As a Servicemember, when the President says things like this, what do you think it means?

MAJ Bryan Zeski — Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:38:09 -0500

Should we expect to go to war to stop North Korea from this goal? We know they are already close to having the capability. Do public statements like this encourage more aggressive actions from dictators like KJU?

What is the strategic goal of a public statement like this? What do you think he hopes to accomplish?

Response by SN Greg Wright made Jan 3 at 2017 12:42 AM

SN Greg Wright — Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:42:39 -0500

Major you probably know better than I that this is hyperbolic bullshit. (Un saying it, not your questions). Oh, I'm sure he means it, and I'm sure he thinks he'll be capable of it, but the reality is is that his one-off missiles have a very poor likelihood of 1. surviving their inexperience in shrinking nuclear payloads to an effective ICBM size, and 2. getting past our countermeasures. He isn't Russia, much as he'd like to think he is. Fat Boy Leader is just throwing yet another tantrum.

Response by SPC Private RallyPoint Member made Jan 3 at 2017 12:54 AM

SPC Private RallyPoint Member — Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:54:06 -0500

It could have multiple meanings. That North Korean technology is shoddy and it will fail. That we are capable of intervening and preventing the launch or destroying the missile before it reaches its target. Or that we will intervene politically or militarily to prevent the launch or further development.

Response by LTC Private RallyPoint Member made Jan 3 at 2017 1:10 AM

LTC Private RallyPoint Member — Tue, 03 Jan 2017 01:10:21 -0500

The Undemocratic Fatty the 3rd is learning from each of his tests. Iran I am sure is helping him. It will just cause Japan to rearm. Donald Trump can only hope that the THAAD of the Guam and Alaska will shoot it down if he indeed is trying to hit the USA.

Response by LTC Private RallyPoint Member made Jan 3 at 2017 1:13 AM

LTC Private RallyPoint Member — Tue, 03 Jan 2017 01:13:18 -0500

Liberals who are in California, especially Hollywood, will be rooting for missle launch success!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOH9trJLedk&t=42s

Film Actors Guild (F.A.G) - Team America: World Police

Hollywood actors are literally the pinnacle of political intellectualism. Clips from Team America: World Police.

Response by CPO Bill Penrod made Jan 3 at 2017 1:25 AM

CPO Bill Penrod — Tue, 03 Jan 2017 01:25:00 -0500

Korea is China's problem so they had better get hot.......

Response by SPC Private RallyPoint Member made Jan 3 at 2017 1:28 AM

SPC Private RallyPoint Member — Tue, 03 Jan 2017 01:28:32 -0500

Shits about to get real.

Response by PO1 William "Chip" Nagel made Jan 3 at 2017 1:42 AM

PO1 William "Chip" Nagel — Tue, 03 Jan 2017 01:42:46 -0500

"Take a Tic Tac and Grab them in the P***Y" Scares the Crap out of me. As a Past SAS Man (Sealed Authentication System, Nuclear Launch Codes). As Someone that had to type message in 3 Mins to make sure they were on the Presidents Desk in 7 Mins. This Man Disturbs Me! Raised as a Social Justice Catholic I fear for those that Oppose this Lunatic.

Response by 1SG Private RallyPoint Member made Jan 3 at 2017 2:15 AM

1SG Private RallyPoint Member — Tue, 03 Jan 2017 02:15:31 -0500

I am trying to look for the silver lining. I'm up for reenlistment in November. Maybe bonuses for CBRN will increase.

Response by LTC Private RallyPoint Member made Jan 3 at 2017 2:30 AM

LTC Private RallyPoint Member — Tue, 03 Jan 2017 02:30:15 -0500

When in Peace, Prepare for War!

Response by SP5 David Cunningham made Jan 3 at 2017 3:34 AM

SP5 David Cunningham — Tue, 03 Jan 2017 03:34:13 -0500

I think we should have listened in the 80's when we were advised to start building a nuclear missle defense shield. Do you think we could have made some real progress with 30 years of development time? Maybe the new administration will get us protected? A super laser perhaps capable of firing from a space platform? Oh that's right, we have scuttled the space shuttle program! Who could have possibly guessed we might need it? The threat of nuclear destruction for over 60 years and we still have no plan for defending ourselves against a homicidal maniac ruler of N. Korea, Pakistan, and soon Iran. And do you really think Cuba ever returned all of their tactical nukes?

Response by Capt Tom Brown made Jan 3 at 2017 4:15 AM

Capt Tom Brown — Tue, 03 Jan 2017 04:15:21 -0500

I wonder from time to time what the US would do if NK launched a missile at US and it fell short and exploded in the ocean about a mile off shore where everyone could see the mushroom cloud rise into the air. How much of a response would be enough or sufficient or proper in such a case? No one knows for sure..

Response by PO3 John Wagner made Jan 3 at 2017 5:28 AM

PO3 John Wagner — Tue, 03 Jan 2017 05:28:20 -0500

We are certainly keeping an awful close eye on the place.. They know it and perhaps are stuffing an extra sock down the front of their pants for the most part when their not waving their missles around.

