LTC Private RallyPoint Member 938400 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><a target="_blank" href="http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2015/09/doj-accuses-u-s-biz-of-discrimination-for-requiring-proof-of-work-eligibility/">http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2015/09/doj-accuses-u-s-biz-of-discrimination-for-requiring-proof-of-work-eligibility/</a> <div class="pta-link-card answers-template-image type-default"> <div class="pta-link-card-picture"> <img src="https://d26horl2n8pviu.cloudfront.net/link_data_pictures/images/000/021/281/qrc/blueseal.jpg?1443053466"> </div> <div class="pta-link-card-content"> <p class="pta-link-card-title"> <a target="blank" href="http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2015/09/doj-accuses-u-s-biz-of-discrimination-for-requiring-proof-of-work-eligibility/">DOJ Accuses U.S. Biz of Discrimination for Requiring Proof of Work Eligibility - Judicial Watch</a> </p> <p class="pta-link-card-description">In its crusade to protect and assist illegal immigrants, the Obama administration has accused an American company of discrimination for requiring employees to furnish proof that they are eligible to work legally in the United States. You know the nation is in trouble when a U.S. business gets investigated by its own government for followingRead the full post</p> </div> <div class="clearfix"></div> </div> DOJ Accuses U.S. Biz of Discrimination for Requiring Proof of Work Eligibility 2015-09-03T15:47:14-04:00 LTC Private RallyPoint Member 938400 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><a target="_blank" href="http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2015/09/doj-accuses-u-s-biz-of-discrimination-for-requiring-proof-of-work-eligibility/">http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2015/09/doj-accuses-u-s-biz-of-discrimination-for-requiring-proof-of-work-eligibility/</a> <div class="pta-link-card answers-template-image type-default"> <div class="pta-link-card-picture"> <img src="https://d26horl2n8pviu.cloudfront.net/link_data_pictures/images/000/021/281/qrc/blueseal.jpg?1443053466"> </div> <div class="pta-link-card-content"> <p class="pta-link-card-title"> <a target="blank" href="http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2015/09/doj-accuses-u-s-biz-of-discrimination-for-requiring-proof-of-work-eligibility/">DOJ Accuses U.S. Biz of Discrimination for Requiring Proof of Work Eligibility - Judicial Watch</a> </p> <p class="pta-link-card-description">In its crusade to protect and assist illegal immigrants, the Obama administration has accused an American company of discrimination for requiring employees to furnish proof that they are eligible to work legally in the United States. You know the nation is in trouble when a U.S. business gets investigated by its own government for followingRead the full post</p> </div> <div class="clearfix"></div> </div> DOJ Accuses U.S. Biz of Discrimination for Requiring Proof of Work Eligibility 2015-09-03T15:47:14-04:00 2015-09-03T15:47:14-04:00 CW3 Kevin Storm 938404 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Maybe its me, but I thought you had to furnish proof? Response by CW3 Kevin Storm made Sep 3 at 2015 3:48 PM 2015-09-03T15:48:16-04:00 2015-09-03T15:48:16-04:00 LTC Stephen F. 938414 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Not surprising from the current administration or it's DOJ <a class="dark-link bold-link" role="profile-hover" data-qtip-container="body" data-id="720311" data-source-page-controller="question_response_contents" href="/profiles/720311-13a-field-artillery-officer">LTC Private RallyPoint Member</a> <br />Granted there are so many laws on the books that they can not all be enforced. But with all of the other troubles this nation is facing right now it seems ludicrous that the DOJ would use its resources to target a business that is actually following the law. Response by LTC Stephen F. made Sep 3 at 2015 3:51 PM 2015-09-03T15:51:25-04:00 2015-09-03T15:51:25-04:00 SPC Jan Allbright, M.Sc., R.S. 938439 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>As is usual in these things, it would be a hellova story, if it was true ... <br /><br />"The department’s investigation found that the company required non-U.S. citizens, but not similarly-situated U.S. citizens, to present specific documentary proof of their immigration status to verify their employment eligibility. The INA’s anti-discrimination provision prohibits employers from making documentary demands based on citizenship or national origin when verifying an employee’s authorization to work."<br /><br />ohhhh .. those pesky facts .... <br /><br />Nebraska Beef was asking the brown people to verify their status and not the white people .. that is the suit.