Is this Undue Command Influence? President Obama's comments about Hillary Clinton's email left 'a foul taste in the FBI's mouth'.

CSM Michael J. Uhlig — Fri, 16 Oct 2015 19:47:29 -0400

What do you think? UCI?

In an interview with "60 Minutes" last Sunday, President Barack Obama said that though it was probably a "mistake" for Hillary Clinton to use a private email server during her time as secretary of state, it “is not a situation in which America’s national security was endangered.”.....

“Injecting politics into what is supposed to be a fact-finding inquiry leaves a foul taste in the F.B.I.’s mouth and makes them fear that no matter what they find, the Justice Department will take the president’s signal and not bring a case,”

Is this her big break?

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/obamas-comments-hillary-clintons-email-143500810.html

Obama's comments about Hillary Clinton's email left 'a foul taste in the FBI's mouth'

The FBI is mad at its president. In an interview with "60 Minutes" last Sunday, President Barack...

Response by LTC Stephen F. made Oct 16 at 2015 3:48 PM

LTC Stephen F. — Fri, 16 Oct 2015 15:48:33 -0400

You have to be a subscriber to the NY Times to see which investigation you are referring to SSgt Alex Robinson. I request you post a description:-)

Response by SFC Michael Hasbun made Oct 16 at 2015 3:49 PM

SFC Michael Hasbun — Fri, 16 Oct 2015 15:49:23 -0400

Nope. Just giving his opinion on a topic that he's asked about over and over and over and over again....

Response by SSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 16 at 2015 6:15 PM

SSgt Private RallyPoint Member — Fri, 16 Oct 2015 18:15:37 -0400

Of course he is and then when people question the politics then he is out of line. In fact, I am so sick of this pandering that America is getting ready to explode. More angry riots and we all need to work together and this president needs to know that is NOT above the laws.

Response by Capt Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 16 at 2015 8:00 PM

Capt Private RallyPoint Member — Fri, 16 Oct 2015 20:00:25 -0400

Politics as usual.
I will say again, if I had in my possession what I saw posted I would be in jail.

Response by SFC Mark Merino made Oct 16 at 2015 8:02 PM

SFC Mark Merino — Fri, 16 Oct 2015 20:02:05 -0400

PLEASE do a thorough investigation and just put the chips on the table. POTUS spoke out of turn. Let the investigation happen independently BEFORE running thy gums.

Response by SSG Michael Hartsfield made Oct 16 at 2015 8:03 PM

SSG Michael Hartsfield — Fri, 16 Oct 2015 20:03:41 -0400

IMHO, this is something that was blown completely out of proportion, as even GEN Colin Powell used a personal email account when he was Secretary of State. I feel this is a case of people looking for evidence to support the facts not looking for facts to support the evidence. UCI? No mainly because the email "controversy" has been centered around Hillary and her "actions."

Response by MSgt Curtis Ellis made Oct 16 at 2015 8:21 PM

MSgt Curtis Ellis — Fri, 16 Oct 2015 20:21:13 -0400

President Barack Obama said that though it was probably a "mistake" for Hillary Clinton to use a private email server during her time as secretary of state, it “is not a situation in which America’s national security was endangered.”.....

Wait, what??? o_O

Response by SSG Warren Swan made Oct 16 at 2015 8:28 PM

SSG Warren Swan — Fri, 16 Oct 2015 20:28:00 -0400

No matter what he says or doesn't say, it's going to be the wrong answer. He cannot win, and had he gave the typical Washington two step answer, he'd have no backbone to some. Whatever the outcome is, lets get it over with and move on. So many more pressing items facing this nation than this.
It's also been mentioned before that this FBI director doesn't play the political games, so why worry over spilled milk?

FBI Director Comey at Center of Clinton Email Storm

FBI director James Comey is at the center of a storm surrounding the Hillary Clinton email scandal, with the bureau now tasked with investigating whether the former secretary of state broke the law by passing classified material over a private email address.

Response by LTC Stephen F. made Oct 16 at 2015 8:33 PM

LTC Stephen F. — Fri, 16 Oct 2015 20:33:54 -0400

CSM Michael J. Uhlig I don't think it is necessarily undue command Influence. I think he is trying to shape the "battlefield."
However, I suspect the President is trying to influence the course of the investigation for two reasons (1) it happened on his watch and (2) Hillary is running for his office.

Response by 1stSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 16 at 2015 9:39 PM

1stSgt Private RallyPoint Member — Fri, 16 Oct 2015 21:39:48 -0400

I can see where they would be upset, but they need to continue and complete the investigation.

