ENS Private RallyPoint Member 1886379 <div class="images-v2-count-1"><div class="content-picture image-v2-number-1" id="image-109057"> <div class="social_icons social-buttons-on-image"> <a href='https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rallypoint.com%2Fanswers%2Finstead-of-limiting-up-votes-to-75-a-day-what-if-members-only-received-3-for-the-first-75-but-could-continue-to-vote-freely-after-that%3Futm_source%3DFacebook%26utm_medium%3Dorganic%26utm_campaign%3DShare%20to%20facebook' target="_blank" class='social-share-button facebook-share-button'><i class="fa fa-facebook-f"></i></a> <a href="https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Instead+of+limiting+up-votes+to+75+a+day%2C+what+if+members+only+received+%2B3+for+the+first+75%2C+but+could+continue+to+vote+%27freely%27+after+that%3F&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rallypoint.com%2Fanswers%2Finstead-of-limiting-up-votes-to-75-a-day-what-if-members-only-received-3-for-the-first-75-but-could-continue-to-vote-freely-after-that&amp;via=RallyPoint" target="_blank" class="social-share-button twitter-custom-share-button"><i class="fa fa-twitter"></i></a> <a href="mailto:?subject=Check this out on RallyPoint!&body=Hi, I thought you would find this interesting:%0D%0AInstead of limiting up-votes to 75 a day, what if members only received +3 for the first 75, but could continue to vote &#39;freely&#39; after that?%0D%0A %0D%0AHere is the link: https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/instead-of-limiting-up-votes-to-75-a-day-what-if-members-only-received-3-for-the-first-75-but-could-continue-to-vote-freely-after-that" target="_blank" class="social-share-button email-share-button"><i class="fa fa-envelope"></i></a> </div> <a class="fancybox" rel="7fd3fbfd9d455ec99459752f3382ef72" href="https://d1ndsj6b8hkqu9.cloudfront.net/pictures/images/000/109/057/for_gallery_v2/384a507a.png"><img src="https://d1ndsj6b8hkqu9.cloudfront.net/pictures/images/000/109/057/large_v3/384a507a.png" alt="384a507a" /></a></div></div>This would allow excellent responses to continue to raise within discussions and reward those with those responses, all the while preventing the &quot;voter&quot; from abusing their influence points by awarding no influence points to the voter for any votes cast after the first 75. I feel this would be a fair and welcomed change to the system. <br /> Instead of limiting up-votes to 75 a day, what if members only received +3 for the first 75, but could continue to vote 'freely' after that? 2016-09-12T19:58:00-04:00 ENS Private RallyPoint Member 1886379 <div class="images-v2-count-1"><div class="content-picture image-v2-number-1" id="image-109057"> <div class="social_icons social-buttons-on-image"> <a href='https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rallypoint.com%2Fanswers%2Finstead-of-limiting-up-votes-to-75-a-day-what-if-members-only-received-3-for-the-first-75-but-could-continue-to-vote-freely-after-that%3Futm_source%3DFacebook%26utm_medium%3Dorganic%26utm_campaign%3DShare%20to%20facebook' target="_blank" class='social-share-button facebook-share-button'><i class="fa fa-facebook-f"></i></a> <a href="https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Instead+of+limiting+up-votes+to+75+a+day%2C+what+if+members+only+received+%2B3+for+the+first+75%2C+but+could+continue+to+vote+%27freely%27+after+that%3F&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rallypoint.com%2Fanswers%2Finstead-of-limiting-up-votes-to-75-a-day-what-if-members-only-received-3-for-the-first-75-but-could-continue-to-vote-freely-after-that&amp;via=RallyPoint" target="_blank" class="social-share-button twitter-custom-share-button"><i class="fa fa-twitter"></i></a> <a href="mailto:?subject=Check this out on RallyPoint!&body=Hi, I thought you would find this interesting:%0D%0AInstead of limiting up-votes to 75 a day, what if members only received +3 for the first 75, but could continue to vote &#39;freely&#39; after that?