James Mendenhall 1275258 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>The government insulted and risked the lives of our brave pilots, that were shot at and targeted for enforcing the imposed no fly zone in Iraq. That should have been a reason for war, but by waiting for the false reason on WMD's adds to the disrespect for the lives of our bravest men and women 2016-02-02T11:48:34-05:00 James Mendenhall 1275258

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>The government insulted and risked the lives of our brave pilots, that were shot at and targeted for enforcing the imposed no fly zone in Iraq. That should have been a reason for war, but by waiting for the false reason on WMD's adds to the disrespect for the lives of our bravest men and women

2016-02-02T11:48:34-05:00 2016-02-02T11:48:34-05:00 MSgt Danny Hope 1275300

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>There were WMDs in Iraq...

2016-02-02T12:02:54-05:00 2016-02-02T12:02:54-05:00 Capt Seid Waddell 1275312

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Yes. The WMD issue was secondary and was emphasized as a political attack upon the Bush administration by the anti-military left.

2016-02-02T12:05:36-05:00 2016-02-02T12:05:36-05:00 PO1 Brian Austin 1275544

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>We did shoot back. A couple of Iraqi MIG's were shot down. Numerous air defense sites were taken out during OSW/ONW. It was what they call a "low level conflict", not widely reported in the media.

2016-02-02T13:23:23-05:00 2016-02-02T13:23:23-05:00 MCPO Roger Collins 1275556

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>The correct term is RESUMPTIOM of hostilities and was approved by Congress and the White House, with concurrence by the UN.

2016-02-02T13:26:03-05:00 2016-02-02T13:26:03-05:00 CSM Michael Poll 1275557

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>What false reason??? I do believe that there were WMD's in Iraq, matter of fact I can guarantee it......

2016-02-02T13:26:17-05:00 2016-02-02T13:26:17-05:00 2016-02-02T11:48:34-05:00