Do you think Hillary Clinton would make a good President? If so, why?

Col Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 08 Jun 2014 11:17:59 -0400

Do you think Hillary Clinton would make a good President, if you vote yes, why? Who do you think would be the best, front running candidate?

Note: Image added by RP staff of past Hillary campaign

Response by MSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 8 at 2014 11:20 AM

MSgt Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 08 Jun 2014 11:20:37 -0400

I don't know if there is a front running candidate right now. With so much going on in the world, there are so many different openings for someone else to show up and make a difference.

Response by MAJ Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 8 at 2014 11:23 AM

MAJ Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 08 Jun 2014 11:23:37 -0400

I will vote for anyone but Hillary (and anyone named Bush). We're a democracy, not a monarchy.

Response by TSgt Scott Hurley made Jun 8 at 2014 11:32 AM

TSgt Scott Hurley — Sun, 08 Jun 2014 11:32:25 -0400

A big FAT HELL NO..... Right now its to early to about anyone else...

Response by SFC Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 8 at 2014 11:50 AM

SFC Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 08 Jun 2014 11:50:33 -0400

Mrs. Clinton has a proven track record of being out of touch with the people of this country, and also of being someone who despises the military.

While I was in Iraq, I was assigned to a certain unit, whose commander had served under the first President Bush, and who also served under Clinton for about another year. This individual had been in charge of carrying the "football" (the briefcase which allows the President to launch nukes no matter where he is). He also had to give the morning briefing to the President.

His specific statement about Clinton: The most arrogant, bitchy, and generally unpleasant person he'd ever been around. He personally overheard her say something derogatory about the military and military service men and women. The specifics elude me for the moment, but once my Alzheimer's subsides, I'll post more about that.

BTW: The individual (who I still maintain occasional contact with) is a fullbird (at least, he was last time I e-mailed him) Navy Commander. I have no reason to doubt this individual, and I know he would not lie about anything that he'd ever done.

Response by SFC Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 8 at 2014 11:52 AM

SFC Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 08 Jun 2014 11:52:55 -0400

Dr. Ben Carson

Response by MSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 8 at 2014 11:59 AM

MSgt Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 08 Jun 2014 11:59:28 -0400

She is fairly evil in my opinion.

I'll vote for anyone surnamed Paul.

Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 8 at 2014 12:23 PM

SSG Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 08 Jun 2014 12:23:01 -0400

Not just no but HELL no. First and foremost, she does not have the best interests in mind for the country. Second, her total disregard for human life, especially with Benghazi, clearly disqualifies her for ANY office. Third, I sure as hell do not want another Clinton, or Bush, or political family in office.

Who I want is someone of the people and FOR the people. Sadly, there are hardly any around who do wish to run.

Response by 1SG Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 8 at 2014 12:26 PM

1SG Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 08 Jun 2014 12:26:36 -0400

My first reaction was to say no, but taking a moment to reconsider and trying to be objective...I'd say I'm not sure right now. I would hope that having made some questionable decisions, she learned from her mistakes. She has faced much personal adversity as anyone and now has had to deal with a lot of political adversity as well. Maybe she has become "battle-hardened" and is better prepared to be President...then again maybe she hasn't. I'm open enough to at least give her a fair chance to convince.

Response by PO2 Rocky Kleeger made Jun 8 at 2014 12:27 PM

PO2 Rocky Kleeger — Sun, 08 Jun 2014 12:27:11 -0400

And right now, there are NO front runners

Response by SPC Charles Brown made Jun 8 at 2014 12:50 PM

SPC Charles Brown — Sun, 08 Jun 2014 12:50:49 -0400

I have to say without any doubt or equivocation that she would be a horrible president. As a part of the presidential team in 2011; 10 years to the day from the original attacks as secretary of state she botched her job to ensure the protection of Embassy staff members by maintaining peaceful relations with Libya which resulted in the loss of 4 American lives. While I admit she was not solely responsible she was partially to blame.

As for the best front running candidate I would have to say my vote goes to Mickey Mouse, no wait, Goofy.

Response by MSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 8 at 2014 1:28 PM

MSgt Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 08 Jun 2014 13:28:07 -0400

"It's in the past, it doesn't matter..." That's not how you answer a question about an attack on one of your offices that cost the lives of four of your workers. She looks to me like someone that has trouble taking responsibility as a leader.

She'll have a lot of ground to make up for to earn my vote because of that. That said, it's not impossible. It also depends heavily on who the republican candidate is.

Response by LCpl Steve Wininger made Jun 8 at 2014 1:42 PM

LCpl Steve Wininger — Sun, 08 Jun 2014 13:42:05 -0400

Absolutely not! No more Clinton's, Bush's, or Obama's. The family affair in Washington has to stop. We need new blood, someone that is faithful to America and the Constitution, not special interests. I know this is asking a lot, but it doesn't hurt to wish.

Response by SSG(P) Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 8 at 2014 1:49 PM

SSG(P) Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 08 Jun 2014 13:49:34 -0400

It would have to be someone special for me to even consider voting for anyone with the surname Bush or Clinton at this point. There are other people that I think I would like to see in office and see how they do but I doubt we will get anyone I would want to vote for in the next election.

Response by Sgt Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 8 at 2014 2:22 PM

Sgt Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 08 Jun 2014 14:22:39 -0400

NO< Hillary would not.

Response by Cpl Jeff Bullington made Jun 8 at 2014 2:27 PM

Cpl Jeff Bullington — Sun, 08 Jun 2014 14:27:06 -0400

Mad dog Mattis

Response by LCpl Rick Ponton made Jun 8 at 2014 3:41 PM

LCpl Rick Ponton — Sun, 08 Jun 2014 15:41:21 -0400

MICHELE BACHMANN

Response by CW3 Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 8 at 2014 3:50 PM

CW3 Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 08 Jun 2014 15:50:38 -0400

Sir,
Bottom line is if your Conservative/Republican you wont vote for her and if your a Liberal/Democrat you will. I am a true blue Democrat and will vote for her and hope she add Elizabeth Warren to her ticket.

Response by CPL Jay Strickland made Jun 8 at 2014 4:30 PM

CPL Jay Strickland — Sun, 08 Jun 2014 16:30:51 -0400

The Russian reset button fiasco. Seriously I know Obama was young and trying to be more diplomatic but Hillary was supposedly experienced and should have know to follow GWB's harder line with Russia. All we have learned is reset button is Russian for yes you can invade another country.

Response by MAJ Robert (Bob) Petrarca made Jun 8 at 2014 4:50 PM

MAJ Robert (Bob) Petrarca — Sun, 08 Jun 2014 16:50:08 -0400

I've got to say that in my military and civilian careers I've enjoyed working for female superiors. Now before take a wrong turn down COL Nathan Jessup Boulevard (if you don't know the reference, you can't handle the truth), let me continue.

I've found a woman boss to be less politically motivated (ok, not so much in this case but ...) more to the point, more direct, more willing to buck the system and less likely to take sh!t. Again from my experience. The current occupant needs to retire and open a Waffle House franchise - those of you who have served south of the Mason-Dixon line know the place - great hash browns!

I think this country needs a little motherly TLC, from someone who knows how give someone like Russia a good paddling with the back of a wooden spoon! Not 100% committed to Hillary yet. I was in favor of the Mondale/Ferraro ticket but too young to vote on that one. Would have gone for the McCain/Palin except for only teeny-tiny thing - Sarah Palin. Would have definitely voted for a McCain/Fey ticket though. :-)

Response by 1SG Frank Rocha made Jun 8 at 2014 5:50 PM

1SG Frank Rocha — Sun, 08 Jun 2014 17:50:36 -0400

not no, but NO NO NO

Response by MSG Wade Huffman made Jun 8 at 2014 8:32 PM

MSG Wade Huffman — Sun, 08 Jun 2014 20:32:16 -0400

I think we've all seen what her response would be to the 2am phone call....

Response by Col Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 8 at 2014 8:46 PM

Col Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 08 Jun 2014 20:46:19 -0400

I agree to not only no, but heck no! Especially given her track record as Secretary of State...Benghazi...

Response by SSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 9 at 2014 11:54 AM

SSgt Private RallyPoint Member — Mon, 09 Jun 2014 11:54:17 -0400

I hear Phil Roberson is running I'd vote for him

Response by SSG Trevor S. made Jun 9 at 2014 12:02 PM

SSG Trevor S. — Mon, 09 Jun 2014 12:02:31 -0400

I would like to see Condolessa Rice run with Marco Rubio as VP.

Response by PO1 Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 9 at 2014 12:06 PM

PO1 Private RallyPoint Member — Mon, 09 Jun 2014 12:06:48 -0400

Rand Paul all the way!

Response by CMDCM Gene Treants made Jun 9 at 2014 12:07 PM

CMDCM Gene Treants — Mon, 09 Jun 2014 12:07:35 -0400

Not only no, but never! The Republicans have nothing but the same old thing - nothing new and inspiring for the rest of the country. The Democrats are hoping the rest of us forget all about Benghazi because they also have nothing new either and hope the Clinton name will revive the dynasty without a real leader, just another bully not responsible for her actions.

Neither mainstream Party has anything that is worth listening to because they are both so far to the Left and Right. The Country needs a healing MODERATE, someone who can work with both parties and not BULLY his/her way like the past administration has done. Someone who can unite and not further divide the Country.

Response by SPC Marc Sachs made Jun 9 at 2014 12:11 PM

SPC Marc Sachs — Mon, 09 Jun 2014 12:11:59 -0400

Hillary Clinton is just as much as a liar as obama. She's been lying in Washington since the 60's.

Response by CPO Bernie Penkin made Jun 9 at 2014 12:31 PM

CPO Bernie Penkin — Mon, 09 Jun 2014 12:31:18 -0400

Never!

Response by SFC Michael Hasbun made Jun 9 at 2014 12:31 PM

SFC Michael Hasbun — Mon, 09 Jun 2014 12:31:30 -0400

Pick any two of these three, and my vote is locked in...

Response by SSG (ret) William Martin made Jun 9 at 2014 12:54 PM

SSG (ret) William Martin — Mon, 09 Jun 2014 12:54:26 -0400

MAJ Whitehorn, Sir, Please in the event MRS. Hilary Clinton is voted as President of this great nation, the United States of America, lets air out of our concerns about her now because if she does become President, there might be a lot SMs being fired for their comments. With that said, I will try to keep it tactful and professional. I am from Arkansas, born and raised in a small town of Conway which is 25 miles from Little Rock. I am not stranger to the Clintons. I myself, do not want to see MRS. Clinton as the next president. To me, MRS. Clinton is just like President Obama but she's no 2.0 version. She is more like negative 2.0. She as president would be stepping deeper into a bottomless bag of FUBAR.

MRS. Clinton should not be President should not be President mostly because of Benghazi. Here are some reason:

1. She lied about why Benghazi was attacked - no integrity
2. She said, "why does it matter" why Benghazi was attacked even though the facts were known
3. She took some responsibility be ordering an investigation but by her own department? If Alpha company as a sexual assault accusations, do they do their own 15-6 investigations? I didn't think so. Someone much higher will make that decision like the BN CDR.
4. She could have prevented the attack. She knew of the dangers yet she sat on the information. She is a manager, not a LEADER!
5. She has silenced whistle blowers. People have been threatened to be silent. Why would she need to do this? It sounds like a cover up to me.
6. She had no plan to defend the four Americans by refusing to provide ample protection.

This is why she should not be President.

Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 9 at 2014 1:27 PM

SSG Private RallyPoint Member — Mon, 09 Jun 2014 13:27:19 -0400

Since Hillary wants the proverbial glass ceiling to be broken for the Presidency, how about Sarah Palin, Mia Love, Nikki Haley, or Shelley Capito?

Response by Cpl Brett Wagner made Jun 9 at 2014 1:32 PM

Cpl Brett Wagner — Mon, 09 Jun 2014 13:32:48 -0400

We don't have much to chose from with who the two parties will put forward. I am convinced that all politicians regardless of party are out for one thing. Themselves.

BTW I would like to vote for the Howard brothers Moe, Curly & Shemp but sadly they are deceased now.

Response by PO2 Phillip Bearden made Jun 9 at 2014 2:46 PM

PO2 Phillip Bearden — Mon, 09 Jun 2014 14:46:30 -0400

She's tough. Maybe she get us back in the black again.

