CSM Michael J. Uhlig 946467 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Situation is it is after sunset.....cars along the sides of the street.....suspect seeking cover.....he is firing at the Law Enforcement Officers.....what could have been done differently? Is there cause for alarm? Do our Law Enforcement Officers need more time on the range? Are these guys operating with expired qualifications? I can already imagine the jokes and memes heading their way! Share your best!<br /><br /><a target="_blank" href="http://uk.complex.com/pop-culture/2015/09/nypd-officers-fire-84-shots-at-suspect-miss-83-times">http://uk.complex.com/pop-culture/2015/09/nypd-officers-fire-84-shots-at-suspect-miss-83-times</a><br /> <div class="pta-link-card answers-template-image type-default"> <div class="pta-link-card-picture"> <img src="https://d26horl2n8pviu.cloudfront.net/link_data_pictures/images/000/021/489/qrc/Screen_Shot_2015-09-06_at_3.34.53_PM_cdj6i7.png?1443053752"> </div> <div class="pta-link-card-content"> <p class="pta-link-card-title"> <a target="blank" href="http://uk.complex.com/pop-culture/2015/09/nypd-officers-fire-84-shots-at-suspect-miss-83-times">Police Fire 84 Shots At Man And Miss 83 Times</a> </p> <p class="pta-link-card-description">The NYPD needs to start training their officers better.</p> </div> <div class="clearfix"></div> </div> Need some time on the range? Police Fire 84 Shots At Man And Miss 83 Times. How can that be? 2015-09-06T21:15:58-04:00 CSM Michael J. Uhlig 946467 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Situation is it is after sunset.....cars along the sides of the street.....suspect seeking cover.....he is firing at the Law Enforcement Officers.....what could have been done differently? Is there cause for alarm? Do our Law Enforcement Officers need more time on the range? Are these guys operating with expired qualifications? I can already imagine the jokes and memes heading their way! Share your best!<br /><br /><a target="_blank" href="http://uk.complex.com/pop-culture/2015/09/nypd-officers-fire-84-shots-at-suspect-miss-83-times">http://uk.complex.com/pop-culture/2015/09/nypd-officers-fire-84-shots-at-suspect-miss-83-times</a><br /> <div class="pta-link-card answers-template-image type-default"> <div class="pta-link-card-picture"> <img src="https://d26horl2n8pviu.cloudfront.net/link_data_pictures/images/000/021/489/qrc/Screen_Shot_2015-09-06_at_3.34.53_PM_cdj6i7.png?1443053752"> </div> <div class="pta-link-card-content"> <p class="pta-link-card-title"> <a target="blank" href="http://uk.complex.com/pop-culture/2015/09/nypd-officers-fire-84-shots-at-suspect-miss-83-times">Police Fire 84 Shots At Man And Miss 83 Times</a> </p> <p class="pta-link-card-description">The NYPD needs to start training their officers better.</p> </div> <div class="clearfix"></div> </div> Need some time on the range? Police Fire 84 Shots At Man And Miss 83 Times. How can that be? 2015-09-06T21:15:58-04:00 2015-09-06T21:15:58-04:00 Sgt Kelli Mays 946481 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Oh my gosh...don't know why but this really cracked me up. Response by Sgt Kelli Mays made Sep 6 at 2015 9:19 PM 2015-09-06T21:19:51-04:00 2015-09-06T21:19:51-04:00 SGM Steve Wettstein 946483 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>You can never have enough trigger time. With that said, everyone needs more time on the range but range time still doesn't prepare you for when someone is shooting back. Response by SGM Steve Wettstein made Sep 6 at 2015 9:20 PM 2015-09-06T21:20:37-04:00 2015-09-06T21:20:37-04:00 SPC(P) Jay Heenan 946541 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>How in the actual f@ck can ANYONE fire 84 shots and miss 83 times? They should all be put on a desk until they get right! That is 83 chances of something REALLY bad happening to some innocent bystander...SMH! Response by SPC(P) Jay Heenan made Sep 6 at 2015 9:41 PM 2015-09-06T21:41:58-04:00 2015-09-06T21:41:58-04:00 SSG Leo Bell 946565 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Did the officer not have on his glasses? Was he hiding and just shooting blindly? Was his sights off? Or is it he just can't shoot? Response by SSG Leo Bell made Sep 6 at 2015 9:49 PM 