"Chelsea Manning may face solitary confinement for having Jenner Vanity Fair issue"

RallyPoint Shared Content — Thu, 13 Aug 2015 11:09:09 -0400

From: The Guardian

Chelsea Manning, the US army soldier serving a 35-year military prison sentence for leaking official secrets, has been threatened with indefinite solitary confinement for having an expired tube of toothpaste in her cell and being found in possession of the Caitlyn Jenner Vanity Fair issue, according to her lawyers and supporters.

Manning, a Guardian columnist who writes about global affairs, intelligence issues and transgender rights from prison in the brig of Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, has allegedly been charged with four violations of custody rules that her lawyers have denounced as absurd and a form of harassment. The army private is reportedly accused of having showed “disrespect”; of having displayed “disorderly conduct” by sweeping food onto the floor during dinner chow; of having kept “prohibited property” – that is books and magazines - in her cell; and of having committing “medicine misuse”, referring to the tube of toothpaste, according to Manning’s supporters.

The maximum punishment for such offences is an indeterminate amount of time in a solitary confinement cell.

The fourth charge, “medicine misuse”, follows an inspection of Manning’s cell on 9 July during which a tube of anti-cavity toothpaste was found. The prison authorities noted that Manning was entitled to have the toothpaste in her cell, but is penalizing her because it was “past its expiration date of 9 April 2015”.

The “prohibited property” charge relates to a number of books and magazines that were found in her cell and confiscated. They included the memoir I Am Malala by Nobel Peace Prize laureate Malala Yousafzai, a novel featuring trans women called A Safe Girl to Love, the LGBT publication Out Magazine, the Caitlyn Jenner issue of Vanity Fair and a copy of Cosmopolitan that included an interview with Manning.

Also confiscated was the US Senate report on torture. It is not clear why any of these publications were considered violations of prison rules – a request by the Guardian to the army public affairs team for an explanation of the charges received no immediate response.

Nancy Hollander, the lawyer dealing with Manning’s appeal against the 35-year sentence for being the source of the WikiLeaks disclosures of US state secrets, called the charge relating to an expired tube of toothpaste “utterly ridiculous”. She added: “I’m concerned that books have been taken from her – those books came to her legally and are clearly not a security threat.”

Hollander also had objections to the fact that the details of the charges listed by Fort Leavenworth included a reference to Manning saying “I want my lawyer” following a discussion with a prison officer. “To ask for a lawyer when you are being accused of something by a prison officer - that’s not ‘disrespect’,” Hollander said.

Chase Strangio, a staff attorney with the ACLU who is handling Manning’s legal dispute with the US military over her health treatment in prison as a transgender woman, said the charges were very concerning. “They could chill her activities or even silence her altogether.”

Strangio said it seemed that Manning was being unfairly targeted. “Chelsea has a growing voice in the public discussion and it would not surprise me were these charges connected to who she is.”

Strangio is in possession of legal documents that were issued by the US military in pre-charging proceedings. The actual charges were read out by Manning verbatim to her supporters, who then published the wording in a petition that has been set up calling for the charges to be dropped. A disciplinary hearing is scheduled for 18 August; should it go ahead the petitioners demand that it should be made open to the public.

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/aug/12/chelsea-manning-solitary-confinement-toothpaste-army

Chelsea Manning may face solitary confinement for having Jenner Vanity Fair issue

Expired tube of toothpaste and Malala Yousafzai memoir also among cell items that led to US soldier being allegedly charged with four violations of custody rules, lawyers say

Response by SGT Ben Keen made Aug 13 at 2015 11:11 AM

SGT Ben Keen — Thu, 13 Aug 2015 11:11:55 -0400

This might get some negative thoughts thrown my way but the rules were broken and the prison is just doing it's job to ensure the rules are enforced equally across the board which I think is the right answer. And note, it's only a possible punishment.

Response by 1stSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Aug 13 at 2015 11:12 AM

1stSgt Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 13 Aug 2015 11:12:42 -0400

Too bad, so sad. Why is the PVT being allowed to blog from the cell? Have we lost our mind? Did this individual not give operational details to Wikileaks?

Response by SSgt Alex Robinson made Aug 13 at 2015 11:15 AM

SSgt Alex Robinson — Thu, 13 Aug 2015 11:15:29 -0400

If you violate rules you should be punished

Response by SSG Warren Swan made Aug 13 at 2015 11:23 AM

SSG Warren Swan — Thu, 13 Aug 2015 11:23:23 -0400

The article is incomplete. It gives offenses, but doesn't speak on the policies that make them prohibited. I thought inmates were allowed to read, so what's wrong with have the Bruce issue of Vanity Fair? Expired toothpaste as a medicine violation? Sounds to me Manning's lawyers are upset over the F**k F**k games that are being played in prison.