Response by SFC Mark Merino made Oct 16 at 2015 10:44 PM

SFC Mark Merino — Fri, 16 Oct 2015 22:44:51 -0400

Nothing like being part of a 15-6 and having the CG say 'Look into this traitor's actions!" Ummmm, yes Sir. Like you don't know he wants you to hammer away. No possible conflict here...lol

Response by CPO Andy Carrillo, MS made Oct 17 at 2015 12:15 AM

CPO Andy Carrillo, MS — Sat, 17 Oct 2015 00:15:02 -0400

An option is for the FBI to arrest and perp-walk Hillery to the nearest jail and formally charge her with whatever crimes the evidence substantiates. At that point the case enters the public domain and available for scrutiny. Until then there's nothing to examine.

Response by Sgt Kelli Mays made Oct 17 at 2015 12:15 AM

Sgt Kelli Mays — Sat, 17 Oct 2015 00:15:43 -0400

Hopefully the FBI will step this investigation up and scrutinize Hillaries actions even more now.

If it is un lawful to have classified documents on any server other than the Governments server....they why isn't Hillary in jail already. THIS BULLCRAP about "oh, gee whiz, golly gee I had no idea I was forwarding classified emails because it wasn't marked property....IS POPPY COCK! ..THE BOTTOM LINE IS Classified emails or rather GOVERNMENT emails are suppose to remain on government servers....it clearly state NO PRIVATE servers....so I don't see how hillary is innocent in the least.

Why bring up all of this other non sense. She got her own personal server, put it in her house and used it for her state department work. SERIOUSLY AND TOTALLY ILLEGAL! !!!

Response by Capt Seid Waddell made Oct 17 at 2015 2:47 AM

Capt Seid Waddell — Sat, 17 Oct 2015 02:47:03 -0400

Par for the course in this lawless administration.

Response by SPC Christopher Perrien made Oct 17 at 2015 3:09 AM

SPC Christopher Perrien — Sat, 17 Oct 2015 03:09:02 -0400

He did the same thing when it came to Trayvon Martin/George Zimmerman , expressing partisanship and surely influencing people against ZImmerman before the trial. For a man who supposively has Constitutional Law as his specialty of a Harvard law degree, He knows nothing and cares less for Constitutional law than would be imaginable to me, if it was not real. He is a fraud and scum. Another example for people who talk of "affirmative action hires" to justify discrimination against African Americans, which he actually is not.

Response by SCPO Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 17 at 2015 11:14 AM

SCPO Private RallyPoint Member — Sat, 17 Oct 2015 11:14:38 -0400

It was undue pressure, but it is so typical of this person. History proves it beyond any shadow of a doubt.

Response by SGM Steve Wettstein made Oct 17 at 2015 11:21 AM

SGM Steve Wettstein — Sat, 17 Oct 2015 11:21:57 -0400

"In an interview with "60 Minutes" last Sunday, President Barack Obama said that though it was probably a "mistake" for Hillary Clinton to use a private email server during her time as secretary of state, it “is not a situation in which America’s national security was endangered.”
How in the hell can he say this? Is he trying to say that in the four years that she was his Sec. State he didn't notice all of the emails she sent him were from her private server?

Response by COL Vincent Stoneking made Oct 17 at 2015 12:05 PM

COL Vincent Stoneking — Sat, 17 Oct 2015 12:05:23 -0400

No, because. Undo Command Influence is a military concept. Neither the President nor Mrs. Clinton is in a relevant chain of military command.

Whether it is APPROPRIATE is a different matter. Likewise, they may or may not be civilian laws or legal principles implicated (tampering with an investigation, etc. ) - I don't know.

Whatever it is, it is not UCI.

Response by SPC(P) Jay Heenan made Oct 17 at 2015 12:19 PM

SPC(P) Jay Heenan — Sat, 17 Oct 2015 12:19:58 -0400

Of course it is, unless I missed something and the head of all of the alphabet agencies are now an elected position. She won't get into any trouble over the email thing, the Benghazi tragedy or any number of the things she has been involved with during her time in politics. Her actions a not much different than the actions of Mr. Snowden and they want to charge him with treason (and I agree that his actions were illegal, but not treasonous). POTUS uses his influence to change the outcome of anything he wants, as long as it fits his political agenda.

Response by MCPO Roger Collins made Oct 17 at 2015 12:26 PM

MCPO Roger Collins — Sat, 17 Oct 2015 12:26:44 -0400

For some reason he is the leader of the "gang that can't shoot straight". The administration overall has created hate and discontent with their ready shoot and aim actions.

Response by MSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 17 at 2015 4:26 PM

MSgt Private RallyPoint Member — Sat, 17 Oct 2015 16:26:03 -0400

Many have faced consequences for the mishandling of secret intel or confidential information. And she needs to be held accountable if she is proven to have violated security measures of information. Transmission security, and physical security must be maintained in order to not allow unauthorized interceptors from accessing any of the confidential information. If having email servers maintained by a mom-and-pop outfit — run out of an old bathroom closet in a downtown Denver loft isn't a problem, then I don't know what is. A Secretary of State should know what is confidential or secret even if it is not classified not the time. For the POTUS to comment “is not a situation in which America’s national security was endangered.” Maybe is a little premature. You really would have to be asinine to think this could not potentially be a national security problem and/or practice.

