Do you think it's possible for terrorists to infiltrate groups of migrants?

2015-11-09T19:56:28-05:00

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/11/09/al-qaeda-terror-boss-discovered-on-migrant-boat-authorities-tried-to-hide-news/

Al Qaeda Terror Boss Discovered On Migrant Boat

A convicted terrorist has been caught trying to smuggle himself into Europe on a migrant boat.

Response by CPT Private RallyPoint Member made Nov 9 at 2015 7:56 PM

2015-11-09T19:56:56-05:00

Yes. I also think that allowing immigrants into the country without vetting them is a big mistake.

Response by SPC Darren Koele made Nov 9 at 2015 10:25 PM

2015-11-09T22:25:45-05:00

Considering that Al Qaeda has been in Latin America for several years, it's entirely conceivable that ISIS can do the same. After that, coming in with migrants, refugees, or just crossing the border, is a walk in the park.

Response by LTC Private RallyPoint Member made Nov 10 at 2015 1:21 AM

2015-11-10T01:21:54-05:00

Yes

Response by CSM Michael J. Uhlig made Nov 10 at 2015 1:23 AM

2015-11-10T01:23:04-05:00

It is not only possible, it is highly probable and very likely! In fact, I would go so far as to say if they did not infiltrate (or at least attempt to), it would be a complete failure to exploit an opportunity on their part SSgt Alex Robinson.

Response by SCPO David Lockwood made Nov 19 at 2015 1:53 PM

2015-11-19T13:53:51-05:00

There's a thing called the Trojan Horse! Yes they can.

Response by Sgt David G Duchesneau made Nov 19 at 2015 2:07 PM

2015-11-19T14:07:26-05:00

Of course they can! Hell, anything is possible and these terrorist bastards can and will use every opportunity that they can.

Response by SMSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Nov 19 at 2015 2:15 PM

2015-11-19T14:15:02-05:00

Not a great question...I mean they DID infiltrate the program and carried out the attacks in Paris. This questions has already been answered in the affirmative.

Response by LTC Stephen F. made Nov 19 at 2015 2:23 PM

2015-11-19T14:23:57-05:00

Terrorists can very easily enter the Syrian refugee program because there is no real way to screen them out.
The better trained ones keep their intentions between themselves an allah. There is no way to identify them. Wannabe's may slip up and give away their intentions but the hardened terrorists will not be identifiable and will certainly deny it if suspected.
Self identified widows should be suspected as potential terrorists.

Response by MAJ Ken Landgren made Nov 19 at 2015 2:27 PM

2015-11-19T14:27:38-05:00

I think 6 men were trying to come to America with fake passports. So we take a picture of their eyeballs, so what?

Response by MSgt James Mullis made Nov 19 at 2015 2:56 PM

2015-11-19T14:56:35-05:00

The question has changed from can they...? to how many terrorists have infiltrated the refugee program?

Response by MAJ Alvin B. made Nov 19 at 2015 3:12 PM

2015-11-19T15:12:07-05:00

FYI: The House of Representatives just voted to alter the President's Plan.

WASHINGTON (AP) — In a stinging rebuke to President Barack Obama by Republicans as well as members of his own party, the House ignored a veto threat Thursday and overwhelmingly approved Republican legislation erecting fresh hurdles for Syrian and Iraqi refugees trying to enter the United States.
Dozens of Democrats joined Republicans as the House passed the measure 289-137. That margin exceeded the two-thirds majority required to override a veto, and it came despite a rushed, early morning visit to the Capitol by top administration officials in a futile attempt to limit Democratic defections for the measure.
Thursday’s vote came six days after a burst of bombings and shootings in Paris killed 129 people, wounded many more and revived post-9/11 jitters in the U.S. and Europe. The attacks have turned the question of admitting people fleeing war-torn Syria and Iraq into a high-stakes political issue in both the United States and Europe, and many congressional Democrats were willing to vote against their party’s lame duck president for fear of angering voters nervous about security at home.
Democrats opposing the GOP bill said the U.S. has no business abandoning its age-old values, including being a safe haven for people fleeing countries racked by violence. The Islamic State group has claimed responsibility for the Paris attacks and controls vast swathes of Syria and Iraq, despite a growing military campaign against them by the U.S. and other nations.
“Defeating terrorism should not mean slamming the door in the faces of those fleeing the terrorists. We might as well take down the Statue of Liberty,” said Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y.
Republicans said that in dangerous times, the government must first protect its own.
“It is against the values of our nation and the values of a free society to give terrorists the opening they are looking for” by not tightening entry restrictions, said House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif.
Before Thursday’s House vote, the White House sent chief of staff Denis McDonough and Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson to the Capitol to try winning over Democrats. Democratic aides said Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney, D-N.Y., had a forceful exchange with Johnson, saying that opposition to the bill would be a terrible vote for Democrats that could cost them seats in next year’s elections.
With the House’s 246 Republicans ready to solidly support the legislation, the administration was eager to keep the final tally for the bill below the two-thirds margin required to override a veto. In a sign of the conflicting political undercurrents confronting Democrats, senior House Democrats said they did not push rank-and-file lawmakers to oppose the bill.
“I’ve said to them from the start, ‘Nobody’s asked you to do anything. Do whatever works for you, for your district,“’ House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., who opposed the legislation, told journalists.
Freshman Rep. Brad Ashford, D-Neb., who faces a tough re-election fight next year, called the Paris attacks “a game changer” and supported the bill, saying, “I cannot sit back and ignore the concerns of my constituents and the American public.”
The measure, which in effect would suspend admissions of Syrian and Iraqi refugees, would require the FBI to conduct background checks on people coming to the U.S. from those countries. It would oblige the heads of the FBI and Homeland Security Department and the director of national intelligence to certify to Congress that each refugee “is not a threat to the security of the United States.”
On the campaign trail, Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton said the U.S. should welcome refugees from the region and bolster America’s defenses and intelligence operations.
On the Senate floor, Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., who hasn’t yet scheduled debate on the issue, said Thursday it is time “to press pause” so policy makers could decide whether adequate vetting procedures are in place, calling it “the most responsible thing for the administration to do right now.”
Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said he’s been disgusted in recent days by the comments from Republicans and called it “fear-mongering and bigotry.”
In a statement assuring a veto, the White House said the GOP bill would not improve Americans’ security. It said the legislation “would unacceptably hamper our efforts to assist some of the most vulnerable people in the world, many of whom are victims of terrorism, and would undermine our partners in the Middle East and Europe in addressing the Syrian refugee crisis.”
Currently, the refugee screening process typically takes 18 to 24 months and includes interviews, fingerprinting and database crosschecks by several federal agencies. Syrians undergo additional screening involving data from the U.N. Refugee Agency and interviews by Homeland Security Department officials trained to question Syrians.
The Obama administration wants to increase the 70,000 refugees to be admitted from around the world this year by 10,000, with much of the increase for Syrians.
The White House said that of 2,174 Syrians admitted to the U.S. since the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, none has been arrested or deported because of allegations they harbored extremist ambitions.

Response by Capt Jeff S. made Nov 20 at 2015 2:17 AM

2015-11-20T02:17:29-05:00