Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders?

SFC Private RallyPoint Member — Sat, 13 Jun 2015 13:06:11 -0400

Regardless of your true political beliefs or affiliations, if faced with choosing between Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders, who would you choose?

Response by LTC Ed Ross made Jun 13 at 2015 1:08 PM

LTC Ed Ross — Sat, 13 Jun 2015 13:08:13 -0400

Space travel.

Response by SP5 Joel O'Brien made Jun 13 at 2015 1:25 PM

SP5 Joel O'Brien — Sat, 13 Jun 2015 13:25:30 -0400

It would be Bernie.

Response by SSG Gerhard S. made Jun 13 at 2015 1:40 PM

SSG Gerhard S. — Sat, 13 Jun 2015 13:40:12 -0400

Bernie Sanders, only because I hope he will be able to accomplish less.

Response by LTC Kevin B. made Jun 13 at 2015 2:17 PM

LTC Kevin B. — Sat, 13 Jun 2015 14:17:24 -0400

I'd go with Bernie Sanders. He seems to be more genuine in standing up for what he actually believes, rather than believing in whatever will help him get elected (which is more of how I view Hillary Clinton). Just my $0.02.

Response by 1SG Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 13 at 2015 3:46 PM

1SG Private RallyPoint Member — Sat, 13 Jun 2015 15:46:41 -0400

Bernie.
At least he is consistent in his views and doesn't change them when the wind blows a different way.

Response by SFC Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 13 at 2015 4:01 PM

SFC Private RallyPoint Member — Sat, 13 Jun 2015 16:01:02 -0400

I'd go with neither. Alex I'll take the pink unicorn for 100.00.

Response by Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS made Jun 13 at 2015 4:17 PM

Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS — Sat, 13 Jun 2015 16:17:15 -0400

Of the two, Mr. Sanders. His views are consistent, concise, and clear. Though I don't agree with about half of them, I respect that he is decisive in nature, and knows where he stands in the world. He isn't pushing an "agenda," he is promoting a "philosophy."

Response by LTC Bink Romanick made Jun 13 at 2015 4:18 PM

LTC Bink Romanick — Sat, 13 Jun 2015 16:18:55 -0400

Both!

Response by SGT Joe Sabedra made Jun 13 at 2015 6:12 PM

SGT Joe Sabedra — Sat, 13 Jun 2015 18:12:41 -0400

Write in.
Ted Nugent and Louie Ghomert (also a soldier)

Response by PO3 David Fries made Jun 13 at 2015 6:12 PM

PO3 David Fries — Sat, 13 Jun 2015 18:12:55 -0400

I'll take the write in, thanks.

Response by SSG Roger Ayscue made Jun 13 at 2015 8:24 PM

SSG Roger Ayscue — Sat, 13 Jun 2015 20:24:24 -0400

To do what? Dog Catcher or trash Collector...Yes. To be president of the United States? No way no how....I would rather shove my head in a Microwave than to vote for either of them.

Response by LCpl Mark Lefler made Jun 14 at 2015 7:44 PM

LCpl Mark Lefler — Sun, 14 Jun 2015 19:44:59 -0400

Bernie is a better person with better ideas, but lacks national presence, which is too bad.

Response by TSgt Philip Howard made Jun 14 at 2015 7:48 PM

TSgt Philip Howard — Sun, 14 Jun 2015 19:48:15 -0400

Neither. I wouldn't sully my conscience voting for either off them.

Response by LTC John Shaw made Jul 26 at 2015 1:55 PM

LTC John Shaw — Sun, 26 Jul 2015 13:55:28 -0400

SFC Private RallyPoint Member Senator Sanders would have my vote based on ethics or the lack thereof from Hilliary.
That said, you can look throughout history and see countless instances of socialist policies destroying one country after another when they run out of other people's money. Socialism is built on a false premise that the economy is static and one person's gain takes away from another.
When you punish a producer enough they will finally figure out they can go somewhere else.
Even when socialism takes over the government of the country, capitalism dominates the black/grey market economy until the socialist government collapses under it's own incompetence.

Response by SSG Ray Strenkowski made Jul 26 at 2015 3:17 PM

SSG Ray Strenkowski — Sun, 26 Jul 2015 15:17:36 -0400

What a horrible horrible choice. But Hillary isn't on the up and up. Bernie at least stands by his convictions (convictions which I abhor, but none the less). It would have to be Bernie.

