Should there be hearings on the FBI recommending no charges for Hillary Clinton Today?

Sgt Tom Cunnally — Thu, 07 Jul 2016 05:00:52 -0400

Republicans want to know why Hillary Clinton was NOT charged with a crime and Democrats call this another With Hunt like Benghazi.

I look forward to hearing M. Comey and any other FBI agents answer more questions about the investigation into Hillary's emails and why she and her staff were not charged with security violations

Response by Sgt Tom Cunnally made Jul 7 at 2016 5:15 AM

Sgt Tom Cunnally — Thu, 07 Jul 2016 05:15:10 -0400

Loretta Lynch will also be asked to appear before congress to testify about her role in not charging Hillary or any of her staff with criminal wrongdoing and her so called chance meeting on the tarmac with Bill Clinton to talk about their grand kids and golf.

Response by SGT David A. 'Cowboy' Groth made Jul 7 at 2016 6:02 AM

SGT David A. 'Cowboy' Groth — Thu, 07 Jul 2016 06:02:17 -0400

Yes. Too much BS in this so called investigation.

Response by SSgt Nicholas Merchant made Jul 7 at 2016 6:20 AM

SSgt Nicholas Merchant — Thu, 07 Jul 2016 06:20:20 -0400

I agree, if any of us were to send classified info over private emails weld be sent to gitmo no questions asked there is things that I was part of over 10 yrs ago that the government says is classified and I cant say anything about it, much less send emails. I just don't understand. I saw many secured emails and info that never had to be questioned if it was classified even if not labled, hoe can we trust a commander in chief who says she had no knowledge of any classified information being shared, I'm sorry but this makes no sense.

Response by Alan K. made Jul 7 at 2016 6:36 AM

Alan K. — Thu, 07 Jul 2016 06:36:15 -0400

Tom don't hold your breath.....I can't attend another funeral just yet....!!!!!!!!!

Response by Sgt Tom Cunnally made Jul 7 at 2016 6:42 AM

Sgt Tom Cunnally — Thu, 07 Jul 2016 06:42:49 -0400

I don't understand why Hillary's conduct was not deemed willfully done and if not why was it extremely careless and not grossly negligent?? And I don't think this is much to do about nothing. I disagree with those who said Hillary was found to not have been charged we should move on and let if go. Clinton supporters and her campaign claim the Republicans are trying to make this into a another controversy and keep it alive until the convention. Ok there may be some of that but I think we have the right to know how FBI Director made a judgement call rather than the AG. And do all of the FBI agree with his decision?? I read that the FBI may have others agents be called to testify.

Response by Capt Walter Miller made Jul 7 at 2016 7:01 AM

Capt Walter Miller — Thu, 07 Jul 2016 07:01:34 -0400

It might be a kabuki dance. Raw meat for the proles done in Newspeak 11.

Walt

Response by Capt Walter Miller made Jul 7 at 2016 7:05 AM

Capt Walter Miller — Thu, 07 Jul 2016 07:05:42 -0400

Clinton's popularity has strongly dropped in the last couple of days.

Best way to pump her up again may be hearings.

Walt

Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 7 at 2016 7:08 AM

SSG Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 07 Jul 2016 07:08:46 -0400

Yes there should be the AG and the FBI director will go before congress to give them their findings... Which was nothing.

Response by FN Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 7 at 2016 7:11 AM

FN Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 07 Jul 2016 07:11:32 -0400

It just goes to show you that ones with the gold make the rules.
Hillary should be in prison for espionage (minimum: 10 year sentence) and it's also a felony so then Hillary will then be a felon which then would destroy her career as a politician.
This country is so fucked up sometimes.
You have the evidence yet you won't convict.
Rigged.

Response by SGT Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 7 at 2016 7:37 AM

SGT Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 07 Jul 2016 07:37:03 -0400

I think there should be....I think the speaker said there was going to be hearings on the director as well as a few others. I mean I think this is setting a precedence of how this will go now in the future with any one with power. Looks like Edward Snowden can be let back in the country now haha

Response by Sgt Tom Cunnally made Jul 7 at 2016 7:48 AM

Sgt Tom Cunnally — Thu, 07 Jul 2016 07:48:09 -0400

The Dems are attacking the Republicans again for holding this hearing today and here are some headlines in the Liberal Media that I found:

"Democrats were furious over Chaffetz’s election-year decision to haul Comey before his committee."