2015-09-06T21:49:42-04:00 2015-09-06T21:49:42-04:00 CSM Carl Cunningham 946609 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I really do not know where to start with this one. I am sure the 84 shots comes from a multitude of officers, I am thinking six by the video. It isn't the movies so shooting someone with a pistol from a long distance is not as easy as you would think. They just needed to close in on him faster. Response by CSM Carl Cunningham made Sep 6 at 2015 10:05 PM 2015-09-06T22:05:14-04:00 2015-09-06T22:05:14-04:00 SSgt Alex Robinson 946698 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><a class="dark-link bold-link" role="profile-hover" data-qtip-container="body" data-id="181746" data-source-page-controller="question_response_contents" href="/profiles/181746-csm-michael-j-uhlig">CSM Michael J. Uhlig</a> sounds like there needs to be remedial marksmanship training Response by SSgt Alex Robinson made Sep 6 at 2015 10:35 PM 2015-09-06T22:35:29-04:00 2015-09-06T22:35:29-04:00 SSG John Erny 946713 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I am by no means an expert with a pistol but I do own a few. I have found that the time honored M-1911 more accurate and controllable than some of the "modern" light weight side arms. With a 1911 I can get pretty close to where I want the round every time. With my XD single stack 9MM 3.3” barreled sidearm I find myself missing the mark until I put some rounds through it.<br />I saw a show on the Military channel and it was 1911 VS. the 9MM Beretta military issue sidearm. Both weapons were used by retired special operations types. They went through the same course but with standard issue magazines for the weapons, 7 rounds for the 1911 and I think it was 15 for the 9MM. The 1911 got far more 1st time hits and did not run out of rounds. <br />I have known law enforcement officers that flat refused to give up their police issue revolvers for semi-automatic pistols because they felt the revolver to be more accurate than the semi-automatic. This has been a few years back mind you. <br />I have seen hunters take single shot, double barrel, pump and semi-auto shotguns bird hunting. It seems to me that the guys with the semi-autos tend to shoot a lot, miss a lot, scare off the game, and make a lot of noise. Folks with the slower shooting weapons take their time and make each shot count. <br />So what is my point behind this? Just because you have the rounds to expend does not mean that you need to. For those of us old enough to remember the M-16 with the full auto switch know why it was removed and replaced with the three round burst. Most people cannot fire rapidly and maintain a consistent group. Add the stress of a fire fight and a surge of adrenaline in your blood which raises your heart rate and respiration and the problem compounds itself. Someone is going to say it is “suppression fire” so I will beat them to it. So we want to have peace officers using suppression fie in our communities, I for one do not. Response by SSG John Erny made Sep 6 at 2015 10:38 PM 2015-09-06T22:38:19-04:00 2015-09-06T22:38:19-04:00 CSM Charles Hayden 946752 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>SGM Michael J. Ulhig; That sitrep causes me to appreciate living in a metropolitan area where funding is made available for police training. Training to a widely accepted and approved standard is very expensive. Funding for 'carefully selected' and trained citizens to enforce laws of the land is also scarce. Response by CSM Charles Hayden made Sep 6 at 2015 10:47 PM 2015-09-06T22:47:31-04:00 2015-09-06T22:47:31-04:00 MSG Brad Sand 946961 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I think they actually under the number of rounds fired for each person hit on the modern battlefield? I think that it is easy to judge without being there. There are a lot of reasons you can fire a weapon without intending to take a life or even hit a suspect? Response by MSG Brad Sand made Sep 7 at 2015 12:47 AM 2015-09-07T00:47:05-04:00 2015-09-07T00:47:05-04:00 MSgt Michelle Mondia 946974 <div class="images-v2-count-1"><div class="content-picture image-v2-number-1" id="image-58936"> <div class="social_icons social-buttons-on-image"> <a href='https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rallypoint.com%2Fanswers%2Fneed-some-time-on-the-range-police-fire-84-shots-at-man-and-miss-83-times-how-can-that-be%3Futm_source%3DFacebook%26utm_medium%3Dorganic%26utm_campaign%3DShare%20to%20facebook' target="_blank" class='social-share-button facebook-share-button'><i class="fa fa-facebook-f"></i></a> <a href="https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Need+some+time+on+the+range%3F+Police+Fire+84+Shots+At+Man+And+Miss+83+Times.