Any updates on DoD directive 5210.56? https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/any-updates-on-dod-directive-5210-56 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>It came out a few years ago and it appeared that military personnel were going to be permitted to carry a personal firearm on post. Then news on it went silent? Here is an article about it and some of its details: <br /><br /> <a target="_blank" href="http://blog.refactortactical.com/blog/concealed-carry-on-base-dod-directive-5210-56-arming-and-the-use-of-force/">http://blog.refactortactical.com/blog/concealed-carry-on-base-dod-directive-5210-56-arming-and-the-use-of-force/</a> <div class="pta-link-card answers-template-image type-default"> <div class="pta-link-card-picture"> </div> <div class="pta-link-card-content"> <p class="pta-link-card-title"> <a target="blank" href="http://blog.refactortactical.com/blog/concealed-carry-on-base-dod-directive-5210-56-arming-and-the-use-of-force/">Concealed Carry on Base? DoD Directive 5210.56, Arming and the Use of Force | RE Factor Tactical</a> </p> <p class="pta-link-card-description">**I am not a lawyer, and nothing below should be considered legal advice. This is merely my reading of a recent DoD directive that I know a lot of people were looking forward to. User assumes all liability** If you&#39;ve been keeping up with the flow of DoD directives, I&#39;m sure that by now someone has mentioned 5210.56, Arming and the Use of Force. People got pretty excited when it was issued, mostly because it &quot;rovides guidance for permitting...</p> </div> <div class="clearfix"></div> </div> Thu, 22 Mar 2018 11:57:19 -0400 Any updates on DoD directive 5210.56? https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/any-updates-on-dod-directive-5210-56 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>It came out a few years ago and it appeared that military personnel were going to be permitted to carry a personal firearm on post. Then news on it went silent? Here is an article about it and some of its details: <br /><br /> <a target="_blank" href="http://blog.refactortactical.com/blog/concealed-carry-on-base-dod-directive-5210-56-arming-and-the-use-of-force/">http://blog.refactortactical.com/blog/concealed-carry-on-base-dod-directive-5210-56-arming-and-the-use-of-force/</a> <div class="pta-link-card answers-template-image type-default"> <div class="pta-link-card-picture"> </div> <div class="pta-link-card-content"> <p class="pta-link-card-title"> <a target="blank" href="http://blog.refactortactical.com/blog/concealed-carry-on-base-dod-directive-5210-56-arming-and-the-use-of-force/">Concealed Carry on Base? DoD Directive 5210.56, Arming and the Use of Force | RE Factor Tactical</a> </p> <p class="pta-link-card-description">**I am not a lawyer, and nothing below should be considered legal advice. This is merely my reading of a recent DoD directive that I know a lot of people were looking forward to. User assumes all liability** If you&#39;ve been keeping up with the flow of DoD directives, I&#39;m sure that by now someone has mentioned 5210.56, Arming and the Use of Force. People got pretty excited when it was issued, mostly because it &quot;rovides guidance for permitting...</p> </div> <div class="clearfix"></div> </div> SSG Private RallyPoint Member Thu, 22 Mar 2018 11:57:19 -0400 2018-03-22T11:57:19-04:00 Response by SMSgt Thor Merich made Mar 22 at 2018 12:34 PM https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/any-updates-on-dod-directive-5210-56?n=3470478&urlhash=3470478 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>In the AF, it’s a local base decision. At my base, folks that are certified can carry. SMSgt Thor Merich Thu, 22 Mar 2018 12:34:50 -0400 2018-03-22T12:34:50-04:00 Response by LTC Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 22 at 2018 12:42 PM https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/any-updates-on-dod-directive-5210-56?n=3470507&urlhash=3470507 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>My understanding is O5s can authorize troops to be armed. LTC Private RallyPoint Member Thu, 22 Mar 2018 12:42:16 -0400 2018-03-22T12:42:16-04:00 Response by SFC Jim Ruether made Mar 22 at 2018 1:24 PM https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/any-updates-on-dod-directive-5210-56?n=3470668&urlhash=3470668 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>It sounds like a good idea when you think of the lives lost and the injuries sustained at Ft. Hood. SFC Jim Ruether Thu, 22 Mar 2018 13:24:09 -0400 2018-03-22T13:24:09-04:00 Response by 1SG Dennis Hicks made Mar 22 at 2018 2:46 PM https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/any-updates-on-dod-directive-5210-56?n=3470894&urlhash=3470894 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>While I would love to carry on base, and I fully support the intent I also don&#39;t want to get shot on the bowl by snuffy who is fiddling with his sidearm as he pulls up his pants in the next stall. It will make UCMJ action on the commanders carpet interesting though :) 1SG Dennis Hicks Thu, 22 Mar 2018 14:46:40 -0400 2018-03-22T14:46:40-04:00 Response by PO1 Mary Vermont made Mar 22 at 2018 3:24 PM https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/any-updates-on-dod-directive-5210-56?n=3470980&urlhash=3470980 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>That would be too logical PO1 Mary Vermont Thu, 22 Mar 2018 15:24:22 -0400 2018-03-22T15:24:22-04:00 Response by COL Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 22 at 2018 6:34 PM https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/any-updates-on-dod-directive-5210-56?n=3471519&urlhash=3471519 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I heard that installation commanders would have the say on who is armed. I got my concealed weapons permit last week in preparation. I also heard that it would probably only be like MPs and 1801s that will be allowed. I’m hoping they include federal special agents so the CI guys can carry too. COL Private RallyPoint Member Thu, 22 Mar 2018 18:34:29 -0400 2018-03-22T18:34:29-04:00 2018-03-22T11:57:19-04:00