Is the U.S. training too many foreign armies?

2015-12-11T09:59:45-05:00

Just looking for your thoughts on this.

http://foreignpolicy.com/2013/01/28/is-america-training-too-many-foreign-armies/

Is America Training Too Many Foreign Armies?

Events in Mali show why it’s time to take a fresh look at the Pentagon’s military assistance programs.

Response by SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL made Dec 11 at 2015 10:04 AM

2015-12-11T10:04:05-05:00

CPT Private RallyPoint Member I don't think so, in fact not enough for world peace. It will take a world effort to defeat ISIS.

Response by 1SG Private RallyPoint Member made Dec 11 at 2015 10:18 AM

2015-12-11T10:18:32-05:00

I am a big supporter of military to military programs. The combined training events build ties and share useful information, and there are subtle but real effects on the behaviors of both their and our armies. It has an awful lot of bang for the buck.

Response by MAJ Private RallyPoint Member made Dec 11 at 2015 10:32 AM

2015-12-11T10:32:18-05:00

One of the additional primary effects of mil-to-mil training is not just the increased capacity or capability - it is the relationships.

A good example was our ability to establish the airbase in Kharshi Khanabad, Uzbekistan in October 2001 to enable our operations in Afghanistan. One of the largest factors enabling that to take place so quickly was the personal relationships developed in the previous years' M2M engagements.

Response by LTC John Shaw made Dec 11 at 2015 11:27 AM

2015-12-11T11:27:50-05:00

We need to keep these programs and expand with Russia and China, even if exchange program only. Working and training together, building relationships is the only way we avoid misunderstandings.

Response by Capt Walter Miller made Dec 11 at 2015 5:40 PM

2015-12-11T17:40:00-05:00

Inshalla, baby.

No army that thinks its God's will if your weapons fire is even trainable in any real sense.

Walt