Posted on Aug 4, 2014
Can the Army Early Retire a Captain back to their former Enlisted Grade?
2.14K
0
0
Recently the Army announced that 1,188 Captains were selected by the OSB/ESERB for seperation and early retirement. Of that total number 101 Captains do not meet the statutory Active Federal Commissioned Service time (currently 8 years) to retire as an Officer.
The requirement for AFCS is found in 10 U.S.C. section 3911.
The authority to to early retire officers is found in 10 U.S.C. section 638A and reads:
"officers on the active-duty list may be considered for early retirement by a selection board.......Officers....holding a regular grade below the grade of colonel, or in the case of the Navy, captain, who are eligible for retirement under section 3911, 6323, or 8911 of this title, or who after two additional years or less of active service would be eligible for retirement under one of those sections and whose names are not on a list of officers recommended for promotion."
So according to 10 U.S.C. 638A in order to be considered for early retirement you must be eligible for retirement under 10 U.S.C. 3911.
Do the 101 Officers told that they have to retire at their highest enlisted grade held have a legal fight? All were within the two years of meeting eligiblity for 3911. Do they have the right by law to continue to serve until they meet eligibility then be retired as Officers?
The requirement for AFCS is found in 10 U.S.C. section 3911.
The authority to to early retire officers is found in 10 U.S.C. section 638A and reads:
"officers on the active-duty list may be considered for early retirement by a selection board.......Officers....holding a regular grade below the grade of colonel, or in the case of the Navy, captain, who are eligible for retirement under section 3911, 6323, or 8911 of this title, or who after two additional years or less of active service would be eligible for retirement under one of those sections and whose names are not on a list of officers recommended for promotion."
So according to 10 U.S.C. 638A in order to be considered for early retirement you must be eligible for retirement under 10 U.S.C. 3911.
Do the 101 Officers told that they have to retire at their highest enlisted grade held have a legal fight? All were within the two years of meeting eligiblity for 3911. Do they have the right by law to continue to serve until they meet eligibility then be retired as Officers?
Posted >1 y ago
This is a duplicate discussion and the contents have been merged with the original discussion. Click below to see more on this topic...
In an expanded effort to slim down the force, the Army is offering more 15-year retirements to officers with prior-enlisted service.
Army Secretary John McHugh, in a June 17 directive, granted early retirements to prior-enlisted officers with eight years or more commissioned service. Previously this voluntary separation was only available to prior-enlisted officers with at least 10 years of commissioned service. Warrant officers are not eligible.
These officers are only retirement eligible if they have 15 years of active-duty service.
As of May 30, there were 256 active-duty officers with eight years of commissioned service who qualify for the early retirements, and 176 with nine years who are eligible.
The 15-year retirement option is officially called the Temporary Early Retirement Authority. Congress authorized its use in 2011 as a force management program to be used through Sept. 30, 2018.
McHugh OK’d it for the Army in 2012 as the service prepared to launch a series of retention screening boards for officers and senior noncommissioned officers of the Regular Army and Army Reserve.
Before now, the use of TERA had been restricted to people identified for separation by involuntary release boards and those who have been passed over for promotion.
The special program allows soldiers with at least 15 but fewer than 20 years of active service to receive the same benefits as those who retire with 20 or more years of service, except that their retirement pay is reduced accordingly.
Before McHugh’s June 17 directive, it was possible for prior-enlisted officers to retire with only eight years commissioned service, but it required a waiver. The new rules are effective through Congress’ 2018 deadline.
Soldiers who have 18 to 20 years of service, and who are in the retirement lock-in category of federal law, may not be discharged unless recommended by a court-martial convening authority, and approved by the assistant secretary of the Army for manpower and reserve affairs.
The Army has Congressional authority to ease the retirement lock-in rule — requiring colonels and lieutenant colonels to serve at least three years after promotion to retire in those ranks — but McHugh has not yet decided to use it.
The Army recently increased the retirement lock-in for promotion to the senior NCO ranks from two to three years.
Staff writer Jim Tice contributed to this report.
Army Secretary John McHugh, in a June 17 directive, granted early retirements to prior-enlisted officers with eight years or more commissioned service. Previously this voluntary separation was only available to prior-enlisted officers with at least 10 years of commissioned service. Warrant officers are not eligible.
These officers are only retirement eligible if they have 15 years of active-duty service.
As of May 30, there were 256 active-duty officers with eight years of commissioned service who qualify for the early retirements, and 176 with nine years who are eligible.
The 15-year retirement option is officially called the Temporary Early Retirement Authority. Congress authorized its use in 2011 as a force management program to be used through Sept. 30, 2018.
McHugh OK’d it for the Army in 2012 as the service prepared to launch a series of retention screening boards for officers and senior noncommissioned officers of the Regular Army and Army Reserve.
Before now, the use of TERA had been restricted to people identified for separation by involuntary release boards and those who have been passed over for promotion.
The special program allows soldiers with at least 15 but fewer than 20 years of active service to receive the same benefits as those who retire with 20 or more years of service, except that their retirement pay is reduced accordingly.
Before McHugh’s June 17 directive, it was possible for prior-enlisted officers to retire with only eight years commissioned service, but it required a waiver. The new rules are effective through Congress’ 2018 deadline.
Soldiers who have 18 to 20 years of service, and who are in the retirement lock-in category of federal law, may not be discharged unless recommended by a court-martial convening authority, and approved by the assistant secretary of the Army for manpower and reserve affairs.
The Army has Congressional authority to ease the retirement lock-in rule — requiring colonels and lieutenant colonels to serve at least three years after promotion to retire in those ranks — but McHugh has not yet decided to use it.
The Army recently increased the retirement lock-in for promotion to the senior NCO ranks from two to three years.
Staff writer Jim Tice contributed to this report.
Read This Next