Is the U.N. calling the shots? Either formally or informally? https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/is-the-u-n-calling-the-shots-either-formally-or-informally <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>The conspiracy theorist crowd has been speculating "hypothetically speaking" that the United Nations is covertly/secretively taking over U.S. Military leadership - decision making...Do your spidey senses tingle? Wed, 22 Oct 2014 15:07:55 -0400 Is the U.N. calling the shots? Either formally or informally? https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/is-the-u-n-calling-the-shots-either-formally-or-informally <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>The conspiracy theorist crowd has been speculating "hypothetically speaking" that the United Nations is covertly/secretively taking over U.S. Military leadership - decision making...Do your spidey senses tingle? Sgt S.P. Woodke Wed, 22 Oct 2014 15:07:55 -0400 2014-10-22T15:07:55-04:00 Response by 1LT Nick Kidwell made Oct 22 at 2014 4:26 PM https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/is-the-u-n-calling-the-shots-either-formally-or-informally?n=288981&urlhash=288981 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>What evidence do you have for this assertion? <br /><br />I'm neither agreeing nor disagreeing, I just think such a statement should be backed up with more than "Spidey Sense." 1LT Nick Kidwell Wed, 22 Oct 2014 16:26:25 -0400 2014-10-22T16:26:25-04:00 Response by CW5 Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 22 at 2014 5:14 PM https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/is-the-u-n-calling-the-shots-either-formally-or-informally?n=289076&urlhash=289076 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><a class="dark-link bold-link" role="profile-hover" data-qtip-container="body" data-id="220837" data-source-page-controller="question_response_contents" href="/profiles/220837-0211-counterintelligence-humint-specialist">Sgt S.P. Woodke</a>, in a word ... no. I think that&#39;s a pretty far fetched idea. No way. Now, there may be issues with U.S. military members serving on U.N. missions. I did that in 1996. But to suggest that the U.N. is somehow &quot;taking over U.S. military leadership.&quot; Nope, that&#39;s a bridge too far for me. CW5 Private RallyPoint Member Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:14:27 -0400 2014-10-22T17:14:27-04:00 Response by Col Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 22 at 2014 5:19 PM https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/is-the-u-n-calling-the-shots-either-formally-or-informally?n=289087&urlhash=289087 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>The UN can&#39;t even tie their own shoes let alone plan a conspiracy/take over. Col Private RallyPoint Member Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:19:55 -0400 2014-10-22T17:19:55-04:00 Response by MSG Wade Huffman made Oct 23 at 2014 9:29 PM https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/is-the-u-n-calling-the-shots-either-formally-or-informally?n=291306&urlhash=291306 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>OK.. I'll be the first to say that our world leadership role has taken a severe hit as of late, but I can't believe that it's been THAT severe. The UN would cease to exits without the US (but that is an entirely different conversation). MSG Wade Huffman Thu, 23 Oct 2014 21:29:16 -0400 2014-10-23T21:29:16-04:00 Response by MSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 23 at 2014 11:34 PM https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/is-the-u-n-calling-the-shots-either-formally-or-informally?n=291510&urlhash=291510 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>No they are not but there is those who believe it. But I will say POTUS should be listening more to those military leaders. MSgt Private RallyPoint Member Thu, 23 Oct 2014 23:34:06 -0400 2014-10-23T23:34:06-04:00 2014-10-22T15:07:55-04:00