SSG Private RallyPoint Member1591330<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Can I be reassigned a 9W code (ineligible to reenlist), even if I was already selected for a QMP but was retained?2016-06-03T11:13:55-04:00SSG Private RallyPoint Member1591330<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Can I be reassigned a 9W code (ineligible to reenlist), even if I was already selected for a QMP but was retained?2016-06-03T11:13:55-04:002016-06-03T11:13:55-04:00SSG William Jones1591361<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>What a dichotomy!!! I can't understand how that could happen. <a class="dark-link bold-link" role="profile-hover" data-qtip-container="body" data-id="754632" data-source-page-controller="question_response_contents" href="/profiles/754632-15e-unmanned-aircraft-systems-repairer">SSG Private RallyPoint Member</a>Response by SSG William Jones made Jun 3 at 2016 11:20 AM2016-06-03T11:20:47-04:002016-06-03T11:20:47-04:00SGM Erik Marquez1591460<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Im looking and do not see the two differing lines of administrative action limiting or affecting one or another in this way.<br />Specifically 9W | Not Eligible Due to SSG NCOER/NCOES Eligibility Requirements; In other words, an alleged failure to meet Staff Sergeant (SSG) E-6 rank requirements. IAW AR 600–8–19<br />the 2016 QMP directive make no mention I can find that would address a limitation of the RE code 9w being given <br /><a target="_blank" href="https://www.army.mil/e2/c/downloads/437324.pdf">https://www.army.mil/e2/c/downloads/437324.pdf</a><br />nor does AR635-200 <a target="_blank" href="http://www.apd.army.mil/pdffiles/r635_200.pdf">http://www.apd.army.mil/pdffiles/r635_200.pdf</a> <div class="pta-link-card answers-template-image type-default">
<div class="pta-link-card-picture">
</div>
<div class="pta-link-card-content">
<p class="pta-link-card-title">
<a target="blank" href="https://www.army.mil/e2/c/downloads/437324.pdf">437324.pdf</a>
</p>
<p class="pta-link-card-description">öX'«2Klkkcë@Ï%*ÛÚÕnlïöÚáÓÁoÖñ_ÿpÖw[hº6$ÇJÝwOIÑ'{ðROVþ`««h#ÂàÙTæZsJuÒdñÿ?éTTjìmfÉÒÔÜlqçÔ/rvÑpðÄØÃDë+þúëíç{.vQµfÜÌ%ÒV¶^ôô!wRÞ%ôã}èwŵ8ßái,JÝ6ÚòÖEýÈ]</p>
</div>
<div class="clearfix"></div>
</div>
Response by SGM Erik Marquez made Jun 3 at 2016 11:39 AM2016-06-03T11:39:13-04:002016-06-03T11:39:13-04:00SGM Matthew Quick1593199<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Short answer...yes; currently. HRC/DA is working to update their policy.<br /><br />The intent should be when the QMP Boards recommends retention and it goes to DA, G-1 for approval, the IMPEPR Code is changed from 9W to the previous IMREPR Code (Normally a 10 or Blank)Response by SGM Matthew Quick made Jun 3 at 2016 6:36 PM2016-06-03T18:36:56-04:002016-06-03T18:36:56-04:002016-06-03T11:13:55-04:00