SFC Private RallyPoint Member6585203<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>In Dec 2018 I had 15-6 for createing a hostil work environment. The IO recommended I be retrained and sent back to a leadership position at a later time. My JAG lawyer told me there was no way to beat it becuase it was a perception thing. I believe the command knew it was a BS case. They closed it out "Favorable" and I was given no punishment. However the baseline was set if you had any 15-6 for leadership with derogatory information you could be non-selected. Remember non of this is in my official file. EPM has to request the 15-6 from JAG just to see it. Its not in my restricted file either because it was closed favorablly. I have looked in so many regulations to see if a 15-6 can be used on a NCO board and I cannot find it. I just keep being told that they can use it, and bascially to kick rocks. Any help would be greatly appreciated?Can a 15-6 be viewed and used against you on a promotion board (after it was closed out "Favorable")?2020-12-16T14:47:00-05:00SFC Private RallyPoint Member6585203<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>In Dec 2018 I had 15-6 for createing a hostil work environment. The IO recommended I be retrained and sent back to a leadership position at a later time. My JAG lawyer told me there was no way to beat it becuase it was a perception thing. I believe the command knew it was a BS case. They closed it out "Favorable" and I was given no punishment. However the baseline was set if you had any 15-6 for leadership with derogatory information you could be non-selected. Remember non of this is in my official file. EPM has to request the 15-6 from JAG just to see it. Its not in my restricted file either because it was closed favorablly. I have looked in so many regulations to see if a 15-6 can be used on a NCO board and I cannot find it. I just keep being told that they can use it, and bascially to kick rocks. Any help would be greatly appreciated?Can a 15-6 be viewed and used against you on a promotion board (after it was closed out "Favorable")?2020-12-16T14:47:00-05:002020-12-16T14:47:00-05:00SFC Casey O'Mally6585422<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>OK... this is no official answer of any sort. But, from what you have said, I would imagine that, yes, it can be used against you. The fact that IO recommended retraining implies that there was an underlying issue. If the entire thing was a bunch of BS, then IO *should have* stated as such and shut the 15-6 down. Instead, it was completed, and retraining was recommended. Even with a "favorable" indication, that re-raining says not everything was going perfectly. My GUESS is that promotion boards would have both a desire and a right to know about that. My guess would ALSO be that if it is in your board file (which, unless things have changed, you still have to review and certify - so you will know if it is there), you are allowed to write a letter to the board to explain it.<br /><br />Again, this is just *my* interpretation.Response by SFC Casey O'Mally made Dec 16 at 2020 4:11 PM2020-12-16T16:11:11-05:002020-12-16T16:11:11-05:00SGM Private RallyPoint Member6585585<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>If a document is not in your iPERMS, a centralized board is not going to see it.<br /><br />However, prior to that board, your BN and BDE commanders recommend, or don't recommend you for consideration at that board.<br />That is where it is possible that it can be used against you.Response by SGM Private RallyPoint Member made Dec 16 at 2020 5:45 PM2020-12-16T17:45:05-05:002020-12-16T17:45:05-05:00SGM Private RallyPoint Member6587047<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>For clarification, when you say "The IO recommended I be retrained" does retrained mean that you were moved out of your MOS and into recruiting?Response by SGM Private RallyPoint Member made Dec 17 at 2020 9:07 AM2020-12-17T09:07:10-05:002020-12-17T09:07:10-05:00SGM Bill Frazer6587762<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Of course you know that sexual harassment and toxic leadership are often perceptions support with minimal evidence.Response by SGM Bill Frazer made Dec 17 at 2020 1:57 PM2020-12-17T13:57:54-05:002020-12-17T13:57:54-05:002020-12-16T14:47:00-05:00