CW4 Dan Vandervort 1512559 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I have been reading the Army Times since the 70's and think it was a bad move. Soldiers , Active, Reserve/Guard and Retired rely on the "timely" information contained within. Was a good paper, could be again! Should the Army Times to go back to a weekly as they were since the 70's? 2016-05-09T10:50:19-04:00 CW4 Dan Vandervort 1512559 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I have been reading the Army Times since the 70's and think it was a bad move. Soldiers , Active, Reserve/Guard and Retired rely on the "timely" information contained within. Was a good paper, could be again! Should the Army Times to go back to a weekly as they were since the 70's? 2016-05-09T10:50:19-04:00 2016-05-09T10:50:19-04:00 CSM David Heidke 1512577 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I want Private Murphy's Law to come back... I loved that! Response by CSM David Heidke made May 9 at 2016 10:54 AM 2016-05-09T10:54:28-04:00 2016-05-09T10:54:28-04:00 CSM Private RallyPoint Member 1512587 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I like the weekly information, but maybe they cannot sustain it. Response by CSM Private RallyPoint Member made May 9 at 2016 10:57 AM 2016-05-09T10:57:23-04:00 2016-05-09T10:57:23-04:00 SFC Joseph Weber 1512670 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Internet strikes again! Response by SFC Joseph Weber made May 9 at 2016 11:26 AM 2016-05-09T11:26:25-04:00 2016-05-09T11:26:25-04:00 SPC Brian Mason 1515619 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>No. I see no reason why AFN could be broadcast. However, troop movements, locations, numbers, etc. "sensitive information' and such should not be disclosed on air. This poses a problem though since, AFN isn't available to people outside of bases and such? I could be wrong, but it's done that way for many good reasons. Response by SPC Brian Mason made May 10 at 2016 10:42 AM 2016-05-10T10:42:20-04:00 2016-05-10T10:42:20-04:00 2016-05-09T10:50:19-04:00