Response by MSG Brad Sand made Jun 9 at 2014 3:03 PM

MSG Brad Sand — Mon, 09 Jun 2014 15:03:32 -0400

I think her poor performance as a Sec. of State only goes to prove she would be a terrible C & C. I think we all could come up with a long list of people better suited to be President, male and female.

Response by SPC Christopher Smith made Jun 9 at 2014 3:47 PM

SPC Christopher Smith — Mon, 09 Jun 2014 15:47:03 -0400

I am the best candidate. Too bad I'm in uniform for the next year and a half.

Response by SSgt Gregory Guina made Jun 9 at 2014 4:53 PM

SSgt Gregory Guina — Mon, 09 Jun 2014 16:53:37 -0400

I hope we can do something and start getting rid of these career politicians.

Response by SSgt George Brown made Jun 9 at 2014 5:04 PM

SSgt George Brown — Mon, 09 Jun 2014 17:04:01 -0400

Even people who support her cannot name one accomplishment she did as Secretary of State.

Response by PO1 Carol Nines made Jun 9 at 2014 5:41 PM

PO1 Carol Nines — Mon, 09 Jun 2014 17:41:10 -0400

ABH = Anyone but Hillary

Response by Sgt Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 9 at 2014 5:51 PM

Sgt Private RallyPoint Member — Mon, 09 Jun 2014 17:51:41 -0400

General "Mad Dog" Mattis for President

Response by PO1 Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 9 at 2014 6:21 PM

PO1 Private RallyPoint Member — Mon, 09 Jun 2014 18:21:20 -0400

If Hillary becomes president I'm pulling sgt Bergdahl card until her term(s) is/are up. Not wishing anyone to die in trying to find me

Response by SSG Keith Evans made Jun 9 at 2014 6:29 PM

SSG Keith Evans — Mon, 09 Jun 2014 18:29:31 -0400

No Way! Everyone has already stated everything I was thinking...

Response by SSG Jeremy Siebenaller made Jun 9 at 2014 9:11 PM

SSG Jeremy Siebenaller — Mon, 09 Jun 2014 21:11:56 -0400

She would be HORRIBLE!!!! But "What difference does it make?"

Response by SSG Daniel Rosploch made Jun 9 at 2014 10:37 PM

SSG Daniel Rosploch — Mon, 09 Jun 2014 22:37:01 -0400

I would like to see Neil Degrasse Tyson or maybe Bill Nye. We need another "first" and no, not Hillary, but an actual scientist. I bet if we had a real scientist things would get better. They normally don't have over-bearing political affiliations and just go with logic and common sense and reason. That's what we need in a president, logic, common sense and reason...sadly, it'll never happen. Scientists aren't cool enough for the social networking people of the world. How did those idiots ever become popular anyway???

Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 9 at 2014 10:59 PM

SSG Private RallyPoint Member — Mon, 09 Jun 2014 22:59:47 -0400

Yep!!!

Response by Sgt Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 9 at 2014 11:45 PM

Sgt Private RallyPoint Member — Mon, 09 Jun 2014 23:45:21 -0400

I think we as veterans and as citizens we need to start voting veterans in office that will protect our interests and the constitution. Does anyone think that the person that holds the office of president should have some military back ground or is it ok to let mon military personnel as president

Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 10 at 2014 12:05 PM

SSG Private RallyPoint Member — Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:05:40 -0400

She is completely out of touch with the military as most democrats are.

Response by SFC Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 10 at 2014 10:33 PM

SFC Private RallyPoint Member — Tue, 10 Jun 2014 22:33:40 -0400

I am deeply frightened by the 12 percent thus far who have voted yes.

Response by CPL Kevin Janes made Jun 11 at 2014 12:12 AM

CPL Kevin Janes — Wed, 11 Jun 2014 00:12:03 -0400

Please, no...

Response by MSgt Lancia Stewart made Jun 11 at 2014 2:25 AM

MSgt Lancia Stewart — Wed, 11 Jun 2014 02:25:40 -0400

Libertarian so... That should answer that.

Response by CW4 Jesse Miller made Jun 11 at 2014 5:32 AM

CW4 Jesse Miller — Wed, 11 Jun 2014 05:32:15 -0400

Our country needs strong leadership. I would like to see West with Paul or Cruz, that would be a good team.

Response by MSG(P) Michael Warrick made Jun 11 at 2014 7:48 AM

MSG(P) Michael Warrick — Wed, 11 Jun 2014 07:48:02 -0400

Ted Cruz

Response by SSG William Sutter made Jun 11 at 2014 9:58 AM

SSG William Sutter — Wed, 11 Jun 2014 09:58:39 -0400

The economy has enough democratic damage. It is time for a republican president.

Response by SSG Gerhard S. made Jun 11 at 2014 10:17 AM

SSG Gerhard S. — Wed, 11 Jun 2014 10:17:30 -0400

Best Candidate? Anybody who will actually uphold their oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution.

Response by SFC Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 11 at 2014 12:20 PM

SFC Private RallyPoint Member — Wed, 11 Jun 2014 12:20:24 -0400

I Stand With Rand.

Response by CPL Richard Robison made Jun 11 at 2014 1:06 PM

CPL Richard Robison — Wed, 11 Jun 2014 13:06:02 -0400

I hear Eric Cantor will be looking for a job soon. :)

Response by PO1 Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 11 at 2014 11:47 PM

PO1 Private RallyPoint Member — Wed, 11 Jun 2014 23:47:26 -0400

She has, and is, proving to be financially irresponsible. She has been proven time and again to be a thoroughly ineffective leader. If we have finally reached the age in this country where a woman takes the helm, there are certainly much better candidates to do so.

Response by Col Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 12 at 2014 7:14 AM

Col Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 12 Jun 2014 07:14:57 -0400

A few people have mentioned Michelle Bachman as a potential candidate. In your opinion, what makes her a good candidate?

Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 12 at 2014 12:36 PM

SSG Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 12 Jun 2014 12:36:30 -0400

I'll vote for her since she and Bill are SO poor and destitute. You can clearly see the squalor they have to live in.

Response by SFC Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 12 at 2014 5:24 PM

SFC Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 12 Jun 2014 17:24:05 -0400

I would vote for Rand Paul, however I do respect Hillary, however she really screwed the pooch on Benghazi.

Response by PO1 Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 12 at 2014 10:58 PM

PO1 Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 12 Jun 2014 22:58:23 -0400

Honestly, i dont care who is president as long as they start making changes and getting congress and the house to quit arguing over stupid stuff and start making changes. And hopefully stop spending more money then make

Response by 1SG David Niles made Jun 13 at 2014 12:02 AM

1SG David Niles — Fri, 13 Jun 2014 00:02:12 -0400

Hillary would do worse than the current administration. My dream ticket would be Geb Bush and Allen West. Both good hard working conservatives. Don't much care for Bush's education stance, but I could live with it. West is a military man and we need one.

Response by SSgt(P) Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 13 at 2014 10:36 AM

SSgt(P) Private RallyPoint Member — Fri, 13 Jun 2014 10:36:18 -0400

I don't think either a democrat or a republican should be the next president. Both parties have shown that they've been working together to polarize the nation. If history proves anything, the more a nation a polarized, the easier it is to control. That's exactly what is being done here. Fear mongering and political rhetoric has brainwashed the public to allowing the government to slowly but surely strip away people rights of free choice.

Response by Col Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 15 at 2014 10:07 AM

Col Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 15 Jun 2014 10:07:17 -0400

So where are those pro Hillary supporters in this discussion?

Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 15 at 2014 12:09 PM

SSG Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 15 Jun 2014 12:09:44 -0400

The leader of the free world should focus on saving lives not covering up the deaths of them

Response by SSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 15 at 2014 3:17 PM

SSgt Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 15 Jun 2014 15:17:29 -0400

To answer, No. I'm not a fan of the career politics.

However, you need to see what will be available in the next election. To be quite honest; we need a change. Who wouldn't mind finding a person that might have been a state level instead of one on those from the federal level. It would be nice to have someone that keeps it simple.

For those that have taken our history classes understands how elections were done in the past and how they have evolved. Ex: our State legislators used to vote for our US Senators. Today we vote for our US senators, thanks to the 17th amendment.

What we need to have, is get those who have been elected to agree and act like statesmen/stateswomen. If you want to go and take the long road, need to press the issue of seniority. Look at trying to limit those terms for each office. We did it for the President. Look at now doing it for the US Representatives and Senators.

I'm a person that still love politics for what it's worth. As a member who served in the Vermont State Legislative Page, in Montpelier and US Senate Page, in D.C. in turned became a banker in my late teens and now in the military. All I'll say is; you can complain all you want. But, it's your job to vote.

If I read some of the post correctly go a head and vent everything out. But, also keep it in good taste.

Response by Cpl Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 15 at 2014 4:10 PM

Cpl Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 15 Jun 2014 16:10:39 -0400

Absolutely not! Read her thesis online before it's scrubbed. That woman has the morals of a jackal. She would eat her own before she lifted a finger for the military. Here it is... http://www.hillaryclintonquarterly.com/documents/HillaryClintonThesis.pdf

Response by SGT Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 15 at 2014 6:20 PM

SGT Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 15 Jun 2014 18:20:08 -0400

Nope, we need something new not the same old type

Response by SGT Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 16 at 2014 5:22 PM

SGT Private RallyPoint Member — Mon, 16 Jun 2014 17:22:56 -0400

No to Hillary!

Still Waiting on my State Senator to run for President!

The Voter's Self Defense System

Project Vote Smart provides free, unbiased, in-depth information about current officials, candidates, issues, legislation, and voting. Non-partisan and nonprofit since 1988.

Response by SFC Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 16 at 2014 9:19 PM

SFC Private RallyPoint Member — Mon, 16 Jun 2014 21:19:54 -0400

This question is really tough especially considering the fact that there haven't been anyone confirmed to be running yet. My top contenders for the 2016 election at this time would be Chris Christie, Marco Rubio, or Paul Ryan. Who knows, there may be someone who would make one of the greatest presidents that we don't even know yet!

Response by SSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 29 at 2014 3:06 PM

SSgt Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 29 Jun 2014 15:06:36 -0400

Honestly after our last one we really need a Republican president.

Response by SSG Ed Mikus made Jul 17 at 2014 7:49 PM

SSG Ed Mikus — Thu, 17 Jul 2014 19:49:52 -0400

Same with less freedom

Response by MSG Wade Huffman made Jul 17 at 2014 8:20 PM

MSG Wade Huffman — Thu, 17 Jul 2014 20:20:55 -0400

Let's just hope we don't have to find out.

Response by Capt Jeff S. made Jul 17 at 2014 8:51 PM

Capt Jeff S. — Thu, 17 Jul 2014 20:51:32 -0400

More of the same old lies from an anti-American Progressive who lacks the ethics, honor and integrity to be Commander in Chief -- just like the current poser, squatting in the White House.

And we would definitely have less freedom, because the Progressive Agenda, which Killary represents, is a Socialist one that is by definition incompatible and at odds with the basic tenets of our Constitution.

Response by LCpl Steve Wininger made Jul 17 at 2014 9:19 PM

LCpl Steve Wininger — Thu, 17 Jul 2014 21:19:27 -0400

NIGHTMARE!!!

Response by Cpl Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 17 at 2014 9:20 PM

Cpl Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 17 Jul 2014 21:20:22 -0400

With real grass roots opposition, it won't be Hillary. All one has to do is read her college thesis to know that, she too, was one of the radical 60's hippies that idolized the weather underground and saul alinsky and cloward and piven.

Response by SSG V. Michelle Woods made Jul 17 at 2014 9:26 PM

SSG V. Michelle Woods — Thu, 17 Jul 2014 21:26:39 -0400

I respect every single person's opinion about politics.

To answer your question, I honest to God have no idea and I wonder how so many other Americans seem to know so much about politicians.

If these people are so bad, why are they in such glorified positions of authority?
More of a rhetorical question I suppose. I just know I'd trust any one of the people on this site (minus the few civilians) more than I would any politician, commercial or propaganda.

It seems pretty clear to me that none of us know what the hell is going on anymore. It feels like it's all a matter of choosing the lesser of evils.

Response by SPC Dennis Mullins made Jul 19 at 2014 6:37 AM

SPC Dennis Mullins — Sat, 19 Jul 2014 06:37:49 -0400

He'll no, cover up!

