ENS Private RallyPoint Member1886379<div class="images-v2-count-1"><div class="content-picture image-v2-number-1" id="image-109057"> <div class="social_icons social-buttons-on-image">
<a href='https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rallypoint.com%2Fanswers%2Finstead-of-limiting-up-votes-to-75-a-day-what-if-members-only-received-3-for-the-first-75-but-could-continue-to-vote-freely-after-that%3Futm_source%3DFacebook%26utm_medium%3Dorganic%26utm_campaign%3DShare%20to%20facebook'
target="_blank" class='social-share-button facebook-share-button'><i class="fa fa-facebook-f"></i></a>
<a href="https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Instead+of+limiting+up-votes+to+75+a+day%2C+what+if+members+only+received+%2B3+for+the+first+75%2C+but+could+continue+to+vote+%27freely%27+after+that%3F&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rallypoint.com%2Fanswers%2Finstead-of-limiting-up-votes-to-75-a-day-what-if-members-only-received-3-for-the-first-75-but-could-continue-to-vote-freely-after-that&via=RallyPoint"
target="_blank" class="social-share-button twitter-custom-share-button"><i class="fa fa-twitter"></i></a>
<a href="mailto:?subject=Check this out on RallyPoint!&body=Hi, I thought you would find this interesting:%0D%0AInstead of limiting up-votes to 75 a day, what if members only received +3 for the first 75, but could continue to vote 'freely' after that?%0D%0A %0D%0AHere is the link: https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/instead-of-limiting-up-votes-to-75-a-day-what-if-members-only-received-3-for-the-first-75-but-could-continue-to-vote-freely-after-that"
target="_blank" class="social-share-button email-share-button"><i class="fa fa-envelope"></i></a>
</div>
<a class="fancybox" rel="7fd3fbfd9d455ec99459752f3382ef72" href="https://d1ndsj6b8hkqu9.cloudfront.net/pictures/images/000/109/057/for_gallery_v2/384a507a.png"><img src="https://d1ndsj6b8hkqu9.cloudfront.net/pictures/images/000/109/057/large_v3/384a507a.png" alt="384a507a" /></a></div></div>This would allow excellent responses to continue to raise within discussions and reward those with those responses, all the while preventing the "voter" from abusing their influence points by awarding no influence points to the voter for any votes cast after the first 75. I feel this would be a fair and welcomed change to the system. <br />Instead of limiting up-votes to 75 a day, what if members only received +3 for the first 75, but could continue to vote 'freely' after that?2016-09-12T19:58:00-04:00ENS Private RallyPoint Member1886379<div class="images-v2-count-1"><div class="content-picture image-v2-number-1" id="image-109057"> <div class="social_icons social-buttons-on-image">
<a href='https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rallypoint.com%2Fanswers%2Finstead-of-limiting-up-votes-to-75-a-day-what-if-members-only-received-3-for-the-first-75-but-could-continue-to-vote-freely-after-that%3Futm_source%3DFacebook%26utm_medium%3Dorganic%26utm_campaign%3DShare%20to%20facebook'
target="_blank" class='social-share-button facebook-share-button'><i class="fa fa-facebook-f"></i></a>
<a href="https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Instead+of+limiting+up-votes+to+75+a+day%2C+what+if+members+only+received+%2B3+for+the+first+75%2C+but+could+continue+to+vote+%27freely%27+after+that%3F&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rallypoint.com%2Fanswers%2Finstead-of-limiting-up-votes-to-75-a-day-what-if-members-only-received-3-for-the-first-75-but-could-continue-to-vote-freely-after-that&via=RallyPoint"
target="_blank" class="social-share-button twitter-custom-share-button"><i class="fa fa-twitter"></i></a>
<a href="mailto:?subject=Check this out on RallyPoint!&body=Hi, I thought you would find this interesting:%0D%0AInstead of limiting up-votes to 75 a day, what if members only received +3 for the first 75, but could continue to vote 'freely' after that?%0D%0A %0D%0AHere is the link: https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/instead-of-limiting-up-votes-to-75-a-day-what-if-members-only-received-3-for-the-first-75-but-could-continue-to-vote-freely-after-that"
