RallyPoint Team2665313<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Our Marines need new guns, and you're in charge. You've got options and a reasonable budget. How do you get it done?2017-06-20T17:24:25-04:00RallyPoint Team2665313<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Our Marines need new guns, and you're in charge. You've got options and a reasonable budget. How do you get it done?2017-06-20T17:24:25-04:002017-06-20T17:24:25-04:00LTC Stephen F.2665318<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I prefer the Glock option.Response by LTC Stephen F. made Jun 20 at 2017 5:25 PM2017-06-20T17:25:26-04:002017-06-20T17:25:26-04:00SGT David A. 'Cowboy' Groth2665325<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Set up where weapon manufaturers send in their bids, the one that is the lowest and has the best weapon, that will do what is expected of it gets the contract.Response by SGT David A. 'Cowboy' Groth made Jun 20 at 2017 5:27 PM2017-06-20T17:27:41-04:002017-06-20T17:27:41-04:00MAJ Private RallyPoint Member2665394<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Well first there is the bona fide needs rule, make or buy determination, coordination for small business concerns and set aside opportunities, posting of a sources sought and conducting an industry day, obtaining proper funding from congress, apply the proper buy American act or NATO trade agreement, detailing out the government performance specifications, synopsizing through federal business opportunities, eventually putting out a solicitation, receiving items for tests, evaluation of those tests, disclosing the testing findings to the companies, allowing ample time for alterations to the design, resubmission of tested items, receiving best and final offers, evaluating their proposals, auditing their proposals, conducting a source selection advisory council, choosing the vendor, determining equal opportunity status of the manufacturing plants, auditing the contractor's accounting system, determining forward pricing rate agreements, evaluating first article testing, dealing with the protests, rewriting the specifications due to a change in senior personnel, re-pricing the change orders, reworking the delivered items, and eventually receiving the items. Not to mention the thousand other steps that go into this process.<br /><br />Or you could just call it a commercial item and buy them at any store at a discount price, but that approach is frowned upon.Response by MAJ Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 20 at 2017 5:46 PM2017-06-20T17:46:30-04:002017-06-20T17:46:30-04:001stSgt Eugene Harless2665529<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Plasma rifle in 40 watt range..... Sorry only what you see here bud.Response by 1stSgt Eugene Harless made Jun 20 at 2017 6:45 PM2017-06-20T18:45:02-04:002017-06-20T18:45:02-04:00SrA Edward Vong2665572<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>BFG 9000Response by SrA Edward Vong made Jun 20 at 2017 7:08 PM2017-06-20T19:08:32-04:002017-06-20T19:08:32-04:00MSgt George Cater2665575<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>None of the above. The options presented do not indicate a serious question.Response by MSgt George Cater made Jun 20 at 2017 7:09 PM2017-06-20T19:09:54-04:002017-06-20T19:09:54-04:00SSgt Dan Montague2666066<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Clearly changing back to a heavier round has been a hot topic since Vietnam. I can say I have only carried a combat load of an M1 Garand ( 30-06 rounds) while plinking targets. It has great stopping power and can reach out, but damn it's heavy. My combat load of 5.56 was 168-224 rounds. It was also heavy but had lots more ammo. Now the issue is the enemy is starting to wear body armor we can shoot through. Hence more rounds needed. <br />We should look at a total new designed weapon that can stand up to the harsh desert climate. We should explore a round that is larger than 5.56 but smaller than 7.62. Screw NATO regs. If we find a good caliber round, they can adapt. (yes I understand why we have NATO ammo) Time to ditch the M16 style weapons. Lets put a bid out to gun manufactures and get this started.Response by SSgt Dan Montague made Jun 20 at 2017 10:48 PM2017-06-20T22:48:03-04:002017-06-20T22:48:03-04:00WO1 Private RallyPoint Member2666166<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I'll go ahead with a shameless plug: I L-U-V my Beretta ARX100. The ARX160 has multiple caliber options, is virtually maintenance free, 100% ambidextrous, compact, and freaking LIGHT weight.Response by WO1 Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 20 at 2017 11:31 PM2017-06-20T23:31:34-04:002017-06-20T23:31:34-04:00SGT David T.2672697<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Can I at least get a draft ICD so I have some idea what the requirement is?Response by SGT David T. made Jun 23 at 2017 6:45 AM2017-06-23T06:45:34-04:002017-06-23T06:45:34-04:00SP5 Richard J Jones2754380<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Contact Sig Sauer, USA hdqtrs. and ask them what they can provide in the way of a lightweight, collaspsible stock, 6mm full auto, with a 30 round mag, interchangeable to a 50, or 100 round mag, that can fire a variety of rounds from fmj to armor piercing. Ask them if they have anything already available, and ,if not, ask them to give a due delivery date when that hardware will be available. Request a mockup copy fully working model, and test in a live fire situation to see if it meets specs. If successful, give them the multi- million dollar contract for supplying new weapons for The USMC. You could also call other arms manufacturers and repeat this process with them. I think there is a requirement that says you have to have an open field in the process to land a government contract.Response by SP5 Richard J Jones made Jul 21 at 2017 8:23 PM2017-07-21T20:23:28-04:002017-07-21T20:23:28-04:00CW3 Private RallyPoint Member2754409<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Simple. THUNDER DOME. 20 leading gun manufacturers enter, only one leaves... But seriously though I am big fan of competition in these types of things instead of countless panels, discussions, and incomplete studies. Setup a simple tactical competition that pits all the leading contenders for a contract against each other. I know similar things have been done before, but lets just settle the finalists this way. Whoever wins, gets the contract.Response by CW3 Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 21 at 2017 8:31 PM2017-07-21T20:31:51-04:002017-07-21T20:31:51-04:00SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL7162151<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Thanks for sharingResponse by SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL made Aug 5 at 2021 10:32 PM2021-08-05T22:32:48-04:002021-08-05T22:32:48-04:002017-06-20T17:24:25-04:00