Anti-Trump rioters on TV last night. Q: When was the last time a Right Wing group rioted in front of a Left Wing organization's event?

CSM - Wed, May 25th

MSG (Join to see) - your question is slanted. When you google it a bunch of Trump, anti Trump protest articles come up so from my perspective your question is propaganda and almost rhetorical unless you meet someone who's willing to do the research or has first hand experience. Basically, it's a talking point, it's a way to end a conversation not start one. It divides people and makes them defensive. Non Violence and passive resistance are also methods that have been employed by liberals the world over. Yet your question leaves no room to showcase this. Trying to paint the Left as more violent or more out of control is an appeal to ignorance, assuming that a claim is true because it has not been or cannot be proven false, or vice versa. So there's no point going back n forth over this. The right can show up with post abortion fetus posters on local street corners, bring automatic wepons to town hall meetings and shout horrific racists remarks at citizens worshiping at Mosques and worse and a far bigger indictment, (historically) the right seems to be the ones at the for front beating the drums to war in this country. So if the question is which side is more civilized and peaceful then we can discuss.

MSgt Michelle Mondia My question is a question. A view of slanting is a matter of perspective. If you go back to my original response, you'll note that I actually credited you with the fact that those were by and large points. But you seem to respond in a defensive manner. I referred to the attacks as terrorist since that's what those murderers were are and simple ... they are terrorists.

If this is a manner to come up with a talking point and end a conversation before one starts, then why are you responding? That idea can only be held if you have nothing with which to respond. You had some input and provided it. Again, well done.

Your take that "These are not the questions we should be asking." is akin to the statement We need to start having a dialogue on race and then if someone brings up a dissenting view point, then the immediate cry of RACISM!! goes out and that shuts down the conversation.

I asked a question, why is it so difficult for to respond with an answer without the vitriol?

Here's the way i would have responded using your info:
=========================
The most recent was the Charleston black church massacre in 2015 where the racially motivated murderer murdered nine people.

The following is a list of terrorist attacks committed by conservatives on the Right Wing since 1990.

USA - Anti-abortion murders (1993 to 1998).
USA - Oklahoma City bombing (1995). - Anti-government radical
USA - Larry Shoemaker (1996). Neo-Nazi notes that a white supremacist
USA - Eric Rudolph (1996 to 1998). Conservative Christian
USA - Christian murder of gay couple (1999). White Supremacists Benjamin Matthew Williams & James Tyler Williams
USA - Benjamin Nathaniel Smith (1999). Neo-NaziAmerican Mass murder
et. etc.
=========================

Appreciate the source reference. thank you.

MSG (Join to see) - Don't mistake my tone, I'm calmly siting a few things. I just want to point out that there is no way to refute your question. It's an appeal to ignorance and illogical. It does fire people up though. So my point is that you should rephrase in order to provoke dissuasion not critisms. It's not a right vs left world and shouldn't be so convenient to brake it down that way.

MSgt Michelle Mondia After reviewing you list you provided, it does not answer the question posed i.e. when was the last time a Right Wing group rioted in front of a Left Wing organization's event? All of the attacks you mentioned, as terrible as they are, were committed by one or two people.

Thus they are not meet the intent of my Right Wing group. Arguably a duo could be called a group however, I'm looking for organizations like the Republican Party, Michigan Militia, The Moral Majority. I could argue against the extreme's like the KKK and Aryan Nation but I would have been willing to understand why they would have been mentioned.

Secondly, what those terrorists did was not riot. They murdered. Their intent was to kill. Rioters don't often set out to kill though there have been deaths during riots.

Finally, may of the situations you point out were not a "Left Wing organization's event". Do you consider Planned Parenthood, a Church, and the Federal Building and those therein a Left Wing organization and were they in the middle of an event?

You had great points for a different question just not this one.

Still no on par with throwing bottles and rocks at police officers. Also the Congressman as I recall wasn't wearing a mask to conceal his identity.

MSG (Join to see) - You are completely correct. That was an awful attempt at searching very hard to find an example.

MSgt Michelle Mondia provided some good ones but then went off on a tangent.

Capt Michael Greene - "He really can focus an audience and move them to action. So that makes me look at his supporters." But he hasn't.

"He's beloved and endorsed by groups who are some of the most bigoted, racist terror groups in the world." You mean like La Raza, MeCha and the Nation of Islam?

Capt Michael Greene You seem to be projecting the hate and lawlessness of those left groups onto a bunch of Right Wing Trump Supporters who have yet to show any such actions displayed by the Left Wing supporters.

MSG (Join to see) - Did you not see Trump's supporters, including the White Supremacists and others, beating up on individual protestors with Trump's encouragement?

Capt Michael Greene I'm just gonna go ahead and refer you back to my original question: Q: When was the last time a Right Wing group rioted in front of a Left Wing organization's event? I'll break it down.

Point 1. "When was the last time" This infers that I do not argue it has not happened, it only asks the question of when did the event last occur.

Point 2. "a Right Wing group". Not individual actors or a tesam of two e.g. Eric Rudolph, The OK City Bombers a group like La Raza, MeCha,etc.

Point 3. "rioted" Not demonstrated, protested ... Rioted.

Point 4. "in front of a Left Wing organization's event?" An event planned or spontaneous, where the purpose was for speakers on the Left e.g. Dem Party, Occupy ____, Code Pink, etc. for the purpose of advocating their cause.

Those assaulted were attendingfor the sole purpose of provoking a situation. I don't want my grandchild to get run over by a car so I don't let her sleep on the highway. Those who assaulted the provacatuers should be held legally accountable for assault or whatever the localor state charge is at the location. However so should the provacatuer for attempt to incite a riot.

Remember the Hard Hat Riot in NYC? Maybe that qualifies.

My greatest point is that there is no perceived need to literally whup ass against Sanders or Hillary. If they're elected, they can be managed.
But young libs are literally deathly afraid of Donald, violently so. If DT wins, I expect actual deaths of Muslims, Mexicans, Blacks, Gays, and others that Trump supporters don't like.