3
3
0
Politics
Benghazi
Responses: 20
6
6
0
Cpl Mark McMiller
SFC Michael Hasbun What witch hunt? It is a fact that Hillary lied about Bengahazi. Now a reasonable person would ask themselves, "why did she lie?". I'm pretty reasonable and I want to know why she lied. Why don't you want to know?
(0)
(0)
Cpl Mark McMiller
SGT (Verify To See) How do you propose one actually obtains EVIDENCE without investigating? It's a known fact that Hillary has been caught lying to Congress about the reason Benghazi occurred; that is perjury and it is a felony. It is also a known fact that she lied about having classified information on her unsecured personal email server, including sending classified information from her unsecured personal email server; at a minimum, that is two more felonies. That is why she is currently under criminal investigation. Then it is a known fact that while under a court order to preserve the emails and turn them over to the government, she had her email server professionally wiped clean; a reasonable person would conclude that she was trying to hide something. And the private sector attorney in charge of turning her emails over to Congress is the same attorney who was in charge of turning Lois Lerner's emails over to Congress when that server turned up wiped clean. I don't know what fantasy world you live in in your mind, but here in the real world if you or I commit a felony, not only is it investigated but we would be arrested. If you want to protect Hillary because you're one of her fanboys, just go ahead and admit that, but don't sit here on this forum and pretend she has done nothing deserving of a criminal investigation because it makes you look like a fool. You do remember that assistant chief of staff of George W. Bush's white house, Scooter Libby was convicted of perjury and served two years in prison and Bush refused to pardon him, right?
(0)
(0)
Cpl Mark McMiller
SGT (Verify To See) Conservative interests? Yea, that's why Obama's Justice Dept is investigating her. And what debunking "smoking guns" are you referring to? I've listed factual evidence. All you've listed is hot air. But you are correct that I don't like Hillary; but that's because she is a liar; and by the way, that opinion is based on fact since she is on video lying.
Regarding Cheney, so what? The deferred salary and stock options were part of his severance package when he resigned as CEO; nothing nefarious about that.
Apparently, you want to hang Cheney with absolutely no evidence of any wrongdoing. But then you want to look the other way regarding Hillary despite the mountain of evidence against her. By the way, who, as you say, reviewed the evidence against Hillary and placed no blame?
Regarding Cheney, so what? The deferred salary and stock options were part of his severance package when he resigned as CEO; nothing nefarious about that.
Apparently, you want to hang Cheney with absolutely no evidence of any wrongdoing. But then you want to look the other way regarding Hillary despite the mountain of evidence against her. By the way, who, as you say, reviewed the evidence against Hillary and placed no blame?
(0)
(0)
SSG Ricardo Marcial
Politicians lying, hold the presses. This is major news.
Seriously, there is plenty of blame to go around, then Secretary of State Clinton does hold all the responsibility, it also falls on a few others, they should have pressed her to act and did nothing or were too afraid to speak. It's BS, peoples lives are in danger, intel reports are created for a purpose, to drive actions to prevent the loss of lives (US in this case) or to gain information so we can kill those that pose a threat. Failure to act on actionable intel is in this case criminal in my opinion. They keep rehashing the same evidence or whatever they have, over and over and over and yet not a single person has been held accountable for this act of negligence. I don't care what side of the isle you sit on, this is politically driven, and nothing will done. Clinton is her own worse enemy, and those that follow her, as well as Trump are blind fools. Lemming running for the cliffs into oblivion.
Seriously, there is plenty of blame to go around, then Secretary of State Clinton does hold all the responsibility, it also falls on a few others, they should have pressed her to act and did nothing or were too afraid to speak. It's BS, peoples lives are in danger, intel reports are created for a purpose, to drive actions to prevent the loss of lives (US in this case) or to gain information so we can kill those that pose a threat. Failure to act on actionable intel is in this case criminal in my opinion. They keep rehashing the same evidence or whatever they have, over and over and over and yet not a single person has been held accountable for this act of negligence. I don't care what side of the isle you sit on, this is politically driven, and nothing will done. Clinton is her own worse enemy, and those that follow her, as well as Trump are blind fools. Lemming running for the cliffs into oblivion.
(0)
(0)
3
3
0
It’s hard because the fact that Republicans have exploited these deaths for political gain do not make them less of a tragedy. Though I have read the comments on this, I have found exactly 0 examples of the hard questions, just that the media won’t ask them. Would the opposition party ask the right questions? MSNBC arguably the most liberal news outlet aired every minute of the hearing, and so did CNN. What do people want? Do they want PBS to waterboard her? What are the unanswered questions? Rep. Gowdy said the revelation that has come to light from 11 hours of questioning, in which they could ask all of the hard questions he wanted and all he could find was an interesting line of questioning.
I think this leads to the problem, Americans who are not as partisan look at this and think the conversation is that the those lives could have been saved; but again the “best info” the Rep. Gowdy could point to was a line of questioning on the motives of the attackers. This is because those answers have been found in the previous investigations. If you think that something as trivial as talking points were really substantive to the events that followed, and that the administration wouldn’t have just thrown a low level under the bus to a) correct the record, b) remove the line of attack.
I think that bad things are going to happen, September 11th, 2001 was President Bush’s Responsiblility; could he have done things better…ABSOLUTLEY, that does not mean malice. President Reagan is Responsible for the Marines in Beirut, and Sec. Clinton, and Pres. Obama are responsible, which I watched the first 3 hours of the hearing and she said no less than 3 times that she was responsible. In the debates immediately following Pres. Obama stated that he was responsible for those we lost (Remember that the line of attack was that Sec. Clinton was being scapegoated as she was the only one to accept responsibility…).
HRC could have sat before that committee said “It was all my fault” pulled a gun from her purse and blown her own brains out, and someone this site would post a question about whether this was all for gun control.
I think this leads to the problem, Americans who are not as partisan look at this and think the conversation is that the those lives could have been saved; but again the “best info” the Rep. Gowdy could point to was a line of questioning on the motives of the attackers. This is because those answers have been found in the previous investigations. If you think that something as trivial as talking points were really substantive to the events that followed, and that the administration wouldn’t have just thrown a low level under the bus to a) correct the record, b) remove the line of attack.
I think that bad things are going to happen, September 11th, 2001 was President Bush’s Responsiblility; could he have done things better…ABSOLUTLEY, that does not mean malice. President Reagan is Responsible for the Marines in Beirut, and Sec. Clinton, and Pres. Obama are responsible, which I watched the first 3 hours of the hearing and she said no less than 3 times that she was responsible. In the debates immediately following Pres. Obama stated that he was responsible for those we lost (Remember that the line of attack was that Sec. Clinton was being scapegoated as she was the only one to accept responsibility…).
HRC could have sat before that committee said “It was all my fault” pulled a gun from her purse and blown her own brains out, and someone this site would post a question about whether this was all for gun control.
(3)
(0)
3
3
0
SGT Francis Wright
Ok, but think about it; all of these interviews and speeches, are one big job interview for President. She wants to skirt the real issues. She just wants to be the first female President. At what cost?
(0)
(0)
CW4 Guy Butler
Ok... I take it none of the previous 7 investigations didn't touch on the real issues.
What are the real issues you're looking at?
What are the real issues you're looking at?
(0)
(0)
Cpl Mark McMiller
CW4 Guy Butler Why did Hillary and the White House lie about Benghazi? That's is the only issue I'm looking at. Why aren't you looking at it?
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google