SSG Private RallyPoint Member1007377<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><a target="_blank" href="http://www.stripes.com/defense-authorization-bill-calls-for-easing-rules-for-guns-on-bases-1.371125">http://www.stripes.com/defense-authorization-bill-calls-for-easing-rules-for-guns-on-bases-1.371125</a> <div class="pta-link-card answers-template-image type-default">
<div class="pta-link-card-picture">
<img src="https://d26horl2n8pviu.cloudfront.net/link_data_pictures/images/000/023/750/qrc/image.jpg?1443665995">
</div>
<div class="pta-link-card-content">
<p class="pta-link-card-title">
<a target="blank" href="http://www.stripes.com/defense-authorization-bill-calls-for-easing-rules-for-guns-on-bases-1.371125">Defense authorization bill calls for easing rules for guns on bases</a>
</p>
<p class="pta-link-card-description">An annual defense policy bill unveiled by Congress this week would give commanders more leeway to allow troops to carry personal firearms for protection on military bases following deadly shootings in Tennessee and elsewhere.</p>
</div>
<div class="clearfix"></div>
</div>
Ease the standards for privately owned weapons on base. Thoughts?2015-09-30T22:20:54-04:00SSG Private RallyPoint Member1007377<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><a target="_blank" href="http://www.stripes.com/defense-authorization-bill-calls-for-easing-rules-for-guns-on-bases-1.371125">http://www.stripes.com/defense-authorization-bill-calls-for-easing-rules-for-guns-on-bases-1.371125</a> <div class="pta-link-card answers-template-image type-default">
<div class="pta-link-card-picture">
<img src="https://d26horl2n8pviu.cloudfront.net/link_data_pictures/images/000/023/750/qrc/image.jpg?1443665995">
</div>
<div class="pta-link-card-content">
<p class="pta-link-card-title">
<a target="blank" href="http://www.stripes.com/defense-authorization-bill-calls-for-easing-rules-for-guns-on-bases-1.371125">Defense authorization bill calls for easing rules for guns on bases</a>
</p>
<p class="pta-link-card-description">An annual defense policy bill unveiled by Congress this week would give commanders more leeway to allow troops to carry personal firearms for protection on military bases following deadly shootings in Tennessee and elsewhere.</p>
</div>
<div class="clearfix"></div>
</div>
Ease the standards for privately owned weapons on base. Thoughts?2015-09-30T22:20:54-04:002015-09-30T22:20:54-04:001stSgt Private RallyPoint Member1007400<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>This will be interesting to watch. I am not sure I would support it. Is this really necessary?Response by 1stSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 30 at 2015 10:31 PM2015-09-30T22:31:56-04:002015-09-30T22:31:56-04:00Capt Richard I P.1007490<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Yes. Arm the Armed Forces!<br /><a target="_blank" href="https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/arm-the-armed-forces">https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/arm-the-armed-forces</a> <div class="pta-link-card answers-template-image type-default">
<div class="pta-link-card-picture">
<img src="https://d26horl2n8pviu.cloudfront.net/link_data_pictures/images/000/023/759/qrc/050807-m-0502e-005.jpg?1443670076">
</div>
<div class="pta-link-card-content">
<p class="pta-link-card-title">
<a target="blank" href="https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/arm-the-armed-forces">Arm the Armed Forces! | RallyPoint</a>
</p>
<p class="pta-link-card-description">The outcome of the discussion "Concealed carry for CAC holders?" by [~222148:SGT Bernard Boyer III]. Below follows my skeleton letter to congress, based on the edits RP members have suggested to the 10 points. Anyone and everyone is welcome to edit and personalize the letter for their own use in writing to their congressional representatives. We sent a mass email on 3 January, the swearing in of the new congress, now it's a free for all. You...</p>
</div>
<div class="clearfix"></div>
</div>
Response by Capt Richard I P. made Sep 30 at 2015 11:27 PM2015-09-30T23:27:49-04:002015-09-30T23:27:49-04:00Capt Mark Strobl1007523<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I always thought it ironic that it was easier to go down to the armory and draw your T/O weapon vice bring your own firearm on base. In a profession of arms, it makes sense to me to have access (and right) to tote your own weapon.Response by Capt Mark Strobl made Oct 1 at 2015 12:00 AM2015-10-01T00:00:06-04:002015-10-01T00:00:06-04:00Capt Seid Waddell1007557<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Good idea. If the armed forces can't be trusted with arms, who can be?Response by Capt Seid Waddell made Oct 1 at 2015 12:34 AM2015-10-01T00:34:11-04:002015-10-01T00:34:11-04:00Cpl James Waycasie1007670<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>We drank a lot and fought a lot in the Marines but we all owned and kept knives. I don't recall anyone ever getting stabbed or cut anywhere I was stationed so I figure Service personnel would be mature enough to handle firearms on base also.Response by Cpl James Waycasie made Oct 1 at 2015 2:10 AM2015-10-01T02:10:18-04:002015-10-01T02:10:18-04:00SGT David T.1008007<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>This doesn't go far enough. Giving the commanders authority will not bring about any meaningful changes. There needs to be a blanket authorization that is independent of the chain of command that allows anyone who is lawfully allowed to carry a weapon of base to do so on. Then and only then will there be meaningful changes. I think a 2nd order effect would be that people would be far more polite to each other up and down the chain of command lol.Response by SGT David T. made Oct 1 at 2015 8:44 AM2015-10-01T08:44:33-04:002015-10-01T08:44:33-04:001LT Aaron Barr1011296<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I would be in favor. Pretty much all of us who've served have been trained in small arms and there's no shortage of knowledgeable people we could seek out to help us train. The idea that we're trusted with weapons like artillery etc. but not with our own, private weapons on post is ludicrous.Response by 1LT Aaron Barr made Oct 2 at 2015 12:12 PM2015-10-02T12:12:11-04:002015-10-02T12:12:11-04:002015-09-30T22:20:54-04:00