Response by SrA Matthew Knight made Jul 26 at 2015 5:25 PM

SrA Matthew Knight — Sun, 26 Jul 2015 17:25:46 -0400

Putting aside who I am actually siding with right now and only being able to choose from those two, Sanders. I haven't heard a single good thing come from Hillary. Sanders on the other hand, though I still won't be voting for him, would be the one I would want to see win the presidency if it has to be a democrat.

Response by CPT Jack Durish made Jul 26 at 2015 6:01 PM

CPT Jack Durish — Sun, 26 Jul 2015 18:01:13 -0400

Acid in my eyes or poured down my throat? It's equally bad. Fortunately, I won't get that choice. Someone else will have to make it. Then I'll get to choose between one of those (or not) and whomever survives the GOP melee. To be honest, I fully expect Elizabeth Warren to be drafted when the Democrats realize that neither Hillary or Bernie will survive until 2016 due to old age...

Response by MAJ Ken Landgren made Jul 26 at 2015 8:31 PM

MAJ Ken Landgren — Sun, 26 Jul 2015 20:31:25 -0400

Hillary complains about the CEO pay while she is a millionaire.

Response by SSgt Alex Robinson made Jul 26 at 2015 9:45 PM

SSgt Alex Robinson — Sun, 26 Jul 2015 21:45:37 -0400

Bernie is at least honest and hasn't violated federal law....

Response by Cpl Tou Lee Yang made Jul 26 at 2015 9:52 PM

Cpl Tou Lee Yang — Sun, 26 Jul 2015 21:52:49 -0400

I find it fascinating how career military personnel is complaining about "socialism". Either Hillary or Bernie is absolutely a better options than what the GOP has to offer in their car filled with nothing but clowns.

Response by CPT Robert Moody made Aug 20 at 2015 7:49 AM

CPT Robert Moody — Thu, 20 Aug 2015 07:49:16 -0400

Homer Simpson

Response by CPT Ray Doeksen made Sep 27 at 2015 12:06 PM

CPT Ray Doeksen — Sun, 27 Sep 2015 12:06:14 -0400

"Regardless?" I think you mean "If you were voting in a Democratic primary or caucus," but my answer is easy to come to ... regardless ... I am going to vote for Bernie Sanders.

Response by SGM Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 5 at 2015 10:08 AM

SGM Private RallyPoint Member — Mon, 05 Oct 2015 10:08:02 -0400

SGT Josh Ingram, Just taking the question on face value, Bernie Sanders, of course. Loyalty “Bear true faith and allegiance to the U.S. constitution, the Army, and other soldiers.” Duty “Fulfill your obligations.” Respect “Treat people as they should be treated.” Selfless Service “Put the welfare of the nation, the Army and your subordinates above your own.” Honor “Live up to the army values.” Integrity “Do what’s right legally and morally.” and Personal Courage “Face fear, danger or adversity (physical or moral).” Which of these values does she embody as it applies to the government, not the Army, of course?

Response by CPT Ray Doeksen made Oct 8 at 2015 2:22 PM

CPT Ray Doeksen — Thu, 08 Oct 2015 14:22:02 -0400

Bernie Sanders, no contest. He's the only candidate running now that I like, from any party.

Response by PO3 Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 9 at 2015 8:25 AM

PO3 Private RallyPoint Member — Fri, 09 Oct 2015 08:25:55 -0400

At least I know what Bernie Sander is. Hillary? I don't know she is lying or not most of the time ...

Response by SGT John Rauch made Oct 9 at 2015 3:45 PM

SGT John Rauch — Fri, 09 Oct 2015 15:45:20 -0400

Response by SFC Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 14 at 2015 5:47 PM

SFC Private RallyPoint Member — Wed, 14 Oct 2015 17:47:47 -0400

at this moment i say Bernie Sanders. As much as its about time we see a female in the office, im not convinces with Hilary.

Response by LTC Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 15 at 2015 12:19 AM

LTC Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 15 Oct 2015 00:19:29 -0400

Hillary Clinton

Response by CPT Pedro Meza made Oct 15 at 2015 11:26 AM

CPT Pedro Meza — Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:26:54 -0400

How about both one as President the other as VP; I loved being out the wire and fear has to be faced.