Response by MAJ Robert (Bob) Petrarca made Jul 19 at 2014 3:27 PM

MAJ Robert (Bob) Petrarca — Sat, 19 Jul 2014 15:27:13 -0400

A place where we pray that no Bush or Clinton offspring decide to run for public office.

Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama, Clinton...

Response by PO1 William "Chip" Nagel made Jul 19 at 2014 5:46 PM

PO1 William "Chip" Nagel — Sat, 19 Jul 2014 17:46:32 -0400

No different than it has ever been any other President. Presidents don't change the Military. If anything I have noticed that the Military Changes the President. All of them seem to stand a little straighter in our Presence and even those that never served learn how to render a somewhat decent Salute and I don't care how much they Condemn "Big Brother" before they get elected they fall in love with the NSA (Part of the DOD) once they are elected. No it won't make a Rats Ass worth of Difference when she is elected. The Far Right Will Paint her as a Communist or some other silliness and the Far Left will Paint her as a Corporate Tool and the truth will be somewhere in between. Being an Old School Compassionate Conservative (Moderate called a Left Winger these days) I will Probably Campaign for her.

Response by LTC Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 19 at 2014 9:49 PM

LTC Private RallyPoint Member — Sat, 19 Jul 2014 21:49:43 -0400

If she wins do you think Bill will move up to Canada again?

Response by PO1 Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 19 at 2014 11:05 PM

PO1 Private RallyPoint Member — Sat, 19 Jul 2014 23:05:53 -0400

It will be "The 8 years the US stood still"

Response by SSG Robin Rushlo made Jul 20 at 2014 10:49 AM

SSG Robin Rushlo — Sun, 20 Jul 2014 10:49:09 -0400

United States of Europe, oe other socialist country will have taken over.

Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 20 at 2014 10:23 PM

SSG Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 20 Jul 2014 22:23:57 -0400

It's NOT as scary as these five fools running the country. Then again, by the time it got to Chelsea, we'd be under the control of China or someone like that.

Response by PO2 Christopher Morehouse made Jul 21 at 2014 12:05 AM

PO2 Christopher Morehouse — Mon, 21 Jul 2014 00:05:28 -0400

Honestly, it would depend on who takes Congress. The first two years of Obama's first term would have looked much different if his party didn't also have strong control of the legislative branch. Among many things, my health insurance would be much lower, because there is no way the ACA would have gotten through without said control. So, Hillary with a split or even non-democratic Congress, might not be so bad. If anything, it will prevent the federal government from swinging their big stick around trying to effect change.

The biggest effect I see would be to the Judicial branch. We have four justices over the age of 70; 2 of whom are fairly conservative, and two who are of a swing-like nature, though liberal leaning. As the President is a large factor in the choice, a two term President could effectively alter the make-up of our supreme court for decades to come.

Response by CWO4 Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 21 at 2014 12:06 AM

CWO4 Private RallyPoint Member — Mon, 21 Jul 2014 00:06:33 -0400

Free... the country will be free like it's been since 1776. Hooyah America!

Response by LCpl Steve Wininger made Jul 21 at 2014 8:37 PM

LCpl Steve Wininger — Mon, 21 Jul 2014 20:37:45 -0400

Imagine third world country!!!! Scary stuff. Desert in Iraq is looking appealing.

Response by 1LT Shawn McCarthy made Jul 22 at 2014 1:27 AM

1LT Shawn McCarthy — Tue, 22 Jul 2014 01:27:26 -0400

What difference, at this point, does it make?

Response by LCpl Mark Lefler made Jul 22 at 2014 8:33 AM

LCpl Mark Lefler — Tue, 22 Jul 2014 08:33:17 -0400

It will be a better place with Hillary then any of the republicans who would grind this country into the ground.

Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 22 at 2014 9:16 AM

SSG Private RallyPoint Member — Tue, 22 Jul 2014 09:16:30 -0400

We'll have to see won't we. I've never been to Russia or Iran before. Just might be a fun trip

Response by SCPO Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 23 at 2014 1:12 PM

SCPO Private RallyPoint Member — Wed, 23 Jul 2014 13:12:11 -0400

I am far more concerned about 8 more years of a dysfunctional privately held corporately-owned Congress and Supreme Court than I am of what any future President will do. The Founding Fathers gave the Congress the bulk of the power in our government. They did not give as much power to the President as people think. It's all in Article 1 of the Constitution.

http://constitutionus.com/

Constitution of the United States - We the People

A highly accessible, easy to use online version full text including the Bill of Rights and the rest of the Amendments includes both sequential and subject indexes.

Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 24 at 2014 11:03 PM

SSG Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 24 Jul 2014 23:03:44 -0400

I'd rather not find out.

Response by SGT Thomas Lucken made Jul 27 at 2014 11:41 AM

SGT Thomas Lucken — Sun, 27 Jul 2014 11:41:17 -0400

I spent most of Bill's 2 terms overseas..... If Hillary is elected, I am gone.....

Response by SSG Jeffrey Spencer made Jul 27 at 2014 11:51 AM

SSG Jeffrey Spencer — Sun, 27 Jul 2014 11:51:38 -0400

God, don't even go there!

Response by SCPO Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 28 at 2014 2:52 PM

SCPO Private RallyPoint Member — Mon, 28 Jul 2014 14:52:40 -0400

Really? Then explain why Congress hasn't passed a budget in 6 years with the Republicans in charge of the House of Representatives. By the way, I am neither a Republican, Democrat, Libertarian, or member of any political party. Political party affiliation is for people who don't know how, or want to, think independently.

As for the WMD's in Iraq, I served with more than a few Marines who were there and said there were no WMD's in country. I suppose they are all liars. Additionally, if there had been WMD's on the ground we would have heard a hell of a lot of crowing from Bush's administration about how they were right. Instead were heard nothing but deflection, subterfuge, and obfuscation when the topic was brought up.

Response by Maj Jeremy R. made Jul 30 at 2014 1:42 PM

Maj Jeremy R. — Wed, 30 Jul 2014 13:42:19 -0400

If we keep electing the Bush and Clinton families to the White House we might as well become a monarchy instead of a democracy. You can't tell me we don't have any other possible candidates except for these two families (I say that knowing Jeb Bush is a possible candidate so we could end up seeing a Jeb Bush vs Hillary Clinton in the general election).

Response by Sgt Private RallyPoint Member made Aug 3 at 2014 3:56 PM

Sgt Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 03 Aug 2014 15:56:01 -0400

8 years? Unlikely. Clintons only get 4

Response by SGT Richard H. made Aug 4 at 2014 9:58 AM

SGT Richard H. — Mon, 04 Aug 2014 09:58:35 -0400

Short answer: Screwed.

Response by PO3 John Jeter made Aug 5 at 2014 11:32 AM

PO3 John Jeter — Tue, 05 Aug 2014 11:32:27 -0400

Holy Cow! You had to work hard to find a nightmare scenario like that! *grin*

Response by Sgt Packy Flickinger made Sep 12 at 2014 12:02 AM

Sgt Packy Flickinger — Fri, 12 Sep 2014 00:02:42 -0400

Combine Detroit with North Korea. That about sums it up.

Response by PO2 Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 12 at 2014 12:39 PM

PO2 Private RallyPoint Member — Fri, 12 Sep 2014 12:39:23 -0400

I want to see Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton as her VP. There is no constitutional law saying he can't be president if she dies, it only says you can't have three consecutive terms.

Response by CSM Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 13 at 2014 1:15 PM

CSM Private RallyPoint Member — Sat, 13 Sep 2014 13:15:17 -0400

About the same as it was after 8 years of "W", and 8 years of Obama, and 8 years of Bill....Nothing changes only the people. Read a poem title the Indispensable Man and think of it this way, The USA is the bucket, and the POTUS is the hand.

Response by SFC William "Bill" Moore made Sep 14 at 2014 8:04 PM

SFC William "Bill" Moore — Sun, 14 Sep 2014 20:04:02 -0400

Answer : What and Who was America?
After Eight years of what we have now, we are going to be lucky if we are a notch or two above third world standards. These 8 and then 8 of Hillary, there will not be a recognizable America! And I don't want another Bush, if you're wondering!

Response by SFC Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 17 at 2014 1:10 PM

SFC Private RallyPoint Member — Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:10:13 -0400

With Hillary Clinton's record as Sec of State and her Benghazi testimony of "what difference does it make?", I would say no. Not even close.

Sadly, I don't think anyone could beat her right now if it were election day. Our country has become an increasingly lemming society who just follow whichever shiny object happens to get their attention.

Response by SPC Marc Sachs made Sep 17 at 2014 1:12 PM

SPC Marc Sachs — Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:12:02 -0400

Killery is going down. After the hits she is finally going to take for Benghazi she will probably not even be on the ticket. However the libs are demented and would want her anyway. We have a bigger issue people. The rise of islam in the USA. Take a look at England and France. They have tried multiculturalism and it is failing there big time. We need to take a bigger stand against this evil and nonsense ideology, because when it either their religion or our Country, their choice is not the later!

Response by LTC Joseph Gross made Sep 18 at 2014 12:45 PM

LTC Joseph Gross — Thu, 18 Sep 2014 12:45:02 -0400

While I would take her over our current president I do not believe she has the right values or reasoning ability to be president. I also believes she lacks the integrity I expect from a dog catcher.

Response by Cpl Chris Rice made Sep 18 at 2014 3:08 PM

Cpl Chris Rice — Thu, 18 Sep 2014 15:08:05 -0400

I think she will do many things better than President Obama, for one she and the former President Clinton are schmoozers, they tend to be able to work deals. This is something that I feel President Obama has lacked, not that he has not tried, but at this point I think is Administration is opting to avoid the repeated ball kicking that is talking with the TEA Party.

On the other hand if you look on the comments here the general consensus is that the she is going to be good or the worst thing ever. I think everybody is being a bit dramatic, and in the end it is her biggest flaw; she is divisive, whether she is attempting to be or not. This is one of the reasons I wonder if Vice President Biden would not make a better POTUS for this time in the American story. He talks straight, people who listen to him tend to like him, and he has long history of working out compromise especially in the Senate (Remember the 2011 Debt Ceiling).

My biggest issue is that the Republican Party is not offering anybody who is as credible as Secretary Clinton, nor are they really offering a counterpoint to her ideas. I think the U.S. Public is tired of politics that exist only to thwart one another, and really that is all the Republican party has accomplished over the course of this Administration. I think a lot of people are interested in Senator Rand Paul until they really study his positions (I am kind of going off of his father's books to fill the blanks with the Senator). Senator Cruz is more divisive than Secretary Clinton, and Governors Walker, and Christie I am not sure aren't a lot corrupt. Senator Rubio has never stood for anything, as we can see by him coming out against his own bills. I would listen to what Governor Huntsman has to say, but he will never make it through a Primary. Eh my $0.02

Response by SSG Jacob Wiley made Sep 18 at 2014 3:27 PM

SSG Jacob Wiley — Thu, 18 Sep 2014 15:27:38 -0400

She's a liar and a traitor.

Response by Cpl Brett Wagner made Sep 19 at 2014 12:43 PM

Cpl Brett Wagner — Fri, 19 Sep 2014 12:43:42 -0400

My prediction is this. Neither party will put forward a candidate that deserves to sit in the office of the President of the United States of America. Both parties have failed us, they deceive us and rob us of our hard earned money and spend it on things that most Americans disagree with. Then to add insult to injury then exempt themselves from their own tyrannical laws.

Response by LCDR Kevin Black made Sep 20 at 2014 10:29 AM

LCDR Kevin Black — Sat, 20 Sep 2014 10:29:17 -0400

Abject failure as SECSTATE. Fired from Watergate investigation for unethical behavior. Shady dealings as a lawyer - Rose Law firm anyone? Insider trade scam for cattle futures. Carpet Bagger Senator who got elected because of her name and not her actual qualifications and experience. Then it was her campaign that started the whole birther business as part of the continual campaign dirty tricks the Clintons have used forever. ISIS happened because she and Joe Biden failed to negotiate a SOFA with Iraq. They lied that things weren't negotiable, everything is negotiable, it was a convenient out to get short term political gain now it has blown up and this administration and the folks who ran it have failed and she was a major player and at fault for a good portion of it. Don't believe what you see on TV go and do some in depth research. There are better Democrats out there and better Republicans then her. She also has a terrible memory, every time she is cornered under testimony she seems to "I do not recall". She is NOT presidential material and don't vote for her merely because the media is backing her and she happens to be a woman. Those are not valid qualifications. You better pick carefully because the world is stacking up for WWIII if we aren't careful and well led. If you don't believe that you better take some history and start learning starting with WW I.

Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 21 at 2014 10:53 AM

SSG Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 21 Sep 2014 10:53:25 -0400

The majority says no just because of her last name. But the truth is, what constitutes being a good President? President Obama passed Obamacare and everyone hates him for it, but he did get OBL. Judging by his work in office will we say 10/15 years from now he was a good President? What about President Bush? Remember everybody hated him when Iraq was spinning out of control while we were headed towards another Great Depression. Will we say he was bad president or a good president. What about James Polk or Franklin Pierce? Do you even know who they are? They might have President when mail was still delivered by house and you had to take the train to get from state to state, but we're they good Presidents?

It's too difficult to judge if someone is going to be a good President because you don't know what's going to happen in that Presidency. All you can do is speculate. So the leader of the free world is a woman, will the world's so called dictators & hardliners [North Korea, Iran] and terrorists group [ISIS] step up the pressure? We don't know that yet. Whose to say Hilary won't adopt a form of the Bush Doctrine and redefine the term preemptive? You just don't know because there are too many variables you have to take into consideration in how an event occurs and how it makes other countries react.

But back to the question at hand and I would probably say maybe Hilary would be a good President.

Response by LTC Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 21 at 2014 11:30 AM

LTC Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 21 Sep 2014 11:30:25 -0400

I don't think anyone who would make a good president could get nominated by a major party.

Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 21 at 2014 3:30 PM

SSG Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 21 Sep 2014 15:30:02 -0400

I don't think we will see another good President until the two party control is squashed and money is out of Washington.

Frankly, we are stuck every election with two bad choices: Doo Doo Burger vs Puke Soup.

Do we need leadership? I thought our system was one of representation? Sure, they represent something.......themselves and their party.

Clinton was a senator for my state. Till this day I still cannot find a single thing she accomplished. IMHO she is a classic politician. A salesman....er saleswomen.

If she were elected, I'd follow her orders as required. I won't vote for her though.

Response by CSM Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 21 at 2014 9:32 PM

CSM Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 21 Sep 2014 21:32:17 -0400

Vice President Biden will get the nod from the democratic party

Response by Maj Chris Nelson made Oct 1 at 2014 2:23 PM

Maj Chris Nelson — Wed, 01 Oct 2014 14:23:03 -0400

I feel that Hilary Clinton would NOT be a good President. My feelings are that she has showed a consistant lack of responsibility in roles she has already held. IF she runs, I will probably not vote for her...however, with that being said, I must also look to see who is on the other side. Personally, I think that NONE of the current politicians are worth much...except in their pocketbook. In golf, we would be allowed a "do-over/Mulligan". Term limits would be a nice start.

Response by LTJG Robert M. made Oct 2 at 2014 11:38 AM

LTJG Robert M. — Thu, 02 Oct 2014 11:38:04 -0400

Has no Accountability/Integrity & is out of touch with reality.

Response by CW5 Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 3 at 2014 9:06 PM

CW5 Private RallyPoint Member — Fri, 03 Oct 2014 21:06:08 -0400

Cpl Brett Wagner, that's a good and a scary question. I'm afraid we are slipping down a not-so-good slope, and eight years of President Hillary Clinton will take us further down the slope. The military will certainly be much weaker.

Response by SFC Boots Attaway made Oct 3 at 2014 10:00 PM

SFC Boots Attaway — Fri, 03 Oct 2014 22:00:28 -0400

Actually the question should be: After 8 years of a President Hillery Clinton, will there be a United States of America left?

Response by MSG Brad Sand made Oct 4 at 2014 10:47 AM

MSG Brad Sand — Sat, 04 Oct 2014 10:47:52 -0400

I think over the last 6...22...years we have proven we can survive anything the Nation drops into the White House. I actually think Hillary would have been better than Barry, but I think we have already slid too far to the Left over the last 6...22 years and America is not in the mood for Hillary.

Response by SSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 4 at 2014 2:48 PM

SSgt Private RallyPoint Member — Sat, 04 Oct 2014 14:48:44 -0400

MSG Wade Huffman SPC Charles Brown It would mean, a 'food fight' with no food.. lol

Response by Cpl Ray Fernandez made Oct 4 at 2014 3:31 PM

Cpl Ray Fernandez — Sat, 04 Oct 2014 15:31:13 -0400

I'm not convinced she will run, and just because she's the expected favorite right now doesn't mean it's inevitable that she will receive the nomination if she does run. In 2008, she ran and well the supposed favorite then was dead in the water against a junior Senator from Illinois. If the front runner won the election by being the favorite before the first primary, we'd have had a President Guliani.

I am not convinced that she will run due to her health, and the recent change in her status as being one of the two creepiest looking new grandparents in the country. I just don't think she'll run but she'll have some sway in shaping who has the nomination and who gets the money while promoting her and Bil's Clinton Global Initiative.

Response by SSG Maurice P. made Oct 4 at 2014 6:05 PM

SSG Maurice P. — Sat, 04 Oct 2014 18:05:48 -0400

i believe we will be close to becoming a 3rd world country by then we will look like tijuana hehehehehehehehehe tijuana of the early 60's with only 1 traffic light hehehehehehehehehe...people living in tin huts no real infrastructure for waste removal or clean water and sanitation...

Response by 1SG Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 4 at 2014 8:09 PM

1SG Private RallyPoint Member — Sat, 04 Oct 2014 20:09:26 -0400

Hope we don't have to find out!

Response by SFC(P) Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 4 at 2014 11:08 PM

SFC(P) Private RallyPoint Member — Sat, 04 Oct 2014 23:08:32 -0400

I do think that as a nation it would be hard for us to stomach another 4-8 years of the same political party sitting in the White House, I also don't think that we want to see another Clinton, or Bush in there either. We need a fresh face with new ideas, and not the same old rhetoric.

Response by CPT Jack Durish made Oct 5 at 2014 11:37 AM

CPT Jack Durish — Sun, 05 Oct 2014 11:37:29 -0400

Honestly, I can't even imagine what America would be like after 8 years of a Hillary Clinton Administration, and that's saying a lot since I have a pretty healthy imagination.

My expectations of the Obama Administration have been fairly accurate. He came to the position with no credentials - no leadership experience - and we have been wandering as a nation rudderless. However, we know much more about Hillary and her leadership style. Remember Travelgate? That was the result of her vindictive nature. Remember Hillarycare? That initiative failed because she blatantly excluded healthcare providers from any public discussion of the healthcare industry. It would be the same as having a panel of drill press operators mapping the diplomatic strategy of the nation.

Still, the future of such a government is cloudy. Would the states finally rise up and put a halt to it? Would the people finally rebel? Maybe Hillary is just the kind of President we need to get the ball rolling...

Response by PO1 Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 5 at 2014 9:15 PM

PO1 Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 05 Oct 2014 21:15:09 -0400

I tried to compare her to a well-accomplished Margaret Thatcher. I failed in my quest.

I even tried to size her up against Angela Merkel. Still no-go! How did we end up so low and so liberal??

Response by SSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 5 at 2014 10:57 PM

SSgt Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 05 Oct 2014 22:57:19 -0400

I honestly find it hard to say whether one will be or has been "good". I've been in the military 9 years and have seen 2 presidents during my service time.

From neither of them have I seen anything that drastically makes my life better as a service member.

From my perspective, outside of the small % increase in our paychecks there hasn't been much but non-stop cuts on our military funds/capabilities.

Luckily we're trained to "shut up and make due" and we have done as well as we could, with what we have gotten/still have left.

I could say maybe for those who were affected by it (not me personally) but maybe the don't ask-don't tell repeal was a positive note.

Response by SSG Pete Fleming made Oct 5 at 2014 11:35 PM

SSG Pete Fleming — Sun, 05 Oct 2014 23:35:27 -0400

But unfortunately I don't know who I would pick... Perhaps someone with a business mind and actually knows how to balance his/her checkbook and manage/coordinate with other departments/agencies.

Response by SPC Paul Shene III made Oct 5 at 2014 11:46 PM

SPC Paul Shene III — Sun, 05 Oct 2014 23:46:49 -0400

the talent pool of candidates is terrible. Hilary Clinton would probably be a mediocre POTUS. Most of the ones publicly mentioned as possibles for POTUS either were failures or criminals.

I'm not hopeful for post 2016.

Response by CPT Jack Durish made Oct 6 at 2014 12:11 PM

CPT Jack Durish — Mon, 06 Oct 2014 12:11:38 -0400

I am certain that the United States will suffer under a Hillary Clinton Administration on two counts: Ideologically and Practically.

Ms Clinton represents a political ideology that has failed in every instance where it has been attempted: Socialism. Don't waste your time arguing. She has branded herself a socialist in every word and deed of her public life and socialism has failed or is failing everywhere in the world. We simply can't afford it given the current state of the economy as well as unrest in the world.

In more practical terms, we need only look to Ms Clinton's performance as an attorney, First Lady, and Secretary of State to see failure piled on failure. Yes, of course, the First Lady has no formal duties, but her husband placed her in positions of responsibility during his Administration and the result was Travelgate (wherein Ms Clinton's "management style" led to crony capitalism and erupted in a major scandal) and Hillarygate (wherein Ms Clinton excluded healthcare providers from her nation wide effort to craft a new public health policy). As Secretary of State, evidence builds every day that she is responsible for the debacle at Benghazi and may be responsible for the deaths of our ambassador there and his defenders.

Lastly, there are health issues. We should not place a person in the most stressful job in the world when they are unlikely to survive it.

If you are anxious to elect a woman as President, allow me to recommend Condoleeza Rice...

Response by SFC Kenneth Hunnell made Oct 10 at 2014 9:27 PM

SFC Kenneth Hunnell — Fri, 10 Oct 2014 21:27:11 -0400

The ironic thing is I initially voted for her. Then later on when someone from another country asked her something about her husband, she spassed out on him. To him it was a natural question. We do not need a president that gets bent out of shape because it got them upset

Response by SSG Maurice P. made Oct 19 at 2014 10:26 PM

SSG Maurice P. — Sun, 19 Oct 2014 22:26:44 -0400

3rd world ............dollar worthless...........sharia...........Ied's common................

Response by SSgt Salvador Martinez made Oct 22 at 2014 6:21 AM

SSgt Salvador Martinez — Wed, 22 Oct 2014 06:21:24 -0400

She will continue where obama left off and destroy our military. weaken our country, throw us under the bus, more military on the streets. I can go on and on

Response by SSgt James Stanley made Oct 22 at 2014 10:07 PM

SSgt James Stanley — Wed, 22 Oct 2014 22:07:13 -0400

I don't even want to think about it. My hope is that we won't have to find out.

Response by SSG Maurice P. made Oct 28 at 2014 6:47 AM

SSG Maurice P. — Tue, 28 Oct 2014 06:47:25 -0400

The butcher of benghazi will not get elected...............

Response by SSG David Fahy made Nov 3 at 2014 3:00 AM

SSG David Fahy — Mon, 03 Nov 2014 03:00:03 -0500

I couldn't imagine what it would be like after 8 years of another clinton in office! With her history and the baggage she brings with her, "NO BODY IN THEIR RIGHT MIND WOULD VOTE FOR HER!" She has lied about a lot of things like whitewater, that she was fired as a lawyer, she hired a group of detectives to get dirt on the women Bill had affairs with to shut them up. Her lies about Benghazi! The war on women starts with Hillary! I feel sorry for her because she said they where dead broke when they left the whitehouse because they had to pay for their daughter's education and had two different mortgages to pay! Hell, she should try making it on what the average joe makes! With Bill's and then Hillary's book deals,her being a senator as well, they should have been living well indeed! I would also like to know how their daughter got a 6 figure job as an consultant working part time just out of school? She wants everyone to think they are just like the average joe out there!

Response by PO3 Camille Romero made Nov 6 at 2014 1:22 AM

PO3 Camille Romero — Thu, 06 Nov 2014 01:22:53 -0500

I concur with MSG Wade Huffman of Dayton, OH....I hope we NEVER have to find out!!!

Response by CPL(P) Private RallyPoint Member made Nov 6 at 2014 4:41 AM

CPL(P) Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 06 Nov 2014 04:41:34 -0500

I'd usually say it couldn't get any worse but... yeah.