target="_blank" class="social-share-button email-share-button"><i class="fa fa-envelope"></i></a>
</div>
<a class="fancybox" rel="8f25b09eab77ec3cc0a3ff4faa29ab90" href="https://d1ndsj6b8hkqu9.cloudfront.net/pictures/images/000/109/057/for_gallery_v2/384a507a.png"><img src="https://d1ndsj6b8hkqu9.cloudfront.net/pictures/images/000/109/057/large_v3/384a507a.png" alt="384a507a" /></a></div></div>This would allow excellent responses to continue to raise within discussions and reward those with those responses, all the while preventing the "voter" from abusing their influence points by awarding no influence points to the voter for any votes cast after the first 75. I feel this would be a fair and welcomed change to the system. <br />Instead of limiting up-votes to 75 a day, what if members only received +3 for the first 75, but could continue to vote 'freely' after that?2016-09-12T19:58:00-04:002016-09-12T19:58:00-04:00SFC George Smith1886403<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>that would help a lot...Response by SFC George Smith made Sep 12 at 2016 8:06 PM2016-09-12T20:06:52-04:002016-09-12T20:06:52-04:00PO2 Kristy Williams1886428<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I think that's a wonderful idea.Response by PO2 Kristy Williams made Sep 12 at 2016 8:16 PM2016-09-12T20:16:42-04:002016-09-12T20:16:42-04:00SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL1886443<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><a class="dark-link bold-link" role="profile-hover" data-qtip-container="body" data-id="501415" data-source-page-controller="question_response_contents" href="/profiles/501415-182x-information-professional-nctams-pac-netwarcom">ENS Private RallyPoint Member</a> thanks for the well conceived response, great points of interest. I am all aboard.Response by SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL made Sep 12 at 2016 8:20 PM2016-09-12T20:20:56-04:002016-09-12T20:20:56-04:00SFC Christopher Perry1886473<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>A great idea, and an up vote to go with it.Response by SFC Christopher Perry made Sep 12 at 2016 8:28 PM2016-09-12T20:28:33-04:002016-09-12T20:28:33-04:00SFC Mark Merino1886780<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I'm still hoping they change their mind about allowing the drive-by down voters. Maybe a breathalyzer attachment to the USB port?.....lolResponse by SFC Mark Merino made Sep 12 at 2016 9:36 PM2016-09-12T21:36:02-04:002016-09-12T21:36:02-04:00SN Greg Wright1887114<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Awesome idea. One that I think <a class="dark-link bold-link" role="profile-hover" data-qtip-container="body" data-id="138758" data-source-page-controller="question_response_contents" href="/profiles/138758-col-mikel-j-burroughs">COL Mikel J. Burroughs</a> would get behind pretty quickly lol.Response by SN Greg Wright made Sep 12 at 2016 11:28 PM2016-09-12T23:28:10-04:002016-09-12T23:28:10-04:00COL Mikel J. Burroughs1888903<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Super idea <a class="dark-link bold-link" role="profile-hover" data-qtip-container="body" data-id="501415" data-source-page-controller="question_response_contents" href="/profiles/501415-182x-information-professional-nctams-pac-netwarcom">ENS Private RallyPoint Member</a>Response by COL Mikel J. Burroughs made Sep 13 at 2016 2:38 PM2016-09-13T14:38:13-04:002016-09-13T14:38:13-04:00CSM Richard StCyr1888925<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Who's in this for points, just like to see what's going on and share info.Response by CSM Richard StCyr made Sep 13 at 2016 2:46 PM2016-09-13T14:46:20-04:002016-09-13T14:46:20-04:00SrA Chris "Shadow" McGee1889017<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Definitely a good idea. I have always seen more great posts to vote up after I run out of votes, not that I do all the time, but when I do there is always another post that deserves a vote up.Response by SrA Chris "Shadow" McGee made Sep 13 at 2016 3:17 PM2016-09-13T15:17:15-04:002016-09-13T15:17:15-04:002016-09-12T19:58:00-04:00