Response by CSM Charles Hayden made Oct 17 at 2015 4:35 PM

CSM Charles Hayden — Sat, 17 Oct 2015 16:35:24 -0400

CSM Michael J. Uhlig We all know this fellow skews everything he gets a chance to. He is w/o shame or actually accepting responsibility for causing disasterous results!

Response by 1SG Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 17 at 2015 4:41 PM

1SG Private RallyPoint Member — Sat, 17 Oct 2015 16:41:36 -0400

CSM Michael J. Uhlig to me, it appears to be subtle attempt at UCI. I recall not too long ago that the Justice Department was told to not prosecute certain cases. The ends justify the means is the message I receive from POTUS's comments in this interview. And that's a shame since I know we in the military are held to a much higher standard. But as professionals, we will continue to choose the hard right over the easy wrong as we have for generations.

Response by MAJ Ken Landgren made Oct 17 at 2015 5:52 PM

MAJ Ken Landgren — Sat, 17 Oct 2015 17:52:19 -0400

Allow me to illuminate and infuse some logic in the situation. Hilary erased all those emails which indicates she is hiding a wrong she committed. People like her know the protocol of not discussing secret subjects on non secure means. She used poor choice and attempted to covered it up.

Response by SSgt Alex Robinson made Oct 17 at 2015 10:49 PM

SSgt Alex Robinson — Sat, 17 Oct 2015 22:49:37 -0400

I think you are correct.. it is undue influence...

Response by SSG Gene Carroll SR. made Oct 17 at 2015 10:56 PM

SSG Gene Carroll SR. — Sat, 17 Oct 2015 22:56:24 -0400

Didn't see the program. So I can't remark on it. I don't trust anything this man has to say no further then I can spit.

Response by SSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 18 at 2015 4:41 PM

SSgt Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 18 Oct 2015 16:41:07 -0400

The FBI needs to charge him too when they indict Miss Frumpy lying pants. I am sure they could find something if they looked hard enough. When POTUS leans on the US Supreme Court, browbeats people and uses the IRS to his advantage, then Houston really does have a major problem. General Patreaus was convicted and he did far less. Perhaps Hillary the Bilious can her just due and people trying to deflect these problems are complicit.

Response by MAJ Ron Peery made Oct 18 at 2015 8:41 PM

MAJ Ron Peery — Sun, 18 Oct 2015 20:41:46 -0400

I think he may be guilty obstruction of a federal criminal investigation. He has as much as said to the agents investigating this case, "You will find nothing, you will drop this investigation because I have spoken." After all, they work in the executive branch of the government, and he is in charge of that branch. And since he also has the power to pardon, he has essentially told the agents that no matter what they find, he is going to "veto" their work. I have seen a lot of corruption over my years of service, but this guy, Obama, is the worst.

Response by PO3 Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 19 at 2015 7:42 AM

PO3 Private RallyPoint Member — Mon, 19 Oct 2015 07:42:39 -0400

well ... just look at what is DOJ is doing :) that is all you need to know.

Response by MSG Brad Sand made Oct 19 at 2015 12:37 PM

MSG Brad Sand — Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:37:30 -0400

Of course it is. He knows that it is, but also knows the media is trying to make Clinton's criminal negligence a non-story as well. The American people should be outraged, but of course they will not be, because the media will feed them a steady diet of lies and distract them with stories about drug addicts in brothels and how US companies have to actually to business in foreign nations.

Response by CPT Jack Durish made Oct 19 at 2015 2:15 PM

CPT Jack Durish — Mon, 19 Oct 2015 14:15:40 -0400

When has President Obama not spoken out of turn? He has attacked a police officer for doing his duty before the facts were known (remember the incident early in his Administration with the distinguished professor?). He has defended thugs who were shot by police while committing crimes ("...if I had a son this is what he would look like"). He has leaped into contentious issues that resulted in riots and looting (to further an agenda that appears to promote racial divisiveness). It is obvious that he is more interested in promoting a narrative and furthering an ideological agenda than in governing a united people. What's one more incident?

Response by COL Ted Mc made Oct 19 at 2015 2:47 PM

COL Ted Mc — Mon, 19 Oct 2015 14:47:10 -0400

CSM Michael J. Uhlig - Sergeant Major; Not UCI but definitely ill advised.

The wiser course of action would have been something along the lines of "You know that it wouldn't be proper for me to comment - either way - on something which is the subject of an ongoing investigation. No matter what I said, some people would accuse me of attempting to influence the outcome of the investigation." - and leaving it at that.