SFC Private RallyPoint Member 202606 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>A colleague and I we were discussing this issue. I told her that since we currently have a memorandum for record signed by each hand receipt holder. That should be sufficient at our level. But she is saying that we should maintain the 2062 or similar document. I feel that the 2062 or similar document should be maintained by the customer. Is the Annual Durable Management review Memorandum sufficient at the G4 PBO level or should we maintain a copy of a 2062 or similar document ? Your feedback is greatly appreciated. At the G4 PBO level, what are our requirements when it comes to the Annual Durable Management Review ? 2014-08-13T13:06:22-04:00 SFC Private RallyPoint Member 202606 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>A colleague and I we were discussing this issue. I told her that since we currently have a memorandum for record signed by each hand receipt holder. That should be sufficient at our level. But she is saying that we should maintain the 2062 or similar document. I feel that the 2062 or similar document should be maintained by the customer. Is the Annual Durable Management review Memorandum sufficient at the G4 PBO level or should we maintain a copy of a 2062 or similar document ? Your feedback is greatly appreciated. At the G4 PBO level, what are our requirements when it comes to the Annual Durable Management Review ? 2014-08-13T13:06:22-04:00 2014-08-13T13:06:22-04:00 SSG John Bacon 202649 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Check this link. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.quartermaster.army.mil/oqmg/professional_bulletin/2004/winter04/Durable_Property_Accountability.htm">http://www.quartermaster.army.mil/oqmg/professional_bulletin/2004/winter04/Durable_Property_Accountability.htm</a> <div class="pta-link-card answers-template-image type-default"> <div class="pta-link-card-picture"> </div> <div class="pta-link-card-content"> <p class="pta-link-card-title"> <a target="blank" href="http://www.quartermaster.army.mil/oqmg/professional_bulletin/2004/winter04/Durable_Property_Accountability.htm">Durable Property Accountability</a> </p> <p class="pta-link-card-description"> SGT Clark didn’t have to sign for the equipment in his cubicle. He is automatically responsible for that equipment - no signed document is required. With almost 100 computers in her company, CPT Tory asked the supply sergeant to keep track of who had what equipment. The unit’s information management officer (IMO) also kept records of computers and software throughout the company as required by AR25-1 (Army Information Management). CPT Tory...</p> </div> <div class="clearfix"></div> </div> Response by SSG John Bacon made Aug 13 at 2014 1:45 PM 2014-08-13T13:45:36-04:00 2014-08-13T13:45:36-04:00 2014-08-13T13:06:22-04:00