Response by LTC Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 15 at 2015 11:55 AM

LTC Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:55:37 -0400

Thankfully we live in America, where we would never be placed in such a quagmire of being limited to just two candidates. Unfortunately, the majority of America believes just that.

Response by SFC Mark Merino made Oct 17 at 2015 9:22 PM

SFC Mark Merino — Sat, 17 Oct 2015 21:22:39 -0400

I'd choose a frontal lobotomy.

Response by SGT Jerrold Pesz made Oct 17 at 2015 9:36 PM

SGT Jerrold Pesz — Sat, 17 Oct 2015 21:36:46 -0400

I would have to be forced to vote for either one of them. If they were the only choices I might start shopping for a nice home in Mexico or Central America. They will all be up here so there should be some real good deals on abandoned houses. The other choice is to just open a beer, relax and be happy that I am old enough that I won't have to live in their socialist hell for too many years.

Response by SSG Jason Penn made Oct 17 at 2015 11:02 PM

SSG Jason Penn — Sat, 17 Oct 2015 23:02:11 -0400

Hmmmmm.... Let's see..... Who in their right mind would ever vote for Billary? I am a retired Intel professional, and I can tell you that as Secretary of State, Hillary received and sent emails that were classified at least to the Secret level. She (by her own admission) did all of her SoS business on a private server that was not in a secure location. She lied about not having any classified material on that server. Anyone in the Intel community can tell you that. She is covering up for two crimes that would keep her from becoming POTUS. 1) mishandling classified information (possibility of a felony depending on scope of the material and how much) and 2) her deletion of tens of thousands of emails that were subpoena'd that most likely proved her knowledge of the Benghazi Embassy attack as it unfolded that she lied about under oath (known as perjury, which is also a felony). So to answer the question in voting for the lesser of two evils, I'd have to go with Bernie Sanders. However, being that I am a staunch Constitutionalist and liberals are seeking to undermine the Constitution (2nd Amendment ring any bells?), I would never vote for him either.

Response by SCPO Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 17 at 2015 11:26 PM

SCPO Private RallyPoint Member — Sat, 17 Oct 2015 23:26:02 -0400

Dr. Jack Kevorkian.

Response by SP5 Mark Kuzinski made Oct 17 at 2015 11:52 PM

SP5 Mark Kuzinski — Sat, 17 Oct 2015 23:52:12 -0400

I think that I would move to Canada if those were the only two choices that I had!

Response by SPC David S. made Oct 18 at 2015 6:03 AM

SPC David S. — Sun, 18 Oct 2015 06:03:34 -0400

Choose to shoot or vote for?

Response by PO1 John Miller made Oct 18 at 2015 6:11 AM

PO1 John Miller — Sun, 18 Oct 2015 06:11:07 -0400

Neither of the above.

Response by Lt Col Jim Coe made Oct 18 at 2015 9:26 AM

Lt Col Jim Coe — Sun, 18 Oct 2015 09:26:34 -0400

None of the above!

Response by MSgt Michelle Mondia made Oct 18 at 2015 10:35 AM

MSgt Michelle Mondia — Sun, 18 Oct 2015 10:35:17 -0400

Crazy right? After the first debate I'm truly torn. Sanders says all the things I want to hear. But I'm not sure he'd have a chance because the people would have to have to back to him up 100%. And the people are lazy and fickle. Clinton is like the candy coated version she would be a better politician and better at getting the support of those who may not nessisarily agree with her point of view. But in a perfect world Sanders would get the nomination. We need his policies the most.

Response by SSG Ed Mikus made Oct 18 at 2015 11:48 AM

SSG Ed Mikus — Sun, 18 Oct 2015 11:48:57 -0400

Sanders

Response by MCPO Roger Collins made Oct 18 at 2015 12:05 PM

MCPO Roger Collins — Sun, 18 Oct 2015 12:05:31 -0400

Interesting to note that in most of the replies, favorable and unfavorable, no one stated anything of substance that would effect someone's opinion that isn't left or right. What solutions do either of these people have to resolve the global meltdown, military and economically or our domestic issues. Such as the Labor Participation rate, the war on energy, U-6 total unemployment rates, hunger in America, National Debt, which, In my opinion is the greatest threat to the USA's future generation.........