Response by MSgt Keith Hebert made Dec 6 at 2014 11:06 AM

MSgt Keith Hebert — Sat, 06 Dec 2014 11:06:12 -0500

I agree with SSgt George Brown nobody can claim one single accomplishment in her career, but that did not stop the last 6 years.

Response by PFC Zanie Young made Dec 6 at 2014 1:00 PM

PFC Zanie Young — Sat, 06 Dec 2014 13:00:42 -0500

Any retiring general or admiral would do better than Mrs. Clinton, as long as he/she doesn't turn this country into a dictatorship. If George Washington, Ulysses S. Grant or Dwight D. Eisenhower can do it, why not some of our generals and admirals?

Response by SrA Marc Haynes made Dec 6 at 2014 4:29 PM

SrA Marc Haynes — Sat, 06 Dec 2014 16:29:36 -0500

I think that she will be a continuation of the epidemic problems with our federal government. I fear that it no longer represents "We the People". I love my country with all of my heart and would give my life as many have. I believe in honor above all else. Can we say that our government follows any code of honor?

Response by LTC Joseph Gross made Dec 7 at 2014 11:40 AM

LTC Joseph Gross — Sun, 07 Dec 2014 11:40:12 -0500

I see where some have talked about her learning from her mistakes. That's a nice thought but you don't learn integrity and responsibility from mistakes! You have that or you don't. She does not and never will.

Response by PO2 Corey Ferretti made Dec 10 at 2014 6:21 PM

PO2 Corey Ferretti — Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:21:52 -0500

I think that we should go for something new in the white house. I'm thinking there should be a rule if you had a family member in the white house in the last 24 years you cant run weather it is a spouse or blood relative.

Response by CPL Private RallyPoint Member made Dec 11 at 2014 10:15 AM

CPL Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 11 Dec 2014 10:15:42 -0500

To tell you the truth I think we need a break until the next president come.

Response by SFC Mark Merino made Feb 16 at 2015 4:07 PM

SFC Mark Merino — Mon, 16 Feb 2015 16:07:10 -0500

Eh. Why not?

Response by SFC Private RallyPoint Member made Feb 22 at 2015 1:24 AM

SFC Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 22 Feb 2015 01:24:50 -0500

Cpl Brett Wagner I am not sure why people dislike her. After all, she is a Christian. Why do people hate Christians so much? Or they hate women? OMG! They hate Christian women! I can't believe it!

In memory of Socks...

Response by SPC Neil Hood made Feb 22 at 2015 1:14 PM

SPC Neil Hood — Sun, 22 Feb 2015 13:14:18 -0500

Won't happen.

Response by SPC Stewart Smith made Feb 22 at 2015 2:29 PM

SPC Stewart Smith — Sun, 22 Feb 2015 14:29:12 -0500

Exactly what it will be like under anyone else.
People need to stop thinking that the president makes every decision and law.

Response by SGT Francis Wright made Feb 22 at 2015 10:12 PM

SGT Francis Wright — Sun, 22 Feb 2015 22:12:22 -0500

There is no room for the Queen of Benghazi as POTUS.

Response by GySgt Wayne A. Ekblad made Mar 5 at 2015 12:25 AM

GySgt Wayne A. Ekblad — Thu, 05 Mar 2015 00:25:50 -0500

I can't answer the question asked ... I am not a psychic.

What I can do though is ask how it ever got to the point that we are looking at the wife of a former President or the son of another former president (who already has another son who is a former President) as our next President? This is a big country full of lots of capable people . . . and all we can come up with is Bushes and Clintons for President?

There is something very wrong with this whole picture . . . and it certainly does not bode well for our future.

Response by Cpl Michael Riordan, CISM, CISSP, CISA made Mar 23 at 2015 4:06 PM

Cpl Michael Riordan, CISM, CISSP, CISA — Mon, 23 Mar 2015 16:06:45 -0400

I feel Clinton or Bush is the same old story. We need a president that will put the US first. We have many critical issues in this country including a crumbling infrastructure, an electric grid that is weak at best from a security stance, etc. We need to take care of our own before we can solve the worlds problems. Just my two cents.

Response by SPC Kervin Hidalgo made Mar 23 at 2015 8:06 PM

SPC Kervin Hidalgo — Mon, 23 Mar 2015 20:06:53 -0400

the reason i voted no is because i have some sense, also four Americans Died her neglectful watch, why give her that option to be president?

Response by LCDR Rabbah Rona Matlow made Mar 23 at 2015 8:25 PM

LCDR Rabbah Rona Matlow — Mon, 23 Mar 2015 20:25:07 -0400

I am terrified of this next election. Never have I been so depressed about the choices. It is very clear that no matter who wins the election, our country loses. We don't need another Bush dynasty or Clinton dynasty in the White House.

We need, more than ever, a strong centrist party. There are no other voices among the Dems right now, and among the GOP, the strongest voices are Tea Partiers.

Going to any extreme is bad for the country, and the extremes get getting worse and worse.

Response by COL Ted Mc made Mar 24 at 2015 1:18 AM

COL Ted Mc — Tue, 24 Mar 2015 01:18:21 -0400

Despite actually knowing what the job entails and having quite a lot of experience in dealing with the leaderships of other countries, Ms. Clinton would never have the support of the Republicans so government would grind to a halt and America would look like it was being run by a bunch of idiots as far as the rest of the world was concerned.

Of course if a Republican were to be elected then they wouldn't have the support of the Democrats so government would grind to a halt and America would look like it was being run by a bunch of idiots as far as the rest of the world was concerned.

After eight years of Mr. Bush not having the support of the Democrats, and eight years of Mr. Obama not having the support of the Republicans, it's time to elect a President who has the support of BOTH wings of The American Capitalist Party.

Response by SSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 24 at 2015 6:42 AM

SSgt Private RallyPoint Member — Tue, 24 Mar 2015 06:42:02 -0400

Not more of this bs. Sick of the lies, duplicity and arrogance, make it stop.

Response by PO1 Jason Taylor made Mar 24 at 2015 6:50 AM

PO1 Jason Taylor — Tue, 24 Mar 2015 06:50:08 -0400

Her and her husband had more military base closures and downsizing then any other couple in the Oval Office. We would kiss our retirement good bye, and our college money, and every other benefit we enjoy. That surprises me that after growing up enjoying the freedom we provide, they downsize us so much.

Response by PO1 Henry Sherrill made Mar 24 at 2015 9:22 AM

PO1 Henry Sherrill — Tue, 24 Mar 2015 09:22:30 -0400

Not no, but HELL NO!

Response by SPC Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 24 at 2015 11:26 AM

SPC Private RallyPoint Member — Tue, 24 Mar 2015 11:26:56 -0400

oh hell no keeping her email secret and don't forget Benghazi shes got blood on her hands she should be put in prison

Response by MAJ Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 24 at 2015 11:35 AM

MAJ Private RallyPoint Member — Tue, 24 Mar 2015 11:35:17 -0400

Nor do I believe in Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, the Tooth Fairy, Big Foot, UFOs, ghosts, the Designated Hitter in the American League, ketchup on steak, or the 10 point reduction for up-votes once you've received 50,000 points for up-votes. Next question.

Response by SGT John Wesley made Mar 24 at 2015 11:41 AM

SGT John Wesley — Tue, 24 Mar 2015 11:41:53 -0400

I don't think either party has a viable candidate. All this finger pointing bulls**t has got me feeling like they really don't care, it's all about winning and walking out of congress a millionaire or billionaire.

Response by Sgt Cody Dumont made Mar 24 at 2015 11:42 AM

Sgt Cody Dumont — Tue, 24 Mar 2015 11:42:36 -0400

She is most corrupt and divisive person on the planet. She is only topped in her dishonesty by the current president.

Response by SFC Collin McMillion made Mar 24 at 2015 12:23 PM

SFC Collin McMillion — Tue, 24 Mar 2015 12:23:33 -0400

Well I would have to think about that. OK done, double hell no!!!! Too much dirty laundry to sort through. People said it was time for a change, so we got Obama, boy what a mess, now what bothers me is that we have all these groups that say it's time for a woman president. Us throw the racial and gender thing out the window and look look for qualifications and ability, some one at least most can respect. We need a leader, but most importantly, we need a good one. We need a President who can start undoing the bs of the last 16 years. I'm just afraid all the good ones will see that task as being too big and just step away.

Response by PO3 Steven Sherrill made Mar 24 at 2015 12:35 PM

PO3 Steven Sherrill — Tue, 24 Mar 2015 12:35:54 -0400

I think that Hillary like any politician is incapable of giving an honest or straightforward in dealing with the American People. Worse still, I think that her attitude is not remorse for her secretive (at best) behavior, rather outrage that she would even be questioned on it. I think that she looks at the military and its members as expendable. Worst of all, I think that the elected officials on both sides of the aisle have completely forgotten that they have taken an oath to support and defend the constitution rather than using it as the butt of a joke. None of these are traits that I want to see in an American President.

What I want from an American President is a person who understands that they are a representative of the people, not a king. A person who carries the constitution with them so they can refer to it often when making decisions. I want a president who understands that the United States cannot afford to be the world's baby sitter. I want a president who is committed to making the lives of American Citizens better a foremost priority. I want a president who regards American Service Members as more than just an expendible tool.

Of course I also want to win the lottery, which (sadly) seems far less far-fetched than finding a good candidate for president.

Response by SFC Charles S. made Mar 24 at 2015 12:46 PM

SFC Charles S. — Tue, 24 Mar 2015 12:46:01 -0400

No does not even begin to come close to my negative on this question. We are done with the Clintons. I have problems with a futures Commander in Chief who is complicit with what happened in Benghazi regardless of her direct involvement she was at the helm. She was overall Responsible. We hold our soldiers to that standard, why can't politicians be held accountable also, especially ones who are seeking to be the Overall leader of our Nation?

Response by SPC Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 24 at 2015 12:48 PM

SPC Private RallyPoint Member — Tue, 24 Mar 2015 12:48:37 -0400

she hide her emails she's untruthful most of all Benghazi she's got blood on her hands and she take campaign donations from foreign nation that anti American

Response by SA Harold Hansmann made Mar 24 at 2015 2:08 PM

SA Harold Hansmann — Tue, 24 Mar 2015 14:08:14 -0400

You're joking right? I don't have a problem with having a woman president, but, not this woman. She can't even manage her own home let alone a government.

Response by TSgt Richard Wheeler made Mar 24 at 2015 2:10 PM

TSgt Richard Wheeler — Tue, 24 Mar 2015 14:10:25 -0400

HELL NO, Ted Cruz is about the only option right now so god help us if there is no other candidates that come out.

Response by SSgt Joe V. made Mar 24 at 2015 2:14 PM

SSgt Joe V. — Tue, 24 Mar 2015 14:14:59 -0400

I realize this question is about as authentic as the question in the article I wrote (https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/does-america-still-need-flag-joe-vanasse-m-a-?trk=mp-author-card) - and is meant to stir emotion, which it does. I feel sorry for the people that think she would be a good president...so, in answer to the poll - f#@k no. She is a habitual liar, she gets people killed and hello, the biggest flaw ever, she can't utilize two email addresses like Palin can...

Response by SA Harold Hansmann made Mar 24 at 2015 2:18 PM

SA Harold Hansmann — Tue, 24 Mar 2015 14:18:31 -0400

I'd run for president, but, I don't want to end up like JFK. Because I would surely piss congress off when I went after their pay, vacation time, and their benefits.

Response by SGT Tyler G. made Mar 24 at 2015 2:21 PM

SGT Tyler G. — Tue, 24 Mar 2015 14:21:59 -0400

While I may agree with her on a few issues, she is far too corporatist for me. I want a president who's only loyalty is to the American people that elected them, and upholding the constitution, even if it is unpopular with conservatives or liberals. Sadly, neither party has a candidate that I foresee running that even remotely fits that description. All but a handful of long-time politicians are bought out by some interest or another.

Response by MSgt Leonard Fletcher made Mar 24 at 2015 4:01 PM

MSgt Leonard Fletcher — Tue, 24 Mar 2015 16:01:47 -0400

Answer - No. Why?

If we can all agree that historical facts become future tendencies then let’s discuss that for a moment. If we cannot agree at least on that premise, wait a few years and your idiocy will be repeated anyway despite your denial.

