"UPDATE: Student vet with PTSD suspended, labeled ‘threat’ to peers after requesting to meet with non-Muslim counselor"

2015-06-01T13:36:45-04:00

After reading the article, do you think the headline fairly depicts the information in the rest of the story?
--
This article was originally posted on campusreform.org:

On May 25, Campus Reform published a story about Jeremy Rawls, a student veteran at Mississippi College who alleged that the college’s decision to suspend and label him a threat to himself and his peers came after he requested to meet with a non-Muslim counselor in the school’s Office of Counseling and Disability Services. Campus Reform reporter Gabriella Morrongiello was first made aware of the allegations by an MC student familiar with the situation.

After speaking with the college and Rawls, new documentation has been released that calls into question reasoning presented in the original story. The Muslim counselor that Rawls allegedly met with was a “student intern,” according to Dr. Bill Townsend, Vice President for Advancement and Legal Counsel to MC’s president. The details of Rawls’ exchange with that intern remain unclear.

On Tuesday, May 26 Mississippi College released a statement regarding Rawls’ allegations after several attempts by Morrongiello to reach out for comment prior to, and after, the story’s publication. In the statement, the university denied Rawls’ allegations, but did not detail Rawls’ suspension “due to federal educational privacy regulations.”

According to an email from Associate Dean of Students Jonathan Ambrose, Rawls was suspended because of “various emails [Rawls] sent/received” and a “documented phone conversation that [Rawls’] wife had with an administrator.”

Currently, no evidence exists that Rawls acted aggressively in email correspondence, nor did administrators respond with anything but an openness to accommodating his needs.

Newly uncovered emails between Rawls and three college administrators call into question a link between Rawls’ encounter with the Muslim student and his subsequent suspension. Rawls addressed a reasonable concern for a veteran with PTSD and requested a non-Muslim “counselor.”

In a phone conversation with Campus Reform, Dr. Townsend said that he was completely “unaware of any request to meet with somebody else.”

“We are a relatively small Christian university, we have no desire to discriminate against a veteran in any way, form, shape or fashion and we would never deny somebody the right to meet with a counselor of their choice,” Townsend said.

Emails do show that both Dr. Morgan Bryant, Director of Student Counseling and Disability Services, and Dr. Ron Howard, Vice President of Academic Affairs, responded to such a request from Rawls and indicated their willingness to fulfill it.

“I am so sorry that your encounter with the Muslim student doing her internship in the Counseling Center caused you so much grief,” Howard wrote in an email on Feb. 23. “I trust that you are receiving counseling at the VA, but I assure you that MC wants to assist you in every way we reasonably can.”

Rawls maintains that the university failed to follow-up with its original offerings and that the reason for his suspension was provided during a meeting with Dr. Ambrose and the Head of Security, Col. McRaney. Campus Reform spoke with Col. McRaney, who deferred any comments to the university.

The university would not clarify the phone conversation between Rawls’ wife and an administrator. The content of that phone conversation could not be clearly described by Rawls.

Rawls has been informed of his right to request any relevant school records under the Family Educational and Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). He is in the process of procuring legal counsel for guidance on the matter.

“I’m sticking to exactly what I have provided and if they have another reason I am not privy to it,” Rawls said in a statement to Campus Reform.

Campus Reform will continue to update this story as developments arise.

As published on May 25, 2015:

Months after the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) pledged to improve its treatment of veterans, disabled student veteran Jeremy Rawls is hoping his college might do the same.

Since February, the rising senior at Mississippi College in Clinton, Miss. has struggled to maintain good grades and reclaim his work-study position after MC administrators allegedly suspended him and labeled him a threat to himself and other students.

In an exclusive interview with Campus Reform, the former active-duty Marine who served two combat tours in Iraq said his suspension came after he requested to meet with a different counselor in the school’s Office of Counseling and Disability Services. Rawls, who is diagnosed with combat-related post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), was originally paired with a female counselor who wore traditional Muslim dress during his initial visit to the office.

“It’s not that I didn’t want to participate… I didn’t want to traumatize her and it wasn’t a good environment to be talking about [my disabilities] with that specific person,” Rawls said.

Rawls’s original reason for visiting the school’s counseling office was to pick up paperwork intended for his professors, a task that had been delayed because of a lengthy recovery from knee surgery.

“Every semester I have to identify with the school as disabled and they give me letters to give to my professors,” Rawls explained. “This semester I had a surgery at the beginning which caused some issues in getting some letters.”

According to Rawls, his attempts to meet with staff members to discuss the school’s policy about changing counselors were repeatedly ignored and it wasn’t until a recent meeting with administrators that he was able to speak with staff.

“Their response was suspending me pending a mental evaluation which I provided and then they put me on further restriction and a reintegration program,” Rawls said.

