CPT Jack Durish6717017<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>When I was a college student, a classmate invited me to join him at the theater while the Maryland State Board of Censors viewed a then recently released film. (His uncle was a member and was able to slip us in.) The film was "Sweet Ecstasy" starring Elke Sommer. <br /><br />It was hard to get into the film inasmuch as one old lady on the panel kept stopping the showing to demand a scene be cut. To be fair, it was "appealing to our prurient interests".<br /><br /><a target="_blank" href="https://youtu.be/qJiC9MGxsrY">https://youtu.be/qJiC9MGxsrY</a><br /><br />Would you believe that my computer spell checker doesn't recognize "purient"? It seems that our ability to offend or be offended has risen above our waists. Ideology, it seems, is now more offensive than sexual arousal. (Or I misspelled it. Still you would think I was close enough.)<br /><br />This lesson was brought home to me by a recent email I received from PragerU. My Norton's web security system flagged every link to PragerU.com as "SUSPICIOUS". I then had to go through extra steps to access the links to release Norton's from liability for allowing me to infect my mind with any unpopular thoughts.<br /><br />Yes, I understand that many have a knee-jerk aversion to PragerU. That's not to say I understand why. But that's not the issue. I simply prefer to make my own choices of the websites I access unless, of course, there is an actual threat to my computer device or information. That's what I pay Norton to protect, not my virtue. <div class="pta-link-card answers-template-image type-youtube">
<div class="pta-link-card-video">
<iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/qJiC9MGxsrY?wmode=transparent" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
</div>
<div class="pta-link-card-content">
<p class="pta-link-card-title">
<a target="blank" href="https://youtu.be/qJiC9MGxsrY">Sweet Ecstacy</a>
</p>
<p class="pta-link-card-description">Beatniks on a boat. From the 1962 film Sweet Ecstasy, featuring Elke Sommer and some beatastic bongos. And a great Banana boat dancer.</p>
</div>
<div class="clearfix"></div>
</div>
Do you want others censoring what you should see and hear?2021-02-03T12:23:30-05:00CPT Jack Durish6717017<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>When I was a college student, a classmate invited me to join him at the theater while the Maryland State Board of Censors viewed a then recently released film. (His uncle was a member and was able to slip us in.) The film was "Sweet Ecstasy" starring Elke Sommer. <br /><br />It was hard to get into the film inasmuch as one old lady on the panel kept stopping the showing to demand a scene be cut. To be fair, it was "appealing to our prurient interests".<br /><br /><a target="_blank" href="https://youtu.be/qJiC9MGxsrY">https://youtu.be/qJiC9MGxsrY</a><br /><br />Would you believe that my computer spell checker doesn't recognize "purient"? It seems that our ability to offend or be offended has risen above our waists. Ideology, it seems, is now more offensive than sexual arousal. (Or I misspelled it. Still you would think I was close enough.)<br /><br />This lesson was brought home to me by a recent email I received from PragerU. My Norton's web security system flagged every link to PragerU.com as "SUSPICIOUS". I then had to go through extra steps to access the links to release Norton's from liability for allowing me to infect my mind with any unpopular thoughts.<br /><br />Yes, I understand that many have a knee-jerk aversion to PragerU. That's not to say I understand why. But that's not the issue. I simply prefer to make my own choices of the websites I access unless, of course, there is an actual threat to my computer device or information. That's what I pay Norton to protect, not my virtue. <div class="pta-link-card answers-template-image type-youtube">
<div class="pta-link-card-video">
<iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/qJiC9MGxsrY?wmode=transparent" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
</div>
<div class="pta-link-card-content">
<p class="pta-link-card-title">
<a target="blank" href="https://youtu.be/qJiC9MGxsrY">Sweet Ecstacy</a>
</p>
<p class="pta-link-card-description">Beatniks on a boat. From the 1962 film Sweet Ecstasy, featuring Elke Sommer and some beatastic bongos. And a great Banana boat dancer.</p>
</div>
<div class="clearfix"></div>
</div>