<br /><br />In other news .. poor old Nebraska apparently is a "frequent flyer"<br />"US Labor Department's OSHA cites Nebraska Beef Ltd. for 8 safety violations at Omaha beef processing facility; proposes $61,084 in fines"<br /><a target="_blank" href="https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=NEWS_RELEASES&amp;p_id=23739">https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=NEWS_RELEASES&amp;p_id=23739</a> <div class="pta-link-card answers-template-image type-default"> <div class="pta-link-card-picture"> <img src="https://d26horl2n8pviu.cloudfront.net/link_data_pictures/images/000/021/282/qrc/banner.gif?1443053467"> </div> <div class="pta-link-card-content"> <p class="pta-link-card-title"> <a target="blank" href="https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=NEWS_RELEASES&amp;p_id=23739">2013 - 03/07/2013 - US Labor Department&#39;s OSHA cites Nebraska Beef Ltd. for 8 safety violations...</a> </p> <p class="pta-link-card-description">2013 - 03/07/2013 - US Labor Department&#39;s OSHA cites Nebraska Beef Ltd. for 8 safety violations at Omaha beef processing facility proposes $61,084 in fines</p> </div> <div class="clearfix"></div> </div> Response by SPC Jan Allbright, M.Sc., R.S. made Sep 3 at 2015 3:58 PM 2015-09-03T15:58:27-04:00 2015-09-03T15:58:27-04:00 SGT Jeremiah B. 938444 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>The company in question broke the law. A 70 year old law in fact. Response by SGT Jeremiah B. made Sep 3 at 2015 3:59 PM 2015-09-03T15:59:23-04:00 2015-09-03T15:59:23-04:00 Capt Seid Waddell 938521 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Another example of lawlessness from this administration. Response by Capt Seid Waddell made Sep 3 at 2015 4:18 PM 2015-09-03T16:18:45-04:00 2015-09-03T16:18:45-04:00 SSgt Alex Robinson 938783 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>It's the law to show proof of citizenship! Response by SSgt Alex Robinson made Sep 3 at 2015 5:44 PM 2015-09-03T17:44:57-04:00 2015-09-03T17:44:57-04:00 SSgt Alex Robinson 938788 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Disgusting! Response by SSgt Alex Robinson made Sep 3 at 2015 5:46 PM 2015-09-03T17:46:07-04:00 2015-09-03T17:46:07-04:00 Capt Jim McLaurin 938842 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Were they aware of the process to file a claim and overcome the rejections of the VA? Response by Capt Jim McLaurin made Sep 3 at 2015 6:03 PM 2015-09-03T18:03:58-04:00 2015-09-03T18:03:58-04:00 SSG Private RallyPoint Member 938874 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Deceptive article, the DOJ requires employees to prove work eligibility, not provide information on immigration status. Nebraska Beef was fined for breaking the law and asking workers to provide proof of immigration status. <br /><br />"While all companies are required to verify that their employees are authorized to work in the U.S., asking workers to provide proof of immigration status is a violation of the Immigration and Nationality Act, a federal law that prohibits employers from making documentary demands based on citizenship or national origin, officials said."<br /><a target="_blank" href="http://www.ibtimes.com/immigration-discrimination-laws-nebraska-beef-ltd-improperly-required-workers-prove-2066231">http://www.ibtimes.com/immigration-discrimination-laws-nebraska-beef-ltd-improperly-required-workers-prove-2066231</a> Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 3 at 2015 6:13 PM 2015-09-03T18:13:54-04:00 2015-09-03T18:13:54-04:00 CPT Private RallyPoint Member 939568 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Illegal aliens are by there description, "illegal". To quote a friend, WTF-over. <a class="dark-link bold-link" role="profile-hover" data-qtip-container="body" data-id="506422" data-source-page-controller="question_response_contents" href="/profiles/506422-sgt-david-g-duchesneau">Sgt David G Duchesneau</a> :-) Response by CPT Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 3 at 2015 10:07 PM 2015-09-03T22:07:00-04:00 2015-09-03T22:07:00-04:00 CPT Private RallyPoint Member 939583 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Carpe Diem. Response by CPT Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 3 at 2015 10:11 PM 2015-09-03T22:11:53-04:00 2015-09-03T22:11:53-04:00 PO1 John Miller 940067 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><br />If one is "authorized to work in the US" wouldn't they in fact be a legal (versus illegal) immigrant and thus be in the country legally in the first place? Or am I overthinking it (wouldn't be the first time)? Response by PO1 John Miller made Sep 4 at 2015 4:04 AM 2015-09-04T04:04:22-04:00 2015-09-04T04:04:22-04:00 2015-09-03T15:47:14-04:00