CW2 Private RallyPoint Member 93310 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><br /><br /><p style="background:white;margin:12pt 0in;line-height:normal;" class="MsoNormal">For discussion for my<br />fellow Military Members: Based on the 15 minutes (reported) that it took for<br />the Military Police to respond to the latest shooting at Fort Hood.<br><br />Should Brigade and Battalion Staff Duty Officers and Staff Duty NCOs be armed<br />while on duty to confront issues like this?<p></p></p><br /><br /><p style="background:white;margin:12pt 0in;line-height:normal;" class="MsoNormal">My Suggestion is to do<br />the following:<p></p></p><br /><br /><p style="margin:0in 0in 10pt;" class="MsoNormal">1.  Arm BDE and BN SDO and SDNCOs with unit<br />provided M9s and Ammo. <br><br />2.<br /> SDO/ SDNCO personnel will account for<br />the firearms and ammunition during shift change through established<br />accountability procedures. (DA Form 2062)<br><br />3.<br />SDO/ SDNCO<br />personnel will also wear a black Duty Brassard on his or her left shoulder<br />denoting duty position (SDO/ SDNCO) while on duty.<br><br />4.<br />Personnel determined by Mental Health Professionals as a threat to themselves<br />or others will not be allowed (as they shouldn’t be currently) to perform SDO/<br />SDNCO duties.<p></p></p><br /><br /><br /><br /><p style="margin:0in 0in 10pt;" class="MsoNormal">My<br />point in the discussion is that we already issue weapons and ammunition for AHA<br />guard, why not to the Staff Duty Officers and Staff Duty NCOs in an accountable<br />manner in order to confront threats within their unit footprint. I am not<br />talking a blanket issue of firearms and ammunition to every Soldier. <p></p></p><br /><br /><p style="margin:0in 0in 10pt;" class="MsoNormal">This<br />divisive issue has Firearms Control advocates calling for stricter screening to<br />identify military members with PTSD to prevent these personnel from firearms<br />purchuse. (Laughable because you could argue anyone deployed has some form of<br />PTSD. Top that off with the fact you can suffer PTSD as a civilian etc...) Others<br />are calling for the federal Government to respect State/ County Concealed Carry<br />Permits on post. While I have no issue personally with that (given the<br />background check and process to get a CCP) I do realize that is a bridge too<br />far as you could wonder the effect that would have with a combination of type A<br />personalities and some members that lack the maturity to follow common sense<br />firearms handling practices. However, with four shootings on Military<br />Installations since 2009, something must be done. In the shooting just prior to<br />this one, a Shore Patrolman lost his life, however his armed shipmate on the<br />ship was able to limit loss of life due to his proximity. I feel we should give<br />the same chance to our Soldiers.<p></p></p><br /><br /> Active Shooter Mitigation Discussion 2014-04-04T02:08:34-04:00 CW2 Private RallyPoint Member 93310 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><br /><br /><p style="background:white;margin:12pt 0in;line-height:normal;" class="MsoNormal">For discussion for my<br />fellow Military Members: Based on the 15 minutes (reported) that it took for<br />the Military Police to respond to the latest shooting at Fort Hood.<br><br />Should Brigade and Battalion Staff Duty Officers and Staff Duty NCOs be armed<br />while on duty to confront issues like this?<p></p></p><br /><br /><p style="background:white;margin:12pt 0in;line-height:normal;" class="MsoNormal">My Suggestion is to do<br />the following:<p></p></p><br /><br /><p style="margin:0in 0in 10pt;" class="MsoNormal">1.  Arm BDE and BN SDO and SDNCOs with unit<br />provided M9s and Ammo. <br><br />2.<br /> SDO/ SDNCO personnel will account for<br />the firearms and ammunition during shift change through established<br />accountability procedures. (DA Form 2062)<br><br />3.<br />SDO/ SDNCO<br />personnel will also wear a black Duty Brassard on his or her left shoulder<br />denoting duty position (SDO/ SDNCO) while on duty.<br><br />4.<br />Personnel determined by Mental Health Professionals as a threat to themselves<br />or others will not be allowed (as they shouldn’t be currently) to perform SDO/<br />SDNCO duties.<p></p></p><br /><br /><br /><br /><p style="margin:0in 0in 10pt;" class="MsoNormal">My<br />point in the discussion is that we already issue weapons and ammunition for AHA<br />guard, why not to the Staff Duty Officers and Staff Duty NCOs in an accountable<br />manner in order to confront threats within their unit footprint. I am not<br />talking a blanket issue of firearms and ammunition to every Soldier. <p></p></p><br /><br /><p style="margin:0in 0in 10pt;" class="MsoNormal">This<br />divisive issue has Firearms Control advocates calling for stricter screening to<br />identify military members with PTSD to prevent these personnel from firearms<br />purchuse. (Laughable because you could argue anyone deployed has some form of<br />PTSD. Top that off with the fact you can suffer PTSD as a civilian etc...) Others<br />are calling for the federal Government to respect State/ County Concealed Carry<br />Permits on post. While I have no issue personally with that (given the<br />background check and process to get a CCP) I do realize that is a bridge too<br />far as you could wonder the effect that would have with a combination of type A<br />personalities and some members that lack the maturity to follow common sense<br />firearms handling practices. However, with four shootings on Military<br />Installations since 2009, something must be done. In the shooting just prior to<br />this one, a Shore Patrolman lost his life, however his armed shipmate on the<br />ship was able to limit loss of life due to his proximity. I feel we should give<br />the same chance to our Soldiers.<p></p></p><br /><br /> Active Shooter Mitigation Discussion 2014-04-04T02:08:34-04:00 2014-04-04T02:08:34-04:00 2014-04-04T02:08:34-04:00