Response by LCDR Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 18 at 2015 12:11 PM

LCDR Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 18 Oct 2015 12:11:24 -0400

#FeelTheBern

Response by Sgt Tom Cunnally made Oct 18 at 2015 1:00 PM

Sgt Tom Cunnally — Sun, 18 Oct 2015 13:00:52 -0400

"Hillary Or Bernie??"

Can I go with None of the Above??? But like Bern's babes

Response by Capt Richard I P. made Oct 18 at 2015 1:41 PM

Capt Richard I P. — Sun, 18 Oct 2015 13:41:14 -0400

Other

Response by LTC Trent Klug made Oct 18 at 2015 2:07 PM

LTC Trent Klug — Sun, 18 Oct 2015 14:07:48 -0400

None of the above.

Response by PO2 Peter Klein made Oct 18 at 2015 2:29 PM

PO2 Peter Klein — Sun, 18 Oct 2015 14:29:48 -0400

Tough choice. I would love to see Clinton break that glass ceiling. I like Sander's style and platform. Either one would be better than anyone the GOP has this time around.

Response by Capt Walter Miller made Oct 18 at 2015 7:25 PM

Capt Walter Miller — Sun, 18 Oct 2015 19:25:53 -0400

Neither.

http://theweek.com/articles/583231/jim-webb-only-presidential-candidate-talking-sense-foreign-policy

Jim Webb is the only presidential candidate talking sense on foreign policy

Perhaps it's no coincidence that the guy who fought in Vietnam has a different perspective on foreign affairs

Response by Capt Walter Miller made Oct 18 at 2015 7:43 PM

Capt Walter Miller — Sun, 18 Oct 2015 19:43:07 -0400

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ralph-nader/the-democrats-presidentia_b_8317074.html

Hillary is not qualified for high office.

This no-fly zone thing -- it has gotten some play but it needs a lot more. How could a former SecState be so idiotic? "Oh, we'll do it in a coalition," she said in the debate.

It is as if saying martial terms like 'coalition' and 'no-fly zone' stokes something deep inside her thoroughly mean personality.

Nader called it:

"As an embedded militarist, during her tenure as Senator and Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton never saw a boondoggle, obsolete weapons system, or boomeranging war she didn't like. She delivered belligerent speeches against China, and scared Secretary of Defense Robert Gates by overruling his opposition through her White House contracts to overthrow the Libyan dictator. This illegal war opened up the savage chaos, bloodshed, and havoc in Libya that continued to spread into huge areas of central Africa."

But I digress.

A no-fly zone with US vs Russian aircraft that is bound to go better if we add in aircraft from other nations.

That was bullshit too.

A no-fly zone when you have Assad, our allies (whoever -they- are), and ISIS all in the mix-- that seriously sounds like a lead in to a Tom Clancy novel that devolves into WORLD WAR THREE.

Geez. NO WAY should Clinton be the president of this country.

Walt

The Democrats' Presidential Debates: Underway and Underwhelming

The quality of the questions was higher than has been the case with other debate spectacles in recent years. Yet CNN's self-censorship - in part reflected in the content of the questions and the favored positioning given to Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders - was not obscured.

Response by Cpl Mark McMiller made Oct 18 at 2015 9:36 PM

Cpl Mark McMiller — Sun, 18 Oct 2015 21:36:14 -0400

Neither.

Response by SPC Justin Gindhart made Oct 18 at 2015 10:37 PM

SPC Justin Gindhart — Sun, 18 Oct 2015 22:37:24 -0400

A bullet to the head

Response by Sgt Cody Dumont made Oct 19 at 2015 6:13 AM

Sgt Cody Dumont — Mon, 19 Oct 2015 06:13:36 -0400

I would move.

Response by SGT Jose Perdelia-Torres made Oct 19 at 2015 1:30 PM

SGT Jose Perdelia-Torres — Mon, 19 Oct 2015 13:30:12 -0400

I'm Voting Bernie Sanders! Do you think I would vote for that Benghazi Murderer. She can't control her own household (Bill Clinton's sexual relations), let alone our Nation as the President. Anyone who is voting for Hilary, better wake up and pay attention to the facts.

Response by 1LT Aaron Barr made Oct 19 at 2015 3:19 PM

1LT Aaron Barr — Mon, 19 Oct 2015 15:19:12 -0400

I'd choose not to vote at all.

