Do you think the U.S. is putting our country at risk by allowing thousands of refugees to enter quickly?

2015-09-11T10:12:21-04:00

Response by SGT Ben Keen made Sep 11 at 2015 10:14 AM

2015-09-11T10:14:06-04:00

PFC Private RallyPoint Member - What do you define as "quickly"? What are your thoughts about the sudden influx of refugees entering the country?

Response by SSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 11 at 2015 10:16 AM

2015-09-11T10:16:40-04:00

Honestly? Yes. We have an employment issue & welfare issue as it currently stands. Accepting thousands more that will only put a further strain on those systems is begging for collapse in one form or another.

Response by SCPO David Lockwood made Sep 11 at 2015 10:18 AM

2015-09-11T10:18:06-04:00

You never know who is among them!

Response by CW4 Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 11 at 2015 10:20 AM

2015-09-11T10:20:35-04:00

PFC Private RallyPoint Member, I am not against helping other people from other countries when they are in need because our country has been doing this since its inception. What I have a problem with is the fact that our country, federal and state governments can’t even successfully take care of all the homeless people within our own borders.

Response by Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS made Sep 11 at 2015 10:32 AM

2015-09-11T10:32:26-04:00

The question should not be whether we are putting the country at risk, but HOW MUCH risk.

Risk is something we can quantify. It's something we can manage. So we can weigh the Risk vs the Reward.

Response by MCPO Roger Collins made Sep 11 at 2015 10:35 AM

2015-09-11T10:35:30-04:00

Yes, but according to statements from State its supposed to be over a period of 18-24 months and at this point 10,000. When you have ISIS acolytes here now, do we really need more. The old saying we have to be right 100% of the time and the bad guys only take one action to kill or maim thousands of us is valid.

Response by LCDR Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 11 at 2015 10:54 AM

2015-09-11T10:54:29-04:00

We are, but so are all of the other nations doing this. Ignoring the problem won't make it go away.

Response by COL Jean (John) F. B. made Sep 11 at 2015 11:34 AM

2015-09-11T11:34:08-04:00

PFC Private RallyPoint Member - I think it is ironic that Obama rejects the Keystone Pipeline but has opened a Jihadi Pipeline into our country. Just more evidence of his objective of destabilizing our country and its security. Every day, our country moves closer and closer to becoming Obamastan.

While I think the US should assist those in need, we need to do so by providing support through NGOs like the Red Cross and not in our country. We also need to take note that the refugees (as well as ISIS/radical Muslim infiltrators) are fleeing a regime that should be eliminated. Seems to me, we (and the world) would be better off getting rid of that regime than having to deal with refugees from that regime.

Response by SrA Edward Vong made Sep 11 at 2015 11:46 AM

2015-09-11T11:46:49-04:00

If someone wanted to get into this country, they will find a way regardless.

Response by MAJ Ken Landgren made Sep 11 at 2015 12:20 PM

2015-09-11T12:20:41-04:00

I call this the year of the underdogs.

Response by LCpl Mark Lefler made Sep 11 at 2015 3:08 PM

2015-09-11T15:08:55-04:00

honestly, and this may sound like a horrible thing to say, but I'd rather have the syrian immigrants then the south of the border ones, I feel like they would bring less violence.

Response by SGT Jerrold Pesz made Sep 11 at 2015 5:53 PM

2015-09-11T17:53:52-04:00

Yes.

Response by CW4 Russ Hamilton (Ret) made Sep 12 at 2015 3:20 AM

2015-09-12T03:20:42-04:00

YES.

Response by MSgt Erik Copp made Sep 13 at 2015 2:19 PM

2015-09-13T14:19:17-04:00

Yes

Response by SSgt Alex Robinson made Sep 13 at 2015 3:35 PM

2015-09-13T15:35:03-04:00

Yes. There is no accurate way to screen these people. It is a real possibility that ISIS, et al have infiltrated these groups.