Response by MAJ Robert (Bob) Petrarca made Aug 13 at 2015 11:33 AM

MAJ Robert (Bob) Petrarca — Thu, 13 Aug 2015 11:33:40 -0400

What's the penalty for having a copy of, "The Anarchist's Cookbook", life times 2? Hey rules is rules especially where this ass clown is.

Response by SPC Robert Patrick made Aug 13 at 2015 12:12 PM

SPC Robert Patrick — Thu, 13 Aug 2015 12:12:34 -0400

Sorry but no fuck her she lost her rights when she released sensitive information to the public she should not even be allowed on a computer this is a military prison she is still classified a soldier while in said military prison. She is still required do as told by the military prison guards ACLU needs to stop getting involved with issues that do not concern them. I'm sorry if I offend anybody (not really suck it up) but Manning you are in prison for releasing damaging secret to the public this isn't like you stole a radio from radio shack stop being such pussy.

Seriously though why are they even still in the news.

Response by COL Jeff Williams made Aug 13 at 2015 12:20 PM

COL Jeff Williams — Thu, 13 Aug 2015 12:20:31 -0400

During the tour I took there, I was told by the staff of all the wonderful opportunities the inmates have to better themselves. I asked "when do they serve their time for the crimes they committed" The response was "isn't enough they are in here?" My reply "NO"

Response by PVT Robert Gresham made Aug 13 at 2015 12:52 PM

PVT Robert Gresham — Thu, 13 Aug 2015 12:52:16 -0400

As angry as Manning's transgressions make me, she is doing her time, and, until things change, has the same rights as every other prisoner. If she has actually violated prison rules she deserves to be punished. If she has not, if charges are being "trumped up", as seems to be the case here, then she has the same rights that are guaranteed to every other inmate.

We cannot, as much as we may like to, discriminate based on the crime which was originally committed. She has had her trial. She is already being punished for her actions. This is one of the cornerstones of our Democracy.

Response by SSG Brian Kresge made Aug 13 at 2015 12:59 PM

SSG Brian Kresge — Thu, 13 Aug 2015 12:59:12 -0400

I wish I could muster the energy to care about Manning. Maybe they'll give him an Espy someday.

Response by CH (MAJ) Private RallyPoint Member made Aug 13 at 2015 1:02 PM

CH (MAJ) Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 13 Aug 2015 13:02:14 -0400

It is very difficult for me to wrap my head around this. What drives policy here? Why is a downsizing Army looking to expand eligibility to group or groups that were previously not considered fit for service?

Response by SGT Christopher Churilla made Aug 13 at 2015 1:04 PM

SGT Christopher Churilla — Thu, 13 Aug 2015 13:04:45 -0400

All I'm reading is one side of the story. Until I hear from the other side I have no opinion.

Response by PO1 Jeff Coon made Aug 13 at 2015 4:10 PM

PO1 Jeff Coon — Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:10:10 -0400

Wait... you can blog in federal prison?

Response by SFC Mark Merino made Aug 13 at 2015 6:51 PM

SFC Mark Merino — Thu, 13 Aug 2015 18:51:36 -0400

Chances of me not losing any sleep over this is 100%.

Response by Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS made Aug 13 at 2015 9:10 PM

Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS — Thu, 13 Aug 2015 21:10:41 -0400

As much as people dislike Manning, I have a feeling we like Justice more. Ignore the prisoner, and look at the situation. It's not about Manning.

Would this be going on with any other prisoner? Would any other prisoner be having these same issues? Or, is it more likely that the Prison staff, like a majority of us, are letting their feelings for Manning cloud their professionalism?

I would love to believe that the Prison staff is 100% Professional 100% of the time. I would love to believe that. However... I think the truth is likely somewhere in between. It is likely that an "expired toothpaste" doesn't rate additional charges. It is likely that “I want my lawyer” isn't disrespect. It's also likely that "prohibited items" is code for something else.

Response by PFC Private RallyPoint Member made Aug 14 at 2015 5:22 PM

PFC Private RallyPoint Member — Fri, 14 Aug 2015 17:22:51 -0400

So for years I have seen that transgender people would be an issue for security world wide....wait until they start cloning people...erm, nvm too late

Response by SSG Buddy Kemper made Aug 14 at 2015 6:10 PM

SSG Buddy Kemper — Fri, 14 Aug 2015 18:10:08 -0400

sexxy

Response by LTC Bink Romanick made Aug 14 at 2015 6:13 PM

LTC Bink Romanick — Fri, 14 Aug 2015 18:13:06 -0400

Seriously why do we care? Thankfully she has disappeared from sight.