%0D%0A %0D%0AHere is the link: https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/instead-of-limiting-up-votes-to-75-a-day-what-if-members-only-received-3-for-the-first-75-but-could-continue-to-vote-freely-after-that" target="_blank" class="social-share-button email-share-button"><i class="fa fa-envelope"></i></a> </div> <a class="fancybox" rel="8f25b09eab77ec3cc0a3ff4faa29ab90" href="https://d1ndsj6b8hkqu9.cloudfront.net/pictures/images/000/109/057/for_gallery_v2/384a507a.png"><img src="https://d1ndsj6b8hkqu9.cloudfront.net/pictures/images/000/109/057/large_v3/384a507a.png" alt="384a507a" /></a></div></div>This would allow excellent responses to continue to raise within discussions and reward those with those responses, all the while preventing the &quot;voter&quot; from abusing their influence points by awarding no influence points to the voter for any votes cast after the first 75. I feel this would be a fair and welcomed change to the system. <br /> Instead of limiting up-votes to 75 a day, what if members only received +3 for the first 75, but could continue to vote 'freely' after that? 2016-09-12T19:58:00-04:00 2016-09-12T19:58:00-04:00 SFC George Smith 1886403 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>that would help a lot... Response by SFC George Smith made Sep 12 at 2016 8:06 PM 2016-09-12T20:06:52-04:00 2016-09-12T20:06:52-04:00 PO2 Kristy Williams 1886428 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I think that&#39;s a wonderful idea. Response by PO2 Kristy Williams made Sep 12 at 2016 8:16 PM 2016-09-12T20:16:42-04:00 2016-09-12T20:16:42-04:00 SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL 1886443 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><a class="dark-link bold-link" role="profile-hover" data-qtip-container="body" data-id="501415" data-source-page-controller="question_response_contents" href="/profiles/501415-182x-information-professional-nctams-pac-netwarcom">ENS Private RallyPoint Member</a> thanks for the well conceived response, great points of interest. I am all aboard. Response by SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL made Sep 12 at 2016 8:20 PM 2016-09-12T20:20:56-04:00 2016-09-12T20:20:56-04:00 SFC Christopher Perry 1886473 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>A great idea, and an up vote to go with it. Response by SFC Christopher Perry made Sep 12 at 2016 8:28 PM 2016-09-12T20:28:33-04:00 2016-09-12T20:28:33-04:00 SFC Mark Merino 1886780 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I&#39;m still hoping they change their mind about allowing the drive-by down voters. Maybe a breathalyzer attachment to the USB port?.....lol Response by SFC Mark Merino made Sep 12 at 2016 9:36 PM 2016-09-12T21:36:02-04:00 2016-09-12T21:36:02-04:00 SN Greg Wright 1887114 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Awesome idea. One that I think <a class="dark-link bold-link" role="profile-hover" data-qtip-container="body" data-id="138758" data-source-page-controller="question_response_contents" href="/profiles/138758-col-mikel-j-burroughs">COL Mikel J. Burroughs</a> would get behind pretty quickly lol. Response by SN Greg Wright made Sep 12 at 2016 11:28 PM 2016-09-12T23:28:10-04:00 2016-09-12T23:28:10-04:00 COL Mikel J. Burroughs 1888903 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Super idea <a class="dark-link bold-link" role="profile-hover" data-qtip-container="body" data-id="501415" data-source-page-controller="question_response_contents" href="/profiles/501415-182x-information-professional-nctams-pac-netwarcom">ENS Private RallyPoint Member</a> Response by COL Mikel J. Burroughs made Sep 13 at 2016 2:38 PM 2016-09-13T14:38:13-04:00 2016-09-13T14:38:13-04:00 CSM Richard StCyr 1888925 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Who&#39;s in this for points, just like to see what&#39;s going on and share info. Response by CSM Richard StCyr made Sep 13 at 2016 2:46 PM 2016-09-13T14:46:20-04:00 2016-09-13T14:46:20-04:00 SrA Chris "Shadow" McGee 1889017 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Definitely a good idea. I have always seen more great posts to vote up after I run out of votes, not that I do all the time, but when I do there is always another post that deserves a vote up. Response by SrA Chris "Shadow" McGee made Sep 13 at 2016 3:17 PM 2016-09-13T15:17:15-04:00 2016-09-13T15:17:15-04:00 2016-09-12T19:58:00-04:00