That being said, I submit to you this question: Are you pleased with all past president’s performance?

My guess is that you, because grandpa didn’t like this or that one, or dad, or even through your own American History report you did in the 9th grade, you aren’t satisfied with all the presidents and you probably have a favorite but can’t really nail down the reason why. Here are some points to ponder:

Over 50% of presidents were lawyers and even more than that were politicians.

18 Presidents previously served as U.S. Representatives; 6 of 18 held this office prior to the four 'previous positions'. Only one - James A. Garfield - was a Representative immediately before election as President. Only one ex-president, John Quincy Adams, ever served as a U.S. Representative.

17 Presidents previously served as state Governors; 9 of 17 were Governors immediately before election as President.

16 Presidents previously served as U.S. Senators; only 3 immediately before election as President.

14 Presidents previously served as Vice-President. All except Nixon were VP immediately before election as President; 9 of the 14 succeeded to the Presidency because of the death or resignation of the elected President; 5 of those 9 were not re-elected.

8 Presidents previously served as Cabinet Secretaries; 6 as Secretary of State; 5 of the 8 served immediately before election as President.

So, with all that being said, I think we should give an American, NON-politician (yet with political savvy), and NON-lawyer the opportunity to bring a perspective to the Oval Office that is actually from the people.

I digress a little to say this; The media is a well-trained tool for sparking interest in trivial things and harping on dead horses. It’s the quintessential virtual barber shop and salon parlor that serves well to stupefy an uninformed and lazy society into drinking the cool-aide flavor of the day. All that to say, don't be lazy!

I believe the KISS method serves best in any situation hence this is my recommendation. In a couple months there will be more relevant sites that do a “decent” job of allowing you to answer questions about issues in politics and the algorithms will do a comparative association to help you narrow your field of potential candidates of whom you would vote. Until then, this should get you started:

Step 1: Learn about yourself and where you stand generally go to http://www.isidewith.com/political-quiz

Step 2: Understanding that not all candidates are yet in this questionnaire and therefore it only serves to show you whose answers you are most matched with go to http://selectsmart.com/president/ and answer from your heart and use the slide bar to best represent how important that issue is to you.

Step 3: Research the candidates in a “broad-scope” technique to learn more about the individuals competing for YOUR vote you may start here: http://2016.presidential-candidates.org/

Step 4: Narrow your research now to a hand-full of hopefuls and spend time reading about their life, their stances and beliefs etc. Now that you have put forth some effort and know more about what you may be discussing (now intelligently) with friends and family, go forth and do your duty, vote.

This is what I believe: the two-party system should be eliminated, campaign expenditures should be capped and equal to the median potential of the group of candidates, donations be only capped and allowed from individuals and never from corporations, voters must show a government issued photo identification, and popular vote determines the winner. Until these things happen, I am tired of choosing between the lesser of two knuckleheads to run my country.

In case you’re curious, personally I believe Dr. Ben Carson (who by the way is not listed yet in step 2) is the greatest ally of “We the People”. He is not a lawyer, not a politician, and reveals his prowess of international affairs in his books. I encourage you to look him up. Although he is a GOP exploratory candidate, I believe if self-proclaimed Democrats and Republicans would put parties aside and look at the individual, they would see their next president.

Discuss ....

Response by GySgt Wayne A. Ekblad made Mar 24 at 2015 4:23 PM

GySgt Wayne A. Ekblad — Tue, 24 Mar 2015 16:23:47 -0400

Response by GySgt Wayne A. Ekblad made Mar 24 at 2015 4:27 PM

GySgt Wayne A. Ekblad — Tue, 24 Mar 2015 16:27:04 -0400

Response by TSgt Tim (lj) Littlejohn made Mar 24 at 2015 5:24 PM

TSgt Tim (lj) Littlejohn — Tue, 24 Mar 2015 17:24:19 -0400

How about we ask our people in Benghazi, what it matters. Not only no, but hell NO!!!!!!!

Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 24 at 2015 6:26 PM

SSG Private RallyPoint Member — Tue, 24 Mar 2015 18:26:24 -0400

I think she would probably be less bad than anyone that could make it through the Republican primaries. If we want something other than a bad President were going to have to vote third party.

Response by SGT Rick Ash made Mar 24 at 2015 7:23 PM

SGT Rick Ash — Tue, 24 Mar 2015 19:23:45 -0400

Too much bad baggage including Benghazi.

Response by SFC Kenneth Hunnell made Mar 24 at 2015 8:13 PM

SFC Kenneth Hunnell — Tue, 24 Mar 2015 20:13:45 -0400

She would have to become a Republican to be president on the next term

Response by LTC Stephen C. made Mar 24 at 2015 8:45 PM

LTC Stephen C. — Tue, 24 Mar 2015 20:45:09 -0400

My response, Col Private RallyPoint Member, is no.

Response by SGT Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 25 at 2015 12:27 AM

SGT Private RallyPoint Member — Wed, 25 Mar 2015 00:27:05 -0400

Good? Maybe, maybe not. I'm leaning more toward not. Entertaining for sure.

Response by SPC David Shaffer made Mar 25 at 2015 12:38 AM

SPC David Shaffer — Wed, 25 Mar 2015 00:38:24 -0400

No..period.

Response by Cpl Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 25 at 2015 4:26 AM

Cpl Private RallyPoint Member — Wed, 25 Mar 2015 04:26:05 -0400

It starts with Saul Alinsky and hasn't ended. She would be the nail in our national coffin.

Response by SCPO David Lockwood made Mar 25 at 2015 9:08 AM

SCPO David Lockwood — Wed, 25 Mar 2015 09:08:18 -0400

Why not she can't do any worse than the past presidents.

Response by PO2 Mark Arnold made Mar 25 at 2015 12:09 PM

PO2 Mark Arnold — Wed, 25 Mar 2015 12:09:29 -0400

We leave no man behind. She will never live up to that level of loyalty. She's already left 4 behind, and I don't believe she should be allowed to add more to her score.

Response by Sgt Kelly Overmyer made Mar 25 at 2015 12:11 PM

Sgt Kelly Overmyer — Wed, 25 Mar 2015 12:11:17 -0400

Queen Douche Bag

Response by PO1 Jeffrey Stoddard made Mar 25 at 2015 12:25 PM

PO1 Jeffrey Stoddard — Wed, 25 Mar 2015 12:25:52 -0400

Its not so much of her capabilities ,it that other powers thinks women are weak.

Response by MCPO John Gross made Mar 25 at 2015 3:57 PM

MCPO John Gross — Wed, 25 Mar 2015 15:57:50 -0400

Where there smoke, there's fire. Watergate (opinions differ), Whitewater, travel gate, health care, Monica, . . . Bengazi, Clinton Foundation donors, E-mail.

'Ethical and open' seem to be concepts not firmly held.

Response by SGT Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 25 at 2015 5:03 PM

SGT Private RallyPoint Member — Wed, 25 Mar 2015 17:03:13 -0400

We don't need 8 more years of the same administration.

Response by MAJ Robert (Bob) Petrarca made Mar 26 at 2015 10:23 PM

MAJ Robert (Bob) Petrarca — Thu, 26 Mar 2015 22:23:46 -0400

Do we still burn witches at the stake or was that outlawed? :-0

Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 27 at 2015 8:18 PM

SSG Private RallyPoint Member — Fri, 27 Mar 2015 20:18:19 -0400

Where's the Hell No button?

Response by Col Joseph Lenertz made Mar 27 at 2015 8:24 PM

Col Joseph Lenertz — Fri, 27 Mar 2015 20:24:44 -0400

Her actions, and reactions to scandal, as SECSTATE, where for the first time she led a large organization, indicate she thinks the rules don't apply to her and that she may even be above the law. I want a leader who puts the people before self, and I do not see it there.

Response by SCPO Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 27 at 2015 8:50 PM

SCPO Private RallyPoint Member — Fri, 27 Mar 2015 20:50:50 -0400

No!!!!!!!!! To the millionth degree, NO! And if any of MY Sailors say she would, I would have to give them my opinion so they would be onboard with me! All joking aside, with all the lies and deception when it comes to ANYTHING this woman has done during her time in Secretary of State, that should be a clear reason why she would NOT make a good President. Besides, she already had her shot at it from 1993 to 2001 for two terms, didn't she? LoL.

Response by GySgt Wayne A. Ekblad made Mar 28 at 2015 4:25 PM

GySgt Wayne A. Ekblad — Sat, 28 Mar 2015 16:25:40 -0400

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/congress/gowdy-clinton-wiped-email-server-clean-deleted-all-emails/2015/03/27/23a8151a-d4d1-11e4-8b1e-274d670aa9c9_story.html?hpid=z6

Response by SPC William Scissom made Mar 28 at 2015 6:07 PM

SPC William Scissom — Sat, 28 Mar 2015 18:07:53 -0400

I have read a lot of these comments and it seems like everyone that voted no did so because of Benghazi. In the 2008 democratic primaries I told my friends and family that Hillary Clinton will never be president based on a remark she said during the debate about being under sniper fire in Bosnia with her daughter. When I heard that obvious lie I was furious because, while she meant that she had some experience with hostile foreign government's, what she was saying is that our military is so chewed up that they would allow the first lady and her daughter to land in a hostile area. How can a person hope to become Commander in Chief when they don't respect the military at all?
The sad fact of the matter is that Washington D.C. is broken. It has become a playground for the wealthy and entitled to pretend to be lawmakers so that they can get their lifetime pensions, while veterans sleep under bridges and are forgotten. There are very few, if any, people in D.C. that deserve their positions. These people didn't get into politics to help America or uphold the constitution, they got into politics to help themselves and uphold their trust funds.
I know that neither party will put up anyone worth voting for in 2016, so I will just hope that a third party will emerge that will actually defend the constitution and do what is right for America. I don't know maybe I'm asking too much.

Response by SPC Donald Tribble made Mar 28 at 2015 6:12 PM

SPC Donald Tribble — Sat, 28 Mar 2015 18:12:26 -0400

No, and of the announced and unannounced candidates there aren't any qualified choices...

Response by GySgt Wayne A. Ekblad made Mar 28 at 2015 7:03 PM

GySgt Wayne A. Ekblad — Sat, 28 Mar 2015 19:03:08 -0400

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/remembrance-of-clintons-past/2015/03/27/839f5d3a-d3db-11e4-a62f-ee745911a4ff_story.html?tid=HP_opinion?tid=HP_opinion

The dangers of four more years of Clintons

Another Clinton presidency means new opportunities for scandal.

Response by GySgt Wayne A. Ekblad made Mar 28 at 2015 7:03 PM

GySgt Wayne A. Ekblad — Sat, 28 Mar 2015 19:03:37 -0400

Response by Sgt David G Duchesneau made Mar 28 at 2015 7:32 PM

Sgt David G Duchesneau — Sat, 28 Mar 2015 19:32:43 -0400

You have to be kidding, right? Hell no! Look at all of this crap about her emails. Now she and her lawyers are going to a Hearing. This should be good. Let's see how she lies her way out of this one. And of course, doesn't everyone totally wipe out their computers? I guess I'm going to have to start doing that. She initially said that she has nothing to hide. Then why is it that she decided to totally wipe out her personal computer? Nothing to hide my ass! Just my 2 cents! SF! (She would no more know what SEMPER FIDELIS meant if her life depended on it.)

Response by PO2 Edward Shelton made Mar 28 at 2015 10:32 PM

PO2 Edward Shelton — Sat, 28 Mar 2015 22:32:49 -0400

She couldn't handle the Secretary of State position well, so what makes her think she would excel as the President? With the Benghazi situation that happened... hell no.

Response by Cpl Tou Lee Yang made Mar 29 at 2015 7:10 AM

Cpl Tou Lee Yang — Sun, 29 Mar 2015 07:10:08 -0400

I would vote for Hillary, unless Elizabeth Warren runs. All these comment about Benghazi, when was the last time a GOP administration kept any Embassy safe? Also, there were only a handful of security at the embassies, if not for the underfunding of security for embassies by the GOP, this might not had happened.

I find it very fascinating that thousands of troops has died in the so called war on terror and not one sound is heard from the GOP, yet one embassy is attacked resulting in the death of an Ambassador, the first since '79 and the GOP stir up a witch hunt, there was no cover-up get over it.

