CPT Kirill *Russian* Varshavskiy 1720783 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Here are my thoughts: <br /><br />Our defense budget in Europe is about to quadruple, heavy NATO forces in Eastern Europe, and the biggest one heavyweight propaganda against America in Russian media, and now the embassador too. It seems Russia wants a fight, but my problem is that they cannot afford it. So the only possible way is nuclear strike. And not just any, but from both coasts with nuclear submarines involved, and a must-have turned off nuclear response. Turning it "off" is a must for this scenario, since otherwise it's a nuclear desert for both sides.<br />I am interested especially in our Air Forces responds, especially comes to mind that ICBM mishap where 1 something million got lost due to technical error of maintenance. Also artic base of Russian forces comes to mind with possible nuclear submarines location. What are your thoughts? Is there going to be a war with Russia? 2016-07-15T17:18:28-04:00 CPT Kirill *Russian* Varshavskiy 1720783 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Here are my thoughts: <br /><br />Our defense budget in Europe is about to quadruple, heavy NATO forces in Eastern Europe, and the biggest one heavyweight propaganda against America in Russian media, and now the embassador too. It seems Russia wants a fight, but my problem is that they cannot afford it. So the only possible way is nuclear strike. And not just any, but from both coasts with nuclear submarines involved, and a must-have turned off nuclear response. Turning it "off" is a must for this scenario, since otherwise it's a nuclear desert for both sides.<br />I am interested especially in our Air Forces responds, especially comes to mind that ICBM mishap where 1 something million got lost due to technical error of maintenance. Also artic base of Russian forces comes to mind with possible nuclear submarines location. What are your thoughts? Is there going to be a war with Russia? 2016-07-15T17:18:28-04:00 2016-07-15T17:18:28-04:00 PO1 William "Chip" Nagel 1720800 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Nope, Just Political Posturing. Measuring Penis Sizes. Response by PO1 William "Chip" Nagel made Jul 15 at 2016 5:26 PM 2016-07-15T17:26:51-04:00 2016-07-15T17:26:51-04:00 SSG Private RallyPoint Member 1720805 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Unlikely, unless one side or the other commits a gross miscalculation. While both the US and Russia struggle for influence and access to resources... both of us benefit from world trade and have more to lose than gain in War. Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 15 at 2016 5:27 PM 2016-07-15T17:27:58-04:00 2016-07-15T17:27:58-04:00 CPT Jack Durish 1720827 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Why? Russia needs a strong US to counter the far more real threat posed by China. And the US has no need to feel threatened by Russia inasmuch as it has no means of projecting force to this hemisphere Response by CPT Jack Durish made Jul 15 at 2016 5:35 PM 2016-07-15T17:35:00-04:00 2016-07-15T17:35:00-04:00 SFC Private RallyPoint Member 1720942 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>DUDE lets hope NOT !!! that would pretty much end us ALL Response by SFC Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 15 at 2016 6:28 PM 2016-07-15T18:28:49-04:00 2016-07-15T18:28:49-04:00 MSgt Private RallyPoint Member 1720996 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><br />After reading your responses to some of the answers, I think you are a little paranoid in the thinking of a nuclear response between our two countries. Granted there is much uneasiness between Russia and the U. S. right now. But neither country benefits from a nuclear war. America has much worse problems to deal with right now then Russia and there little games. Response by MSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 15 at 2016 6:50 PM 2016-07-15T18:50:35-04:00 2016-07-15T18:50:35-04:00 SN Greg Wright 1721065 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I'm not sure what you mean by 'must-have turned off nuclear response'. Are you suggesting that the US would not retaliate if they Russians launched a full-scale strike? That's absurd. We would. At that point, I don't give two shits about the rest of the world. Plus, you're forgetting our own boomers. The Air Force is only half of the US nuclear arsenal. So to answer your question, there might be limited-theater engagements (like, say, Syria), but full-scale war? No. Response by SN Greg Wright made Jul 15 at 2016 7:18 PM 2016-07-15T19:18:54-04:00 2016-07-15T19:18:54-04:00 Capt Daniel Goodman 1721212 