CW4 Dan Vandervort1512559<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I have been reading the Army Times since the 70's and think it was a bad move. Soldiers , Active, Reserve/Guard and Retired rely on the "timely" information contained within. Was a good paper, could be again!Should the Army Times to go back to a weekly as they were since the 70's?2016-05-09T10:50:19-04:00CW4 Dan Vandervort1512559<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I have been reading the Army Times since the 70's and think it was a bad move. Soldiers , Active, Reserve/Guard and Retired rely on the "timely" information contained within. Was a good paper, could be again!Should the Army Times to go back to a weekly as they were since the 70's?2016-05-09T10:50:19-04:002016-05-09T10:50:19-04:00CSM David Heidke1512577<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I want Private Murphy's Law to come back... I loved that!Response by CSM David Heidke made May 9 at 2016 10:54 AM2016-05-09T10:54:28-04:002016-05-09T10:54:28-04:00CSM Private RallyPoint Member1512587<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I like the weekly information, but maybe they cannot sustain it.Response by CSM Private RallyPoint Member made May 9 at 2016 10:57 AM2016-05-09T10:57:23-04:002016-05-09T10:57:23-04:00SFC Joseph Weber1512670<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Internet strikes again!Response by SFC Joseph Weber made May 9 at 2016 11:26 AM2016-05-09T11:26:25-04:002016-05-09T11:26:25-04:00SPC Brian Mason1515619<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>No. I see no reason why AFN could be broadcast. However, troop movements, locations, numbers, etc. "sensitive information' and such should not be disclosed on air. This poses a problem though since, AFN isn't available to people outside of bases and such? I could be wrong, but it's done that way for many good reasons.Response by SPC Brian Mason made May 10 at 2016 10:42 AM2016-05-10T10:42:20-04:002016-05-10T10:42:20-04:002016-05-09T10:50:19-04:00