SFC Private RallyPoint Member277518<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>What do you think about the new SHARP implementations and new victim's rights according to the 2014 NDAA?SHARP and Victim's Rights2014-10-14T13:57:37-04:00SFC Private RallyPoint Member277518<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>What do you think about the new SHARP implementations and new victim's rights according to the 2014 NDAA?SHARP and Victim's Rights2014-10-14T13:57:37-04:002014-10-14T13:57:37-04:00CW5 Private RallyPoint Member277565<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Thanks for bringing this to our attention, <a class="dark-link bold-link" role="profile-hover" data-qtip-container="body" data-id="8007" data-source-page-controller="question_response_contents" href="/profiles/8007-27d-paralegal-specialist">SFC Private RallyPoint Member</a>. I read about the changes to the MCM under the 2014 NDAA (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=121444">http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=121444</a>), and I have to say the changes sound good to me. The changes seem to be all about protecting victims of sexual assault/harassment, and that's a good thing. <br /><br />I'm wondering if there is even a possible down side, and I think the only down side would be that the alleged perpetrator's rights have to be in the mix somehow, especially if the "event" (say, sex) really was consensual and the "victim" decided afterwards - for whatever reason - to change her/his mind. <div class="pta-link-card answers-template-image type-default">
<div class="pta-link-card-picture">
<img src="https://d26horl2n8pviu.cloudfront.net/link_data_pictures/images/000/003/866/qrc/dodlogo.png?1443024585">
</div>
<div class="pta-link-card-content">
<p class="pta-link-card-title">
<a target="blank" href="http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=121444">Article View</a>
</p>
<p class="pta-link-card-description">Official website for U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE</p>
</div>
<div class="clearfix"></div>
</div>
Response by CW5 Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 14 at 2014 2:27 PM2014-10-14T14:27:36-04:002014-10-14T14:27:36-04:00SGT Jay Ehrenfeld1245313<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>SSgt,<br />It a classic he said she said and the law usually take on the males because lack of evidence there was a sexually crime committed. I didn't said all sexually crime is false. One female news reporter said all females does lies and a female singer has been report and she blame herself and she got a back lash to because she blame herself for it and not the male.<br />If two people accepted of their action when it happen then it no sexually crime has committed.<br />There is a case in the court right now that a formal college males got kick out because the dear Colleague letter also there is two female College professors claiming that accidentally they have sex and these two college professor blame the males for it and not the females for her action. Remember it take two ramble. yes or no and you remember at university Virginia false claim and turn that she lied to cover up her action.<br />According these two things is against the males on campus and the so called Title 9. but the Senator form new want the Dear colleague letter became a federal law so the make wit go to court to relief them of their false lies by the females.<br />The females who make false claim should be Accountable for her action toward the male the feminist want to be equal can't have it both ways where their responsible for their action in this matter it not one way street both parties should held accountable.Response by SGT Jay Ehrenfeld made Jan 19 at 2016 1:04 PM2016-01-19T13:04:51-05:002016-01-19T13:04:51-05:002014-10-14T13:57:37-04:00