Can concrete dust crush the lower 2/3rds of the Twin Towers?

2020-11-12T18:53:31-05:00

No it can not. Explosions and incendiaries caused the collapse of the three World Trade Center buildings on 9/11. Dust weights some zero pounds. For more see this lecture about basic physics. https://www.facebook.com/watch/live/?v= [login to see] 77608&ref=notif&notif_id= [login to see] 53785&notif_t=live_video

And there is way more to learn.
3, 354 architects and engineers more than 15,000 scientists, including 52 Nobel laureates and 63 recipients of the National Medal of Science, some 320 skilled commercial of military pilots (Pilots for 9/11 Truth), and some 58 elected public officials are saying that scientific irrefutably evidence proves that the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings were destroyed by explosives and incendiaries.

Video classes Part 2, about the science of 9/11 truth
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IrogMzHaFtg&list=UUL-c_zvZ3lhlU7NU1ikxgmQ
(AE911truth.org,)
Part 3
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pOonEvmZphk&list=UUL-c_zvZ3lhlU7NU1ikxgmQ&index=13

Part 1
rhttps://http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AuhwtgMc9eM&list=UUL-c_zvZ3lhlU7NU1ikxgmQ&index=15

There is also a video of yellow colored steel dripping off the side of the south Twin Tower just before it collapsed. It is not aluminum metal because it is silver color as a liquid.
9/11 Whistleblower: Kevin Ryan former UL scientist
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=kevin+ryan++9%2F11&view=detail&mid=C54C4CE39E87D2ED79A2C54C4CE39E87D2ED79A2&FORM=VIRE&fbclid=IwAR1iZF8PwQQK9UXlmtOq0lFdBxvCK-82L2juolGGcqatD-gYXsIsZ2o7O-A

“But someone would have talked by now”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eOWRLoNOhRs&feature=youtu.be&fbclid=IwAR3ziEq6mBVhmZjSqAZmfK6u6T2PRvXAXQZ0zB6fajhFul0e6a2xvaqbCHI

The 9/11 Commission whistleblowers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOBwfEWXxPY

9/11 Whistleblower: Michael Springmann
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ooj_KOoVmAI&feature=youtu.be&fbclid=IwAR1EpjU9sW3J5R9JtO4PYgYM5-ArljH-L3K0nRSgGVjNC8YLI9nvheP3vCU

9/11 Whistleblowers: William Rodriguez
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irNqB5N0o30&fbclid=IwAR1l0AZ61pJrzBrVFhz1FKE2lDpc5LaL15kXtQD4tNhNEKJJya5VKA2G3-Y

The New Pearl Harbor revisited
https://www.facebook.com/sultan.abdallah70/videos/ [login to see] 08442/UzpfSTcxOTg1MDYwMjpWSzoxMTM0MzkyMDQ2NzIwNzIz/

Analysis of the outer box columns being propelled outwardly away from the center core columns at too fast a speed or acceleration
https://www.opednews.com/articles/Destruction-of-the-WTC-Sou-by-Wayne-Coste-911_911-Destruction_911-Truth_Architects-And-Engineers-For-911-Truth-200912-845.html?fbclid=IwAR3MLDJJa8I0zk9z-THCL-vDSDgmh3c_9nzO8mJy1bltGC6evwAlAZOHYo4

Steel melts at 2,750 degree F. See the photo of yellow hot steel (2,192 F.) being removed from the WTC wreckage at http://www.911myths.com/html/wtc_molten_steel.html)

Fire Fighters for 9/11 truth
https://www.facebook.com/groups/ [login to see] 2870/

We are in a war on science.

9/11: An Architect's Guide - Part 2 - Twin Towers' Explosive Destruction (11/12/20 Webinar - R...

9/11: An Architect’s Guide (On-Demand) | Part 2: The Twin Towers’ Explosive DestructionCourse Number: AE911-AAG-OD2On-demand three-part webinar series....