In an email notifying Rawls of his suspension, Associate Dean of Students Jonathan Ambrose said administrators and the Student Intervention Team have a “due diligence in not only the protection of yourself, but also the campus community as a whole from potential harm or the threat there of.”

“You are not permitted to be on campus for any reason or attend class during the duration of the Interim Suspension unless you have written permission,” states an email sent to Rawls on Feb. 26 and later obtained by Campus Reform.

“To have been a marine and to tell us we’re a threat...that’s actually a compliment,” said Rawls. “But telling me I’m a threat to others was extremely offensive.”

According to Rawls, who is pursuing a degree in English with a minor in education, the school never spoke with “a single professor” about his grades or behavior prior to suspending and subsequently removing him from a work-study position which he’d procured through the local VA.

On March 16, Rawls was notified of his permission to reintegrate back into academics after fulfilling the school’s request for an independent mental evaluation.

“At this time, you are only allowed integration back into academics, meaning: attending class, lectures, or any other academic related matter that is pertinent to a class or graded assignment,” Ambrose wrote in a second email to the student veteran.

In addition to a provision restricting Rawls from attending on-campus events or participating in student organizations, the school’s Integration Action Plan required that he “show ability to handle [his] academic course load” and “demonstrate regular attendance in mental health therapy at a licensed therapist” of his choice.

“The college itself is very supportive, there is just an ignorance toward veterans with PTSD and they are demonized so much by the media which led to confusion about what they [MC administrators] were dealing with,” Rawls said.

According to Rawls, the university also requested that he provide access to his medical records to the very counseling department where he encountered the original problem.

After successfully filing a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Rawls began seeking legal representation—a task he says has been more difficult than anticipated.

“Lawyers generally see veterans as an issue,” Rawls explained, adding that “every single one has told me ‘Yes, this is an issue,’ but they don’t do civil rights law or they’re not in the right location or they’re too busy.”

“I’ve been given every excuse imaginable,” Rawls said.

Last Thursday, Rawls met with administrators in an effort to begin resolving the matter and to ensure that he is able to fully participate in academics and extracurricular activities in the coming school year.

“They asked me what I wanted and I told them I want to be a normal student and I want my job back,” Rawls said.

In addition to serving in the Marine Corps, Rawls worked as a private contractor in Afghanistan and was a member of the Army National Guard for seven years. He was on active-duty in Iraq during the Second Battle of Fallujah—named the bloodiest battle of the Iraq War—and says he’s lost many friends to suicide due to PTSD.

The committed student and proud veteran believes his school’s actions reflect the need for “cultural change.”

“If they’ll do this to me, and I’m one of the most outspoken veterans on campus, they’ll definitely do this to others,” Rawls said.

According to Rawls, friends of his who are familiar with the situation—namely fellow student veterans—are deeply offended by MC’s conduct.

“They believe that if they had an altercation, they are automatically going to be seen as the aggressor now or that because they have PTSD, they are going to be viewed as unstable,” Rawls said.

Although Rawls “doesn’t really see a long-term solution to this,” he remains dedicated to his academics and intends to graduate from MC next spring.

“I still wish to go to MC and I know the vast majority is conservative and veteran-friendly, I guess this issue has slipped through the cracks,” Rawls said.

Mississippi College did not respond to a request for comment in time for publication.

http://www.campusreform.org/?ID=6527

Response by Capt Seid Waddell made Jun 1 at 2015 1:45 PM

2015-06-01T13:45:02-04:00

Yes, but there is a lot of information that is being held back.

Response by SPC Charles Brown made Jun 1 at 2015 1:50 PM

2015-06-01T13:50:22-04:00

someone at this college needs to fix this.

Response by SCPO David Lockwood made Jun 1 at 2015 1:56 PM

2015-06-01T13:56:51-04:00

There has to something else. It make no sense for the college to act in this manner for a simple request as this.

Response by PO1 John Miller made Jun 1 at 2015 1:56 PM

2015-06-01T13:56:52-04:00

Sounds to me like this Marine/Soldier has a case, but we're also not getting the full story.

Response by CPT Pedro Meza made Jun 1 at 2015 3:03 PM

2015-06-01T15:03:03-04:00

There is more to this story, and there is not enough information to make a wise decision, it should be noted that given all the bad press towards Muslims and towards Veterans with PTSD that such a case has been waiting to happen; and will continue to happen.

Response by PO3 Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 2 at 2015 6:18 PM

2015-06-02T18:18:03-04:00

There is definitely more to this story. Private Christian colleges have a thing for red tape, privacy, and policy, and it seems a lot of information gets misinterpreted and left out in situations like this. It's hard to make a call without knowing all of the details.