“Republican after Republican praised Director Comey’s impeccable record of independence_right up until the moment he issued his conclusion,” said the committee’s top Democrat, Rep. Elijah Cummings of Maryland. “The only emergency here is that yet another Republican conspiracy theory is slipping away.”

Clinton’s spokesman, Brian Fallon, denounced Chaffetz’s hearing as “another taxpayer-funded sham.”

Response by SCPO Joshua I made Jul 7 at 2016 7:58 AM

SCPO Joshua I — Thu, 07 Jul 2016 07:58:07 -0400

The interesting thing is that while Hillary may avoid prosecution, her entire staff are essentially un-clearable now. How can any of them ever be given a clearance after the fbi director's statements?

Response by SSG Warren Swan made Jul 7 at 2016 8:11 AM

SSG Warren Swan — Thu, 07 Jul 2016 08:11:43 -0400

No. We need to get over it and move on. If anyone really thought she was going to be indicted, please go to the bathroom and see if there is anything between your ears other than cobwebs and a lockout tagout block. We've wasted two years of this Congress to go all out in blue falconing each other, [login to see] 649854698 investigations that went to the same conclusion we all knew was coming. It has taken members of congress to new lows on both sides, and proved the last two years weren't about what "The American Public Wants", but more like "I'm gonna settle some scores". If you compare the two congresses between Regan with Beiruit, and Obama and Bengazi, Regan's congress was more focused on the job compared to "getting even". They didn't take two years to find conclusions, or spend millions of dollars going nowhere. None of them had the fruit loop haircut Growdy has. Let's close this chapter, and move on. No one is coming back, and no one in congress really ever GAF about them anyways. It was all scores being settled.

Response by Maj Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 7 at 2016 8:22 AM

Maj Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 07 Jul 2016 08:22:31 -0400

I looked through some of her emails that Wikileaks released yesterday and they are amazing. Here's just one I read that was marked Confidential (interesting has both unclassified and a confidential marking).
https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/7621

But, I held clearances for 32 years. We often talked about how the rules are different for those in Washington. Not saying I agree; but fact of life.

WikiLeaks - Hillary Clinton Email Archive

If you need help using Tor you can contact WikiLeaks for assistance in setting it up using our simple webchat available at: https://wikileaks.org/talk

Response by MSgt Richard Rountree made Jul 7 at 2016 8:28 AM

MSgt Richard Rountree — Thu, 07 Jul 2016 08:28:22 -0400

Absolutely. It's called 'congressional oversight' and like our rights it needs to be exercised, i.e., a right unexercised will be a right denied.

Response by Sgt Tom Cunnally made Jul 7 at 2016 8:36 AM

Sgt Tom Cunnally — Thu, 07 Jul 2016 08:36:54 -0400

"The Hearing "will start at 1000Hrs today and we can argue about it later. Those who oppose this congressional hearing are also the same who said Hillary did nothing wrong with her email and server. So maybe these Hillary supporters don't want us to learn more about their nonsense????..

Response by Lt Col Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 7 at 2016 8:48 AM

Lt Col Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 07 Jul 2016 08:48:34 -0400

Double standard? RHIP? like to know your thoughts https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2015/11/30/decision-to-force-out-marine-who-sent-warning-ahead-of-insider-attack-upheld/

Decision to force out Marine who sent warning ahead of insider attack upheld

Maj. Jason Brezler was investigated after sending a warning about an allegedly corrupt Afghan police chief whose servant later killed three Marines.

Response by MCPO Roger Collins made Jul 7 at 2016 9:54 AM

MCPO Roger Collins — Thu, 07 Jul 2016 09:54:47 -0400

19:56 27.05.2016
US Navy serviceman Kristian Saucier was found guilty of taking photographs of classified spaces of the nuclear attack submarine Alexandria, according to the US Department of Justice.

