https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/i-have-read-the-army-times-for-19-years-all-i-see-on-the-cover-now-is-negative-does-anyone-else-think-so <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div> Wed, 26 Mar 2014 07:08:19 -0400 https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/i-have-read-the-army-times-for-19-years-all-i-see-on-the-cover-now-is-negative-does-anyone-else-think-so <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div> SFC Private RallyPoint Member Wed, 26 Mar 2014 07:08:19 -0400 2014-03-26T07:08:19-04:00 https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/i-have-read-the-army-times-for-19-years-all-i-see-on-the-cover-now-is-negative-does-anyone-else-think-so?n=87988&urlhash=87988 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I agree 100%.  We are trying to improve the Army image and they aren't helping. LTC Private RallyPoint Member Sat, 29 Mar 2014 05:35:11 -0400 2014-03-29T05:35:11-04:00 https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/i-have-read-the-army-times-for-19-years-all-i-see-on-the-cover-now-is-negative-does-anyone-else-think-so?n=133413&urlhash=133413 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>When I was in Korea in the mid-90s, the Stars and Stripes was often referred to as the Stars and Gripes. The Army Times became the Army Gripes by much the same generic characterization when Gannett acquired the publication rights in the late 90's. I had a subscription for a very long time but I allowed it to lapse for the very reason proposed in your question here, SFC Ballard.<br /><br />JDH LTC Jonathan Howell, CSEP, PMP Fri, 23 May 2014 12:23:02 -0400 2014-05-23T12:23:02-04:00 2014-03-26T07:08:19-04:00