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><a target="_blank" href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Expeditionary_Force_Siberia">https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Expeditionary_Force_Siberia</a><br /><br />The whole thing with Russia goes back to at least here...you figure both sides would just simply have gotten bored by now after nearly 100 yrs, you know? <div class="pta-link-card answers-template-image type-default"> <div class="pta-link-card-picture"> <img src="https://d26horl2n8pviu.cloudfront.net/link_data_pictures/images/000/083/463/qrc/300px-American_troops_in_Vladivostok_1918_HD-SN-99-02013.JPEG?1468628427"> </div> <div class="pta-link-card-content"> <p class="pta-link-card-title"> <a target="blank" href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Expeditionary_Force_Siberia">American Expeditionary Force Siberia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia</a> </p> <p class="pta-link-card-description">The American Expeditionary Force Siberia (AEF Siberia) was a United States Army force that was &quot;involved&quot; in the Russian Civil War in Vladivostok, Russian Empire, during the end of World War I after the October Revolution, from 1918 to 1920. However, the American Expeditionary Force were devastated by the Siberian weather and did not fight in any battle before returning. As a result of this expedition, which failed but became known to the...</p> </div> <div class="clearfix"></div> </div> Response by Capt Daniel Goodman made Jul 15 at 2016 8:21 PM 2016-07-15T20:21:39-04:00 2016-07-15T20:21:39-04:00 LTC Private RallyPoint Member 1721321 <div class="images-v2-count-1"><div class="content-picture image-v2-number-1" id="image-98887"> <div class="social_icons social-buttons-on-image"> <a href='https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rallypoint.com%2Fanswers%2Fis-there-going-to-be-a-war-with-russia%3Futm_source%3DFacebook%26utm_medium%3Dorganic%26utm_campaign%3DShare%20to%20facebook' target="_blank" class='social-share-button facebook-share-button'><i class="fa fa-facebook-f"></i></a> <a href="https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Is+there+going+to+be+a+war+with+Russia%3F&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rallypoint.com%2Fanswers%2Fis-there-going-to-be-a-war-with-russia&amp;via=RallyPoint" target="_blank" class="social-share-button twitter-custom-share-button"><i class="fa fa-twitter"></i></a> <a href="mailto:?subject=Check this out on RallyPoint!&body=Hi, I thought you would find this interesting:%0D%0AIs there going to be a war with Russia?%0D%0A %0D%0AHere is the link: https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/is-there-going-to-be-a-war-with-russia" target="_blank" class="social-share-button email-share-button"><i class="fa fa-envelope"></i></a> </div> <a class="fancybox" rel="6fbcd62cf33e5df2c92d3a85e74fe056" href="https://d1ndsj6b8hkqu9.cloudfront.net/pictures/images/000/098/887/for_gallery_v2/b23a7466.jpg"><img src="https://d1ndsj6b8hkqu9.cloudfront.net/pictures/images/000/098/887/large_v3/b23a7466.jpg" alt="B23a7466" /></a></div></div>I see that most of the gas and oil pipelines go to the EU and would Russia want to lose its best and basically only customer? He may gamble on it and he may be a hothead and not care.<br /><br /> Russia may be tempted to grab the Baltics but finally the NATO countries are agreeing to have 2% of its GDP for defense. NATO has been relying on the USA too much. Even Canada is at 0.98% when they promised two years go to up it. It needs to be 2.00% or more.<br /><br />I do think that Russia is bankrupting itself to be the bully in Europe again now that oil is half of what it was $50 a barrel not $100 like it used to. It cant a full blown war but it may bluff, like Germany, to steal lands from its neighbors. That is why the USA and NATO must be ready in case he tests us. Response by LTC Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 15 at 2016 9:13 PM 2016-07-15T21:13:28-04:00 2016-07-15T21:13:28-04:00 LTC Private RallyPoint Member 1721333 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Do you want to hear what a female political punk band thinks in Russia? check out Pussy Riot!