+How+can+that+be%3F&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rallypoint.com%2Fanswers%2Fneed-some-time-on-the-range-police-fire-84-shots-at-man-and-miss-83-times-how-can-that-be&amp;via=RallyPoint" target="_blank" class="social-share-button twitter-custom-share-button"><i class="fa fa-twitter"></i></a> <a href="mailto:?subject=Check this out on RallyPoint!&body=Hi, I thought you would find this interesting:%0D%0ANeed some time on the range? Police Fire 84 Shots At Man And Miss 83 Times. How can that be?%0D%0A %0D%0AHere is the link: https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/need-some-time-on-the-range-police-fire-84-shots-at-man-and-miss-83-times-how-can-that-be" target="_blank" class="social-share-button email-share-button"><i class="fa fa-envelope"></i></a> </div> <a class="fancybox" rel="fa936baeab339f6e4e7370902c97fd98" href="https://d1ndsj6b8hkqu9.cloudfront.net/pictures/images/000/058/936/for_gallery_v2/bcc24b2d.jpg"><img src="https://d1ndsj6b8hkqu9.cloudfront.net/pictures/images/000/058/936/large_v3/bcc24b2d.jpg" alt="Bcc24b2d" /></a></div></div> Response by MSgt Michelle Mondia made Sep 7 at 2015 1:02 AM 2015-09-07T01:02:41-04:00 2015-09-07T01:02:41-04:00 PFC Private RallyPoint Member 947012 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Why? You only have to look as far as Rallypoint and any discussion that involves shooting. The exchange of false information is enough to nauseate anyone who has shot more than 1,000 rounds in a career...and let's be honest, there are plenty of Rallypoint regulars who are quick to argue a shooting technique with someone who shoots more in a year than they did in a career. Bad marksmanship and bad techniques prevail due to a lack of understanding. That once or twice a year qualification range does not make an expert marksman. Hell, people freaked out that the Department of Homeland Security bought several hundred thousand rounds... Response by PFC Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 7 at 2015 1:43 AM 2015-09-07T01:43:58-04:00 2015-09-07T01:43:58-04:00 PO1 William "Chip" Nagel 947021 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Damn. I think these folks need a little more Practice! Response by PO1 William "Chip" Nagel made Sep 7 at 2015 1:51 AM 2015-09-07T01:51:58-04:00 2015-09-07T01:51:58-04:00 Cpl Chris Cargile 947031 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I was a cop for 5 1/2 years and completed a lot of optional firearms training, including FBI Firearms Instructor certification. My dad was ex-military and cop, and I grew up around guns. All that being said, not all cops are "gun guys", many of them only shoot during their 2 range visits a year. Marksmanship is a perishable skill under the best of circumstances, and I can assure you that a stressful police encounter is far from range conditions. And, it sounds like the perp had decent tactics. Shit happens. Response by Cpl Chris Cargile made Sep 7 at 2015 1:59 AM 2015-09-07T01:59:01-04:00 2015-09-07T01:59:01-04:00 SFC Private RallyPoint Member 949035 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>God gave life, God take life! HE was in control that day. I believe in miracles Response by SFC Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 8 at 2015 1:24 AM 2015-09-08T01:24:27-04:00 2015-09-08T01:24:27-04:00 SFC Private RallyPoint Member 949042 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>People are human. Mistakes will be made. Oh well... Did she even pay for the food? I wanna know how the rest of the evening went for "Miss Perfect." Response by SFC Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 8 at 2015 1:30 AM 2015-09-08T01:30:54-04:00 2015-09-08T01:30:54-04:00 2015-09-06T21:15:58-04:00