How do you feel about the Army's new Handgun, the Sig Sauar P320?

2017-01-20T09:08:32-05:00

The Army's new handgun is the Sig Sauar P320. Are you excited about this?

Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Jan 20 at 2017 9:13 AM

2017-01-20T09:13:52-05:00

I love Sigs. I can't wait until they start fielding them! Times like this is when it sucks to be in the National Guard because we probably won't see these until 2080 or so...

Response by SPC(P) Private RallyPoint Member made Jan 20 at 2017 9:17 AM

2017-01-20T09:17:47-05:00

I'm in favor of this, it sounds like the Army wanted to switch to a round with more of an impact which for the P320 could be the 357Sig or the 40GSW. My dad owns a P320 in 357Sig which is fun to shoot but the rounds are expensive and difficult to find at times, maybe if the army switches calibers it will increase how available that caliber is.

Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Jan 20 at 2017 9:30 AM

2017-01-20T09:30:10-05:00

I think that this is a good weapon however I still don't think we should spend money on a new pistol right now.

Response by MSG Private RallyPoint Member made Jan 20 at 2017 9:35 AM

2017-01-20T09:35:22-05:00

I'm excited to fire this one as I've never had the opportunity to do so. I just know I'm not a fan of the M9

Response by COL Private RallyPoint Member made Jan 20 at 2017 9:47 AM

2017-01-20T09:47:43-05:00

SSG(P) Private RallyPoint Member - I'm excited about it! I came in during the transition phase from the M1911 to the M9 and was trained on both. Prefered the M9 - seemed easier for me to fire accurately and I liked the larger magazine capacity. That being said, Sig Sauer makes great products. I just wonder how long it will take to get fielded...

Response by MSgt George Cater made Jan 20 at 2017 11:23 AM

2017-01-20T11:23:08-05:00

Love it! Own a P320 Compact. Carry it every day. 18 rds. Smooth crisp trigger. Accurate.

Response by LTC Private RallyPoint Member made Jan 20 at 2017 11:46 AM

2017-01-20T11:46:28-05:00

I've always like Sigs, never owned one but have fired one or two, found them reliable and accurate.

Response by SFC Pete Kain made Jan 20 at 2017 11:53 AM

2017-01-20T11:53:59-05:00

Crap, it's not a .45. WTH?

Response by SGT Private RallyPoint Member made Jan 20 at 2017 12:07 PM

2017-01-20T12:07:26-05:00

I wonder if they will try to use 357 sig as the standard ammo or stick with .40 since other government branches also use .40. But overall I am pleased with the decision, if only they would accept another manufacturer's M4 style rifle in place of the colt.

I do wish they would have gone with a G17 (yes I know no external safety but I have never had any sort of reliability issue with mine) or the HK45 (polygonal barrel is superb, better recoil balancing for follow up shots)

Response by SGT David A. 'Cowboy' Groth made Jan 20 at 2017 12:44 PM

2017-01-20T12:44:06-05:00

Will they fit in the same holster they use for the Berreta, or are they going with a newer holster.

Response by Maj John Bell made Jan 20 at 2017 2:17 PM

2017-01-20T14:17:54-05:00

In US military history from WWI forward, do you believe the effectiveness of a pistol as a producer of casualties is as important as its value as a field expedient paper weight in the field?

Response by SSG Brian Lovins made Jan 20 at 2017 7:23 PM

2017-01-20T19:23:23-05:00

I am no longer in but before going to get my concealed handgun license I wanted a new pistol, the SIG320C is what I chose, this is by far my favorite handgun.

Response by COL Charles Williams made Jan 21 at 2017 12:35 AM

2017-01-21T00:35:00-05:00

looks cool

Response by MSgt Steven Holt, NRP, CCEMT-P made Jan 21 at 2017 12:24 PM

2017-01-21T12:24:35-05:00

I don't have any first hand experience with a Sig Sauer product; never had the opportunity mostly. Of the people I know who personally own a Sig product, to a person they all universally have great things to say about the weapon.

I'm just not a big fan of the 9mm round no matter what weapon it's fired from. I prefer something with a little more "umph" behind it such as the .40 or .45cal round. Kind of ironic considering my daily carry piece is a PK380.

Response by SSG(P) Private RallyPoint Member made Jan 24 at 2017 9:28 AM

2017-01-24T09:28:38-05:00

I didn't know a whole lot about this pistol, so I did some research. It seems that the caliber can be changed simply by changing the upper portion. From here and other websites, the Sig P320 seems to be very popular. So I did some pricing at local gun stores near me. These are retailing for $516 for the regular black finish, and $587 for the FDE finish or OD Green handgrip and lower assembly. I own a Springfield XD40 now, but I might see about buying one of these P320s. The accessory market should be exploding very shortly, as it is very easy to find Beretta 92F accessories everywhere, but XD40 accessories are a bit more difficult to find.

Response by SPC Miles Blackman made Jan 24 at 2017 9:47 AM

2017-01-24T09:47:02-05:00

The 1911 served this nation for over 70yrs, and the Army is replacing the M-9 after what about 25yrs. Maybe we should go back to the 1911, if it's not broke don't fix it.

Response by SFC Private RallyPoint Member made Jan 24 at 2017 11:44 AM

2017-01-24T11:44:09-05:00

SSG(P) Private RallyPoint Member as an enlisted Soldier, it's pretty much irrelevant since I will probably never get to fire one

Response by LTC Martin Metz made Jan 24 at 2017 2:06 PM

2017-01-24T14:06:19-05:00

I bought a P320 about a year ago before the hoopla. It's a good and accurate piece. The Army chose wisely.

Response by SSG Jacey R. made Jan 24 at 2017 2:13 PM

2017-01-24T14:13:10-05:00

I have a P229 in .40 S&W and a P250c in 9 mm, I love them both. I have been a big fan of Sig for many years. I have been looking to purchase a P320 soon, still trying to decide on 9 mm or the .40 S&W.

Response by SGT Michael Cardin made Jan 25 at 2017 12:20 AM

2017-01-25T00:20:11-05:00

I think that the Sig Sauer is hands down a much better handgun than the Beretta M9 will ever be, no matter how long the civilian 92F is produced.

Response by LTC Erik Spike Thiesmeyer, Sr. made Jan 25 at 2017 1:06 AM

2017-01-25T01:06:32-05:00

I think it's awesome. I've owned several Sigs over the years and they are outstanding! I'm sure this one will be tricked out to perfection. Of course, I want one! Much better choice than the Baretta. The Sig P229 would have been a great choice 20 years ago.

Response by MAJ Hugh Blanchard made Jan 25 at 2017 9:35 PM

2017-01-25T21:35:25-05:00

I don't know enough about the Sig Sauer P320. If this is a .40 or .45, then I would probably approve it. If it's a 9 mm or .38, I'd probably be unhappy. Any pistol with a caliber that doesn't begin with the number "4" or greater is under-powered.
I know the SEAL's use a Sig, but it's surely a higher caliber than a .38 or 9 mm (which is a short .380).
I love .45 Long Colt and .45 ACP. Whenever I've used that round, anything struck with .45 caliber stays down on the ground and dies.

Response by SP5 Gene Nevill made Aug 7 at 2019 10:18 AM

2019-08-07T10:18:13-04:00

I like the P320 as a whole. Since it is a multi platform. The 9mm is not what I would like, but the prevalence of the round makes the basic choice understandable. T have a Sig 40 cal and I like it better. The P320 is a well made handgun by a reputable company.