SSgt Alex Robinson926076<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><a target="_blank" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/protesters-have-no-free-speech-rights-on-supreme-courts-front-porch/2015/08/28/f79ae262-4d9e-11e5-bfb9-9736d04fc8e4_story.html">http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/protesters-have-no-free-speech-rights-on-supreme-courts-front-porch/2015/08/28/f79ae262-4d9e-11e5-bfb9-9736d04fc8e4_story.html</a> <div class="pta-link-card answers-template-image type-default">
<div class="pta-link-card-picture">
<img src="https://d26horl2n8pviu.cloudfront.net/link_data_pictures/images/000/020/946/qrc/h_2010_1332771121.jpg?1443052876">
</div>
<div class="pta-link-card-content">
<p class="pta-link-card-title">
<a target="blank" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/protesters-have-no-free-speech-rights-on-supreme-courts-front-porch/2015/08/28/f79ae262-4d9e-11e5-bfb9-9736d04fc8e4_story.html">Protesters have no free-speech rights on Supreme Court’s front porch</a>
</p>
<p class="pta-link-card-description">An appeals court said that demonstrators may be limited to the sidewalk in front of the high court.</p>
</div>
<div class="clearfix"></div>
</div>
Do you think citizens have a right to congregate or protest in front of the Supreme Court?2015-08-29T02:47:04-04:00SSgt Alex Robinson926076<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><a target="_blank" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/protesters-have-no-free-speech-rights-on-supreme-courts-front-porch/2015/08/28/f79ae262-4d9e-11e5-bfb9-9736d04fc8e4_story.html">http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/protesters-have-no-free-speech-rights-on-supreme-courts-front-porch/2015/08/28/f79ae262-4d9e-11e5-bfb9-9736d04fc8e4_story.html</a> <div class="pta-link-card answers-template-image type-default">
<div class="pta-link-card-picture">
<img src="https://d26horl2n8pviu.cloudfront.net/link_data_pictures/images/000/020/946/qrc/h_2010_1332771121.jpg?1443052876">
</div>
<div class="pta-link-card-content">
<p class="pta-link-card-title">
<a target="blank" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/protesters-have-no-free-speech-rights-on-supreme-courts-front-porch/2015/08/28/f79ae262-4d9e-11e5-bfb9-9736d04fc8e4_story.html">Protesters have no free-speech rights on Supreme Court’s front porch</a>
</p>
<p class="pta-link-card-description">An appeals court said that demonstrators may be limited to the sidewalk in front of the high court.</p>
</div>
<div class="clearfix"></div>
</div>
Do you think citizens have a right to congregate or protest in front of the Supreme Court?2015-08-29T02:47:04-04:002015-08-29T02:47:04-04:00Capt Seid Waddell926080<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."<br />- First Amendment to the ConstitutionResponse by Capt Seid Waddell made Aug 29 at 2015 2:52 AM2015-08-29T02:52:11-04:002015-08-29T02:52:11-04:00PO1 William "Chip" Nagel926103<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>1st Amendment, Hell Yeah!Response by PO1 William "Chip" Nagel made Aug 29 at 2015 3:27 AM2015-08-29T03:27:19-04:002015-08-29T03:27:19-04:001SG Private RallyPoint Member926183<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Absolutely! <a class="dark-link bold-link" role="profile-hover" data-qtip-container="body" data-id="668456" data-source-page-controller="question_response_contents" href="/profiles/668456-capt-seid-waddell">Capt Seid Waddell</a> well said.Response by 1SG Private RallyPoint Member made Aug 29 at 2015 5:46 AM2015-08-29T05:46:51-04:002015-08-29T05:46:51-04:00Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS926309<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Here's what it boils down to.<br /><br />Can the Government "Control Access" to specific property owned by the People? That is really the question.<br /><br />If the answer is no, then the People can Assemble and Protest ANYWHERE on "Government" (Peoples' )Property including but not limited to Military installations.