Do you think the DOJ is trying to create an officer conviction to satisfy an agenda?

SSG Trevor S. — Sat, 23 May 2015 16:04:46 -0400

A quote from the article:"The Justice Department said after the acquittal of Officer Michael Brelo’s on voluntary manslaughter charges that it would "review all available legal options."
This statement was made after an Ohio police officer was acquitted in a shooting case. Do you think the DOJ is desperate to create a guilty police officer to further an agenda?
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/05/23/verdict-reached-for-cleveland-patrolman-charged-in-deaths-suspects-amid-137/?intcmp=latestnews

Several arrests made as protesters flood Cleveland streets after officer's acquittal

A judge has reached a verdict in the trial of a Cleveland officer charged with voluntary manslaughter in the shooting deaths of two unarmed people in a 137-shot barrage of police gunfire.

Response by CPT Bruce Rodgers made May 23 at 2015 4:16 PM

CPT Bruce Rodgers — Sat, 23 May 2015 16:16:45 -0400

Politics has no place in law enforcement

Response by MAJ Carlos "CAP" A Puentes Sr made May 24 at 2015 12:05 PM

MAJ Carlos "CAP" A Puentes Sr — Sun, 24 May 2015 12:05:12 -0400

No, DOJ is not trying to satisfy an agenda. The police officer was nuts if the story is true based on the articles. The victim, while having a long record, was driving a car that backfired near/in front of a police station. Of course chase was given and the key item being that after they (driver and companion) were stopped and appeared no longer a threat, the officer jumped on the hood of the car and fired 15 rounds into the two victims. Nuts. Of course it bears an investigation by a third party.