COL Private RallyPoint Member2437857<div class="images-v2-count-1"><div class="content-picture image-v2-number-1" id="image-141265"> <div class="social_icons social-buttons-on-image">
<a href='https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rallypoint.com%2Fanswers%2Fon-national-security-issues-is-it-wiser-for-a-us-president-to-seek-advice-from-retired-generals-or-career-diplomats%3Futm_source%3DFacebook%26utm_medium%3Dorganic%26utm_campaign%3DShare%20to%20facebook'
target="_blank" class='social-share-button facebook-share-button'><i class="fa fa-facebook-f"></i></a>
<a href="https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=On+National+Security+issues%2C+is+it+wiser+for+a+US+President+to+seek+advice+from+retired+Generals+or+career+Diplomats%3F&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rallypoint.com%2Fanswers%2Fon-national-security-issues-is-it-wiser-for-a-us-president-to-seek-advice-from-retired-generals-or-career-diplomats&via=RallyPoint"
target="_blank" class="social-share-button twitter-custom-share-button"><i class="fa fa-twitter"></i></a>
<a href="mailto:?subject=Check this out on RallyPoint!&body=Hi, I thought you would find this interesting:%0D%0AOn National Security issues, is it wiser for a US President to seek advice from retired Generals or career Diplomats?%0D%0A %0D%0AHere is the link: https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/on-national-security-issues-is-it-wiser-for-a-us-president-to-seek-advice-from-retired-generals-or-career-diplomats"
target="_blank" class="social-share-button email-share-button"><i class="fa fa-envelope"></i></a>
</div>
<a class="fancybox" rel="d9f2afb724dda8054649304dcfbdd063" href="https://d1ndsj6b8hkqu9.cloudfront.net/pictures/images/000/141/265/for_gallery_v2/1418f0c6.JPG"><img src="https://d1ndsj6b8hkqu9.cloudfront.net/pictures/images/000/141/265/large_v3/1418f0c6.JPG" alt="1418f0c6" /></a></div></div>On National Security issues, is it wiser for a US President to seek advice from retired Generals or career Diplomats?2017-03-21T19:02:07-04:00COL Private RallyPoint Member2437857<div class="images-v2-count-1"><div class="content-picture image-v2-number-1" id="image-141265"> <div class="social_icons social-buttons-on-image">
<a href='https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rallypoint.com%2Fanswers%2Fon-national-security-issues-is-it-wiser-for-a-us-president-to-seek-advice-from-retired-generals-or-career-diplomats%3Futm_source%3DFacebook%26utm_medium%3Dorganic%26utm_campaign%3DShare%20to%20facebook'
target="_blank" class='social-share-button facebook-share-button'><i class="fa fa-facebook-f"></i></a>
<a href="https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=On+National+Security+issues%2C+is+it+wiser+for+a+US+President+to+seek+advice+from+retired+Generals+or+career+Diplomats%3F&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rallypoint.com%2Fanswers%2Fon-national-security-issues-is-it-wiser-for-a-us-president-to-seek-advice-from-retired-generals-or-career-diplomats&via=RallyPoint"
target="_blank" class="social-share-button twitter-custom-share-button"><i class="fa fa-twitter"></i></a>
<a href="mailto:?subject=Check this out on RallyPoint!&body=Hi, I thought you would find this interesting:%0D%0AOn National Security issues, is it wiser for a US President to seek advice from retired Generals or career Diplomats?%0D%0A %0D%0AHere is the link: https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/on-national-security-issues-is-it-wiser-for-a-us-president-to-seek-advice-from-retired-generals-or-career-diplomats"
target="_blank" class="social-share-button email-share-button"><i class="fa fa-envelope"></i></a>
</div>
<a class="fancybox" rel="0c86cf15ef53ebd35bda500b5cbd46a1" href="https://d1ndsj6b8hkqu9.cloudfront.net/pictures/images/000/141/265/for_gallery_v2/1418f0c6.JPG"><img src="https://d1ndsj6b8hkqu9.cloudfront.net/pictures/images/000/141/265/large_v3/1418f0c6.JPG" alt="1418f0c6" /></a></div></div>On National Security issues, is it wiser for a US President to seek advice from retired Generals or career Diplomats?2017-03-21T19:02:07-04:002017-03-21T19:02:07-04:001SG(P) Private RallyPoint Member2437875<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Sir, I don't think it's an "either/or" issue. I believe a holistic approach is best.Response by 1SG(P) Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 21 at 2017 7:08 PM2017-03-21T19:08:16-04:002017-03-21T19:08:16-04:00CMSgt Private RallyPoint Member2437879<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Should have included Twiter as a choice. JK, sorry, couldn't resist.Response by CMSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 21 at 2017 7:09 PM2017-03-21T19:09:03-04:002017-03-21T19:09:03-04:00Sgt Private RallyPoint Member2437964<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><a class="dark-link bold-link" role="profile-hover" data-qtip-container="body" data-id="804525" data-source-page-controller="question_response_contents" href="/profiles/804525-11a-infantry-officer-63rd-rsc-hq-63rd-rsc">COL Private RallyPoint Member</a> Sir, It