Oops I think I may have offended a few people.

SFC Christopher Perry — Sun, 15 Mar 2015 15:20:49 -0400

There was an article posted on LinkedIn that was, at least in the way I interpreted it, telling civilian employers that they should modify their application process, hiring procedures and even orientation process to fit the needs of transitioning veterans.

My answer was, that while I am all in on any programs that enable us to adapt to the civilian sector, it is our job to adapt not that of a potential employer. I understand that we have all made sacrifices to do what we do, but we did in fact volunteer to do it. I don't feel this entitles us to some sort of advantage. We deserve nothing more than the chance to compete for a position we are qualified for. What are your thoughts?

Response by CPT Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 15 at 2015 4:03 PM

CPT Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 15 Mar 2015 16:03:49 -0400

SFC Christopher Perry, can you post a link to the article you mention?

I want to agree with you (we're a society built on capitalism, not socialism) but if the reason for the article is that former SMs have some innate value that's better tapped if employers revise how they recruit talent, there may be some merit to it.

Response by Sgt Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 27 at 2015 11:08 AM

Sgt Private RallyPoint Member — Fri, 27 Mar 2015 11:08:39 -0400

Without the context provided by the original article, I would have to agree with CPT Private RallyPoint Member. If it makes fiscal sense, and helps a company or industry target a specific type of employee that there is an identified need for, what reason is there to not do it?

You put out bait for the animal you want. You don't demand that deer starting eating sushi just because that's what you're using.