Read more: http://sputniknews.com/us/20160527/ [login to see] /us-navy-nuclear-submarine.html#ixzz4DjNTcGhO

US Sailor Guilty of Taking Classified Photos of US Nuclear Submarine

US Navy serviceman Kristian Saucier was found guilty of taking photographs of classified spaces of the nuclear attack submarine Alexandria, according to the US Department of Justice.

Response by MCPO Roger Collins made Jul 7 at 2016 10:15 AM

MCPO Roger Collins — Thu, 07 Jul 2016 10:15:02 -0400

This will not go away until after the elections. Yes, the investigation and travesty of justice on Hillary's breaking the law is over, but the accountability is not. Hopefully, those that have our national interests in mind remember what she did and the results of a corrupt government leads to, some that are above the law. A quick review of comments were made this morning on TV and the use of the words, intent and careless were being used by the President and many others leading up to Comey's acceptance of defeat. The message was transmitted and received on the precise wording to prevent prosecution.

Response by LTC Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 7 at 2016 10:19 AM

LTC Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 07 Jul 2016 10:19:29 -0400

How about hearings into Republican use of taxpayer dollars for partisan electioneering? I'd like hearings into the $7,000,000 wasted on Benghazi investigation number eight that revealed exactly the same lack of culpability and the same lack of rescue possibility as investigations one through seven, all in the hopes of dropping Hillary Clinton's poll numbers.

Kevin McCarthy admitted it in a rare moment of going off party message, and we taxpayers deserve our money back.

Response by CPT Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 7 at 2016 11:11 AM

CPT Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 07 Jul 2016 11:11:53 -0400

I'm listening to the hearings right now, and I don't understand what's going on. The FBI director said that Mrs. Clinton's server was unauthorized and not secure, and contained over 100 classified (at their origin) emails. Right after that he said that he believes she didn't break the law. Can someone explain to me how those two statements are compatible? I have nothing against the Director, but I really don't get it.

Response by MSgt Michael Smith made Jul 7 at 2016 11:26 AM

MSgt Michael Smith — Thu, 07 Jul 2016 11:26:16 -0400

We should definitely have more hearings to hear why those hearings didn't reach the conclusions we wanted them to! And then maybe more hearings on the purpose of hearings, and how so-called hearings are nowadays mostly lame political games designed to discredit people in the executive branch --Do you hear me?

Response by SFC Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 7 at 2016 11:50 AM

SFC Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 07 Jul 2016 11:50:01 -0400

Unfortunately, it seems as thought he system is one-sided and rigged to make Killary the next POTUS. All we can do is our part and vote. But I am pretty sure that it will make no difference.

Response by CPT Jack Durish made Jul 7 at 2016 2:08 PM

CPT Jack Durish — Thu, 07 Jul 2016 14:08:07 -0400

The FBI Director's own statement yesterday describing in detail indictable offenses and culminating in a recommendation of no indictment demands investigation. He may as well have projected a slide show with one slide screaming "This is a political cover up!". The whole argument of lack of criminal intent was a canard. No criminal intent is required in this case.

Response by PO1 Roger Waddle made Jul 7 at 2016 2:13 PM

PO1 Roger Waddle — Thu, 07 Jul 2016 14:13:53 -0400

yes and since her campaign acct is so large I would like to see proof she did not sale her email info

Response by SFC Everett Oliver made Jul 7 at 2016 3:07 PM

SFC Everett Oliver — Thu, 07 Jul 2016 15:07:33 -0400

It was a circus. Trey Gowdy had Dir Comely admit to at least 4 crimes committed by Hillary and every Democrat on there praised him for conduction a fair investigation... This Administration and PC crowd has got to go...

Response by Capt Walter Miller made Jul 8 at 2016 11:33 AM

Capt Walter Miller — Fri, 08 Jul 2016 11:33:13 -0400

The GOP didn't catch Clinton out in all those Benghazi hearings because she told a lot of whopping lies.

It is easy to sound polished, relaxed and self-confident when you don't have to worry about telling the truth.

Walt

Response by Capt Walter Miller made Oct 31 at 2016 11:42 AM

Capt Walter Miller — Mon, 31 Oct 2016 11:42:22 -0400

A while back someone told Dir. Comey -- no way will you recommend charges against madame Clinton. That prime directive seems to have gone poof.