depends on who the diplomat is and if they put the United States first. There has to be a combination of both to arrive at a balanced approach to National Security.Response by Sgt Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 21 at 2017 7:38 PM2017-03-21T19:38:58-04:002017-03-21T19:38:58-04:00MSG Private RallyPoint Member2437972<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I'd just go with the regional experts that are subordinate staff at the National Security Council for the meaty facts of an issue, then with diplomatic heads of the Policy Trio to interpret and decide. In each case it can be obvious who should have the lead, Sec State for diplomacy and foreign policy (in which case they negotiate with the DoD as an implied threat) and Sec Def for matters of actual military use or peacekeeping. Other issues have a combination of the whole NSC working together. The National Security Adviser is like the referee for the whole thing and needs to make sure applicable agencies have a say or at least to go around the table and ask if they have anything to add. No offense, but the question is inherently flawed; the POTUS should seek advice from everyone who has a dog in the fight, then leader up and make a decision. I will say however, it is with good reason the NSA's are usually generals. Generals have KSA's to be diplomats AND SMEs on defense, Politicians....well, not so much.Response by MSG Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 21 at 2017 7:43 PM2017-03-21T19:43:17-04:002017-03-21T19:43:17-04:00SSgt Gary Andrews2438064<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>He should listen to both.......but either one would be better than listening to Fox News and acting on whatever he hears there.Response by SSgt Gary Andrews made Mar 21 at 2017 8:19 PM2017-03-21T20:19:18-04:002017-03-21T20:19:18-04:00SFC George Smith2438082<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>the Career Diplomates are little more than Career Politicians...Response by SFC George Smith made Mar 21 at 2017 8:24 PM2017-03-21T20:24:54-04:002017-03-21T20:24:54-04:00SGT Philip Roncari2438368<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Personally I'd rather seek advice from let's say General Mattis than say John Kerry,but then again I'm not the President,that's my answer and I'm sticking to it ,PS thank God Kerry is gone couldn't stand the man,with any luck at all he won't return to Massachusetts, bad enough I've got to put up with winters in this place not him too!Response by SGT Philip Roncari made Mar 21 at 2017 9:57 PM2017-03-21T21:57:53-04:002017-03-21T21:57:53-04:00SGT Roger Mitchell2438794<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>That can only depend upon the topic and the individual- some generals may be more skilled in certain topics, while some diplomats maybe more versed in other topics. That's why there are councils and agencies of mixed backgrounds when it comes to national security. I think a balanced approach of several backgrounds is wisest and a best practiceResponse by SGT Roger Mitchell made Mar 22 at 2017 2:39 AM2017-03-22T02:39:43-04:002017-03-22T02:39:43-04:00PFC Jonathan Albano2438805<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Both Generals and Diplomats can be valid intelligence resources to draw upon in this situation. A wise leader will seek multiple perspectives and gather as much information as possible before coming to a decision.Response by PFC Jonathan Albano made Mar 22 at 2017 3:00 AM2017-03-22T03:00:42-04:002017-03-22T03:00:42-04:00Cpl Justin Goolsby2439579<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Both... a wise man would not play favorites with those offering guidance. A wise man would listen to the words of all those around him and make the best decision based on the information provided.Response by Cpl Justin Goolsby made Mar 22 at 2017 11:27 AM2017-03-22T11:27:24-04:002017-03-22T11:27:24-04:00COL Private RallyPoint Member2441869<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Great discussion. Thx for such insightful perspective...Response by COL Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 23 at 2017 9:17 AM2017-03-23T09:17:45-04:002017-03-23T09:17:45-04:00LTC Joseph Gross2442746<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Greatly depends on the situation and the advisers available.Response by LTC Joseph Gross made Mar 23 at 2017 2:14 PM2017-03-23T14:14:37-04:002017-03-23T14:14:37-04:00LTC Private RallyPoint Member2444513<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><a class="dark-link bold-link" role="profile-hover" data-qtip-container="body" data-id="804525" data-source-page-controller="question_response_contents" href="/profiles/804525-11a-infantry-officer-63rd-rsc-hq-63rd-rsc">COL Private RallyPoint Member</a> a mixture, not necessarily 50/50 as things change over time and you need to have different views to get a better fuller picture.Response by LTC Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 24 at 2017 1:50 AM2017-03-24T01:50:06-04:002017-03-24T01:50:06-04:002017-03-21T19:02:07-04:00