Have you ever seen a post on RP by an AD officer or senior enlisted that was prejudicial to good order and discipline- what did you do ?

2016-06-23T08:38:25-04:00

Response by GySgt Carl Rumbolo made Jun 23 at 2016 8:40 AM

2016-06-23T08:40:15-04:00

Some additional points - I am not talking about political commentary or other protected speech. I am talking about comments or statements that are discriminatory or may constitute illegal acts committed or supported by the person, or statements that indicate they would not be a fair and impartial judge while administering military discipline.

Response by Col Jim Harmon made Jun 23 at 2016 8:47 AM

2016-06-23T08:47:39-04:00

RP is a social network that provides humorous relief; good gouge sharing; real life vignettes (aka, Sea Stories); and social bonding among the Band of Brothers and Sisters.

RP is not an official DoD site nor is it construed to be one. It is hard to imagine how anything posted here is contrary to the good order and discipline of the operational military.

RP is what the Club System used to be.

Response by SGT David T. made Jun 23 at 2016 9:44 AM

2016-06-23T09:44:26-04:00

I'm sure some posts could be construed that way. My normal response is to respond with my opinion or to simply do nothing. I am not in the military. It is not my place to enforce the standards among those still in.

Response by SGT Sara Hendrix made Jun 23 at 2016 10:06 AM

2016-06-23T10:06:18-04:00

Attempt to show the correct action . . Although most often someone who has that narcissistic tendency will believe, however incorrectly, that they are right . And thus the best you can do is show others the correct actions. Now if its an illegal act .... i would report as appropriate . But be sure there isnt a misunderstanding on what they are stating . Get all the facts as best one can.

Response by TSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 23 at 2016 11:02 AM

2016-06-23T11:02:43-04:00

I got into a VERY heated discussion with an Army Major on here about his religious views. He was very adamant, over the course of several posts, that only his particular religious views were correct and called all others "agents of satan". I was professional, when I called his decision making ability in to question, based on the unsettling tone and careless delivery

The thread continued for a few days, and I was never out of line or directly disrespectful. The discussion was civil for the most part, a point/counterpoint... and then he threatened me with an article 89, to which I responded that his very open bigotry and unprofessional conduct was in violation of Article 133. He never responded in the thread.