Can we make it a law that all Islamic immigrants must be sponsored by an American citizen, so an attack puts the sponsor on trial too?

Cpl Robert Masi — Fri, 29 Dec 2017 07:47:02 -0500

Response by Cpl Robert Masi made Dec 29 at 2017 7:51 AM

Cpl Robert Masi — Fri, 29 Dec 2017 07:51:35 -0500

If Leftists want mass immigration in America, they should be forced to suffer the actions and consequences of those policies.
They shouldn't get a free pass to pretend like they never saw it coming, every time there is a terrorist attack.....This applies to Europe as well. Put Merkel and Reinfeldt on trial for the rape epidemic of women that mass Muslim immigration has brought

Response by SGM Erik Marquez made Dec 29 at 2017 8:08 AM

SGM Erik Marquez — Fri, 29 Dec 2017 08:08:47 -0500

You bet, just as soon as you Justify your new law with how it would have stopped this former US Marine turned Islamic jihadist https://www.opslens.com/2017/12/23/fbi-foils-isis-christmas-terror-plot-former-marine-charged/?utm_source=GOV&utm_medium=CPC

FBI Charges Former Marine With Planning Christmas Day Terror Attack

The FBI has charged a former United States Marine and Muslim convert with planning an ISIS terror attack on San Francisco's Pier 39. The plot involved killing as many civilians as possible on Christmas day.

Response by SPC David Willis made Dec 29 at 2017 8:12 AM

SPC David Willis — Fri, 29 Dec 2017 08:12:15 -0500

Legal immigration? Yea let's start sponsoring gun buyers as well.

Response by CPT Jack Durish made Dec 29 at 2017 10:30 AM

CPT Jack Durish — Fri, 29 Dec 2017 10:30:02 -0500

Frustrating, isn't it? You can hear the frustration in the question. America was designed for people who could handle freedom. That is, take responsibility for their actions. Islam fundamentally preaches that people can't be trusted with freedom. They are incapable of making decisions for themselves and, thus, cannot be held responsible for their decisions. Therein lies the real problem. How then can you transfer responsibility to a "sponsor"? They won't be able to control the people they sponsor if they cannot control their own behavior.

Response by MCPO Roger Collins made Dec 29 at 2017 10:46 AM

MCPO Roger Collins — Fri, 29 Dec 2017 10:46:38 -0500

That would make sense, however a few laws would have to be changed or a revision of past decisions by the SCOTUS, specifically those regarding refugees and those entering the USA by way of chain migration. Don't see that happening any time soon.

Response by LTC Private RallyPoint Member made Dec 29 at 2017 12:58 PM

LTC Private RallyPoint Member — Fri, 29 Dec 2017 12:58:08 -0500

Sorry, first amendment and all that. We don’t discriminate against people based on race, gender, religion, age and more recently sexual identification in this country, and a very good thing we don’t.

Response by SN Greg Wright made Dec 29 at 2017 12:58 PM

SN Greg Wright — Fri, 29 Dec 2017 12:58:40 -0500

Your question erroneously presupposes that all Muslims are bad. In fact, 99.9% of them are just people like you and I wanting to live their lives. You gonna require sponsors for Christians, Catholics, and Jews, too?

Response by 1stSgt Nelson Kerr made Dec 29 at 2017 8:35 PM

1stSgt Nelson Kerr — Fri, 29 Dec 2017 20:35:46 -0500

You can do so, but first you have to get enough people to amendment the Constitutions, that means to y have to get the votes of two thirds of both houses of Constitutes and three quarters of State legislatures.
I doubt that you could find enough anti- American legislators to support gutting the 1st and 14th amendments, amendment in a singles state's lelisalture much less 38 States

You swore o defend the US Constitution It is sad that you do not seem to have the slightest clue about what you swore to protect.