SPC Patrick O'Brien 7270865 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div> If a officer promises a foreign adversary information on military movements is that treason or sedition or is it something else? 2021-09-15T10:46:33-04:00 SPC Patrick O'Brien 7270865 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div> If a officer promises a foreign adversary information on military movements is that treason or sedition or is it something else? 2021-09-15T10:46:33-04:00 2021-09-15T10:46:33-04:00 SFC Casey O'Mally 7270928 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>It is *most likely* espionage. Espionage, when directed against one&#39;s own nation, has generally been defined as a treasonous act.<br /><br />The only reason I caveat as *most likely* is because at this point it is an &quot;offer&quot; not an exchange. It is possible (although unlikely) that this offer was made as some sort of counter-espionage or sting operation. I am very reluctant to immediately state black or white when there is a POSSIBILITY of grey. Response by SFC Casey O'Mally made Sep 15 at 2021 11:04 AM 2021-09-15T11:04:31-04:00 2021-09-15T11:04:31-04:00 PFC David Foster 7271064 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>He could be making promises that he has no intention of keeping to get information out of them.... it&#39;s nothing until he actually gives up information. Response by PFC David Foster made Sep 15 at 2021 11:45 AM 2021-09-15T11:45:30-04:00 2021-09-15T11:45:30-04:00 Sgt Jude Eschete 7271267 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I know what you&#39;re referring to, but no information was given. It is not illegal to tell someone they would not follow unlawful orders. Personally, after the January 6th Insurrection, I can&#39;t see how any servicemember can think that what was done on that day was okay in any right. I applaud Gen. Miley for putting democracy first. <br /><br />The thought that a lame-duck president can make impromptu military decisions kind of baffles me. What&#39;s to stop any future president from burning everything down on the way out? Personally, I think wartime powers need to be heavily returned back to congress, and only emergency powers allowed to the president to deploy immediate forces (the whole purpose of the USMC) to critical situations. Anything else for the long term needs to be a decision by congress. Response by Sgt Jude Eschete made Sep 15 at 2021 12:40 PM 2021-09-15T12:40:40-04:00 2021-09-15T12:40:40-04:00 SFC Kelly Fuerhoff 7271444 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Ooh a vague post that we know who it&#39;s attempted to be about but sure let&#39;s have another post to go with the 50 other...smh. Response by SFC Kelly Fuerhoff made Sep 15 at 2021 1:22 PM 2021-09-15T13:22:20-04:00 2021-09-15T13:22:20-04:00 CWO3 Private RallyPoint Member 7271652 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>It&#39;s being proactive to preserve humanity under a questionably impaired and potentially dangerous CINC. 1/6/21 is germane, and statements by those in the NCA. No declared war = no treason is the bottom line. Response by CWO3 Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 15 at 2021 2:32 PM 2021-09-15T14:32:35-04:00 2021-09-15T14:32:35-04:00 MSG Private RallyPoint Member 7273775 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Gee...for whom could you be referring to? I wonder..... Response by MSG Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 16 at 2021 9:20 AM 2021-09-16T09:20:08-04:00 2021-09-16T09:20:08-04:00 SFC Michael Hasbun 7282161 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>If a former grunt who couldn&#39;t make it past E4 can&#39;t tell the difference between an adversary or a competitor, is that autism or something else? Response by SFC Michael Hasbun made Sep 19 at 2021 3:15 PM 2021-09-19T15:15:26-04:00 2021-09-19T15:15:26-04:00 2021-09-15T10:46:33-04:00