Is a Fitbit or an Apple Watch better for tracking fitness goals and competing with other like-minded individuals? What are the cons for each?

Miranda Opiela — Mon, 14 May 2018 12:20:41 -0400

Which one is better for tracking fitness goals and competing with other like minded individuals? Cons for each?

Response by SGT Nathan G. made May 14 at 2018 12:26 PM

SGT Nathan G. — Mon, 14 May 2018 12:26:22 -0400

I feel that FitBit is a better device due to efficiency and its low-cost compared to Apple. I have a FitBit. However, either device can motivate you to workout and compete against other individuals which can be better for you. Most people, myself included, are more motivated to exercise and push for goals when you are competing. Only cons that I can see is if you are the opposite of motivated when competing it won’t help you or you end up so competitive that you injure yourself by not resting in between workout periods.

Response by PFC Jim Wheeler made May 14 at 2018 1:54 PM

PFC Jim Wheeler — Mon, 14 May 2018 13:54:27 -0400

Neither track HR accurately, so if that is something you want then you should avoid both.

Response by CPT Private RallyPoint Member made May 14 at 2018 10:36 PM

CPT Private RallyPoint Member — Mon, 14 May 2018 22:36:32 -0400

I use only map my run.

Cons? I don't wear a fitbit or an apple watch because I don't want to be chained to technology. The map my run app lets me log my running goals and plan my routes. There is an inner passion or intrinsic motivation that is felt running as a member of a local track club. Most everyone tries to keep up on their own.

As far as competition is concerned, I subscribe to the running in the forest philosophy. When being chased by a bear in the forest I only need to be faster than the next slowest runner!

Response by SSG (ret) William Martin made May 15 at 2018 8:45 AM

SSG (ret) William Martin — Tue, 15 May 2018 08:45:58 -0400

I have a Garmin Fit Vivo 2. It's economic and very simple. I use it to track my steps. The factory battery, a CR1632, lasted for about two years while others must be charged a lot often.

Response by SSG (ret) William Martin made May 16 at 2018 1:03 PM

SSG (ret) William Martin — Wed, 16 May 2018 13:03:14 -0400

Miranda Opiela Guess what? After having my Garmin Vivofit2 for almost 24 months it finally took a crap on me. The batteries are rated at 12 to 18 months and it lasted 22 months. I tried changing the batteries but the gasket between the battering door and the main body got damaged and water leaked in so be careful if you ever changed the batteries. I did purchased a Vivofit 3 though through Amazon. I don't need it to be high tech since I only track steps.