SSgt Paul Esquibel1062855<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Previously the standard was using your heart rate to determine your walk then it was changed to a pass or fail. To me having been injured before and taken the previously and current standard of test liked the old standard because to me it proved if you were in fact doing what you could do per your profile and to some effect progressing to get better and back to doing the run.How did you feel when the AF changed the standard of the walk test?2015-10-24T11:14:42-04:00SSgt Paul Esquibel1062855<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Previously the standard was using your heart rate to determine your walk then it was changed to a pass or fail. To me having been injured before and taken the previously and current standard of test liked the old standard because to me it proved if you were in fact doing what you could do per your profile and to some effect progressing to get better and back to doing the run.How did you feel when the AF changed the standard of the walk test?2015-10-24T11:14:42-04:002015-10-24T11:14:42-04:00SSgt Alex Robinson1062878<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I think there are better ways to determine physical fitnessResponse by SSgt Alex Robinson made Oct 24 at 2015 11:28 AM2015-10-24T11:28:51-04:002015-10-24T11:28:51-04:00MSgt Matthew Meindl1063184<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Having done the ergo bike test, have never agreed with anything that is based on heart rate. Have a minimum standard and have people either pass or fail. Never agreed with a walk option, if "injured", reflect that person was not able to perform fitness test for that time period. Have seen to many people who did not maintain proper fitness and used the walk to get around the system. Heart rate differs between people (many things that can affect it). An increased heart rate at low exertion can actually reflect poor fitness.Response by MSgt Matthew Meindl made Oct 24 at 2015 1:54 PM2015-10-24T13:54:02-04:002015-10-24T13:54:02-04:00MSgt John Carroll1063420<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I haven't done the new walk test but I did do the old one once. It was after a surgery and I wasn't cleared to run, only walk. That test sucked. A mile and a half run was easy, that walk was no joke. I passed but my shins were on fire.Response by MSgt John Carroll made Oct 24 at 2015 4:01 PM2015-10-24T16:01:24-04:002015-10-24T16:01:24-04:00MSG Private RallyPoint Member1063577<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>What is your walk distance/time requirement? Because, for me in the Army, I have a perm profile to do the 2.5 mile walk and I have a max time of 36 minutes to complete it. I usually get it done between 33:10 and 34:50. And let me tell you, I am SMOKED after that walk. Winded. Heart rate high. Shins on fire.Response by MSG Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 24 at 2015 5:29 PM2015-10-24T17:29:55-04:002015-10-24T17:29:55-04:00TSgt Private RallyPoint Member1064586<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I think the major flaw with the prev walk test was that there was no time limit. I witnessed individuals literally strolling for the entire test and passing because the formula worked out for them. I tended to do it the other way go as hard as I could for the 1 mile usually 11:30-12:00 and finish with a HR 170-190 and passed every time. I think it was that inconsistency that drove the changes. Though I do wish it was more than a pass fail, because if you pass you are scored as exempt which doesn't look good on paper for those of us with chronic issues.Response by TSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 25 at 2015 10:18 AM2015-10-25T10:18:39-04:002015-10-25T10:18:39-04:00SrA Matthew Knight1066078<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I never took the past version of the walk test so I can't speak on it's behalf but I know that the current one sucks. I was on profile due to foot/ankle issues during my last PT test and had to do the walk, I honestly think it made the pain I had worse. That and having never done it before I had no idea how to pace it so although I thought I had a good start I was actually starting slow. Damn near had to walk/jog the last lap to make the end in time. That test is horrible, particularly for the lower legs.Response by SrA Matthew Knight made Oct 26 at 2015 1:57 AM2015-10-26T01:57:28-04:002015-10-26T01:57:28-04:00TSgt Joshua Copeland1066349<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>The old (well the most recent old) walk test didn't factor in starting heart rate which caused some folks for auto fail. Now the OLD walk test was a BEAST. 3 miles in under 40 mins.Response by TSgt Joshua Copeland made Oct 26 at 2015 9:12 AM2015-10-26T09:12:28-04:002015-10-26T09:12:28-04:00MSgt Devon Saunders1078792<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Here's what I don't like. The fitness test consist of 4 components. Cardio (run or walk), push-ups, sit-ups, and BMI. If you meet your required time on the run, it goes in AFFMS as a pass. If you meet the required time on the walk, it goes in AFFMS as exempt, but don't meet the time? Fail shows. How are you exempt if you performed 1 of 2 cardio's? Secondly, I feel the AF punishes members who have a medical condition that prevents them from running by making them test every 6 months even though they scored over a 90 doing the walk test. The walk test is by no means a "walk in the park." Last point. They did away with the heart rate, fine. Then added a lap. Funny. And before anyone asks. Yes, I take the walk test and pass it with no problem. Just like runners have to run to stay in compliance, us walkers have to walk as well.Response by MSgt Devon Saunders made Oct 31 at 2015 10:43 AM2015-10-31T10:43:30-04:002015-10-31T10:43:30-04:002015-10-24T11:14:42-04:00