Response by Sgt Daniel V. made Oct 19 at 2015 4:35 PM

Sgt Daniel V. — Mon, 19 Oct 2015 16:35:30 -0400

Canada i hear has nice things going on for the next four years.

Response by SSG Richard Reilly made Oct 20 at 2015 2:24 PM

SSG Richard Reilly — Tue, 20 Oct 2015 14:24:17 -0400

Kermit the Frog.

Response by MAJ James Woods made Oct 20 at 2015 6:19 PM

MAJ James Woods — Tue, 20 Oct 2015 18:19:40 -0400

Bernie is the lesser of three evils when you consider whomever the GOP candidate will be.

Response by LTC Eric Coger made Oct 21 at 2015 10:29 AM

LTC Eric Coger — Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:29:37 -0400

I go with Richard Pryor from "Brewster's Millions." Vote NONE OF THE ABOVE. The leading candidates from both major parties are all unqualified for the position of President of the United States. They may meet the statutory requirements of the Constitution, but none of the top 4 or 5 have the credibility, experience, or character to right the ship. It's an embarrassing and frustrating cycle for 2016.

Response by SrA Art Siatkowsky made Oct 23 at 2015 10:01 AM

SrA Art Siatkowsky — Fri, 23 Oct 2015 10:01:49 -0400

They are both communists...I'd choose revolution.

Response by Capt Jeff S. made Oct 27 at 2015 3:23 AM

Capt Jeff S. — Tue, 27 Oct 2015 03:23:58 -0400

You act as if there are only two choices. How about NEITHER!!!

Response by PO1 Glenn Boucher made Oct 29 at 2015 2:15 PM

PO1 Glenn Boucher — Thu, 29 Oct 2015 14:15:49 -0400

I would just rather not vote because neither of them have the countries best interests at heart.

Response by CW3 Jim Norris made Nov 3 at 2015 11:56 AM

CW3 Jim Norris — Tue, 03 Nov 2015 11:56:51 -0500

Hell, might a well go Whole Hog and vote for the outright communist Sanders as the Marxist light Clinton. Let's get all this liberty and constitutional concerns behind us, so we can concentrate on what is important - the complete destruction of capitalism and the Republic as currently constituted.

Response by Cpl Matthew Wall made Nov 6 at 2015 10:55 AM

Cpl Matthew Wall — Fri, 06 Nov 2015 10:55:55 -0500

Neither, Hillary is a liar and Sanders is a socialist. We can't trust one and we'd be broke under the other.

Response by SrA Art Siatkowsky made Nov 10 at 2015 3:11 AM

SrA Art Siatkowsky — Tue, 10 Nov 2015 03:11:45 -0500

Sorry dems it will be a Republican this time. Thank God for that.... both these communist would destroy our constitution. Hillary is an absolute disgrace to humanity and Bernie may be more honest but an honest communist is still a communist. How did the Democratic party get so bad? The only Democratic president in the last 100 years who was a decent human being was Jimmy Carter, and he wasn't a very good president. I think America is utterly fed up with horribly failed liberal policies and many are looking at Greece and Venezuela and seeing how these policies have ruined both of nations. Its time for a change of venue and its way overdue.

Response by CW3 Jim Norris made Nov 10 at 2015 1:11 PM

CW3 Jim Norris — Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:11:24 -0500

If these are the choices - go Marxist all the way with Sanders, why mess with marxist lite with Clinton?

Response by PFC Private RallyPoint Member made Nov 10 at 2015 11:57 PM

PFC Private RallyPoint Member — Tue, 10 Nov 2015 23:57:37 -0500

Sanders is winning polls by a landslide so there's the choice.

Response by MSG Private RallyPoint Member made Jan 16 at 2016 10:24 AM

MSG Private RallyPoint Member — Sat, 16 Jan 2016 10:24:26 -0500

Neither one.

Response by MCPO Roger Collins made Jan 16 at 2016 10:31 AM

MCPO Roger Collins — Sat, 16 Jan 2016 10:31:25 -0500

If you were in a deep pool of horse crap, and someone threw a bucket of snot at you, would you duck? Decisions, decisions. I go with category 2.