Being a leader is hard, you can't satisfy everyone and everyone is not going to like you. I'm sure most of you officers and SNCO are aware of that. To make an assumption that Hillary would not be a good leader is absurd. Every leader has their weakness, doesn't matter who they are.

Response by MAJ Private RallyPoint Member made Apr 9 at 2015 11:16 AM

MAJ Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 09 Apr 2015 11:16:46 -0400

Historically, anytime a democrat is in the office, the military begins to shrink and we get fewer and smaller raises. Historically, when a republican is in office, the military grows and we get larger and more often increases to our pay. I am not sure why somebody in the military or that works with the military would ever want a democrat unless they dislike job security and more money.

Response by SFC Private RallyPoint Member made Apr 9 at 2015 11:41 AM

SFC Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 09 Apr 2015 11:41:08 -0400

how many words would you like in an answer?
one?- Benghazi
two?- not forthcoming
three? another stinking Democrat????

no way can our country handle another extremist liberal, America needs a Leader, not a politician ( I know that isnt exactly accurate), a LEADER who can provide examples to emulate; not another "do as I say, not as I do" liberal type.

Response by SSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Apr 12 at 2015 10:54 AM

SSgt Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 12 Apr 2015 10:54:58 -0400

I knew a MSgt who worked on Air Force One during the Clinton years. He told me at least a few stories of how Hillary treated military. Not such a good picture of how she could potentially treat our armed forces and veterans as president.

Response by CPT Private RallyPoint Member made Apr 12 at 2015 11:13 AM

CPT Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 12 Apr 2015 11:13:22 -0400

Hahaha

Response by SPC David Shaffer made Apr 12 at 2015 12:08 PM

SPC David Shaffer — Sun, 12 Apr 2015 12:08:16 -0400

In all honesty, we will never know how a candidate is going to act until they are POTUS. All of these candidates have one trait in common in my book, and that is winning the election. All they say, do, and react to is towards the goal of winning the election. Usually the only thing you can do is look at their past activity, and hope for the best. That is my opinion. We will someday have a person running for POTUS that will truly be for the people, and not base all of their decisions on what is best for big business...again just my opinion.

Response by MSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Apr 12 at 2015 12:18 PM

MSgt Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 12 Apr 2015 12:18:32 -0400

No, I do not believe she would make a good POTUS. The assertion that it is time for a women to be POTUS may be true. But to vote Hillary Clinton for that reason only is idiotic. The fact remains that she has proven to be non trust worthy, lies and has a tendency to cover up situations gone bad. The argument may be made that this person did this or that person did that. Okay so what, we are talking about her qualities and qualifications right now not anyone else. Quit trying to justify her actions by comparing her to someone else. If she is that good then trumpet her accomplishments. And please do not say it is her turn that is asinine. It is no more her turn then it is Jeb Bush's turn. This country deserves much better. And if all the better we have to offer is Hillary Clinton and Jeb Bush we are in a world of hurt.

Response by SGM Mikel Dawson made Apr 12 at 2015 12:51 PM

SGM Mikel Dawson — Sun, 12 Apr 2015 12:51:48 -0400

If she conducted her presidency as she did her time in the State Department, not. We saw enough of her during Bill's time in office. Going back even further do we forget White Water? A trend of leadership we can do with out.

Response by SFC Robert Evans Jr made Apr 12 at 2015 12:57 PM

SFC Robert Evans Jr — Sun, 12 Apr 2015 12:57:43 -0400

No, we have had enough Clinton's and Bush's in the White house, we could use a good leader male or female but not her. They have had their 8 years already.

Response by SGT Michael Touchet made Apr 12 at 2015 1:05 PM

SGT Michael Touchet — Sun, 12 Apr 2015 13:05:16 -0400

NO! She is not fit to hold any position in Government, especially that of the office of the POTUS. She has failed miserably as the Secretary of State, namely Benghazi, concealing official correspondence by using her own personal email account and then appointed herself as the sole arbiter of what the public was entitled to see. The problem with that is she is a public servant that was acting on the behalf of we the People who are entitled to know what deals she had made with foreign entities in the name of America. The Clinton Foundation has reportedly taken money from questionable foreign entities that surely comes with some strings attached. If one of us were applying for a security clearance we would surely be denied. The POTUS should be trusted; Hillary cannot be trusted with the baggage that she brings. Her entire career has been riddled with questionable ethic problems, early in her career she was fired from the Water Gate investigation for lying. The leopards spots will not change. We need a POTUS who will strengthen our Military, economy and restore America's reputation on the world stage. That is my humble opinion.

Response by SGT(P) Private RallyPoint Member made Apr 12 at 2015 3:15 PM

SGT(P) Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 12 Apr 2015 15:15:18 -0400

I think it's our patriotic duty to hear her out during the campaign with an open mind (there sure isn't enough of that these days) and see what she says she would offer. Her use of private e-mail while she was Secretary of State is a huge negative for me and I would say at this point she doesn't have my vote. I wish we could get a well-deserving independent candidate to run; one who isn't beholden to any particular party. This way half of the Legislative Branch wouldn't be spending the next four years looking to subvert or undercut the executive branch at every single turn. Imagine a congress that actually works with the President on issues they agree with while exercising judicious advocacy of a better course of action on issues they don't. That all being said we need a President who will actually have a great working (and personal) relationship with Congress to make it all work. Yes, it is sunny in Josh-land today...

Response by SSG (ret) William Martin made Apr 12 at 2015 4:39 PM

SSG (ret) William Martin — Sun, 12 Apr 2015 16:39:36 -0400

I heard her say on video, "If you want a women President, vote for me" so that means every female qualifies for the Presidency as long as the meet the minimum requirements.

Response by SFC Mark Merino made Apr 12 at 2015 5:17 PM

SFC Mark Merino — Sun, 12 Apr 2015 17:17:13 -0400

SNL has led the way......

http://www.cnet.com/news/snl-mocks-hillary-clintons-blackberry-video-making-skills/

SNL mocks Hillary Clinton's BlackBerry selfie video-making skills - CNET

Technically Incorrect: With Hillary Clinton expected to announce her candidacy for president Sunday watch her shoot a very personal video -- in vertical, naturally.

Response by SFC Private RallyPoint Member made Apr 13 at 2015 3:43 AM

SFC Private RallyPoint Member — Mon, 13 Apr 2015 03:43:46 -0400

I am generally opposed to her ideology and believe she would continue on a path our nation cannot afford.

Other than that, I do not think I could stand to listen to her for four or eight years. Her voice is like nails on the chalkboard to me.

Response by CAPT Kevin B. made Apr 13 at 2015 11:43 AM

CAPT Kevin B. — Mon, 13 Apr 2015 11:43:31 -0400

Wow, this looks like the same conversation we had in 1971. The military vote supported Nixon as he was getting out of 'Nam. That didn't mean the guy was clean as we found out a few years later. Clean seems to be an early topic of this election cycle.

The bigger question for any voter is "What do we want to be?" There's been a drift towards entitlements and looking more like Europe. That really bothers those who remember the good old days, albeit sometimes forgetting the negatives then. The substantial response on this site is Ms. Clinton would take us farther away from where we'd like to be.

I hope every candidate would be honest enough to say what they envision our country should look and feel like. I know, a pipe dream. It's easy to bash someone. I need the candidates to move beyond that.

Response by PO1 Jason Taylor made Apr 13 at 2015 1:27 PM

PO1 Jason Taylor — Mon, 13 Apr 2015 13:27:08 -0400

She would make absolutely the worst president to date! Her and her husband got rid of more military member positions, shut down more bases, and tried to take away our retirements. Why is it that social security, retirments, and other benifits we WORK for always seem to be running out of money, but food stamps, welfare, and medicade seem to have limitless resorses? Vote her in and see what happens! Lol

Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Apr 13 at 2015 8:12 PM

SSG Private RallyPoint Member — Mon, 13 Apr 2015 20:12:38 -0400

Nope, not at all. Need someone with actual common sense and American pride. As well as need to stop all the needless spending and incurring an even greater national debt.

Response by PO1 Glenn Boucher made Apr 13 at 2015 8:16 PM

PO1 Glenn Boucher — Mon, 13 Apr 2015 20:16:48 -0400

I don't think she will be a good President, but she will be far from the worst. The sad thing is that with all of the damage the Republican party has done to themselves in the last few years it will be hard to mount an effective campaign against her. I think she can do some good things, but it will depend on how well she picks her inner circle.

Response by PO3 Omar Olmeda made Apr 13 at 2015 8:54 PM

PO3 Omar Olmeda — Mon, 13 Apr 2015 20:54:52 -0400

She has way too much blood in her hands.

Response by SSG (ret) William Martin made Apr 14 at 2015 2:40 AM

SSG (ret) William Martin — Tue, 14 Apr 2015 02:40:04 -0400

I am going to vote for Hillary Clinton because we need the first woman president which is what you will never catch me saying EVER!

Response by SGT Private RallyPoint Member made Apr 14 at 2015 7:41 AM

SGT Private RallyPoint Member — Tue, 14 Apr 2015 07:41:27 -0400

Whoever sticks to their word and fully goes forward with protecting our country to their best ability is who should be president...but that's only in a prefect world

Response by MAJ Dallas D. made Apr 14 at 2015 8:42 AM

MAJ Dallas D. — Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:42:29 -0400

She should be in jail for Benghazi not running for President. Plain and simple.

Response by COL Charles Williams made Apr 14 at 2015 7:45 PM

COL Charles Williams — Tue, 14 Apr 2015 19:45:32 -0400

No need to answer

Response by CW2 Private RallyPoint Member made Apr 14 at 2015 8:08 PM

CW2 Private RallyPoint Member — Tue, 14 Apr 2015 20:08:37 -0400

No accomplishments, no integrity, no respect for the military...no thank you.

Response by SGT Private RallyPoint Member made Apr 14 at 2015 10:28 PM

SGT Private RallyPoint Member — Tue, 14 Apr 2015 22:28:07 -0400

I say elect Rick Grimes as president. Lol. Yes I say the are on the same level. Both would of course be a joke. But if there really was a Rick Grimes, I would vote for him way before Hillary.

Response by SA Harold Hansmann made Apr 15 at 2015 3:31 PM

SA Harold Hansmann — Wed, 15 Apr 2015 15:31:42 -0400

I saw something awhile back, about Hillary Clinton and WaterGate. About her lying and immoral attitude. Can any of you who where around at that time, confirm, said accusations?

Response by SGT Private RallyPoint Member made Apr 28 at 2015 7:03 PM

SGT Private RallyPoint Member — Tue, 28 Apr 2015 19:03:13 -0400

Response by SSG Arnie Jones made Apr 28 at 2015 9:05 PM

SSG Arnie Jones — Tue, 28 Apr 2015 21:05:00 -0400

"NO" .. "NO" .. "NO" .. "NO" .. , etc...

Response by SGM Mikel Dawson made Apr 28 at 2015 10:04 PM

SGM Mikel Dawson — Tue, 28 Apr 2015 22:04:11 -0400

If you want someone who will lie, cheat, blow smoke up your @$$. What difference does it make now? We can count on her to be just as transparent as her boss Hussein Obama.

Response by PO1 Jason Taylor made Apr 29 at 2015 8:00 AM

PO1 Jason Taylor — Wed, 29 Apr 2015 08:00:01 -0400

The thought of another Clinton in office made me throw up in my mouth a little!

Response by A1C Lisa Casserly made Apr 30 at 2015 3:42 PM

A1C Lisa Casserly — Thu, 30 Apr 2015 15:42:36 -0400

Why not? First of all, several years back, the Gold Star Mothers went to Washington to meet with politicians. She was THE ONLY ONE who refused to meet with them. Of course you know that the Gold Star Mothers is the group of parents who have lost a child while they were serving in the military. I think this is SHAMEFUL, especially for one who now wishes to be our Commander in Chief. And, as the mother of a Wounded Warrior, this makes me especially angry. And beyond that, I won't get into it... but I think she would be a TERRIBLE president!!

Response by SGT James P. Davidson, MSM made May 6 at 2015 11:18 AM

SGT James P. Davidson, MSM — Wed, 06 May 2015 11:18:30 -0400

First, I believe it is a shame that we are facing 'legacy' candidates. We do not live (yet?) under a monarchy, nor a patriarchy. It is, actually, quite frightening. What happens next? Chelsea? Jenna? Not good.