Response by CW3 Dick McManus made Nov 12 at 2020 6:54 PM

2020-11-12T18:54:44-05:00

The seismic signals propagating from New York City on September 11, 2001, recorded at Palisades (34 km) and published by the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University (LDEO). The official LDEO interpretations of the seismic waves and concludes that the waves clearly point to pre-airplane impact explosions and pre-collapse explosions as the causes of the seismic signals. He reaches a similar conclusion for WTC 7.
They concluded that only strong explosives could be the cause of such seismic waves, in accordance with the observed low frequencies. According to the nature of the recorded waves we can propose a location of each explosive source. According to the presence of shear waves or the presence of Rayleigh waves only, we hypothesize a subterranean or a subaerial explosion occurred. The magnitude of an aerial explosion (an explosion higher than ground level within the World Trade Center (WTC) buildings) is insufficient to provide seismic waves at 34 km.

A 0.9 earthquake (seismic signal) occurred near the North Tower(WTC1) 14 seconds prior to the AA11 impacted, per NTSB data within the 9/11 Commission report. Or a strong subterranean explosion at the WTC1.

A 0.7 earthquake (seismic signal) occurred near the South Tower (WTC2) 17 seconds before the UA175 impacted per NTSB data, or a subaerial explosion at the WTC2. And one during the WTC7 collapse.

French geophysicist, Dr. André Rousseau, like Furlong and Ross, provided reasons to conclude that the signals that the official story attributed to airplane impacts had actually been caused by something else – which, as evidence documented in Point TT-8 suggests, was shocks, explosive in nature, that had occurred at the bases of the buildings. Rousseau further demonstrated that the wave details themselves were characteristic of such explosions, not of plane impacts or building collapses. http://www.consensus911.org/point-tt-7/

LDEO's attribution of the waveforms to plane impacts at the Twin Towers is that even if the impacts had been considerably more energetic, these signals (shock wave) could not have been generated by such impacts. The actual waves generated by the crashes had to have been deadened before hitting the ground. The recorded (seismic) waves are not linked to the plane crashes but to another origin. Further, the difference in the magnitude of the two signals prior to an airplane impact in both WTC buildings, can only be linked to differences in the volume of explosives and/or their distance below the surface of the ground.

Given that neither the airplane crashing into the towers, nor the vibration of the towers due to airplane impacts, nor the fall of debris hitting the ground, can be the source of the seismic waves registered 34 kilometers away. Also the fact is the low frequencies of those waves could not have been generated by these phenomena. Only explosions could produce the waves observed.

Also witnesses and a video observation confirm LDEO’s conclusions that subaerial explosions close to the times of airplane impacts on WTC1 and WTC2. There are a total 37 witnesses to the basement explosions. William Rodriguez testified before the 9/11 Commission that he and his co-workers experienced explosions in the basements and about an injured co-worker.

Times of the airplane impacts used in the above analysis came from the 9/11 Commission come from radar at ground level and are based on the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) data. They are the only reliable times because they are based on ground radar data which do not involve any hypothetical assumptions. They are reliable to one second. https://911truth.org/seismic-signal-emitted-wave-plane-impact-collapse-towers/

As a consequence, LDEO draw the conclusion that the three buildings were demolished by a controlled process. (Source: Dr. Andre Rousseau, November 1, 2012) http://www.journalof911studies.com/resources/RousseauVol34November2012.pdf

https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/technical-articles/articles-in-the-journal-of-9-11-studies/424-were-explosives-the-source-of-the-seismic-signals-emitted-from-new-york-on-september-11-2001

And NIST hired LDEO to re-analyze the seismic data, but they will not make their paper public.

Point TT-7: Why Did the Twin Towers Collapse? The Seismic Evidence | Consensus 911

But independent analyses have disputed LDEO’s conclusions and thereby the conclusions reached by FEMA and NIST. These independent analyses dispute even more the conclusions of the 9/11 Commission.

Response by CW2 Private RallyPoint Member made Nov 12 at 2020 7:31 PM

2020-11-12T19:31:24-05:00

OK I'll bite. Say it IS all true, what do you propose happens?