Maj Walt Stachowicz1664052<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>The reporting seniors who wrote the reports are named (all General Officers) but I don't know if they are aware of their quotes being used in campaign literature. Sounds fishy to me.Is it ethical for a retired officer to run for public office, and use comments from his OER as endorsements from the reporting seniors?2016-06-25T20:36:33-04:00Maj Walt Stachowicz1664052<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>The reporting seniors who wrote the reports are named (all General Officers) but I don't know if they are aware of their quotes being used in campaign literature. Sounds fishy to me.Is it ethical for a retired officer to run for public office, and use comments from his OER as endorsements from the reporting seniors?2016-06-25T20:36:33-04:002016-06-25T20:36:33-04:00LTC Private RallyPoint Member1664057<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>What office??? He is retired. I suppose the issues are a better platform to run on, but a little self-promotion isn't too far afield in today's political circus.Response by LTC Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 25 at 2016 8:38 PM2016-06-25T20:38:20-04:002016-06-25T20:38:20-04:00Capt Private RallyPoint Member1664058<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Why would it be unethical?Response by Capt Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 25 at 2016 8:38 PM2016-06-25T20:38:27-04:002016-06-25T20:38:27-04:00CSM Charles Hayden1664102<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><a class="dark-link bold-link" role="profile-hover" data-qtip-container="body" data-id="756274" data-source-page-controller="question_response_contents" href="/profiles/756274-maj-walt-stachowicz">Maj Walt Stachowicz</a> Generalizations or excerpts tastefully done could be OK. Citing his general success in the military would be much more discrete and correct IMO.Response by CSM Charles Hayden made Jun 25 at 2016 9:04 PM2016-06-25T21:04:56-04:002016-06-25T21:04:56-04:00Private RallyPoint Member1664116<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I would think that he would have let them know in advance of the publication. It would be a little like writing a resume recommendation for someone and then finding out that the person is now a sex offender and trolling your name/company without your knowledge.Response by Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 25 at 2016 9:13 PM2016-06-25T21:13:11-04:002016-06-25T21:13:11-04:00PO1 William "Chip" Nagel1664145<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Technically I suspect it is not quite Kosher but Personally I think "Why Not" LOL!Response by PO1 William "Chip" Nagel made Jun 25 at 2016 9:28 PM2016-06-25T21:28:24-04:002016-06-25T21:28:24-04:00SGT Jerrold Pesz1664162<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I don't see a problem as long as the quotes are accurate.Response by SGT Jerrold Pesz made Jun 25 at 2016 9:33 PM2016-06-25T21:33:13-04:002016-06-25T21:33:13-04:00SGT Private RallyPoint Member1664181<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Just goes to prove he is a true politician.Response by SGT Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 25 at 2016 9:39 PM2016-06-25T21:39:16-04:002016-06-25T21:39:16-04:00MSG Private RallyPoint Member1664230<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Sure. It speaks to his/her character and ability. Were an opponent to discover the OER/NCOER with derogatory remarks that opponent might use it against the veteran so ... its use is valid.Response by MSG Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 25 at 2016 9:58 PM2016-06-25T21:58:26-04:002016-06-25T21:58:26-04:00SSG Private RallyPoint Member1664728<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Ethical, sure. However, most civilians will not appreciate the comments in an OER. The fact someone would try to use them may represent their inability to communicate effectively with people of different backgrounds. I would need to see which comments were being used to judge more fairly.Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 26 at 2016 3:31 AM2016-06-26T03:31:36-04:002016-06-26T03:31:36-04:00Maj Walt Stachowicz1667111<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I have written many fitness reports (OERs in Army lingo) over the years. They were for a specific period of time, and related to the specific duties performed. None of them were a perpetual blanket endorsement of what a person may decide to embark upon in the future. To publish selected remarks years afterwards and make them look to be endorsements seems to me to be less than wise. Otherwise, why not include remarks from a 6th grade report card?Response by Maj Walt Stachowicz made Jun 27 at 2016 8:56 AM2016-06-27T08:56:22-04:002016-06-27T08:56:22-04:00Capt Private RallyPoint Member1667138<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>As I read the comments, I get the impression that people think that an performance report is somehow a private communication.Response by Capt Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 27 at 2016 9:12 AM2016-06-27T09:12:44-04:002016-06-27T09:12:44-04:00COL Jon Thompson1668993<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I don't see anything wrong with this. If a well-known General officer wrote something good, I don't see a problem using it with 2 conditions. First, it is an accurate quote from an OER. Second, he is not claiming it was written by a General officer but in fact was written when that officer was a different rank. For example, as a 1LT in California, I received an outstanding OER from my company commander, Captain Mark Milley. It would not be completely truthful to attribute those quotes to the current Army Chief of Staff.Response by COL Jon Thompson made Jun 27 at 2016 9:13 PM2016-06-27T21:13:28-04:002016-06-27T21:13:28-04:00PV2 Glen Lewis2585909<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I don't see why it wouldn't be. Every other facet of their lives is fair game for use for or against him. So why shouldn't it be. I expect it would speak to his credibility and dedication to our country.Response by PV2 Glen Lewis made May 20 at 2017 5:15 PM2017-05-20T17:15:00-04:002017-05-20T17:15:00-04:002016-06-25T20:36:33-04:00