Response by SFC Private RallyPoint Member made Jan 3 at 2017 6:33 AM

SFC Private RallyPoint Member — Tue, 03 Jan 2017 06:33:16 -0500

This is sort of a baited question. The real answer, and not the one you are fishing for, is that the US and other allies will continue to apply economic sanctions and deny ITAR items and technology from flowing into the country. It means that we will continue to intercept ships carrying illegal cargo heading to North Korea and seize those assets. The strategic goal and what Trump hopes to accomplish with his public statement is the same one that has been spoken by previous presidents and has been the diplomatic stance with North Korea for decades.

Response by GySgt Charles O'Connell made Jan 3 at 2017 7:28 AM

GySgt Charles O'Connell — Tue, 03 Jan 2017 07:28:10 -0500

Seems to me North Korea has been on the verge of having a viable delivery system since the the early 90's. In fact I remember winning a bet with a fellow SNCO who was convinced that N. Korea was going to invade S. Korea following a nuclear strike. Didn't happen, and I got a case of beer. As to the Pres. Elect's comments... Lets face, we got what we voted for, it was either gonna be him, undisciplined, inexperienced, flamboyant. Or we could have got the other. Disliked by most, indecisive, motivated solely by self interest, no real tested leadership ability, the very best of the worst type of politician.

Have his comments irritated KJU? Maybe, but so what, the clown shoots people for not wearing their, I love Kim badge.

Response by Maj Kevin "Mac" McLaughlin made Jan 3 at 2017 7:53 AM

Maj Kevin "Mac" McLaughlin — Tue, 03 Jan 2017 07:53:14 -0500

Where in that statement does it say we're going to war to stop it? Has the "light-heart" talk worked? First they got the nukes, then they succeeded in building intermediate range missiles, now they're working on ICBMs. Should we just stand by and let it happen, or actually propose new and more significant ways to stop them?

Response by LTC Private RallyPoint Member made Jan 3 at 2017 7:53 AM

LTC Private RallyPoint Member — Tue, 03 Jan 2017 07:53:59 -0500

MAJ Bryan Zeski What do you think it means? I suspect we ought not read too deeply into the old instagram diplomacy technique. KJU was pretty aggressive long before this election, and policies of appeasement seem to have done more to embolden him than a current tweet or two.

Response by Cpl Justin Goolsby made Jan 3 at 2017 8:31 AM

Cpl Justin Goolsby — Tue, 03 Jan 2017 08:31:16 -0500

Whenever I hear of North Korea pulling some stunt, I am reminded about the movie The Mouse That Roared. It's basically about an impoverished country who declares war on the US in order to lose so the US can swoop in with financial aide to build up the economy and infrastructure. Sound familiar...

Personally, I don't believe North Korea is anywhere close to being a real threat and with their great dictator executing half his family and cabinet, I wouldn't be surprised if his head ends up on a pike one of these days.

North Korea is going to bluster all day long. That's why we have intelligence briefs to determine the accuracy of these blusters. I don't anticipate going to war with North Korea anytime soon. I find it far more likely that a bomb would just happen to drop on his palace in the middle of the night.

I do not believe that public statements cause dictators to become more aggressive. Trump didn't create KJU. Trump wasn't even running for President when KJU inherited the throne and then proceeded to publicly execute his family members and high ranking officials.

So no... dictators are going to act like dictators no matter how we act publicly. Remember, we let the Nazis and the Third Reich run wild in Europe. It wasn't until the Kamikazes attacked us that we joined the fight.

The strategic goal of a public statement like this should be obvious. To calm the fears of the general public and hint a bit of a warning at enemies. We don't want to look weak in public. So you put on a tough façade. If you're lucky, that will be enough to keep an enemy in check.

Response by LTC Private RallyPoint Member made Jan 3 at 2017 9:47 AM

LTC Private RallyPoint Member — Tue, 03 Jan 2017 09:47:32 -0500

Don't be surprised that the Japanese version of the Aegis Cruiser will shoot down the ICBM was and its launch date. Japan will put North Korea in its please... Watch it happen

Response by SSgt Dan Montague made Jan 3 at 2017 10:00 AM

SSgt Dan Montague — Tue, 03 Jan 2017 10:00:54 -0500

if Trump says it?? I think he means he's going to build a wall. And not just any wall, a great wall. It will block all illegal missiles and bombs from entering our country.

Response by SFC Domingo M. made Jan 3 at 2017 10:25 AM

SFC Domingo M. — Tue, 03 Jan 2017 10:25:26 -0500

It reminds me of the fact that president Clinton sold our GPS technology to the Chinese for campaign contributions. This just made it possible for the Communists to get the technical ability to pinpoint target their delivery systems. I'm sure they share that technology with North Korea. North Korea completed its nuclear program after Jimmy Carter worked out a deal between North Korea and the Clinton administration. It wasn't until GWB accused them of cheating in their deal and included them in his Axis of Evil group that it all came out. Within a year, North Korea became a nuclear power. They had never actually given up their nuclear ambitions. Clinton and Carter both got played. If we're not careful, Iran will be the next to pull the wool over our eyes. Based on the Obama administration, they think the U.S. will not act regardless how much they cheat on the nuclear deal.

