"China expected to conduct massive overhaul of military, making it more similar to the U.S. style of command"

RallyPoint Shared Content — Sat, 05 Sep 2015 09:34:39 -0400

From: The National Post

President Xi Jinping will as soon as this month announce the most sweeping overhaul of the Chinese military in at least three decades, moving it closer to a U.S.- style joint command structure, people familiar with the matter said.

The blueprint would unify the army, navy, air force and strategic missile corps under one command, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the proposal hasn’t been released. The plans call for thinning the ranks of officers and traditional ground forces, helping elevate the role of the navy and air force, to better project force in a modern conflict, they said.

It would also consolidate the country’s seven military regions to as few as four, one of the people said.

Xi is preparing to unveil the proposal in the wake of Thursday’s World War II anniversary parade in Beijing, which will showcase his authority over the People’s Liberation Army and China’s growing clout in the region. The plan to mold the military into a force that meets Xi’s goal of being “able to fight and win a modern war” has been delayed for months as anti- graft investigators swept up dozens of current and retired generals, referring the PLA’s former top general to prosecutors in July.

Xi “mainly employed the anti-corruption campaign in the military to form his absolute command over the army, so that his military restructuring plan can press ahead after being initially stalled,” said Yue Gang, a retired colonel in the PLA’s General Staff Department. “Now, his authority in the army is solid enough for him to flesh out his vision to transform the military and set it on a path to emulate the U.S.”

The Ministry of National Defense did not immediately respond to a faxed request for comment.

Unified Command

The plan would set out the details of the Communist Party’s endorsement of a joint military command in November 2013. The new system — which includes a joint command at both the regional and national level — would replace the region-based structure that emphasizes the army and predates the country’s founding in 1949 at a time Communist soldiers were clashing with Japanese invaders and Nationalist troops.

Such a command system is seen as necessary to improve communications and coordinate modern forces across the various arms of the military. The organizational changes would aid China’s shift from a land-based military to one able to project force far from its coastline.

Maritime Reach

The effort to adopt a U.S.-inspired command comes as China extends its maritime reach and the world’s two largest economies face increasing friction from the shipping lanes of East Asia to cyberspace. The Obama administration is considering cyber retaliation against China or other countries it believes have sponsored hacking attacks on corporate or government computers in the U.S., people familiar with the matter said.

The PLA’s last major overhaul — carried out under Deng Xiaoping in 1985 — reduced the number of military regions to seven from 11 and resulted in the dismissal of some 1 million soldiers. In its annual report to the U.S. Congress in May, the Pentagon said the current overhaul “would be the most significant changes to the PLA’s command organization since 1949.”

The changes would include merging the General Logistics and General Armaments departments, the people said. The defense ministry’s focus would be directed more toward administrative and diplomatic matters while the number of non-combat personnel and institutions would be scaled back, they said.

Nationwide Drills

The PLA began practicing the use of a joint-command system during a series of nationwide military exercises that began last month. It had an army of 850,000, compared with 398,000 people in the air force and 235,000 in the navy, according to figures released in 2013, the first time China confirmed the relative size of the branches.

In July the party expelled Guo Boxiong– the PLA’s retired top general — on suspicion he abused power and took bribes either directly or through family members. It was the highest- profile case bought against top brass since Xi took power in 2012, with generals accused of everything from embezzling public funds to selling ranks.

Phillip Saunders, director of the Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs at the U.S. National Defense University in Washington, said the difficulty in integrating the various forces is a weakness for the PLA now in conducting combat operations.

“Setting up joint command and control mechanisms is intended to fix that,” he said. “However, it took the U.S. military years to really learn how to communicate between the services and conduct real joint operations. It will likely take the PLA even longer.”

http://news.nationalpost.com/news/world/china-expected-to-conduct-massive-overhaul-of-military-making-it-more-similar-to-the-u-s-style-of-command

China expected to conduct massive overhaul of military, making it more similar to the U.S. style...

The changes would aid China’s shift from a land-based military to one able to project force by sea and air far from its coastline

Response by GySgt Wayne A. Ekblad made Sep 5 at 2015 9:35 AM

GySgt Wayne A. Ekblad — Sat, 05 Sep 2015 09:35:15 -0400

I guess we should be flattered!

Response by CSM Michael J. Uhlig made Sep 5 at 2015 9:44 AM

CSM Michael J. Uhlig — Sat, 05 Sep 2015 09:44:09 -0400

Good that we could set the example for them.

Response by Cpl James Waycasie made Sep 5 at 2015 9:48 AM

Cpl James Waycasie — Sat, 05 Sep 2015 09:48:56 -0400

Everybody wants to be like Mike, in this case the USA. The greatest thing about our Military is we are not beaten or humiliated into obedience. When in South Korea their regular Army would fall out in boxer shorts in snow 4 ft deep and their Sgts would walk around and just beat them with sticks. Granted they are toughened up, but most nations like Russia , China, and North Korea and more run their military on fear and blind orders. We are taught even as a Private to pick up , take charge if needed and move on. We are taught from the beginning to be a leader. We are taught a brotherly bond that instills confidence, respect, and teamwork amongst our ranks. You can restructure to "look" like anything you want to look like, simply put, we are not just Military, we are family, we are brothers and sisters who will fight to the death for each other. Restructure all you like, that will never give you the true spirit of American Military personnel.

Response by CPT Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 5 at 2015 3:49 PM

CPT Private RallyPoint Member — Sat, 05 Sep 2015 15:49:32 -0400

This is a bit concerning to me. They are a country with a lot of potential. Their military is pretty weak for their status. A traditional war would find them on a losing end. Our strategy is far beyond what they have. A unified command would drastically improve their military and their efficiency. I am sure they found that employing a Army centric model is not the best anymore. Most of the time now a days the Navy and the Air Force are the first Responders and need to have well versed understanding of the region instead of having to take orders from some Army officer.

Response by 2LT Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 6 at 2015 1:50 PM

2LT Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 06 Sep 2015 13:50:08 -0400

"Why can't we be friends...."

Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Sep 7 at 2015 12:03 PM

SSG Private RallyPoint Member — Mon, 07 Sep 2015 12:03:26 -0400

Time to buy stock in the companies that make PT belts, then.

Response by PO3 Private RallyPoint Member made Dec 18 at 2015 10:14 AM

PO3 Private RallyPoint Member — Fri, 18 Dec 2015 10:14:35 -0500

It is not about how tough the soldier make the military tough. It is what kind of mentality of the soldier make the military tough. Eastern military training is tough fighting solider following orders, until they get their soldier fight and win an objective even without orders .... then, maybe they can be as strong as us.

Like I stated, Our strength is the decentralized mentality that spread through our living style. For them, they only see chaos on our side, but for us, we still get what we wanted to achieve even in "chaos". That what they should really give a "HUH?" for.

Response by MAJ Ken Landgren made Dec 18 at 2015 11:05 AM

MAJ Ken Landgren — Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:05:13 -0500

I wonder if the battlefield command is centralized.