I am supposed to start my terminal leave on the 7th of July, but I failed my last PT test. What discharge will I get, and can I still leave?

I'm betting he is still in his MSO. Gotta go either Guard/Reserve as a TPU or he goes IRR. Either way, you're correct SGM, that Flag is on Page 1 of his 201...

Edited to add ~~
But as I read through this Thread, he said that his Unit has already submitted the Chapter paperwork. His ETS is coming up. He's failed two consecutive APFT's. Correctly or incorrectly thinks he's been given a Permanent Profile. That takes a full blown MEB to be official. If it IS official then an Alternate APFT event would have been identified. If it wasn't an MEB then it would simply be a T3 from his Doc.

Something is not right in this story. Something is VERY not right.

MSG Pat Colby - HOLY CRAP MSG you have some time in. I still call it a 201. It's SRB now I think. lol

SGT Jonathon Caldwell - think what were missing is the purpose of a bar. Rehabilitative tool. If you can't rehabilitate because a soldier is etsing... because he wouldn't have time to get to the first 90 day review your not baring him to be rehabilitative your barring him to prevent re-entry.

SSG Randall P. - correct. The bar would be placed to hinder re-entry. Thus changing the RE code causing the person to have to get a waiver if ever trying to enlist again due to possibly being unfit. But my original answer to the original question was just to assure him that there will be no adverse effect on his discharge status due to a failed PT test.

SGT Jonathon Caldwell - now this is my opinion so take it for what it is. If it's a REHABILITATIVE tool according to 601-280 chapter 8. Then if you are barring a soldier to prevent re entry then you are attempting to punish the soldier and you should go with a chapter instead.
But that's opinion.

SSG Randall P. - I totally agree. It should be used as a means to rehabilitative "put a boot in an ass" to fix an issue causing an unacceptable behavior or act if you want to be a soldier. Since he is so close to ETS, my opinion is the COC would probably just let it ride. Possibly have another PT test as a formality and let the SM separate. Especially if the SM's separation counseling states no further want to be in the Army. However if used in this case my opinion would be rather than punishment it would rather be the commanders discretion of keeping someone unfit for service out or if it was a short timer fluke and the rest of their service was stellar and SM was in good character throughout then let them ETS.

Wow. There's a phrase I have heard in a while. "They can't stop the clock!"

Also "They can kill you but they can't eat you."

Well, the clock CAN stop...but only in a STOP LOSS situation like a unit deployment during war. But in this case, I agree with the above posts. The most they can do, if they want to, is a bar to re-enlistment. But as a Sr. NCO, I wouldn't have recommended it for one of my departing Soldiers unless they had had a habitual problem. Why taint their record from possibly either going USAR or coming back during a time of a later national crisis.

SFC Michael Deffendall - TOUCHE! Stop Loss can indeed stop the clock.

Fortunately, my DD214 renders me immune from such douchbaggery as time manipulation!