Response by SPC Johnney Abbott made Jan 3 at 2017 10:33 AM

SPC Johnney Abbott — Tue, 03 Jan 2017 10:33:52 -0500

He do s this every year. Or threatens war or what ever. We shouldn't read much into it, but have a plan for long range strikes.
We already know he doesn't care about what happens to his people. But he loves his military though. I don't think he would endanger his little slice on a bluff like that.

Response by MSG Brad Sand made Jan 3 at 2017 10:39 AM

MSG Brad Sand — Tue, 03 Jan 2017 10:39:02 -0500

It seems to mean that the new President will not let North Korea develop a weapon capable of reaching the US...because that is what he said? I, at least, think that would be a good thing? Does anyone in the US want the Democratic People's Republic of Korea to have that capability? I hope not BUT no one here should want that!
Stopping the North Koreans from developing a nuclear weapon capable of reaching the US would be a much easier thing for the US if past presidents had placed stronger barriers in place, in my opinion?
We should always expect to go to war with our enemies, especially those enemies who we have been at war with for over 60 years? North Korea is our enemy, attacked South Korea and threatens them today. Unlike the Summer of 1950, I do not think the North Korean would be able to defeat the South and I do not think the Chinese would be interested in coming to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea's aid if they did make that mistake? BUT we should still expect the worst.
What is the strategic goal of a public statement? Putting the North Korean's on notice. Letting them know their is a new sheriff in town. That is what all public statements are about, the President Elect has just used a new medium.
What do I think he hopes to accomplish? Stopping the Democratic People's Republic of Korea from developing a nuclear weapon capable of reaching the US.

Response by SFC J Fullerton made Jan 3 at 2017 10:49 AM

SFC J Fullerton — Tue, 03 Jan 2017 10:49:54 -0500

Just another example of how this man has no clue of what it means to be The POTUS. He thinks its all a game he can play with his Twitter account.

Response by SPC Erich Guenther made Jan 3 at 2017 11:30 AM

SPC Erich Guenther — Tue, 03 Jan 2017 11:30:32 -0500

It's a smart strategy that Ronald Reagan also used. Keep your opposition off balance and unsure of what you mean and what your going to do. It serves deterrence far more than to preannounce everything in advance including troop levels and troop deployment objectives. Reagan used to load the 82nd Airborne on the C141's regularly and send them to all areas of the globe to send a strong message but he would remain silent and ambiguous of the mission of the 82nd. Obama wouldn't do that unless he announced it months in advance, indicated total number of troops in the deployment and what their exact mission was (very weak foreign policy, IMV and wastes far more taxpayer funds).

Response by 1LT Private RallyPoint Member made Jan 3 at 2017 4:50 PM

1LT Private RallyPoint Member — Tue, 03 Jan 2017 16:50:50 -0500

MAJ Bryan Zeski - Until Kim Il Suk learns to miniaturize fission weapons - and manages to produce thermonuclear weapons - and develops heavy lift launch capability - this is all smoke and mirrors. Sure, this is an excuse to go to war with N Korea - but that is exactly what Kim Il Suk wants - having seen The Mouse That Roared too many times. Warmest Regards, Sandy :)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YmTmdDpUEMc

The Mouse That Roared - Declaration of War

Declaration of War. British satirical comedy film. 1959.

Response by PO3 John Wagner made Jan 3 at 2017 5:58 PM

PO3 John Wagner — Tue, 03 Jan 2017 17:58:37 -0500

I think that North Koreans should keep looking up if they continue to talk that way

Response by MSG Private RallyPoint Member made Jan 3 at 2017 8:40 PM

MSG Private RallyPoint Member — Tue, 03 Jan 2017 20:40:11 -0500

It's bluster but also a way of letting our adversaries know that the incoming POTUS is NOT in any way to be confused with the outgoing POTUS.

Response by SSG Mark Franzen made Jan 4 at 2017 12:27 AM

SSG Mark Franzen — Wed, 04 Jan 2017 00:27:42 -0500

Trump is dumb as Box of rocks which really I am starting to Get worried about when he becomes the President Who the hell are the people that voted for Him they have no clue on what he going to do Just because Clinton had problems with E mails and what ever else but now you are going get screwed should have all voted for Bernie. And the statement above what trump says it won't happen well I am to tell you it could and if does than what? And yes his bold statement that he Knows More than the generals well I am sorry he doesn't and his best move would be move to Russia with Friend .

Response by MSgt James Mullis made Jan 4 at 2017 4:35 PM

MSgt James Mullis — Wed, 04 Jan 2017 16:35:00 -0500

I'm guessing it is a continuation of PE Trumps not so subtle messages to China. While Kim Fatty Fat is still their problem to fix, the PE is saying one way or another the problem will get fixed. On the other hand, if anyone in uniform doesn't like what the future President of the United States is saying (or Tweeting) they should think about separating. Hey look on the bright side, it looks like the economy is finally improving.