDR has authority to direct a body fat assessment

" d. Commanders have the authority to direct a body fat assessment on any Soldier that they determine does not present a Soldierly appearance to ensure Soldier meets the screening table weight for his or her measured height. "

A better plan might be, use the opportunity to better ones self with GREAT motivation. Use the resources that are not just available, but by Reg MUST be provided

Response by COL Randall C. made May 13 at 2023 7:28 PM

2023-05-13T19:28:57-04:00

I'm in agreement with both SGM Erik Marquez and CSM Darieus ZaGara.

First, I'm surprised by the "Soldiers have 30 days before being flagged" comment. Flagging of Soldiers that fail ABCP is not an optional task for the commander - they are required to initiate the flag when a Soldier changes from a 'favorable' to an 'unfavorable' status. There used to be wiggle room many years ago, but it hasn't been option for the commander for a while - they are required to initiate the flag within three working days of the failure and put them in the program.

I often gave a bit of leeway back in my Company Commander days, but by the time I was a Battalion Commander, I didn't have an option anymore (at least on flags).

Second, flagging actions are like a light switch. You turn them on and you turn them off, especially with the HR systems these days.

Now, putting all that aside for a bit, to CSM Darieus ZaGara's point, while all soldiers should be treated the same (they should all be 'treated right' together or 'treated wrong' together), there could be reasons for 'not giving the Soldier the benefit of the doubt'. I assume there isn't an official policy in the unit's ABCP that Soldiers have 30 days to come into compliance, so it would be one of those "Commander's discretion" things. IF everything is the same, then I agree that they should all be treated the same. However, if the one that was flagged immediately was one of those 'problem children' that has a strike or two against them, then I wouldn't give 'discretion' if I had that opportunity (but, I will reiterate, it's not really an option anymore).

To SGM Erik Marquez's point - the tape test wasn't administered according to Army standards and would need to be redone if challenged. However, I really don't think it's going to change the outcome at all (unless they really fouled up the measurements, subsequent tape measurements would only change a quarter-inch at best) as there would need to be about a 1.5" difference between the readings to make up the 2%. Again, it's POSSIBLE that they really fouled-up the measurements the first time, but as was said, the errors are commonly in favor of the soldier (usually they pull the tape tightly) and not against.

Response by SPC James Neidig made May 14 at 2023 2:04 AM

2023-05-14T02:04:49-04:00

Is This The First Time The SM Failed The Tape ?
If There Is A History Of The SM Failing Tape Then There Is An Issue That Needs To Be Addressed , Does The SM Have Personal Issues That Need To Be Addressed ? Some People Use Eating As A Way To Cope With Stress And Depression.

Response by SGM Bill Frazer made May 14 at 2023 1:06 PM

2023-05-14T13:06:22-04:00

It would be nice to have actual facts- you make it sound like they alone were singled out. Has he been on the weight program before, how many times has he failed HT/WT tests, etc. Don't play defense lawyers, they portray killers as angels.

Response by SSgt Christophe Murphy made May 15 at 2023 8:19 AM

2023-05-15T08:19:18-04:00

If this isn't the first time this individual failed tape that may explain why their case is being expedited in comparison to others.

Response by CPT Private RallyPoint Member made May 15 at 2023 4:35 PM

2023-05-15T16:35:15-04:00

The SM should be flagged right away. I had my previous 1SG handle the packets for HT/WT. There a lot of requirements. In all honestly, I would just accept the flag and lose the weight. The Soldier could fight it but it might be over a month or so. They could lose the weight by then and pass tape.

Response by CPT Private RallyPoint Member made May 22 at 2023 4:19 PM

2023-05-22T16:19:00-04:00

Read all the comments, the one thing I think I'll point out others are probably dancing around is:

Only the command team and the soldier know the whole story. It's likely the soldier being treated differently is being done so because they have different things going on.

That doesn't mean they are not being singled out. In which case that is wrong.

However, lets say all the presented information are facts. The command team is not flagging folks properly and that is a problem that needs to be addressed.

OK Fine................

Now.............

What is the desired outcome for the solider who is being singled out? If the problem is brought to light and the commander is hammered down upon, then I simply see Battalion ordering a new tape session, and the soldier at the center of all of this is still in the same end state.

Best case:
Yep, bad commander shame on you, you are relieved for command.
Yep, fat soldier, you are still fat, battalion did the measurement again, and under the watchful eye of the Battalion XO and Battalion CSM. So it's impossible to contest with any chance of success.

Required action:
Lose weight no matter what is going on.