Posted on Sep 3, 2015
Do Camelback style hydration systems decrease individual water consumption vs. canteens or water bottles?
3.25K
7
15
3
3
0
During a JRTC rotation my brigade completed this past August I noticed that I drank considerably more water when I primarily drank from my canteens instead of my camelback. I also tracked my refills and total consumption better. Has anyone else noticed a similar trend in their units or been in a unit that limited the use of camelback style hydration systems? For reference we are a Guard unit from MN and the temps in Louisiana were triple digits almost every day. My water consumption averaged around 2.5 gal/day. On both of my deployments I was mounted instead of light and had the giant water bottles accessible at all times.
Posted 9 y ago
Responses: 12
It might be that I burned out on the camel back after wearing the stupid thing every waking moment through OSUT, but I rarely ever use mine. When I'm in kit, I carry a canteen on my flick or IBA, and I usually stash my camel back in my ruck, and use it to fill the canteen, if I drain it without a water buffalo nearby. I find that I dehydrate if I use the camel back alone, as I'll take a sip of water instead of a chug. So, yes, I agree. I encourage the joes in my squad to use their canteen. The only time I used my camel back is when I'm rucking, I'll throw the camel back on top my ruck, and keep the hose over my shoulder and sip it while I walk.
(1)
(0)
I would think the camelback would increase hydration but you do probably avoid gulping (which could be a good thing, but also account for lower consumption). Interesting thought on this, I'll be paying attention to other responses.
(1)
(0)
1SG (Join to see)
This is where my line of thinking was. I like the availability of the bite valve and being hands-free; however, I don't feel like I get much water through it compared to taking a couple gulps from the canteen.
(0)
(0)
I think it depends on the activity you are doing. The easier is it to find and carry, the more I drink.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next