Response by SGT Curtis Earl made Jun 3 at 2015 6:08 AM

2015-06-03T06:08:49-04:00

Just sounds like the Marine/Soldier made an offensive and racist request. I'll bet he has some kinda justification for being a bigot. I've attended 2 predominately white colleges in the South. If would have made me seriously uncomfortable to ask for a non-white professor. What difference does it make what their race or religion is? Grant you, I'm impressed that a Christian school is Mississippi allowed a Muslim to even walk by the campus, let alone be employed. Bravo to them for not being bigots.

Response by CPL Aaron Cottingham made Jun 7 at 2015 2:34 AM

2015-06-07T02:34:25-04:00

He has the right to choose, to whom he speaks with. It is seemingly coexistent with the new fad of, crying racism if you are not the person seen.

Response by CPL Aaron Cottingham made Jun 7 at 2015 2:35 AM

2015-06-07T02:35:48-04:00

Would not stories of war, be more offensive to said counselor?

Response by PO1 John Miller made Jun 7 at 2015 2:41 AM

2015-06-07T02:41:46-04:00

Has anyone heard an update on this?

Response by SFC Mark Merino made Jun 7 at 2015 3:12 AM

2015-06-07T03:12:15-04:00

Sounds like the media is doing their usual jobs by spinning the story to fit their agenda. This story is missing A LOT of factual information. Anyone with an understanding of psychology knows that the client has to have a basic trust for their counselor. It is completely understandable that anyone with PTS brought on by a war in a Muslim area would be inclined to ask for a non-muslim counselor. It is their right. Discriminating against a student veteran because they have PTS should have the same monetary threat in a lawsuit against the university as a claim filed by a muslim for discrimination. However, in this society we are becoming, it is better to hug everyone and embrace everyone as victims of some sort of oppression and descrimination, but treat that big mean crazy soldier, who is obviously a former hateful killer of muslims, like the ticking timebomb that he obviously is. But I digress. I need more facts and less emotion.

Response by SFC Michael Hasbun made Oct 28 at 2015 10:32 AM

2015-10-28T10:32:47-04:00

Is it really discrimination if you reap consequences for discriminating? Let's not BS, he was being kind of a bigot..

Response by Max Ross made Aug 9 at 2019 12:36 PM

2019-08-09T12:36:48-04:00

There is a ton of information missing (from both sides).

Unless he communicated/acted in any self harm, aggressive or threatening behavior, there would be zero grounds for giving this label "danger to self or others); overreacting - an institution lacking knowledge and potentially libelous slander.

1. Individuals have a right to choose their health care provider without providing a reason. It's on the provider to accommodate and if unable to, recommend the person seek outside resources. It would be nice for them to help but not required.

2. The university requesting medical records from the previous health care provider is fishing and only useful to build a case. They should be looking at the present actions. Otherwise, the university is perpetuating this neurotic fear and regressing all the progress in destigmatizing MH conditions.

3. Reasonable accommodation is required to be provided under the ADA as long as current documents exist showing the disability remains.

If the individual has a hx of any self-harm or aggressive behavior (on campus), they can be required to obtain medical clearance to ensure their condition (s) do not interfere with their academics (or safety of others). If not, it is on the onus of the university to prove their claims. If this is a PC move, it only further divides the people on this issue.

Again, there is an overwhelming amount of information needed to determine the case.

Response by SPC Nancy Greene made Aug 9 at 2019 6:39 PM

2019-08-09T18:39:23-04:00

Although I was never in combat, I have PTSD. It only took over 18 Psychiatrists over19 years to properly provide me with this diagnosis. Even though I obtained two Masters Degrees from East Carolina University in North Carolina, I was unable to diagnose myself and at times thought I was ‘crazy’. I know NOW that PTSD negativity impacted me throughout my work history. I feel both personally and professionally, PTSD is extremely difficult for anyone to understand and deal with on a regular basis. I didn’t have any ‘melt-downs’ while in Graduate School; however, I was a full-time student, single mom, and worked 20 hours a week as a Graduate Teaching Assistant at the School of Nursing. After graduation, I began to notice anger and aggressive outbursts when dealing with the VAMC and trying to get community-based services paid for. I guess what I’m trying to say is “DON’T GIVE UP!” And if all else fails, contact your Congressman and the White House VA hotline: [login to see] ! Good Luck!

Response by Lt Col Charlie Brown made Oct 8 at 2019 11:32 PM

2019-10-08T23:32:29-04:00

Looks like the headline is slanted and inappropriate to me. Yet another slam at a veteran.

Response by SSG Edward Tilton made Feb 25 at 2021 9:16 PM

2021-02-25T21:16:56-05:00

Nonsense, what was his TRAUMA? This happens when too many analysts are involved