At this point, I have little faith in but a few of the 'Republican' candidates, which is infinitely more than I do in the Democrat candidates.

We, as a nation, need leaders, not politicians.

I'm reserving my vote until I am left (again) with the 'lesser of two evils', or until a REAL candidate comes forth, standing - unwaveringly - on the founding principals of this great Nation.

Response by SSgt Private RallyPoint Member made May 6 at 2015 12:21 PM

SSgt Private RallyPoint Member — Wed, 06 May 2015 12:21:15 -0400

I personally don't believe so. I think there is a bunch of accountability of a person in public office, and from the media reports I feel she hasn't lived up to this accountability in lower offices. I personally do not get a sincere feeling about her.

Response by Cpl Anthony Pearson made May 7 at 2015 2:49 PM

Cpl Anthony Pearson — Thu, 07 May 2015 14:49:11 -0400

Snake. Deceptive. Smug. Teflon.

Benghazi. Email scandal.
She doesn't seem to give a damn about our troops, our citizens, our covert operations, etc. She is a CLINTON, and feels she is above the law and untouchable.

As much as she disgusts me, I might actually prefer her over Obama, although it really is just as bad.

Response by COL Mikel J. Burroughs made May 8 at 2015 3:04 PM

COL Mikel J. Burroughs — Fri, 08 May 2015 15:04:12 -0400

I have real problem with the Clintons period. When my former Commander in Chief committed adultery in the White House and then lied to the American Public it caused my trust for both to be lost forever. Hillary stuck with him because of his popularity and to reach her goal in landing in the White House. Not my kind of leaders. The President and Commander in Chief has to be trustworthy and someone we all would feel proud to serve under - that is just my opinion. Right or wrong, I believe that Hillary has lied to the American Public (like most Presidents and government officials) to hide mistakes that have cost the lives of some of our brother in arms. True leaders have to stand and be accounted for even when things aren't going right or they make mistakes. There is no "I" the word Team!

Response by Sgt Serina Ruiz made May 8 at 2015 3:08 PM

Sgt Serina Ruiz — Fri, 08 May 2015 15:08:33 -0400

Neither democrats nor republicans can put forth an honorable candidate with pure intentions. Ever since private campaign funding every elect has some corporate business backing them up and using them as a puppet for their own personal gain. Corporate America needs a massive change in government operations. It's sad, really.

Response by CH (MAJ) William Beaver made May 11 at 2015 3:35 PM

CH (MAJ) William Beaver — Mon, 11 May 2015 15:35:25 -0400

Response by Sgt Mark Ramos made May 11 at 2015 7:51 PM

Sgt Mark Ramos — Mon, 11 May 2015 19:51:07 -0400

I was not a fan in the beginning. Then I liked some of what she did and said as a Senator related to national security and support for the military. However, as Secretary of State I grew critical again. The personal email server, ineffectiveness, and her seemingly explosive temper disqualify her in my book. But, in reading "Clinton Cash", I'm now convinced that she should get a term, behind bars.

Response by CPO Private RallyPoint Member made May 11 at 2015 7:52 PM

CPO Private RallyPoint Member — Mon, 11 May 2015 19:52:09 -0400

She has a hard time with actual reality. She loves to point fingers and changes viewpoints to gain popularity. She made remarks when she ran last time that Obama didn't have enough experience yet 3 months later when he was her party's candidate she was saying he was ready. She talks out of both sides of her mouth. Kind of like when McCain ran she commented how he was too old yet she will be only three years younger than he was when she runs this time. I guess age, like reality doesn't apply to her either.

Response by MSgt Roger Younce made May 14 at 2015 6:00 PM

MSgt Roger Younce — Thu, 14 May 2015 18:00:09 -0400

She has no leadership skills and cannot be trusted.

Response by LCpl Mark Lefler made Jun 14 at 2015 8:35 PM

LCpl Mark Lefler — Sun, 14 Jun 2015 20:35:09 -0400

Well, she'd be better then any of the republican candidates, they're beyond horrible as politicians, patriots and as human beings.

Response by CH (MAJ) William Beaver made Jun 14 at 2015 8:52 PM

CH (MAJ) William Beaver — Sun, 14 Jun 2015 20:52:08 -0400

S O S ! ...and I don't mean 'save our ship.' Well, maybe I do.

Response by PFC Scott Grow made Jun 21 at 2015 2:54 PM

PFC Scott Grow — Sun, 21 Jun 2015 14:54:43 -0400

No I do not.

Response by SSG Thomas Brousseau made Jun 23 at 2015 1:29 AM

SSG Thomas Brousseau — Tue, 23 Jun 2015 01:29:30 -0400

ABSOLUTELY NOT! She has lost any support or respect from the SOCOM community because of how she handle Benghazi and lost any respect and support from Iraqi Freedom Veterans after she failed to secure a SOFA agreement with Iraq and looseing the right to leave behind a residual force in Iraq that could have stopped Isis dead in their tracks. She has lost any support and respect from our allies from Poland to Isreal because she made all of the wrong decisions.

Response by PO1 Aaron Baltosser made Aug 27 at 2015 12:57 PM

PO1 Aaron Baltosser — Thu, 27 Aug 2015 12:57:23 -0400

Response by SSgt Alex Robinson made Aug 27 at 2015 6:59 PM

SSgt Alex Robinson — Thu, 27 Aug 2015 18:59:24 -0400

Heck no she won't.

Response by 1SG Glenn Collins made Aug 28 at 2015 3:56 AM

1SG Glenn Collins — Fri, 28 Aug 2015 03:56:47 -0400

I am not a big fan of the elite getting away with mismanagement of sensitive information, failing to correctly route government information through certified DOD internet protocols, yet again I am not a fan of Snowden, but if they want to hammer him, then it should be the same for Hillary amongst the other congresspeople that are coming out of the wood works as failing to comply with DOD standards.

Response by SSG Toryn Green made Aug 28 at 2015 4:04 AM

SSG Toryn Green — Fri, 28 Aug 2015 04:04:57 -0400

Absolutely not!

Response by SGT Jerrold Pesz made Sep 1 at 2015 10:30 AM

SGT Jerrold Pesz — Tue, 01 Sep 2015 10:30:32 -0400

It probably couldn't get any worse.

Response by CW3 Eric W. S. made Sep 1 at 2015 10:43 AM

CW3 Eric W. S. — Tue, 01 Sep 2015 10:43:41 -0400

Honestly believe she is too ingrained into the current policy, she has no solid basis on which to build her own platform or name. She is merely riding the coat-tails of the dems from Bill on down...

Response by SA Harold Hansmann made Sep 9 at 2015 10:25 AM

SA Harold Hansmann — Wed, 09 Sep 2015 10:25:33 -0400

Did anyone say it yet?
"OH, HELL NO!!!!!"

Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 23 at 2015 6:27 PM

SSG Private RallyPoint Member — Wed, 23 Sep 2015 18:27:21 -0400

I don't support Hillary because of her misuse of classified material. I have a hard time trusting the secrets of our nation with someone who has shown a track record of not being able to protect the secrets of our nation.

Response by SSG Michael Scott made Oct 3 at 2015 2:55 PM

SSG Michael Scott — Sat, 03 Oct 2015 14:55:01 -0400

No, but he'll no. One word, Benghazi. Period

Response by PO1 Aaron Baltosser made May 19 at 2016 4:41 PM

PO1 Aaron Baltosser — Thu, 19 May 2016 16:41:31 -0400

No chance. She lost in her very brief time as Secretary of State 6 Billion dollars somehow. She was in charge, yet had less opsec knowledge than the most junior Private that handles classified messages. She swore to kill as many coal jobs as possible helping the current president, and fulfilled that promise. She claims to be a champion for women's rights and demands equal pay for women...but pays her women on staff 38% less than she does her men on staff. She has vigorously defended a child rapist, and laughed at the victom. She claims all rape and sexual assault should be immediately believed and investigated...unless her husband is involved. Then she operates more effectively than the German propoganda artists to discredit and humiliate them. She has received funding from George Soros who is heard in a video saying the best work he ever did was working with Nazis to kill his fellow Jews. The KKK has donated to Hillary this time as well. She lectures on the evils of the high cost of college education, yet charges minimum $500,000 for a speaking fee, raising the cost to attend that institution. She speaks about being broke when she and her husband left the White House, but was still a multimillionaire. She was fired from her first job as part of the Watergate investigation for ethics violations, and her ethical compass has not guided her on a straight and narrow path yet. She is under at least two criminal investigations now by the FBI.
None of the above are strong reasons she is a solid candidate for any office let alone that of the President of the United States.

Response by Capt Michael Greene made May 22 at 2016 11:50 AM

Capt Michael Greene — Sun, 22 May 2016 11:50:45 -0400

She knows the ropes and all the people and has kept her cool under terrible pressure. Mainly, if I vote for her, it would be to keep the near-fascist bigoted buffoon from rubber-stamping the conservative agenda of killing off education, science and civil rights.

Response by SFC Robert Bower made May 25 at 2016 10:33 AM

SFC Robert Bower — Wed, 25 May 2016 10:33:54 -0400

No she wouldn't cause the only thing Crooked Hillary cares about is MONEY!

Response by MSG Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 21 at 2016 9:20 PM

MSG Private RallyPoint Member — Tue, 21 Jun 2016 21:20:53 -0400

Nope.

Response by Sgt Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 4 at 2016 4:12 PM

Sgt Private RallyPoint Member — Mon, 04 Jul 2016 16:12:02 -0400

hell no

Response by MSgt John McGowan made Aug 18 at 2016 10:02 AM

MSgt John McGowan — Thu, 18 Aug 2016 10:02:30 -0400

Maj. I am not sure we can live with her. I do not wat to see the next 4 years under her.

Response by SPC Sheila Lewis made Sep 22 at 2016 4:42 PM

SPC Sheila Lewis — Thu, 22 Sep 2016 16:42:55 -0400

Too many years of self-interest.

Response by TSgt Jim Gregg made Sep 23 at 2016 8:58 PM

TSgt Jim Gregg — Fri, 23 Sep 2016 20:58:28 -0400

I think out of the current candidates, that Hilary is the best choice with Gary Johnson a very close 2nd. I think the green party candidate is naive. As for Trump, frankly he scares the hell out of me. Operating from a viewpoint of anger only leads to more casualties.

Response by SFC Arthur Tucker made Oct 6 at 2016 1:50 PM

SFC Arthur Tucker — Thu, 06 Oct 2016 13:50:24 -0400

She has already shown that she is not capable of taking charge of anything.

Response by CMDCM Gene Treants made Oct 13 at 2016 3:48 PM

CMDCM Gene Treants — Thu, 13 Oct 2016 15:48:14 -0400

Having been there through this election process and seeing what our Parties have put forth, watching the "debates" and listening carefully, Neither MAjor party candidate is worth voting for today! Unfortunately the other choices are just, as usual, detractors. This election does nto represent American values to me.

Response by SSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 13 at 2016 5:26 PM

SSgt Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 13 Oct 2016 17:26:10 -0400

Anyone who chose yes or maybe, what meds are you on?

Response by TSgt Jim Gregg made Oct 13 at 2016 6:04 PM

TSgt Jim Gregg — Thu, 13 Oct 2016 18:04:50 -0400

Of the four currently running she is the best. We have one who thinks it's okay to denigrate women, minorities and veterans. He also has close ties to Russia. The next wants to legalize pot and is a little crazy. And the last likes to vandalize private property. Is Hillary the best President? She has potential and I trust her to have to make the tough calls at 0300 versus looking at sex tapes and calling people fat at 0300.

Response by Cpl Anthony Pearson made Oct 20 at 2016 2:05 PM

Cpl Anthony Pearson — Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:05:35 -0400

She IS the establishment that I *hate* and complain about nearly every day of my adult life. I hate our corrupt, crooked, elitist, 'line their own pockets' politicians who care only for themselves and very little about Americans and our way of life.

She represents everything that offends me to my core.

If I vote for her, I feel I can no longer complain about corrupt officials, crooked government, special interests, taxpayer abuse, fraud, etc. - ever again. How could I?

Trump is imperfect. I hate that he is our OTHER option. That said, he does NOT represent EVERYTHING I hate about our current government.

So Trump it is. God bless us all.

Response by SSG Wally Lawver made Oct 28 at 2016 1:08 PM

SSG Wally Lawver — Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:08:56 -0400

Hell No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!