Response by CPT Jason Mitchell, MBA made Jan 16 at 2016 12:11 PM

CPT Jason Mitchell, MBA — Sat, 16 Jan 2016 12:11:57 -0500

Not a tough choice at all. I consider myself a conservative voter, but confronted with the choice between these two: I'd choose Bernie. You might be scratching your head until it bleeds now. I know, he's a true, dyed in the wool Socialist, but I think he means well. Meanwhile, you have Hillary on the other hand. She is a proven liar, manipulative, self-serving politician of the highest order. She is exactly what the political class needs to continue their lackluster service to our country. I would rather that neither won the election, but at least Bernie believes in his plan and is an honest person. Unfortunately, he wants to punish the rich for their hard work and luck over their lifetimes. Some of them may be greedy, egotistical, and out for themselves, but I find it hard to believe that none of them are good people who may have gone from rags to riches (like in my Dad's case). I just wish Bernie's plan to help the poor and middle-class didn't involve running off all the corporations in America by taxing only them in order to fund all his "free" entitlements.

Response by LTC Eric Coger made Jan 17 at 2016 10:44 AM

LTC Eric Coger — Sun, 17 Jan 2016 10:44:22 -0500

Hillary. And I hate to say it, but she is more centrist than Bernie and will bankrupt us slower... two terrible options.

Response by SFC Frank Hartley made Jan 17 at 2016 3:29 PM

SFC Frank Hartley — Sun, 17 Jan 2016 15:29:35 -0500

If this is for the Democrat nominee, and if I was a Democrat, then I'd vote for Hillary since she is the most corrupt.

Response by PO3 David Fries made Jan 17 at 2016 3:49 PM

PO3 David Fries — Sun, 17 Jan 2016 15:49:39 -0500

Write in vote!

Response by SGT Private RallyPoint Member made Jan 18 at 2016 2:45 PM

SGT Private RallyPoint Member — Mon, 18 Jan 2016 14:45:48 -0500

the real question here is how can anyone who swore an oath to the constitution vote for a liberal or a socialist? do they not teach the definition of words in school anymore?

Response by Maj Matt Hylton made Jan 18 at 2016 3:17 PM

Maj Matt Hylton — Mon, 18 Jan 2016 15:17:59 -0500

Bernie - hands down.

http://vetsforbernie.org/

Veterans For Bernie Sanders

We are veterans committed to helping elect a President who will make veterans' issues a priority. We are proud to enthusiastically support Bernie Sanders for President in 2016.

Response by SGT Jerrold Pesz made Jan 18 at 2016 3:35 PM

SGT Jerrold Pesz — Mon, 18 Jan 2016 15:35:26 -0500

That is about like being given the choice between hanging or the electric chair. You are doomed either way.

Response by SrA Marlin Taylor made Jan 18 at 2016 6:08 PM

SrA Marlin Taylor — Mon, 18 Jan 2016 18:08:19 -0500

You want us to choose? So we have to choose between a liar or a socialist? I guess I would pick the socialist.

Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Jan 19 at 2016 5:29 PM

SSG Private RallyPoint Member — Tue, 19 Jan 2016 17:29:30 -0500

Sanders. So far he's the only candidate I've seen on the entire platform who's even given voice to Veterans support initiatives.

Response by SSG Roger Ayscue made Feb 3 at 2016 10:44 PM

SSG Roger Ayscue — Wed, 03 Feb 2016 22:44:13 -0500

Secession from the Union.

Response by SGT(P) Private RallyPoint Member made Feb 4 at 2016 12:49 PM

SGT(P) Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 04 Feb 2016 12:49:21 -0500

Hopefully the FBI indicted Hillary and takes her out of the running. But With the last 44 presidents, It has always been a different affiliation after an 8yr term.

So the real question is Trump, Rand or Cruz. Rand is an awesome senator and military supporter. Trump regardless of being a Dem most of his life would probably fix America and Cruz? IDK bit of a pussy.

Response by CPO Frank Coluccio made Feb 4 at 2016 5:00 PM

CPO Frank Coluccio — Thu, 04 Feb 2016 17:00:36 -0500

A relocation to Costa Rica

Response by Capt Walter Miller made Feb 20 at 2016 5:47 PM

Capt Walter Miller — Sat, 20 Feb 2016 17:47:53 -0500

I don't know how you could vote for Sanders. He has a police record. This picture confirmed as him. He was protesting segregation in 1963.