Congressman calls for release of Marines' gender integration study. More Comprehensive Study included. Your Thoughts?

Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS — Sun, 11 Oct 2015 20:30:12 -0400

http://www.marinecorpstimes.com/story/military/2015/10/10/congressman-calls-release-marines-gender-integration-study/73618840/

We had the original 4 page summary, but below is the 33 page doc. Basically MORE info. It's not the full data, but we're getting there.

http://cdn.sandiegouniontrib.com/news/documents/2015/09/24/USMC_WISR_Documents_Not_releasable.pdf

Congressman calls for release of Marines' gender integration study

“You have to recruit from the American population. Half the American population is female,” Carter told service members at Naval Air Station Sigonella in Sicily, Italy.

Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 11 at 2015 8:36 PM

SSG Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 11 Oct 2015 20:36:24 -0400

Maybe this will shed some light Into the specialties that ones gender plays a part.

Response by Capt Seid Waddell made Oct 11 at 2015 10:44 PM

Capt Seid Waddell — Sun, 11 Oct 2015 22:44:03 -0400

Response by SN Greg Wright made Oct 12 at 2015 12:46 AM

SN Greg Wright — Mon, 12 Oct 2015 00:46:35 -0400

Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS Sargent, how DARE you post information on an objective study that does not support the leanings of our government!?!? Shame on you for believing in facts, rather than unicorns and butterflies and cows that fart strawberries.

I am ashamed to call you a brother in arms. Or at least, I WOULD be...if I wasn't a rational being capable of separating politics from reality. Since I am....:

Well done, brother. Keep fighting the good fight. Count yourself in the same class as the Commandant who, despite going against the grain, against his immediate boss, stood up and said, "This is what it is. Do what you will."

I do.

Response by Cpl Jeff N. made Oct 12 at 2015 7:12 AM

Cpl Jeff N. — Mon, 12 Oct 2015 07:12:05 -0400

Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS . Thanks for posting this. The Marine Corps actually does the work. conducts in depth analysis and reaches conclusions based upon data and what most people already knew through experience in the real world. The response from some will be like one CPT Servicemember (who hides his real name). They will post unrelated pictures and comments not germane to the discussion.

No one is saying women have not/do not serve honorably it is about leading combat arms MOS's against the enemy. The mission of the Marine Corps rifle is "The mission of the Marine Corps rifle squad is to locate, close with and destroy the enemy by fire and maneuver and to repel enemy's assault by fire and close combat." It is pretty simple. What gives us the best chance for success against the enemy.

Response by CW4 Russ Hamilton (Ret) made Oct 12 at 2015 8:48 AM

CW4 Russ Hamilton (Ret) — Mon, 12 Oct 2015 08:48:52 -0400

This topic is ridiculous, not because women can’t serve in combat (they do already), it’s because the numbers expected in combination with actual ability is beyond unrealistic. Ash Carter is out of touch with reality for so many reasons. He seems to expect that once the "barriers" are removed, women will be flocking to join combat arms and special operations units. Maybe he should go spend a couple months with any of these elements. Rep. Seth Moulton, D-Mass., who served as a Marine infantry officer in Iraq is also delusional. Rep. Moulton is the real deal but I think playing the politics game of his party either has warped his senses or he’s simply posturing to look good, knowing full well this isn’t going to happen. Maybe the same goes for Ash Carter.

If you can find women who WANT to live this life and who can also do it WITHOUT lowering standards – let them.

Response by CPT Private RallyPoint Member made Oct 12 at 2015 1:30 PM

CPT Private RallyPoint Member — Mon, 12 Oct 2015 13:30:48 -0400

The problem with this study is that it does not address the real claims of those who advocate opening all military jobs to women. It is completely unsurprising that most females are much less suited to combat arms jobs than most males. However, there are outliers-females who possess outstanding athletic ability and the mental and psychological qualities necessary to thrive in combat arms jobs. Regardless of their rarity, there is no truly principled reason (consonant with American ideals) that would preclude fully-qualified females from pursuing combat arms jobs. The military spends money on the most fatuous things, and yet it is ostensibly too much trouble to allow fully-qualified, hard-charging females to be fully integrated into combat arms jobs. Regardless of what hysterical males claim, integrating truly elite females into combat arms jobs will not in any way diminish national security.

Response by LCpl Mark Lefler made Oct 12 at 2015 5:33 PM

LCpl Mark Lefler — Mon, 12 Oct 2015 17:33:52 -0400

not real convinced with this study. Women have been in combat all over the world throughout history, this one study doesn't suddenly undo that. There are countries around the world today that have women in combat positions. If a woman meets the standards, then they are obviously met regardless.

Much of this is people resistant to change, which in itself is a sad thing because without change we stay static and eventually we lose.

Response by SSgt Donnie West made Oct 13 at 2015 12:22 AM

SSgt Donnie West — Tue, 13 Oct 2015 00:22:45 -0400

As I posted in my previous comments; this study just showed what I have been saying all along, there are certain jobs in the marine corps that should be held by male marines and ground combat arms is one of them. I have been there and know what the job is. we have to consider all the logistical things that go into adding women to the mix. just ask a support officer of any BN or Co. it can be very costly. men do not require much in the field. we can't just look at the outside of the situation; you have to consider the details. it is not a place for women. I don't think the American people are ready for body bags full of women because they think this jobs should be equal. just wait for the next war when we go back to Iraq. yes; we are going back.

Response by Sgt Jamie Grippin made Apr 14 at 2016 9:38 AM

Sgt Jamie Grippin — Thu, 14 Apr 2016 09:38:25 -0400

Sounds like they want to keep running studies until they get the results they want.