<br />They are the thorn in the side of Putin. It is their version of Rage Against the Machine<br /><a target="_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6eziXGirsQ">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6eziXGirsQ</a><br /> <div class="pta-link-card answers-template-image type-youtube"> <div class="pta-link-card-video"> <iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z6eziXGirsQ?wmode=transparent" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> </div> <div class="pta-link-card-content"> <p class="pta-link-card-title"> <a target="blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6eziXGirsQ">New Pussy Riot Video Targets Oil Industry (English Subtitles)</a> </p> <p class="pta-link-card-description">Pussy Riot lambast Putin, Russia&#39;s oil industry in new video New Pussy Riot Video Targets Oil Industry (English Subtitles)</p> </div> <div class="clearfix"></div> </div> Response by LTC Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 15 at 2016 9:26 PM 2016-07-15T21:26:10-04:00 2016-07-15T21:26:10-04:00 SGT Jerrold Pesz 1721343 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>No. Response by SGT Jerrold Pesz made Jul 15 at 2016 9:33 PM 2016-07-15T21:33:35-04:00 2016-07-15T21:33:35-04:00 SGT Private RallyPoint Member 1721368 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>No! Response by SGT Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 15 at 2016 9:47 PM 2016-07-15T21:47:03-04:00 2016-07-15T21:47:03-04:00 SPC Kirk Gilles 1721856 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Nope, because Ronald Reagan and I beat them in the Cold War! Soviets never got Kansas while I was there. 1st ID Ft Riley...<br />Seriously, Putin would like to rebuild the former USSR. Georgian and Ukrainian land grabs were part of that. Putin just cashiered some 80 captains from the navy because he thought they were too soft about the West. Response by SPC Kirk Gilles made Jul 16 at 2016 4:10 AM 2016-07-16T04:10:23-04:00 2016-07-16T04:10:23-04:00 SFC Matthew Mason 1730680 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>If democrats get the whitehouse again then yes, Russia will be a serious threat. Response by SFC Matthew Mason made Jul 19 at 2016 9:33 AM 2016-07-19T09:33:35-04:00 2016-07-19T09:33:35-04:00 CPT Kirill *Russian* Varshavskiy 1733604 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Putin's Finger On The Nuclear Trigger -- U.S. Sees A Scary Reversal In Russian Policy<br /><a target="_blank" href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/donaldkirk/2015/12/11/putins-finger-on-the-nuclear-trigger-u-s-policy-makers-see-a-scary-reversal-in-russian-policy/#52858f332091">http://www.forbes.com/sites/donaldkirk/2015/12/11/putins-finger-on-the-nuclear-trigger-u-s-policy-makers-see-a-scary-reversal-in-russian-policy/#52858f332091</a><br /><br />Russia builds massive Arctic military base<br /><a target="_blank" href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/russia/11944219/Russia-builds-massive-Arctic-military-base.html">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/russia/11944219/Russia-builds-massive-Arctic-military-base.html</a><br /><br />Turkey manipulating Western media by claiming Russian jet violated NATO airspace - Moscow<br /><a target="_blank" href="https://www.rt.com/news/330919-turkey-manipulates-media-russia/">https://www.rt.com/news/330919-turkey-manipulates-media-russia/</a><br /><br />US to quadruple defence budget for Europe<br /><a target="_blank" href="http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-35476180">http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-35476180</a><br /><br />USA needs to militarise Asia instead of Europe. Anything close within Russian border in Europe will justify the war. Asia most likely will support US in case of declared war. Given Putin a reason not to use nukes, since he would have to deal with forces moved to Asia. Which essentially would only give USA time to buy. <div class="pta-link-card answers-template-image type-default"> <div class="pta-link-card-picture"> <img src="https://d26horl2n8pviu.cloudfront.net/link_data_pictures/images/000/084/892/qrc/circle.png?1468990666"> </div> <div class="pta-link-card-content"> <p class="pta-link-card-title"> <a target="blank" href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/donaldkirk/2015/12/11/putins-finger-on-the-nuclear-trigger-u-s-policy-makers-see-a-scary-reversal-in-russian-policy/#52858f332091">Forbes Welcome</a> </p> <p class="pta-link-card-description">Forbes Welcome page -- Forbes is a global media company, focusing on business, investing, technology, entrepreneurship, leadership, and lifestyle.</p> </div> <div class="clearfix"></div> </div> Response by CPT Kirill *Russian* Varshavskiy made Jul 20 at 2016 12:57 AM 2016-07-20T00:57:46-04:00 2016-07-20T00:57:46-04:00 MSG John Duchesneau 3359040 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>We&#39;ve been talking about going to war with Russia since 1945 - 73 years ago. It hasn&#39;t happened and it probably won&#39;t. Response by MSG John Duchesneau made Feb 15 at 2018 10:14 PM 2018-02-15T22:14:00-05:00 2018-02-15T22:14:00-05:00 2016-07-15T17:18:28-04:00