Do you want others censoring what you should see and hear?2021-02-03T12:23:30-05:002021-02-03T12:23:30-05:00SPC Nancy Greene6717051<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Definitely Agree with You <a class="dark-link bold-link" role="profile-hover" data-qtip-container="body" data-id="78668" data-source-page-controller="question_response_contents" href="/profiles/78668-cpt-jack-durish">CPT Jack Durish</a>! It ‘should’ be our right to free speech; however, it certainly does NOT appear this way. In regard to auto spell correct; I am definitely curious as to who wrote this program which is thrust upon us! I have been unsuccessful on numerous occasions to utilize vocabulary words and ‘proper’ English grammar. These practices and censorship could account for the failure of younger generations actually learning and increasing their vocabulary...just my two centsResponse by SPC Nancy Greene made Feb 3 at 2021 12:40 PM2021-02-03T12:40:16-05:002021-02-03T12:40:16-05:00SP5 Private RallyPoint Member6717084<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><a class="dark-link bold-link" role="profile-hover" data-qtip-container="body" data-id="78668" data-source-page-controller="question_response_contents" href="/profiles/78668-cpt-jack-durish">CPT Jack Durish</a> try "prurient". I agree that I need to be the one to decide what I SHOULD see/hear/read.Response by SP5 Private RallyPoint Member made Feb 3 at 2021 12:49 PM2021-02-03T12:49:26-05:002021-02-03T12:49:26-05:00MAJ Ken Landgren6717224<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Should lies be censored?Response by MAJ Ken Landgren made Feb 3 at 2021 1:51 PM2021-02-03T13:51:03-05:002021-02-03T13:51:03-05:00SR Kenneth Beck6717245<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>PC Matic doesn't have a problem with PragerU. I link directly to there website, not via U-TubeResponse by SR Kenneth Beck made Feb 3 at 2021 2:05 PM2021-02-03T14:05:13-05:002021-02-03T14:05:13-05:00Cpl Mark A. Morris6717421<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Norton's web security system may have fallen within the control of the Geheime Staatspolizei Sir.Response by Cpl Mark A. Morris made Feb 3 at 2021 3:21 PM2021-02-03T15:21:18-05:002021-02-03T15:21:18-05:00SFC Casey O'Mally6718034<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>In general, censorship is bad. However, there are no absolutes. As a parent, I absolutely censor what my child sees and hears, as well as what she accesses on the interwebs. As a (former) intelligence professional, I absolutely censored what information was released, to whom, and in what format.<br />The government does have a responsibility to its citizens and there may be times when it is appropriate to restrict, redact, or forbid the dissemination of certain information. I believe in these rare instances (and they should be rare) the onus is on the government to prove that necessity for censorship, not on the public to disprove it.Response by SFC Casey O'Mally made Feb 3 at 2021 8:24 PM2021-02-03T20:24:15-05:002021-02-03T20:24:15-05:00Maj John Bell6886965<div class="images-v2-count-1"><div class="content-picture image-v2-number-1" id="image-582891"> <div class="social_icons social-buttons-on-image">
<a href='https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rallypoint.com%2Fanswers%2Fdo-you-want-others-censoring-what-you-should-see-and-hear%3Futm_source%3DFacebook%26utm_medium%3Dorganic%26utm_campaign%3DShare%20to%20facebook'
target="_blank" class='social-share-button facebook-share-button'><i class="fa fa-facebook-f"></i></a>
<a href="https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Do+you+want+others+censoring+what+you+should+see+and+hear%3F&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rallypoint.com%2Fanswers%2Fdo-you-want-others-censoring-what-you-should-see-and-hear&via=RallyPoint"
target="_blank" class="social-share-button twitter-custom-share-button"><i class="fa fa-twitter"></i></a>
<a href="mailto:?subject=Check this out on RallyPoint!&body=Hi, I thought you would find this interesting:%0D%0ADo you want others censoring what you should see and hear?%0D%0A %0D%0AHere is the link: https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/do-you-want-others-censoring-what-you-should-see-and-hear"
target="_blank" class="social-share-button email-share-button"><i class="fa fa-envelope"></i></a>
</div>
<a class="fancybox" rel="e252c0ed326ad08dc629a56b6bb73c17" href="https://d1ndsj6b8hkqu9.cloudfront.net/pictures/images/000/582/891/for_gallery_v2/d9bef0c8.jpg"><img src="https://d1ndsj6b8hkqu9.cloudfront.net/pictures/images/000/582/891/large_v3/d9bef0c8.jpg" alt="D9bef0c8" /></a></div></div>I don't. But If I owned a bill board, I'd want the right to tell someone "there's no amount of money you can pay me to put "______________________" on my bill board. So let's leave the 1st Amendment to limiting government over reach.<br /><br />"Yes Zuzu, every time a business oversteps its place in the culture wars, a handful of entrepreneurs get their wings." It may take them time to show up, but those entrepreneurs ARE coming.Response by Maj John Bell made Apr 8 at 2021 3:15 PM2021-04-08T15:15:25-04:002021-04-08T15:15:25-04:002021-02-03T12:23:30-05:00