CW2 Private RallyPoint Member 2023458 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Will Service Members use the &quot;Clinton Defense&quot; and is it a viable defense? Why or why not? Has the Clinton security issues and lack of prosecution for them set a new standard for a defense in the courts? 2016-10-29T17:54:08-04:00 CW2 Private RallyPoint Member 2023458 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Will Service Members use the &quot;Clinton Defense&quot; and is it a viable defense? Why or why not? Has the Clinton security issues and lack of prosecution for them set a new standard for a defense in the courts? 2016-10-29T17:54:08-04:00 2016-10-29T17:54:08-04:00 SSG Private RallyPoint Member 2023465 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>It has already been tried and it failed. Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 29 at 2016 5:56 PM 2016-10-29T17:56:44-04:00 2016-10-29T17:56:44-04:00 TSgt Private RallyPoint Member 2023544 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>in my opinion, it is not a viable defense. service members are still service members, and any attempts to undermine military law in the name of a tyrant should be met with unrelenting ridicule. it is already proven that you are treated differently in the civilian courtroom based on economic and social standing, and has been an issue for a very long time. this defense would never work. Response by TSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 29 at 2016 6:41 PM 2016-10-29T18:41:34-04:00 2016-10-29T18:41:34-04:00 SPC Paul Jennings, J.D. 2023593 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>No. You can&#39;t claim a defense based on someone else getting away with the same offense, especially if they were never prosecuted or tried. Response by SPC Paul Jennings, J.D. made Oct 29 at 2016 7:17 PM 2016-10-29T19:17:39-04:00 2016-10-29T19:17:39-04:00 Capt Private RallyPoint Member 2023619 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>No, because it was not in a court. Response by Capt Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 29 at 2016 7:27 PM 2016-10-29T19:27:01-04:00 2016-10-29T19:27:01-04:00 SFC George Smith 2023944 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Only if you are going to Be Powerful and and Rich and Have a lot of Dirt on folks... Response by SFC George Smith made Oct 29 at 2016 9:26 PM 2016-10-29T21:26:33-04:00 2016-10-29T21:26:33-04:00 SPC Erich Guenther 2024314 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I think we should probably wait until this runs out. I&#39;m not sure the Clinton Defense has worked yet because the case is not over yet. Response by SPC Erich Guenther made Oct 30 at 2016 12:02 AM 2016-10-30T00:02:20-04:00 2016-10-30T00:02:20-04:00 Capt Seid Waddell 2024437 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>The &quot;Clinton Defense&quot; is a sign of political corruption of the FBI and the DOJ - and it only works for Hillary. You try that and they will lock you up and throw away the key. Response by Capt Seid Waddell made Oct 30 at 2016 2:41 AM 2016-10-30T02:41:30-04:00 2016-10-30T02:41:30-04:00 MSgt John McGowan 2025457 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>CW2. Only if you have the name Clinton. Response by MSgt John McGowan made Oct 30 at 2016 2:50 PM 2016-10-30T14:50:50-04:00 2016-10-30T14:50:50-04:00 SPC Private RallyPoint Member 2026322 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I doubt it Chief, a Sailor and a Marine went down for the same thing as I understand and the Marine tried to use Clinton&#39;s defense and it failed. To be fair UCMJ is a bit different then Civilian Law though and there&#39;s more for someone of influence to manipulate. Response by SPC Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 30 at 2016 9:22 PM 2016-10-30T21:22:36-04:00 2016-10-30T21:22:36-04:00 Cpl Dennis F. 2034089 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Yes, it&#39;s also known as the Sgt. Shultz defense &quot;I know nothing!&quot; Response by Cpl Dennis F. made Nov 2 at 2016 2:04 PM 2016-11-02T14:04:26-04:00 2016-11-02T14:04:26-04:00 2016-10-29T17:54:08-04:00