<br /><br />If the answer is yes, then the restriction can be viewed as "reasonable" even if we disagree with it, and the writers of it are in a "conflict of interest" by its very nature.Response by Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS made Aug 29 at 2015 8:53 AM2015-08-29T08:53:40-04:002015-08-29T08:53:40-04:00MCPO Roger Collins926440<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Of course, as long as it doesn't impede the functioning of the SCOTUS.Response by MCPO Roger Collins made Aug 29 at 2015 10:44 AM2015-08-29T10:44:46-04:002015-08-29T10:44:46-04:00SCPO Private RallyPoint Member926540<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>The ONLY right mentioned in the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution pursuant to this question is the "right of the people to PEACEABLY ASSEMBLE." Nowhere does it give the people the right to PROTEST!!! PERIOD!!!Response by SCPO Private RallyPoint Member made Aug 29 at 2015 11:53 AM2015-08-29T11:53:56-04:002015-08-29T11:53:56-04:00Sgt Wayne Wood2920145<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>yes... PEACEFUL protest should always be allowed.Response by Sgt Wayne Wood made Sep 15 at 2017 12:43 PM2017-09-15T12:43:59-04:002017-09-15T12:43:59-04:00SFC Jim Ruether2920160<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Peacefully yes. An aggressive group throwing punches and tipping over police cars....."Hell No"Response by SFC Jim Ruether made Sep 15 at 2017 12:49 PM2017-09-15T12:49:28-04:002017-09-15T12:49:28-04:00CWO3 Private RallyPoint Member2920580<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>If they have the proper permit and abide by the conditions of it, then yes. Only provided they don't violate the terms and impede the daily functions, and when asked to alter their conduct they do so in a reasonable manner. The permit is not a blank check for others to dogpile onto and violate standing law or standards of acceptable conduct. That's the difference between peaceful assembly and protest and participating in and inciting a riot.Response by CWO3 Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 15 at 2017 3:52 PM2017-09-15T15:52:57-04:002017-09-15T15:52:57-04:00Sgt Frank Latham6023565<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Peaceful protest is guaranteed by the 1st amendment. Infringing on the rights of others is not.Response by Sgt Frank Latham made Jun 19 at 2020 4:55 PM2020-06-19T16:55:59-04:002020-06-19T16:55:59-04:00PO2 Harold Ashton6140147<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>"Trump likes walls - we're gonna give him walls." <br /><br />Portland’s man of steel and Navy vet is now calling for Walls of Veterans to come out and support #BlackLivesMatter<br /><br />At least 6 #WallofVets group have started up to defend Black Lives and defend our cities from Trump’s invasion. Spread the word support these veterans!<br /><br />DC: @wallofvetsdc<br />LA: @wallofvets<br />Austin: @wallofvetsaust1<br />Portland: @PdxVets<br />Vegas: @VetsWallVegas<br />Seattle: @VetsSea<br /><br /><a target="_blank" href="https://twitter.com/i/status/">https://twitter.com/i/status/</a> [login to see] 28459264 <div class="pta-link-card answers-template-image type-default">
<div class="pta-link-card-picture">
</div>
<div class="pta-link-card-content">
<p class="pta-link-card-title">
<a target="blank" href="https://twitter.com/i/status/1286335697528459264">1286335697528459264</a>
</p>
<p class="pta-link-card-description"></p>
</div>
<div class="clearfix"></div>
</div>
Response by PO2 Harold Ashton made Jul 25 at 2020 10:07 PM2020-07-25T22:07:21-04:002020-07-25T22:07:21-04:00SFC Private RallyPoint Member6142670<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>To the dude who seems to have blocked me but argues there is no right to protest: that’s the dumbest thing I’ve seen in a while. Thought you should know you’re embarrassing yourself and your opinion doesn’t jive with any known reputable interpretation of the 1st Amendment.Response by SFC Private RallyPoint Member made Jul 26 at 2020 1:11 PM2020-07-26T13:11:31-04:002020-07-26T13:11:31-04:00SGT Justin Anderson6207652<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Yes they have a right to. You don't have to necessarilly like what they're protesting, but I respect the fact that they're using the right. Seems a lot Americans and service members forget we fought several wars for those rights and have fought others to give that right to others in the world. To not exercise any of these rights would be more of a slap in the face to any one who fought and/or died for those freedoms. To rant, I hate seeing Americans and SM's make an issue of people using those rights. Seeing people take part in their government and use those rights is part of what makes me proud to have served, doesn't matter if I happen to like the issue at hand they're protesting. Sorry, rant over.Response by SGT Justin Anderson made Aug 14 at 2020 10:42 PM2020-08-14T22:42:50-04:002020-08-14T22:42:50-04:002015-08-29T02:47:04-04:00