What do you think of Hawaii requiring gun owners to be recorded into a federal database?

SSgt Jerry DeLaney — Fri, 24 Jun 2016 12:45:31 -0400

http://m.hawaiinewsnow.com/hawaiinewsnow/db/330510/content/E2wCdOuo/gallery

Response by SGM Erik Marquez made Jun 24 at 2016 12:46 PM

SGM Erik Marquez — Fri, 24 Jun 2016 12:46:51 -0400

Your link is dead

Response by SSgt Kyle Holler made Jun 24 at 2016 12:47 PM

SSgt Kyle Holler — Fri, 24 Jun 2016 12:47:53 -0400

BS that's what I think! So now they know who legally owns guns and can take them away from those people. That's the government over reaching their bondries.

Response by Capt Seid Waddell made Jun 24 at 2016 12:48 PM

Capt Seid Waddell — Fri, 24 Jun 2016 12:48:43 -0400

Beautiful place, too expensive and liberal to live there.
Like California on steroids.

Response by SGM Erik Marquez made Jun 24 at 2016 12:49 PM

SGM Erik Marquez — Fri, 24 Jun 2016 12:49:28 -0400

The Firearms Owners Protection Act is clear on its prohibition against ANY federal database of guns or gun owners.

"No such rule or regulation prescribed [by the Attorney General] after the date of the enactment of the Firearms Owners Protection Act may require that records required to be maintained under this chapter or any portion of the contents of such records, be recorded at or transferred to a facility owned, managed, or controlled by the United States or any State or any political subdivision thereof, nor that any system of registration of firearms, firearms owners, or firearms transactions or disposition be established."

Hawaii’s move is in direct contradiction of FOPA’s mandate.
Oh and NO SUCH LAW in Hawaii exists, it is a proposal at this point..not a law. Thus your title is not accurate

Response by SGT David T. made Jun 24 at 2016 1:02 PM

SGT David T. — Fri, 24 Jun 2016 13:02:15 -0400

Good thing I don't live in Hawaii.

Response by CPO Greg Mcandrew made Jun 24 at 2016 2:43 PM

CPO Greg Mcandrew — Fri, 24 Jun 2016 14:43:31 -0400

it is bullshit and the first step in disarming law abiding citizens

Response by CSM Thomas McGarry made Jun 24 at 2016 3:27 PM

CSM Thomas McGarry — Fri, 24 Jun 2016 15:27:15 -0400

You'd think they'd have better things to worry about like what to do about all the bag people on Oahu!!!

Response by SGM Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 24 at 2016 3:45 PM

SGM Private RallyPoint Member — Fri, 24 Jun 2016 15:45:33 -0400

They will make law abiding citizens into criminals.

Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 24 at 2016 4:24 PM

SSG Private RallyPoint Member — Fri, 24 Jun 2016 16:24:16 -0400

If such a law does exist, and there isn't a Federal law invalidating that law, I wouldn't like it... however I really don't give a crap if my name is in another Federal database at this point.

Response by MSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 24 at 2016 8:48 PM

MSgt Private RallyPoint Member — Fri, 24 Jun 2016 20:48:48 -0400

Your link doesn't lead to anywhere. Here is a better link.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/06/24/hawaii-becomes-first-state-to-put-gun-owners-in-federal-database.html

So I ask gun control advocates, what exactly does this do to stop mad men or women from perpetrating heinous crimes upon innocent individuals. And what crimes are in the bill that will automatically notify police if an island resident is arrested anywhere else in the country. What happened to due process? An arrest does not constitute a conviction. Sounds like an invasion of civil liberties and I'm sure there will be many appeals. Could end up costing the tax payers of Hawaii a bundle in legal fees.

Hawaii becomes first state to put gun owners in federal database | Fox News

Hawaii signed a bill Thursday to become the first state to enter gun owners into an FBI database that will automatically notify police if an island resident is arrested anywhere else in the country.

Response by CAPT Kevin B. made Jun 24 at 2016 9:01 PM

CAPT Kevin B. — Fri, 24 Jun 2016 21:01:21 -0400

Discussion only and not necessarily reflective of any opinion.

I'll postulate for discussion there continues to be a "database". It isn't called that because all that's maintained are "entries", i.e. the weapon, owner, etc. whenever you fill out the Federal form for the background check. So the "entries" are on a storage medium. Every day more are added and backed up. How do you think they trace stuff used in crimes? I suspect "analytical tool" includes features of tabulation, search, etc. which is the software that would get used to query "entries". So long as the two are not connected (yeah right), they can say they don't have a database. I'd figure the same would be true for phone metadata. There's always "we don't do that" but what gets missed is the "so what do you really do?" An easy way to bypass the FOPA is offshore record keeping by a third party that you'd never find the contract that links it to the Government. Why have a contract when you use Grey Money? Add to that all sorts of non firearms related data about you, then there is an excuse to say "we're not maintaining for the purpose of firearms use". They won't say "we're maintaining a lot of data about you for which a portion is firearms stuff."

So am I a conspiracy theory type? Not really. I was just channeling my "OJ If I Did It mode" while I decide what wine to cork for tonight. I make this point to say for those who declare the provisions of FOPA are absolutely clear, think again. Although it sounds tight, there's plenty of space to drive a Mac Truck through. There always is and that's what lawyers do. Even if it's violated, you'd have to see what the provisions of enforcement are in the Act. If it's a Nothing Burger, then it's begging to be ignored. And if you sued with class action, etc., the Judge would say "What are the damages?" Well, nothing really.... yet. OK, so I'll issue a decree. OK, that just says follow the law. That could get ignored as well. So the penalty for getting caught is a bad PR day in the news cycle at a minimum, always on Friday afternoon after Wall Street closes. Tough seeing what else may happen.

Response by 1LT Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 25 at 2016 9:18 PM

1LT Private RallyPoint Member — Sat, 25 Jun 2016 21:18:12 -0400

Cleaver Photo if you ask me.

Response by SPC Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 27 at 2016 12:46 PM

SPC Private RallyPoint Member — Mon, 27 Jun 2016 12:46:26 -0400

The beginning of the end...

Response by SSgt Michael Diaz made Jun 28 at 2016 11:42 AM

SSgt Michael Diaz — Tue, 28 Jun 2016 11:42:39 -0400

I think the goobener is full of crap. I think my next vacation won't be to Hawaii

Response by CSM Darieus ZaGara made Jun 28 at 2016 6:07 PM

CSM Darieus ZaGara — Tue, 28 Jun 2016 18:07:25 -0400

I do not understand all the hoopla regarding the right to bare arms. Nothing says you have the right not to register.

Response by MAJ David Foley made Jul 14 at 2016 5:21 PM

MAJ David Foley — Thu, 14 Jul 2016 17:21:30 -0400

Not in favor of this. When you purchase a firearm you must fill out a ATFE Form 4473. That is a Federal data base and should be enough.